GW170817 was the first gravitational-wave detection of a binary neutron-star merger1. It was accompanied by radiation across the electromagnetic spectrum and localized2 to the galaxy NGC 4993 at a distance of 40 megaparsecs. It has been proposed that the observed γ-ray, X-ray and radio emission is due to an ultra-relativistic jet being launched during the merger (and successfully breaking out of the surrounding material), directed away from our line of sight (off-axis)3,4,5,6. The presence of such a jet is predicted from models that posit neutron-star mergers as the drivers of short hard-γ-ray bursts7,8. Here we report that the radio light curve of GW170817 has no direct signature of the afterglow of an off-axis jet. Although we cannot completely rule out the existence of a jet directed away from the line of sight, the observed γ-ray emission could not have originated from such a jet. Instead, the radio data require the existence of a mildly relativistic wide-angle outflow moving towards us. This outflow could be the high-velocity tail of the neutron-rich material that was ejected dynamically during the merger, or a cocoon of material that breaks out when a jet launched during the merger transfers its energy to the dynamical ejecta. Because the cocoon model explains the radio light curve of GW170817, as well as the γ-ray and X-ray emission (and possibly also the ultraviolet and optical emission)9,10,11,12,13,14,15, it is the model that is most consistent with the observational data. Cocoons may be a ubiquitous phenomenon produced in neutron-star mergers, giving rise to a hitherto unidentified population of radio, ultraviolet, X-ray and γ-ray transients in the local Universe.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    et al. GW170817: observation of gravitational waves from a binary neutron star inspiral. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017)

  2. 2.

    et al. Multi-messenger observations of a binary neutron star merger. Astrophys. J. 848, L12 (2017)

  3. 3.

    et al. The electromagnetic counterpart of the binary neutron star merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. VI. Radio constraints on a relativistic jet and predictions for late-time emission from the kilonova ejecta. Astrophys. J. 848, L21 (2017)

  4. 4.

    et al. The electromagnetic counterpart of the binary neutron star merger LIGO/Virgo GW170817. V. Rising X-ray emission from an off-axis jet. Astrophys. J. 848, L20 (2017)

  5. 5.

    et al. The X-ray counterpart to the gravitational-wave event GW170817. Nature 551, 71–74 (2017)

  6. 6.

    et al. A deep Chandra X-ray study of neutron star coalescence GW170817. Astrophys. J. 848, L25 (2017)

  7. 7.

    , , & Nucleosynthesis, neutrino bursts and γ-rays from coalescing neutron stars. Nature 340, 126–128 (1989)

  8. 8.

    Short-hard gamma-ray bursts. Phys. Rep. 442, 166–236 (2007)

  9. 9.

    , & The cocoon emission – an electromagnetic counterpart to gravitational waves from neutron star mergers. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 473, 576–584 (2018)

  10. 10.

    , , & Off-axis emission of short γ-ray bursts and the detectability of electromagnetic counterparts of gravitational-wave-detected binary mergers. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 471, 1652–1661 (2017)

  11. 11.

    et al. Illuminating gravitational waves: a concordant picture of photons from a neutron star merger. Science 358, 1559–1565 (2017)

  12. 12.

    et al. A radio counterpart to a neutron star merger. Science 358, 1579–1583 (2017)

  13. 13.

    et al. Swift and NuSTAR observations of GW170817: detection of a blue kilonova. Science 358, 1565–1570 (2017)

  14. 14.

    ., ., & A cocoon shock breakout as the origin of the gamma-ray emission in GW170817. Preprint at (2017)

  15. 15.

    & Evidence for cocoon emission from the early light curve of SSS17a. Preprint at (2017)

  16. 16.

    , , & A decade of short-duration gamma-ray burst broadband afterglows: energetics, circumburst densities, and jet opening angles. Astrophys. J. 815, 102 (2015)

  17. 17.

    et al. Gravitational waves and gamma-rays from a binary neutron star merger: GW170817 and GRB 170817A. Astrophys. J. 848, L13 (2017)

  18. 18.

    , , & Off-axis afterglow emission from jetted gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 570, L61–L64 (2002)

  19. 19.

    , & The detectability of orphan afterglows. Astrophys. J. 579, 699–705 (2002)

  20. 20.

    , & Systematics of dynamical mass ejection, nucleosynthesis, and radioactively powered electromagnetic signals from neutron-star mergers. Astrophys. J. 773, 78 (2013)

  21. 21.

    et al. Mass ejection from the merger of binary neutron stars. Phys. Rev. D 87, 024001 (2013)

  22. 22.

    , & Ultrarelativistic electromagnetic counterpart to binary neutron star mergers. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 437, L6–L10 (2014)

  23. 23.

