Review Article | Published:

Progress in and promise of bacterial quorum sensing research

Nature volume 551, pages 313320 (16 November 2017) | Download Citation

  • A Corrigendum to this article was published on 28 February 2018

Abstract

This Review highlights how we can build upon the relatively new and rapidly developing field of research into bacterial quorum sensing (QS). We now have a depth of knowledge about how bacteria use QS signals to communicate with each other and to coordinate their activities. In recent years there have been extraordinary advances in our understanding of the genetics, genomics, biochemistry, and signal diversity of QS. We are beginning to understand the connections between QS and bacterial sociality. This foundation places us at the beginning of a new era in which researchers will be able to work towards new medicines to treat devastating infectious diseases, and use bacteria to understand the biology of sociality.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from $8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Change history

  • Corrected online 28 February 2018

    Please see accompanying Corrigendum (http://doi.org/10.1038/nature25977). In Fig. 1b, the carboxyl group of compound number 6 has been added, and the chemical name in the Fig. 1b legend has changed from ‘methyl dodecenoic acid’ to ‘11-methyl-cis-dodecenoic acid’. See Supplementary Information to the Corrigendum for the original Fig. 1.

References

  1. 1.

    Sociobiology: The New Synthesis (Harvard Univ. Press, 1975)

  2. 2.

    , & Quorum sensing in bacteria: the LuxR-LuxI family of cell density-responsive transcriptional regulators. J. Bacteriol. 176, 269–275 (1994). Introduction of the bacterial quorum sensing concept, which has come into common usage to cover mechanisms involved in population density sensing.

  3. 3.

    & Quorum sensing signal-response systems in Gram-negative bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 576–588 (2016)

  4. 4.

    , , & Acyl-homoserine lactone quorum sensing: from evolution to application. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 67, 43–63 (2013)

  5. 5.

    Control of the competent state in Pneumococcus by a hormone-like cell product: an example for a new type of regulatory mechanism in bacteria. Nature 208, 155–159 (1965). This paper was the first to provide evidence that an extracellular hormone-like molecule promoted bacterial group behaviour.

  6. 6.

    ., & Cellular control of the synthesis and activity of the bacterial luminescent system. J. Bacteriol. 104, 313–322 (1970). This paper showed that the sudden increase of bioluminescence by mid-logarithmic Vibrio fischeri and Vibrio harveyi cultures required transcription and a self-produced factor, and this phenomenon was referred to as autoinduction.

  7. 7.

    , & Induction of luciferase synthesis in Beneckea harveyi by other marine bacteria. Arch. Microbiol. 120, 87–91 (1979)

  8. 8.

    , & Bacterial bioluminescence: isolation and genetic analysis of functions from Vibrio fischeri. Cell 32, 773–781 (1983)

  9. 9.

    & Identification of genes and gene products necessary for bacterial bioluminescence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 81, 4154–4158 (1984)

  10. 10.

    . et al. Structural identification of autoinducer of Photobacterium fischeri luciferase. Biochemistry 20, 2444–2449 (1981). This article reports the first acyl-homoserine lactone chemical structure

  11. 11.

    ., & An unmodified heptadecapeptide pheromone induces competence for genetic transformation in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 11140–11144 (1995)

  12. 12.

    , & Cell density control of staphylococcal virulence mediated by an octapeptide pheromone. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 12055–12059 (1995)

  13. 13.

    et al. Structural identification of a bacterial quorum-sensing signal containing boron. Nature 415, 545–549 (2002). This article describes the chemical structure of AI-2.

  14. 14.

    , , & The LuxS family of bacterial autoinducers: biosynthesis of a novel quorum-sensing signal molecule. Mol. Microbiol. 41, 463–476 (2001)

  15. 15.

    et al. Quorum sensing in the dimorphic fungus Candida albicans is mediated by farnesol. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67, 2982–2992 (2001)

  16. 16.

