Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Haze heats Pluto’s atmosphere yet explains its cold temperature


Pluto’s atmosphere is cold and hazy1,2,3. Recent observations1 have shown it to be much colder than predicted theoretically4, suggesting an unknown cooling mechanism1. Atmospheric gas molecules, particularly water vapour, have been proposed as a coolant; however, because Pluto’s thermal structure is expected to be in radiative–conductive equilibrium4,5,6,7,8,9, the required water vapour would need to be supersaturated by many orders of magnitude under thermodynamic equilibrium conditions9. Here we report that atmospheric hazes, rather than gases, can explain Pluto’s temperature profile. We find that haze particles have substantially larger solar heating and thermal cooling rates than gas molecules, dominating the atmospheric radiative balance from the ground to an altitude of 700 kilometres, above which heat conduction maintains an isothermal atmosphere. We conclude that Pluto’s atmosphere is unique among Solar System planetary atmospheres, as its radiative energy equilibrium is controlled primarily by haze particles instead of gas molecules. We predict that Pluto is therefore several orders of magnitude brighter at mid-infrared wavelengths than previously thought—a brightness that could be detected by future telescopes.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Atmospheric temperature and gas-density profiles of Pluto.
Figure 2: Radiative heating and cooling in the atmosphere of Pluto.
Figure 3: Heat-transfer timescales in the atmosphere of Pluto.
Figure 4: Infrared spectra of Pluto with flux values at Earth’s distance, with and without the effects of haze radiation from Pluto’s atmosphere.


  1. 1

    Gladstone, G. R. et al. The atmosphere of Pluto as observed by New Horizons. Science 351, aad8866 (2016)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Young, L. A. et al. Structure and composition of Pluto’s atmosphere from the New Horizons solar ultraviolet occultation. Icarus 300, 174–199 (2017)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Cheng, A. F. et al. Haze in Pluto’s atmosphere. Icarus 290, 112–133 (2017)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Zhu, X. et al. The density and thermal structure of Pluto’s atmosphere and associated escape processes and rates. Icarus 228, 301–314 (2014)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Yelle, R. V. & Lunine, J. I. Evidence for a molecule heavier than methane in the atmosphere of Pluto. Nature 339, 288–290 (1989)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Hubbard, W. B. Nonisothermal Pluto atmosphere models. Icarus 84, 1–11 (1990)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Lellouch, E. Pluto’s atmospheric structure: clear vs hazy models. Icarus 108, 255–264 (1994)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Strobel, D. F. et al. On the vertical thermal structure of Pluto’s atmosphere. Icarus 120, 266–289 (1996)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Strobel, D. F. & Zhu, X. Comparative planetary nitrogen atmospheres: density and thermal structures of Pluto and Triton. Icarus 291, 55–64 (2017)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Tomasko, M. G. Heat balance in Titan’s atmosphere. Planet. Space Sci. 56, 648–659 (2008)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Zhang, X. et al. Aerosol influence on energy balance of the middle atmosphere of Jupiter. Nat. Commun. 6, 10231 (2015)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Lavvas, P. et al. Aerosol growth in Titan’s ionosphere. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 2729–2734 (2013)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Gao, P. et al. Constraints on the microphysics of Pluto’s photochemical haze from New Horizons observations. Icarus 287, 116–123 (2017)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Bertrand, T. & Forget, F. 3D modeling of organic haze in Pluto’s atmosphere. Icarus 287, 72–86 (2017)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Imanaka, H. et al. Laboratory experiments of Titan tholin formed in cold plasma at various pressures: implications for nitrogen-containing polycyclic aromatic compounds in Titan haze. Icarus 168, 344–366 (2004)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    West, R. et al. in Titan: Surface, Atmosphere and Magnetosphere (eds Mueller-Wodarg, I. et al.) 285–321 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014)