    , & Identifying elusive electromagnetic counterparts to gravitational wave mergers: an end-to-end simulation. Astrophys. J. 767, 124 (2013)

  24. 24.

    & Observational evidence for mass ejection accompanying short gamma-ray bursts. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 472, L55–L59 (2017)

  25. 25.

    ., ., ., & CASA architecture and applications. ASP Conf. Ser. 376, 127–130 (2007)

  26. 26.

    Aperture synthesis with a non-regular distribution of interferometer baselines. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 15, 417–426 (1974)

  27. 27.

    , & LIGO/VIRGO G298048: precise position of SSS17a based on HST and Gaia. GCN Circ. 21816 (2017)

  28. 28.

    ., & A retrospective view of MIRIAD. ASP Conf. Ser. 77, 433–436 (1995)

  29. 29.

    Difmap: an interactive program for synthesis imaging. ASP Conf. Ser. 125, 77–84 (1997)

  30. 30.

    et al. A wideband digital back-end for the upgraded GMRT. J. Astron. Instrum. 6, 1641011 (2017)

  31. 31.

    , , & Late-time radio observations of 68 type Ibc supernovae: strong constraints on off-axis gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 638, 930–937 (2006)

  32. 32.

    & Mass ejection from neutron star mergers: different components and expected radio signals. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 450, 1430–1440 (2015)

  33. 33.

    & Observational implications of gamma-ray burst afterglow jet simulations and numerical light curve calculations. Astrophys. J. 751, 155 (2012)

  34. 34.

    , & Spectra and light curves of gamma-ray burst afterglows. Astrophys. J. 497, L17–L20 (1998)

  35. 35.

    et al. The combined ultraviolet, optical, and near-infrared light curves of the kilonova associated with the binary neutron star merger GW170817: homogenized data set, analytic models, and physical implications. Astrophys. J. 851, L21 (2017)

  36. 36.

    & The observable signatures of GRB cocoons. Astrophys. J. 834, 28 (2016)

  37. 37.

    et al. Off-axis prompt X-ray transients from the cocoon of short gamma-ray bursts. Astrophys. J. 848, L6 (2017)

  38. 38.

    , , & The primordial deuterium abundance of the most metal-poor damped Lyman-α system. Astrophys. J. 830, 148 (2016)

  39. 39.

    , , & The primordial helium abundance from updated emissivities. J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 11, 17 (2013)

  40. 40.

    Planck Collaboration. Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters. Astron. Astrophys. 594, A13 (2016)

  41. 41.

    , & The baryon census in a multiphase intergalactic medium: 30% of the baryons may still be missing. Astrophys. J. 759, 23 (2012)

  42. 42.

    ., & The circumgalactic medium. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 55, 389–432 (2017)

Download references


We acknowledge the support and dedication of the staff of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory and particularly thank the VLA Director, M. McKinnon, as well as A. Mioduszewski and H. Medlin, for making the VLA campaign possible. We thank B. Griswold (NASA/GSFC) for beautiful graphic arts (Fig. 2). S.R.K. thanks M. Shull for discussions. The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a facility of the National Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc. We thank the GMRT staff for scheduling our observations. The GMRT is run by the National Centre for Radio Astrophysics of the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research. The Australia Telescope Compact Array is part of the Australia Telescope National Facility, which is funded by the Australian Government for operation as a National Facility managed by CSIRO. K.P.M. is a Hintze Fellow and so is supported by the Hintze Centre for Astrophysical Surveys, which is funded through the Hintze Family Charitable Foundation. E.N. acknowledges the support of an ERC starting grant (GRB/SN) and an ISF grant (1277/13). G.H. acknowledges the support of NSF award AST-1654815. A.C. acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation CAREER award number 1455090 titled ‘CAREER: Radio and gravitational-wave emission from the largest explosions since the Big Bang’. A.H. acknowledges support by the I-Core Program of the Planning and Budgeting Committee and the Israel Science Foundation. T.M. acknowledges the support of the Australian Research Council through grant FT150100099. Parts of this research were conducted by the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for All-sky Astrophysics (CAASTRO), through project number CE110001020. D.L.K. was supported by NSF grant AST-1412421. M.M.K.’s work was supported by the GROWTH (Global Relay of Observatories Watching Transients Happen) project funded by the NSF under PIRE grant number 1545949. This work is part of the research programme Innovational Research Incentives Scheme (Vernieuwingsimpuls), which is financed by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research through NWO VIDI grant number 639.042.612-Nissanke and NWO TOP grant number 62002444-Nissanke. P.C. acknowledges support from the Department of Science and Technology via SwarnaJayanti Fellowship awards (DST/SJF/PSA-01/2014-15). T.P. acknowledges the support of the Advanced ERC grant TReX. V.B. acknowledges the support of the Science and Engineering Research Board, Department of Science and Technology, India, for the GROWTH-India project.

