Orbital misalignment of the Neptune-mass exoplanet GJ 436b with the spin of its cool star

Published online:


The angle between the spin of a star and the orbital planes of its planets traces the history of the planetary system. Exoplanets orbiting close to cool stars are expected to be on circular, aligned orbits because of strong tidal interactions with the stellar convective envelope1. Spin–orbit alignment can be measured when the planet transits its star, but such ground-based spectroscopic measurements are challenging for cool, slowly rotating stars2. Here we report the three-dimensional characterization of the trajectory of an exoplanet around an M dwarf star, derived by mapping the spectrum of the stellar photosphere along the chord transited by the planet3. We find that the eccentric orbit of the Neptune-mass exoplanet GJ 436b is nearly perpendicular to the stellar equator. Both eccentricity and misalignment, surprising around a cool star, can result from dynamical interactions (via Kozai migration4) with a yet-undetected outer companion. This inward migration of GJ 436b could have triggered the atmospheric escape that now sustains its giant exosphere5.

  • Subscribe to Nature for full access:



Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.


  1. 1.

    et al. Hot stars with hot Jupiters have high obliquities. Astrophys. J. 718, L145–L149 (2010)

  2. 2.

    et al. A global analysis of Spitzer and new HARPS data confirms the loneliness and metal-richness of GJ 436 b. Astron. Astrophys. 572, A73 (2014)

  3. 3.

    et al. The Rossiter-McLaughlin effect reloaded: probing the 3D spin-orbit geometry, differential stellar rotation, and the spatially-resolved stellar spectrum of star-planet systems. Astron. Astrophys. 588, A127 (2016)

  4. 4.

    et al. Dynamical evolution of the Gliese 436 planetary system. Kozai migration as a potential source for Gliese 436b’s eccentricity. Astron. Astrophys. 545, A88 (2012)

  5. 5.

    et al. A giant comet-like cloud of hydrogen escaping the warm Neptune-mass exoplanet GJ 436b. Nature 522, 459–461 (2015)

  6. 6.

    et al. Setting new standards with HARPS. Messenger 114, 20–24 (2003)

  7. 7.

    et al. HARPS-N: the new planet hunter at TNG. Proc. SPIE 8446, 84461V (2012)

  8. 8.

    et al. A Spitzer transmission spectrum for the exoplanet GJ 436b, evidence for stellar variability, and constraints on dayside flux variations. Astrophys. J. 735, 27 (2011)

  9. 9.

    et al. SOPHIE velocimetry of Kepler transit candidates. XVI. Tomographic measurement of the low obliquity of KOI-12b, a warm Jupiter transiting a fast rotator. Astron. Astrophys. 579, A55 (2015)

  10. 10.

    et al. Obliquities of hot Jupiter host stars: evidence for tidal interactions and primordial misalignments. Astrophys. J. 757, 18 (2012)

  11. 11.

    et al. A Neptune-mass planet orbiting the nearby M dwarf GJ 436. Astrophys. J. 617, 580–588 (2004)

  12. 12.

    et al. Magnetic activity in the HARPS M dwarf sample. The rotation-activity relationship for very low-mass stars through R′(HK). Astron. Astrophys. 600, A13 (2017)

  13. 13.

    et al. A featureless transmission spectrum for the Neptune-mass exoplanet GJ 436b. Nature 505, 66–68 (2014)

  14. 14.

    et al. The LCES HIRES/Keck Precision Radial Velocity Exoplanet Survey. Astron. J. 153, 208 (2017)

  15. 15.

    & Eccentricity modulation of a close-in planet by a companion: application to GJ 436 system. Sci. Chin. Ser. G 52, 640–648 (2009)

  16. 16.

    On the long-term tidal evolution of GJ 436b in the presence of a resonant companion. Preprint at (2008)

  17. 17.

    et al. A quasi-stationary solution to Gliese 436b’s eccentricity. Astrophys. J. 699, 23–30 (2009)

  18. 18.

    A window on exoplanet dynamical histories: Rossiter-McLaughlin observations of WASP-13b and WASP-32b. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 440, 3392–3401 (2014)

  19. 19.

    et al. WASP-8b: a retrograde transiting planet in a multiple system. Astron. Astrophys. 517, L1 (2010)

  20. 20.

    et al. Refined architecture of the WASP-8 system: a cautionary tale for traditional Rossiter-McLaughlin analysis. Astron. Astrophys. 599, A33 (2017)

  21. 21.

    et al. Rotation periods of late-type dwarf stars from time series high-resolution spectroscopy of chromospheric indicators. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 452, 2745–2756 (2015)

  22. 22.

    et al. Line-profile tomography of exoplanet transits—I. The Doppler shadow of HD 189733b. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 403, 151–158 (2010)

  23. 23.

    batman: BAsic Transit Model cAlculatioN in Python. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 127, 1161 (2015)

  24. 24.

    et al. EXOFAST: A Hubble Space Telescope transit light curve for GJ 436b. Astron. Astrophys. 486, 1039 (2008)

  25. 25.

    et al. Large-scale magnetic topologies of mid M dwarfs. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 390, 567–581 (2008)

  26. 26.