  17. 17

    Khare, B. N. et al. Optical constants of organic tholins produced in a simulated titanian atmosphere: from soft X-ray to microwave frequencies. Icarus 60, 127–137 (1984)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Lavvas, P. et al. The detached haze layer in Titan’s mesosphere. Icarus 201, 626–633 (2009)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Ramirez, S. I. et al. Complex refractive index of Titan’s aerosol analogues in the 200–900 nm domain. Icarus 156, 515–529 (2002)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Vinatier, S. et al. Optical constants of Titan’s stratospheric aerosols in the 70–1500 cm−1 spectral range constrained by Cassini/CIRS observations. Icarus 219, 5–12 (2012)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Buratti, B. J. et al. Global albedos of Pluto and Charon from LORRI New Horizons observations. Icarus 287, 207–217 (2017)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Tomasko, M. G. et al. A model of Titan’s aerosols based on measurements made inside the atmosphere. Planet. Space Sci. 56, 669–707 (2008)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Wong, M. L. et al. The photochemistry of Pluto’s atmosphere as illuminated by New Horizons. Icarus 287, 110–115 (2017)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Anderson, C. M. & Samuelson, R. E. Titan’s aerosol and stratospheric ice opacities between 18 and 500 μm: vertical and spectral characteristics from Cassini CIRS. Icarus 212, 762–778 (2011)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    McKay, C. P., Pollack, J. B. & Courtin, R. The thermal structure of Titan’s atmosphere. Icarus 80, 23–53 (1989)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Herbert, F. & Sandel, B. R. CH4 and haze in Triton’s lower atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 96, 19241–19252 (1991)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Lellouch, E. et al. Thermal properties of Pluto’s and Charon’s surfaces from Spitzer observations. Icarus 214, 701–716 (2011)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Glasse, A. et al. The Mid-Infrared Instrument for the James Webb Space Telescope, IX: predicted sensitivity. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pacif. 127, 686–695 (2015)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Lellouch, E. et al. Detection of CO and HCN in Pluto’s atmosphere with ALMA. Icarus 286, 289–307 (2017)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Moore, M. H. et al. Infrared spectra and optical constants of nitrile ices relevant to Titan’s atmosphere. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 191, 96–112 (2010)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Strobel, D. F. N2 escape rates from Pluto’s atmosphere. Icarus 193, 612–619 (2008)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Hinson, D. P. et al. Radio occultation measurements of Pluto’s neutral atmosphere with New Horizons. Icarus 290, 96–111 (2017)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Zhang, X. et al. Radiative forcing of the stratosphere of Jupiter, Part I: atmospheric cooling rates from Voyager to Cassini. Planet. Space Sci. 88, 3–25 (2013)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Rothman, L. S. et al. The HITRAN2012 molecular spectroscopic database. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 130, 4–50 (2013)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Häger, J., Krieger, W. & Pfab, J. Collisional deactivation of laser-excited acetylene by H2, HBr, N2 and CO. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 2. 77, 469–476 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Lavvas, P., Sander, M., Kraft, M. & Imanaka, H. Surface chemistry and particle shape: processes for the evolution of aerosols in Titan’s atmosphere. Astrophys. J. 728, 80 (2011)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Zhang, X ., West, R. A ., Banfield, D. & Yung, Y. L. Stratospheric aerosols on Jupiter from Cassini observations. Icarus 226, 159–171 (2013); erratum 266, 433–434 (2016)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Lavvas, P., Yelle, R. V. & Griffith, C. A. Titan’s vertical aerosol structure at the Huygens landing site: constraints on particle size, density, charge, and refractive index. Icarus 210, 832–842 (2010)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Filippov, A. V. & Rosner, D. E. Energy transfer between an aerosol particle and gas at high temperature ratios in the Knudsen transition regime. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 43, 127–138 (2000)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Burke, J. R. & Hollenbach, D. J. The gas-grain interaction in the interstellar medium—thermal accommodation and trapping. Astrophys. J. 265, 223–234 (1983)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Y. Yung, B. Bézard, E. Lellouch, M. Liang, X. Zhu and P. Gao for discussions. X.Z. acknowledges partial support from NASA Solar System Workings grant NNX16AG08G. D.F.S. acknowledges partial support from NASA’s New Horizons Mission. H.I. acknowledges support from NASA Cassini Data Analysis grant NNX14AF61G and NASA Exoplanet Research grant NNX15AQ73G.

Author information




X.Z. conceived the research, performed the calculations and wrote the manuscript. D.F.S. provided the New Horizons data and the gas-only model and assisted with analysis. H.I. provided the refractive indices of haze particles. D.F.S. and H.I. contributed to manuscript writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xi Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Reviewer Information Nature thanks R. West and Y. Yung for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Properties of haze in Pluto’s atmosphere as a function of altitude.

Vertical distributions of: a, the mean particle size; b, the observed haze attenuation factor at the Alice far-ultraviolet (FUV) channel; c, particle number density; and d, scaling factors applied to the haze k values in our balanced model.

Extended Data Figure 2 Optical properties of haze in Pluto’s atmosphere as a function of wavelength.

a, Total vertical optical depths of haze for two cases: if the particles in the near-surface layers are Mie spheres, or if they are fractal aggregates. b, Extinction efficiencies for a 10-nm monomer particle and an aggregated particle composed of 10-nm monomers with a volume-equivalent radius of 0.15 μm (ref. 3). Extinction efficiency for the aggregates is defined as the calculated total extinction cross-section divided by the cross-section of equal-volume spheres22. c, Single scattering albedos as a function of wavelength. The contribution of the spectral region from 1 μm to 7 μm (grey lines) to the haze heating rate is less than 1% and is omitted here.

Extended Data Figure 3 Reflectivity I/F values as a function of phase angle.

LORRI observations at an altitude of 45 km (black) and near the surface (blue) are shown with squares3. Simulated phase functions from multiple solutions of aggregates (composed of 10-nm monomers, 30-nm monomers or 50-nm monomers) are scaled to fit the observations.

Extended Data Figure 4 Sensitivity study of haze heating and cooling rates.

a, b, Modelled heating rates. c, d, Modelled cooling rates. Solid lines represent the results obtained if the near-surface haze layers are composed of Mie-sphere particles with radii of 0.5 μm. Dashed lines show the results obtained if the near-surface particles are instead aggregates identical to those at 45 km (consistent with Extended Data Fig. 3). b, d, Zoomed-in versions of a and c, respectively, for the lower 100-km region.

PowerPoint slides

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, X., Strobel, D. & Imanaka, H. Haze heats Pluto’s atmosphere yet explains its cold temperature. Nature 551, 352–355 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing