Letter | Published:

An electric-eel-inspired soft power source from stacked hydrogels

Nature volume 552, pages 214218 (14 December 2017) | Download Citation


Progress towards the integration of technology into living organisms requires electrical power sources that are biocompatible, mechanically flexible, and able to harness the chemical energy available inside biological systems. Conventional batteries were not designed with these criteria in mind. The electric organ of the knifefish Electrophorus electricus (commonly known as the electric eel) is, however, an example of an electrical power source that operates within biological constraints while featuring power characteristics that include peak potential differences of 600 volts and currents of 1 ampere1,2. Here we introduce an electric-eel-inspired power concept that uses gradients of ions between miniature polyacrylamide hydrogel compartments bounded by a repeating sequence of cation- and anion-selective hydrogel membranes. The system uses a scalable stacking or folding geometry that generates 110 volts at open circuit or 27 milliwatts per square metre per gel cell upon simultaneous, self-registered mechanical contact activation of thousands of gel compartments in series while circumventing power dissipation before contact. Unlike typical batteries, these systems are soft, flexible, transparent, and potentially biocompatible. These characteristics suggest that artificial electric organs could be used to power next-generation implant materials such as pacemakers, implantable sensors, or prosthetic devices in hybrids of living and non-living systems3,4,5,6.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    in Fish Physiology Vol. 5 (eds & ) 347–491 (Academic Press, 1971)

  2. 2.

    , & Electrophorus electricus as a model system for the study of membrane excitability. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 119, 225–241 (1998)

  3. 3.

    , & Synthetic protocells to mimic and test cell function. Adv. Mater. 22, 120–127 (2010)

  4. 4.

    , , , & Electrochemical capacitors with high output voltages that mimic electric eels. Adv. Mater. 28, 2070–2076 (2016)

  5. 5.

    et al. Epidermal electronics. Science 333, 838–843 (2011)

  6. 6.

    Assumptions: taking chemistry in new directions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 3632–3641 (2004)

  7. 7.

    et al. Nonhuman genetics. Genomic basis for the convergent evolution of electric organs. Science 344, 1522–1525 (2014)

  8. 8.

    Leaping eels electrify threats, supporting Humboldt’s account of a battle with horses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 6979–6984 (2016)

  9. 9.

    & Designing artificial cells to harness the biological ion concentration gradient. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 666–670 (2008)

  10. 10.

    The electric discharge of the electric eel. Electr. Eng. 69, 145–147 (1950)

  11. 11.

    , , & Action potential and enzyme activity in the electric organ of Electrophorus electricus (Linnaeus): I. Choline esterase and respiration. J. Neurophysiol. 5, 499–515 (1942)

  12. 12.

    & Membrane potentials in the electroplates of the electric eel. J. Physiol. 119, 315–351 (1953)

  13. 13.

    , & Electrical characteristics of electric tissue. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 47, 487–500 (1946)

  14. 14.

    Production of electric power by mixing fresh and salt water in the hydroelectric pile. Nature 174, 660–660 (1954)

  15. 15.

    , , , & Microvalve-actuated precise control of individual droplets in microfluidic devices. Lab Chip 9, 1340–1343 (2009)

  16. 16.

    et al. High-speed, clinical-scale microfluidic generation of stable phase-change droplets for gas embolotherapy. Lab Chip 11, 3990–3998 (2011)

  17. 17.

    , , , & Poly(vinyl alcohol)-heparin biosynthetic microspheres produced by microfluidics and ultraviolet photopolymerisation. Biomicrofluidics 7, 44109 (2013)

  18. 18.

    et al. Desalination by electrodialysis using a stack of patterned ion-selective hydrogels on a microfluidic device. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 8685–8693 (2016)

  19. 19.

    Method of Packaging and Deployment of Large Membranes in Space. Report No. 618 (Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, 1985)

  20. 20.

    & Patch recordings from the electrocytes of Electrophorus electricus. Na currents and PNa/PK variability. J. Gen. Physiol. 97, 1013–1041 (1991)

  21. 21.

    , & Development of an experimental apparatus for simultaneous observation of optical and electrical signals from single ion channels. Single Mol. 3, 33–42 (2002)

  22. 22.

    et al. Single-layer MoS2 nanopores as nanopower generators. Nature 536, 197–200 (2016)

  23. 23.

    et al. A single-pixel wireless contact lens display. J. Micromech. Microeng. 21, 125014 (2011)

  24. 24.