    , , & Phenotypic variation and intracellular parasitism by Histoplasma capsulatum. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 8794–8798 (2000)

  17. 17.

    et al. Communication between viruses guides lysis-lysogeny decisions. Nature 541, 488–493 (2017)

  18. 18.

    et al. Production of bioactive volatiles by different Burkholderia ambifaria strains. J. Chem. Ecol. 39, 892–906 (2013)

  19. 19.

    , , & Pseudomonas aeruginosa cell-to-cell signaling is required for virulence in a model of acute pulmonary infection. Infect. Immun. 68, 4331–4334 (2000)

  20. 20.

    , , & A small diffusible signal molecule is responsible for the global control of virulence and exoenzyme production in the plant pathogen Erwinia carotovora. EMBO J. 12, 2467–2476 (1993)

  21. 21.

    , , & Social evolution theory for microorganisms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4, 597–607 (2006)

  22. 22.

    , , & Quorum sensing and the confusion about diffusion. Trends Microbiol. 20, 586–594 (2012)

  23. 23.

    Is quorum sensing a side effect of diffusion sensing? Trends Microbiol. 10, 365–370 (2002)

  24. 24.

    , , & Density-dependent fitness benefits in quorum-sensing bacterial populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 8259–8263 (2012)

  25. 25.

    ., ., & Cooperation and conflict in quorum-sensing bacterial populations. Nature 450, 411–414 (2007). This article and reference 28 showed that while QS can provide a benefit at the group level, cheaters can avoid the cost of QS and can therefore spread in a population.

  26. 26.

    , , , & Cooperation, quorum sensing, and evolution of virulence in Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun. 82, 1045–1051 (2014)

  27. 27.

    . et al. Quorum-sensing and cheating in bacterial biofilms. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 279, 4765–4771 (2012)

  28. 28.

    , & Social cheating in Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 15876–15881 (2007)

  29. 29.

    et al. Quorum sensing and the social evolution of bacterial virulence. Curr. Biol. 19, 341–345 (2009)

  30. 30.

    , , & Social evolution in micro-organisms and a Trojan horse approach to medical intervention strategies. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 364, 3157–3168 (2009)

  31. 31.

    The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. J. Theor. Biol. 7, 17–52 (1964)

  32. 32.

    The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. J. Theor. Biol. 7, 1–16 (1964)

  33. 33.

    . et al. Kin selection, quorum sensing and virulence in pathogenic bacteria. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 279, 3584–3588 (2012)

  34. 34.

    et al. Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality. Nature 471, E1–E4; Reply E9–E10 (2011)

  35. 35.

    , & Limitations of inclusive fitness. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 20135–20139 (2013)

  36. 36.

    , & The evolution of eusociality. Nature 466, 1057–1062 (2010)

  37. 37.

    , & Spatial structure, cooperation and competition in biofilms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 589–600 (2016)

  38. 38.

    , & A molecular mechanism that stabilizes cooperative secretions in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol. Microbiol. 79, 166–179 (2011)

  39. 39.

    , & Bacterial quorum sensing and metabolic incentives to cooperate. Science 338, 264–266 (2012)

  40. 40.

    , , & Host sanctions and the legume-rhizobium mutualism. Nature 425, 78–81 (2003)

  41. 41.

    , & Quorum sensing control of Type VI secretion factors restricts the proliferation of quorum-sensing mutants. eLife 5, e14712 (2016)

  42. 42.

    , , & Quorum sensing and policing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa social cheaters. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 2187–2191 (2015)

  43. 43.

    , , & Evolutionary theory of bacterial quorum sensing: when is a signal not a signal? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 362, 1241–1249 (2007)

  44. 44.

    & Communication in bacteria: an ecological and evolutionary perspective. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4, 249–258 (2006)

  45. 45.

    & Animal Signals (Oxford Univ. Press, 2003)

  46. 46.

