Ecologists have long sought a way to explain how the remarkable biodiversity observed in nature is maintained. On the one hand, simple models of interacting competitors cannot produce the stable persistence of very large ecological communities1,2,3,4,5. On the other hand, neutral models6,7,8,9, in which species do not interact and diversity is maintained by immigration and speciation, yield unrealistically small fluctuations in population abundance10, and a strong positive correlation between a species’ abundance and its age11, contrary to empirical evidence. Models allowing for the robust persistence of large communities of interacting competitors are lacking. Here we show that very diverse communities could persist thanks to the stabilizing role of higher-order interactions12,13, in which the presence of a species influences the interaction between other species. Although higher-order interactions have been studied for decades14,15,16, their role in shaping ecological communities is still unclear5. The inclusion of higher-order interactions in competitive network models stabilizes dynamics, making species coexistence robust to the perturbation of both population abundance and parameter values. We show that higher-order interactions have strong effects in models of closed ecological communities, as well as of open communities in which new species are constantly introduced. In our framework, higher-order interactions are completely defined by pairwise interactions, facilitating empirical parameterization and validation of our models.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Open Access articles citing this article.
Scientific Reports Open Access 12 November 2022
Scientific Reports Open Access 05 October 2022
Spatial coalescent connectivity through multi-generation dispersal modelling predicts gene flow across marine phyla
Nature Communications Open Access 04 October 2022
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to Nature and 55 other Nature journal
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
May, R. M. Will a large complex system be stable? Nature 238, 413–414 (1972)
Clark, J. S. et al. High-dimensional coexistence based on individual variation: a synthesis of evidence. Ecol. Monogr. 80, 569–608 (2010)
Barabás, G. J., Michalska-Smith, M. & Allesina, S. The effect of intra- and interspecific competition on coexistence in multispecies communities. Am. Nat. 188, E1–E12 (2016)
D’Andrea, R. & Ostling, A. Challenges in linking trait patterns to niche differentiation. Oikos 125, 1369–1385 (2016)
Levine, J., Bascompte, J., Adler, P. & Allesina, S. Beyond pairwise coexistence: biodiversity maintenance in complex ecological communities. Nature 546, 56–64 (2017)
Hubbell, S. P. The Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography Vol. 32 (Princeton Univ. Press, 2001)
Volkov, I., Banavar, J. R., Hubbell, S. P. & Maritan, A. Neutral theory and relative species abundance in ecology. Nature 424, 1035–1037 (2003)
Alonso, D., Etienne, R. S. & McKane, A. J. The merits of neutral theory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 451–457 (2006)
Azaele, S. et al. Statistical mechanics of ecological systems: neutral theory and beyond. Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035003 (2016)
Chisholm, R. A. et al. Temporal variability of forest communities: empirical estimates of population change in 4000 tree species. Ecol. Lett. 17, 855–865 (2014)
Chisholm, R. A. & O’Dwyer, J. P. Species ages in neutral biodiversity models. Theor. Popul. Biol. 93, 85–94 (2014)
Billick, I. & Case, T. J. Higher order interactions in ecological communities: what are they and how can they be detected? Ecology 75, 1529–1543 (1994)
Werner, E. E. & Peacor, S. D. A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 84, 1083–1100 (2003)
Case, T. J. & Bender, E. A. Testing for higher order interactions. Am. Nat. 118, 920–929 (1981)
Abrams, P. A. Arguments in favor of higher order interactions. Am. Nat. 121, 887–891 (1983)
Kareiva, P. Higher order interactions as a foil to reductionist ecology. Ecology 75, 1527–1528 (1994)
Friedman, J., Higgins, L. M. & Gore, J. Community structure follows simple assembly rules in microbial microcosms. Nature Ecol. Evol. 1, 0109 (2017)
Fisher, D. C. & Ryan, J. Optimal strategies for a generalized “scissors, paper, and stone” game. Am. Math. Mon. 99, 935–942 (1992)
Allesina, S. & Levine, J. M. A competitive network theory of species diversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 5638–5642 (2011)
Kerr, B., Riley, M. A., Feldman, M. W. & Bohannan, B. J. Local dispersal promotes biodiversity in a real-life game of rock–paper–scissors. Nature 418, 171–174 (2002)
Taylor, P. D. & Jonker, L. B. Evolutionary stable strategies and game dynamics. Math. Biosci. 40, 145–156 (1978)
Hofbauer, J., Schuster, P. & Sigmund, K. A note on evolutionary stable strategies and game dynamics. J. Theor. Biol. 81, 609–612 (1979)
Hofbauer, J. & Sigmund, K. Evolutionary game dynamics. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 40, 479–520 (2003)
Nowak, M. A. & Sigmund, K. Evolutionary dynamics of biological games. Science 303, 793–799 (2004)
Brandl, F. The distribution of optimal strategies in symmetric zero-sum games. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.06845 (2016)
Fisher, D. C. & Reeves, R. B. Optimal strategies for random tournament games. Linear Algebra Appl. 217, 83–85 (1995)
Laslier, B. & Laslier, J.-F. Reinforcement learning from comparisons: Three alternatives is enough, two is not. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1301.5734 (2013)
Wootton, J. T. Indirect effects and habitat use in an intertidal community: interaction chains and interaction modifications. Am. Nat. 141, 71–89 (1993)
Bairey, E., Kelsic, E. D. & Kishony, R. High-order species interactions shape ecosystem diversity. Nat. Commun. 7, 12285 (2016)
Reichenbach, T., Mobilia, M. & Frey, E. Coexistence versus extinction in the stochastic cyclic Lotka-Volterra model. Phys. Rev. E 74, 051907 (2006)
We thank J. Aljadeff, F. Brandl, J. A. Capitán, J.-F. Laslier, J. M. Levine, C. A. Marcelo Serván and E. Sander for comments and discussions. E. Leigh provided constructive feedback. J.G. was supported by the Human Frontier Science Program. S.A. and G.B. were supported by NSF grant DEB-1148867. M.J.M-S. was supported by US Department of Education grant P200A150101.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Reviewer Information Nature thanks D. Alonso, R. Chisholm, R. Laird, J. O’Dwyer and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Grilli, J., Barabás, G., Michalska-Smith, M. et al. Higher-order interactions stabilize dynamics in competitive network models. Nature 548, 210–213 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23273
This article is cited by
RSNET: inferring gene regulatory networks by a redundancy silencing and network enhancement technique
BMC Bioinformatics (2022)
Scientific Reports (2022)
Nature Ecology & Evolution (2022)
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes (2022)
Nature Communications (2022)