    , , & Continuous 24-hour monitoring of intraocular pressure patterns with a contact lens sensor: safety, tolerability, and reproducibility in patients with glaucoma. Arch. Ophthalmol. 130, 1534–1539 (2012)

  25. 25.

    et al. Electric eel-skin-inspired mechanically durable and super-stretchable nanogenerator for deformable power source and fully autonomous conformable electronic-skin applications. Adv. Mater. 28, 10024–10032 (2016)

  26. 26.

    , , , & Soft robotics for chemists. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 1890–1895 (2011)

  27. 27.

    , & Ultralow-power electronics for biomedical applications. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 10, 247–274 (2008)

  28. 28.

    & Biologically energized cardiac pacemaker: in vivo experience with dogs. Nature 218, 180–181 (1968)

  29. 29.

    et al. Additive manufacturing of hydrogel-based materials for next-generation implantable medical devices. Sci. Robot. 2, eaah6451 (2017)

  30. 30.

    , , , & A comparison of some electrical and anatomical characteristics of the electric eel, Electrophorus electricus. Zoologica 25, 553–562 (1940)

  31. 31.

    Ion movements studied with single isolated electroplax. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 81, 285–306 (1959)

  32. 32.

    & Effect of potassium on electroplax of Electrophorus electricus. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 49, 69–101 (1957)

  33. 33.

    , & Analysis of spike electrogenesis and depolarizing K inactivation in electroplaques of Electrophorus electricus, L. J. Gen. Physiol. 49, 321–349 (1965)

Download references


We are grateful to B. Rothen-Rutishauser and A. Petri-Fink at the Adolphe Merkle Institute for the use of their 3DDiscovery printer. F. Bircher’s iPrint institute at the Haute École d’Ingénierie et d’Architecture Fribourg, particularly F. Bourguet and M. Soutrenon, donated time towards adapting a printer for our use and helped us to understand the intricacies of microvalve printing systems. Laser cutting was performed at Fablab Fribourg. U. Steiner’s group, in particular P. Sutton and M. Fischer, provided instrumentation and advice related to impedance measurements. Research reported in this publication was supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (grant FA9550-12-1-0435 to M.M., J.Y., D.S. and M.S.) and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under award T32GM008353, which funds the Cellular Biotechnology Training Program (T.B.H.S.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Author notes

    • Thomas B. H. Schroeder
    •  & Anirvan Guha

    These authors contributed equally to this work.


  1. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

    • Thomas B. H. Schroeder
  2. Adolphe Merkle Institute, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland

    • Thomas B. H. Schroeder
    • , Anirvan Guha
    •  & Michael Mayer
  3. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

    • Aaron Lamoureux
    • , Gloria VanRenterghem
    •  & Max Shtein
  4. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

    • David Sept
    •  & Michael Mayer
  5. Center for Computational Medicine and Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

    • David Sept
  6. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA

    • Jerry Yang


  1. Search for Thomas B. H. Schroeder in:

  2. Search for Anirvan Guha in:

  3. Search for Aaron Lamoureux in:

  4. Search for Gloria VanRenterghem in:

  5. Search for David Sept in:

  6. Search for Max Shtein in:

  7. Search for Jerry Yang in:

  8. Search for Michael Mayer in:


T.B.H.S., A.G., J.Y. and M.M. conceived the project and designed the experiments. T.B.H.S. and A.G. performed all data collection. A.L. and M.S. provided the idea of Miura-ori folding. G.V. helped to define the parameters of the fluidic implementation. T.B.H.S. and D.S. conducted analysis of literature electrical datasets of Electrophorus. T.B.H.S., A.G. and M.M. wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Mayer.

Reviewer Information Nature thanks C. Bettinger, P. Calvert and A. Stokes for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains seven discussion sections and two supplementary tables. The contents are theoretical background, characterization, fabrication methods, and calculations related to the artificial electric organ presented in this work.


  1. 1.

    Fluidic artificial organ implementation

    This video shows fluidic artificial organ implementation.

  2. 2.

    Printer depositing gels for serpentine implementation.

    This video shows printer depositing gels for serpentine implementation.

  3. 3.

    Miura-ori folding of a gel-bearing substrate

    This video shows Miura-ori folding of a gel-bearing substrate.

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.