Author information


  1. Denys Wilkinson Building, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK

    • K. P. Mooley
  2. National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Socorro, New Mexico 87801, USA

    • K. P. Mooley
    • , D. A. Frail
    •  & S. T. Myers
  3. California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, MC 249-17, Pasadena, California 91125, USA

    • K. P. Mooley
    • , G. Hallinan
    • , K. De
    • , M. M. Kasliwal
    •  & S. R. Kulkarni
  4. The Raymond and Beverly Sackler School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel

    • E. Nakar
    •  & O. Gottlieb
  5. Department Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Peyton Hall, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA

    • K. Hotokezaka
  6. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Texas Tech University, Box 41051, Lubbock, Texas 79409-1051, USA

    • A. Corsi
  7. Racah Institute of Physics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem 91904, Israel

    • A. Horesh
    •  & T. Piran
  8. Sydney Institute for Astronomy, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia

    • T. Murphy
    • , E. Lenc
    • , D. Dobie
    •  & C. Lynch
  9. ARC Centre of Excellence for All-sky Astrophysics (CAASTRO), Australia

    • T. Murphy
    • , E. Lenc
    • , D. Dobie
    •  & C. Lynch
  10. Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201, USA

    • D. L. Kaplan
  11. ATNF, CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science, PO Box 76, Epping, New South Wales 1710, Australia

    • D. Dobie
    •  & K. W. Bannister
  12. National Centre for Radio Astrophysics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Pune University Campus, Ganeshkhind Pune 411007, India

    • P. Chandra
  13. Department of Astronomy, Stockholm University, AlbaNova, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden

    • P. Chandra
  14. Centre for Astrophysics and Supercomputing, Swinburne University of Technology, John Street, Hawthorn, Victoria 3122, Australia

    • A. Deller
  15. ARC Centre of Excellence for Gravitational Wave Discovery (OzGrav), Australia

    • A. Deller
  16. Institute of Mathematics, Astrophysics and Particle Physics, Radboud University, Heyendaalseweg 135, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    • S. Nissanke
  17. Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai 400076, India

    • V. Bhalerao
  18. Department of Space, Earth and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, Onsala Space Observatory, S-439 92 Onsala, Sweden

    • S. Bourke
  19. Astroparticle Physics Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Mail Code 661, Greenbelt, Maryland 20771, USA

    • L. P. Singer


  1. Search for K. P. Mooley in:

  2. Search for E. Nakar in:

  3. Search for K. Hotokezaka in:

  4. Search for G. Hallinan in:

  5. Search for A. Corsi in:

  6. Search for D. A. Frail in:

  7. Search for A. Horesh in:

  8. Search for T. Murphy in:

  9. Search for E. Lenc in:

  10. Search for D. L. Kaplan in:

  11. Search for K. De in:

  12. Search for D. Dobie in:

  13. Search for P. Chandra in:

  14. Search for A. Deller in:

  15. Search for O. Gottlieb in:

  16. Search for M. M. Kasliwal in:

  17. Search for S. R. Kulkarni in:

  18. Search for S. T. Myers in:

  19. Search for S. Nissanke in:

  20. Search for T. Piran in:

  21. Search for C. Lynch in:

  22. Search for V. Bhalerao in:

  23. Search for S. Bourke in:

  24. Search for K. W. Bannister in:

  25. Search for L. P. Singer in:


K.P.M., E.N., K.H., G.H. and D.A.F. wrote the paper. A.C. compiled the references. A.C. and A.H. compiled Methods. D.D. and K.D. compiled the radio measurements table. K.P.M. managed the VLA observing programme and processed all of the VLA data. S.T.M., A.D. and S.B. helped to plan the VLA observations. E.N., K.H., D.L.K. and K.P.M. prepared the figures. T.M. planned and managed ATCA observations and data analysis and contributed to the manuscript text. D.L.K. helped to propose and plan the ATCA observations and contributed to the manuscript text. E.L., D.D., C.L. and K.W.B. helped with ATCA observations and data reduction. K.D. planned and managed GMRT observations and contributed to the manuscript text. K.P.M. and P.C. processed the GMRT data. V.B. helped with the GMRT observations. O.G. and E.N. provided the cocoon simulation. K.H. provided the spherical ejecta model. S.N. did the gravitational-wave and cocoon-rates analysis. S.R.K., T.P., M.M.K. and L.P.S. provided text for the paper. All co-authors discussed the results and provided comments on the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. P. Mooley.

Reviewer Information Nature thanks S. Chatterjee and R. Wijers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

About this article

Publication history







By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.