    , & Quorum sensing in Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, and Vibrio harveyi: a new family of genes responsible for autoinducer production. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 1639–1644 (1999)

  47. 47.

    Bacterial esperanto. Nat. Struct. Biol. 9, 83–84 (2002)

  48. 48.

    , & Lsr-mediated transport and processing of AI-2 in Salmonella typhimurium. Mol. Microbiol. 50, 1411–1427 (2003)

  49. 49.

    , & The LuxS-dependent autoinducer AI-2 controls the expression of an ABC transporter that functions in AI-2 uptake in Salmonella typhimurium. Mol. Microbiol. 42, 777–793 (2001)

  50. 50.

    & Lack of genomic evidence of AI-2 receptors suggests a non-quorum sensing role for luxS in most bacteria. BMC Microbiol. 8, 154 (2008)

  51. 51.

    , & Bacterial cell-to-cell communication: sorry, can’t talk now — gone to lunch! Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 5, 216–222 (2002)

  52. 52.

    Divining the essence of symbiosis: insights from the squid-vibrio model. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001783 (2014)

  53. 53.

    The importance of microbes in animal development: lessons from the squid-vibrio symbiosis. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 68, 177–194 (2014)

  54. 54.

    , , , & Salmonella typhimurium encodes an SdiA homolog, a putative quorum sensor of the LuxR family, that regulates genes on the virulence plasmid. J. Bacteriol. 180, 1185–1193 (1998)

  55. 55.

    & LuxR-family ‘solos’: bachelor sensors/regulators of signalling molecules. Microbiology 155, 1377–1385 (2009)

  56. 56.

    , , , & SdiA of Salmonella enterica is a LuxR homolog that detects mixed microbial communities. J. Bacteriol. 183, 5733–5742 (2001)

  57. 57.

    & Detection of other microbial species by Salmonella: expression of the SdiA regulon. J. Bacteriol. 185, 1357–1366 (2003)

  58. 58.

    et al. Chemical sensing in mammalian host-bacterial commensal associations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 9831–9836 (2010)

  59. 59.

    et al. Structural and mechanistic roles of novel chemical ligands on the SdiA quorum-sensing transcription regulator. MBio 6, e02429–14 (2015)

  60. 60.

    , , , & N-acyl-L-homoserine lactone signal interception by Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 256, 83–89 (2006)

  61. 61.

    et al. QscR, a modulator of quorum-sensing signal synthesis and virulence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 2752–2757 (2001)

  62. 62.

    , & Activity of purified QscR, a Pseudomonas aeruginosa orphan quorum-sensing transcription factor. Mol. Microbiol. 59, 602–609 (2006)

  63. 63.

    & An evolving perspective on the Pseudomonas aeruginosa orphan quorum sensing regulator QscR. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 4, 152 (2014)

  64. 64.

    et al. Pyrones as bacterial signaling molecules. Nat. Chem. Biol. 9, 573–578 (2013)

  65. 65.

    , , & Dialkylresorcinols as bacterial signaling molecules. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 572–577 (2015)

  66. 66.

    et al. Bacterial subfamily of LuxR regulators that respond to plant compounds. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 4579–4588 (2011)

  67. 67.

    & A novel widespread interkingdom signaling circuit. Trends Plant Sci. 18, 167–174 (2013)

  68. 68.

    et al. A LuxR homolog in a cottonwood tree endophyte that activates gene expression in response to a plant signal or specific peptides. MBio 7, e01101–16 (2016)

  69. 69.

    , , , & Manipulation of the quorum sensing signal AI-2 affects the antibiotic-treated gut microbiota. Cell Reports 10, 1861–1871 (2015)

  70. 70.

    & Interactions between the microbiota and pathogenic bacteria in the gut. Nature 535, 85–93 (2016)

  71. 71.

    et al. Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 41, 435–464 (1987)

  72. 72.

    et al. Bursting the bubble on bacterial biofilms: a flow cell methodology. Biofouling 28, 835–842 (2012)

  73. 73.