    Techniques for automated high-precision photometry of Sun-like stars. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 111, 845 (1999)

  27. 27.

    et al. How to constrain your M dwarf: measuring effective temperature, bolometric luminosity, mass, and radius. Astrophys. J. 804, 64 (2015)

  28. 28.

    et al. A spin-down clock for cool stars from observations of a 2.5-billion-year-old cluster. Nature 517, 589–591 (2015)

  29. 29.

    et al. Rotation periods for cool stars in the 4 Gyr old open cluster M67, the solar-stellar connection, and the applicability of gyrochronology to at least solar age. Astrophys. J. 823, 16 (2016)

  30. 30.

    et al. Two nearby sub-Earth-sized exoplanet candidates in the GJ 436 system. Astrophys. J. 755, 9 (2012)

  31. 31.

    et al. Limits to the planet candidate GJ 436c. Astron. Astrophys. 487, L5 (2008)

  32. 32.

    et al. A search for additional planets in the NASA EPOXI observations of the exoplanet system GJ 436. Astrophys. J. 716, 1047 (2010)

  33. 33.

    et al. On the GJ 436 planetary system. Acta Astron. 64, 323 (2014)

  34. 34.

    et al. The Geneva reduction and analysis pipeline for high-contrast imaging of planetary companions. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 455, 2178–2186 (2016)

  35. 35.

    et al. New evolutionary models for pre-main sequence and main sequence low-mass stars down to the hydrogen-burning limit. Astron. Astrophys. 577, A42 (2015)

  36. 36.

    et al. Evolutionary models for cool brown dwarfs and extrasolar giant planets. The case of HD 209458. Astron. Astrophys. 402, 701 (2003)

Download references


This work is based on observations made with the HARPS spectrograph on the 3.6 m ESO telescope at the ESO La Silla Observatory, Chile, under GTO program ID 072.C-0488, and with the Italian Telescopio Nazionale Galileo operated on the island of La Palma by the Fundación Galileo Galilei of the INAF (Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica) at the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias under OPTICON program 16A/049, ‘Sensing Planetary Atmospheres with Differential Echelle Spectroscopy’ (SPADES). OPTICON has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2013-2016) under grant agreement number 312430. This project has also received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreement number 724427 (FOUR ACES). This work was carried out in the framework of the National Centre for Competence in Research ‘PlanetS’ supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF). R.A., N.A.-D., V.B., D.E., C.L. and A.W. acknowledge the financial support of the SNSF. H.M.C. gratefully acknowledges support as a CHEOPS Fellow from the SNSF National Centre of Competence in Research ‘PlanetS’. G.W.H. acknowledges long-term support from Tennessee State University and the State of Tennessee through its Centers of Excellence programme. X.B. and X.D. acknowledge the support of CNRS/PNP (Programme national de planétologie). X.B. acknowledges funding from the European Research Council under the ERC Grant Agreement number 337591-ExTrA. We thank C. A. Watson for calculating the convective mass of GJ 436, H. Knutson for facilitating the determination of the stellar rotation period, J.-B. Delisle for discussing the system geometry, and the Telescopio Nazionale Galileo staff for the service observation.

Author information


  1. Observatoire de l’Université de Genève, 51 chemin des Maillettes, 1290 Versoix, Switzerland

    • Vincent Bourrier
    • , Christophe Lovis
    • , David Ehrenreich
    • , Nicola Astudillo-Defru
    • , Romain Allart
    • , Damien Ségransan
    • , Heather M. Cegla
    • , Aurélien Wyttenbach
    • , Baptiste Lavie
    •  & Francesco Pepe
  2. Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IPAG, F-38000 Grenoble, France

    • Hervé Beust
    • , Xavier Bonfils
    •  & Xavier Delfosse
  3. Center of Excellence in Information Systems, Tennessee State University, Nashville, Tennessee 37209, USA

    • Gregory W. Henry
  4. University of Bern, Center for Space and Habitability, Sidlerstrasse 5, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland

    • Kevin Heng


  1. Search for Vincent Bourrier in:

  2. Search for Christophe Lovis in:

  3. Search for Hervé Beust in:

  4. Search for David Ehrenreich in:

  5. Search for Gregory W. Henry in:

  6. Search for Nicola Astudillo-Defru in:

  7. Search for Romain Allart in:

  8. Search for Xavier Bonfils in:

  9. Search for Damien Ségransan in:

  10. Search for Xavier Delfosse in:

  11. Search for Heather M. Cegla in:

  12. Search for Aurélien Wyttenbach in:

  13. Search for Kevin Heng in:

  14. Search for Baptiste Lavie in:

  15. Search for Francesco Pepe in:


V.B. coordinated the study of the GJ 436 system, performed the reduction and analysis of the transit data, interpreted the results, and wrote the paper. V.B. and D.E. proposed the original idea. D.E. developed the HARPS-N transit observation programme (led by D.E. and A.W.). V.B., H.M.C. and C.L. developed and refined the reloaded Rossiter–McLaughlin technique. H.B. performed the Kozai simulations and contributed to the interpretation. G.W.H. derived the stellar rotation period from analysis of photometry. N.A.-D. and X.D. derived the stellar rotation period from analysis of activity indices. X.B. and N.A.-D. analysed radial velocity values, and D.S. analysed direct imaging data used to constrain GJ 436c. R.A., H.C., C.L. and A.W. contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the transit data. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent Bourrier.

Reviewer Information Nature thanks A. C. Cameron and A. Mann for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.