    & Sociomicrobiology: the connections between quorum sensing and biofilms. Trends Microbiol. 13, 27–33 (2005)

  74. 74.

    et al. The impact of quorum sensing and swarming motility on Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation is nutritionally conditional. Mol. Microbiol. 62, 1264–1277 (2006)

  75. 75.

    et al. The in vivo biofilm. Trends Microbiol. 21, 466–474 (2013)

  76. 76.

    , , & The limitations of in vitro experimentation in understanding biofilms and chronic infection. J. Mol. Biol. 427, 3646–3661 (2015)

  77. 77.

    et al. Bacterial fight-and-flight responses enhance virulence in a polymicrobial infection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 7819–7824 (2014)

  78. 78.

    , , , & The biogeography of polymicrobial infection. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 93–105 (2016)

  79. 79.

    et al. Mutational analysis of Burkholderia thailandensis quorum sensing and self-aggregation. J. Bacteriol. 191, 5901–5909 (2009)

  80. 80.

    , & Chemotaxis towards autoinducer 2 mediates autoaggregation in Escherichia coli. Nat. Commun. 7, 12984 (2016)

  81. 81.

    , & Microfluidic confinement of single cells of bacteria in small volumes initiates high-density behavior of quorum sensing and growth and reveals its variability. Angew. Chem. Int. Edn Engl. 48, 5908–5911 (2009)

  82. 82.

    et al. Confinement-induced quorum sensing of individual Staphylococcus aureus bacteria. Nat. Chem. Biol. 6, 41–45 (2010)

  83. 83.

    et al. A crucial role for spatial distribution in bacterial quorum sensing. Sci. Rep. 6, 34695 (2016)

  84. 84.

    ., ., ., & Real-time monitoring of quorum sensing in 3D-printed bacterial aggregates using scanning electrochemical microscopy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 18255–18260 (2014). This paper provided the first assessment of the calling distance of AHL signals produced by P. aeruginosa aggregates.

  85. 85.

    & Cell-cell signalling in bacteria: not simply a matter of quorum. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 70, 1–19 (2009)

  86. 86.

    , & Chemical challenges to bacterial AHL signaling in the environment. Chem. Rev. 111, 86–99 (2011)

  87. 87.

    Ecosystem processes and interactions in a morass of diversity. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 81, 507–519 (2012)

  88. 88.

    et al. Polymorphonuclear leukocytes restrict growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the lungs of cystic fibrosis patients. Infect. Immun. 82, 4477–4486 (2014)

  89. 89.

    et al. Quenching quorum-sensing-dependent bacterial infection by an N-acyl homoserine lactonase. Nature 411, 813–817 (2001). This paper provided evidence that engineering a plant host to enzymatically degrade QS signals can reduce disease caused by a bacterial pathogen.

  90. 90.

    et al. Acyl-homoserine lactone acylase from Ralstonia strain XJ12B represents a novel and potent class of quorum-quenching enzymes. Mol. Microbiol. 47, 849–860 (2003)

  91. 91.

    & Divergence and convergence in enzyme evolution: parallel evolution of paraoxonases from quorum-quenching lactonases. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 11–20 (2012)

  92. 92.

    , , & Engineering soluble human paraoxonase 2 for quorum quenching. ACS Chem. Biol. 11, 3122–3131 (2016)

  93. 93.

    et al. Human and murine paraoxonase 1 are host modulators of Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 253, 29–37 (2005)

  94. 94.

    et al. Quorum quenching enzyme activity is widely conserved in the sera of mammalian species. FEBS Lett. 579, 3713–3717 (2005)

  95. 95.

    et al. Drosophila are protected from Pseudomonas aeruginosa lethality by transgenic expression of paraoxonase-1. J. Clin. Invest. 118, 3123–3131 (2008)

  96. 96.

    Tackling Drug-Resistant Infections Globally: Final Report and Recommendations (The Review on Microbial Resistance, 2016)

  97. 97.

    , , & Targeting virulence: can we make evolution-proof drugs? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 300–308 (2014)

  98. 98.

    . et al. Eukaryotic interference with homoserine lactone-mediated prokaryotic signalling. J. Bacteriol. 178, 6618–6622 (1996). This paper describes the discovery of a class of compounds produced by the Australian macroalga Delisea pulchra that inhibit QS-controlled processes.

  99. 99.

    et al. Attenuation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence by quorum sensing inhibitors. EMBO J. 22, 3803–3815 (2003)

  100. 100.

    , , & A high-throughput screen for quorum-sensing inhibitors that target acyl-homoserine lactone synthases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 13815–13820 (2013)

  101. 101.

    et al. Novel Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum-sensing inhibitors identified in an ultra-high-throughput screen. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 50, 3674–3679 (2006)

  102. 102.

    et al. A quorum-sensing inhibitor blocks Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence and biofilm formation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 17981–17986 (2013)

  103. 103.

    et al. Identification of anti-virulence compounds that disrupt quorum-sensing regulated acute and persistent pathogenicity. PLoS Pathog. 10, e1004321 (2014)

  104. 104.

    , , , & Mutational analysis of the quorum-sensing receptor LasR reveals interactions that govern activation and inhibition by nonlactone ligands. Chem. Biol. 21, 1361–1369 (2014)

  105. 105.

    , , & Identification of synthetic inducers and inhibitors of the quorum-sensing regulator LasR in Pseudomonas aeruginosa by high-throughput screening. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 8255–8258 (2010)

  106. 106.

    et al. Quorum sensing and virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa during lung infection of cystic fibrosis patients. PLoS One 5, e10115 (2010)

  107. 107.

    et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa lasR mutants are associated with cystic fibrosis lung disease progression. J. Cyst. Fibros. 8, 66–70 (2009)

  108. 108.

    et al. LasR variant cystic fibrosis isolates reveal an adaptable quorum-sensing hierarchy in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. MBio 7, e01513–16 (2016)

  109. 109.

    , , , & Essential genome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis sputum. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 4110–4115 (2015)

  110. 110.

    Bacterial communication and group behavior. J. Clin. Invest. 112, 1288–1290 (2003)

  111. 111.

    ., ., ., & Process-oriented review of bacterial quorum quenching for membrane biofouling mitigation in membrane bioreactors (MBRs). Membranes (Basel) 6, E52 (2016)

  112. 112.

    & Niche-Specific impact of a symbiotic function on the persistence of microbial symbionts within a natural host. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 82, 5990–5996 (2016)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S. Levin and S. Brown for advice and T. Miyashiro for sharing images of squid light organs. We acknowledge support for of our research programs from US Public Health Service (USPHS) Grants GM59026 and P30DK089507 (to E.P.G.), R01GM116547 and NIH R01DE023193 (to M.W.), the Genomic Science Program, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research, as part of the Plant Microbe Interfaces Scientific Focus Area (http://pmi.ornl.gov). Oak Ridge National Laboratory is managed by UT-Battelle LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 (to E.P.G.), and an Innovative Team Program Grant of Guangdong Province, China 2013S034 (to E.P.G.).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332-0230, USA

    • Marvin Whiteley
    •  & Stephen P. Diggle
  2. Department of Microbiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195-7735, USA

    • E. Peter Greenberg
  3. Integrative Microbiology Research Center, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China

    • E. Peter Greenberg

Authors

  1. Search for Marvin Whiteley in:

  2. Search for Stephen P. Diggle in:

  3. Search for E. Peter Greenberg in:

Contributions

M.W., S.P.D. and E.P.G. contributed equally to development, writing and revising this Review.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Peter Greenberg.

Reviewer Information Nature thanks N. Fierer, M. McFall-Ngai and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24624

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.