Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Discovery of intrinsic ferromagnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals crystals


The realization of long-range ferromagnetic order in two-dimensional van der Waals crystals, combined with their rich electronic and optical properties, could lead to new magnetic, magnetoelectric and magneto-optic applications1,2,3,4. In two-dimensional systems, the long-range magnetic order is strongly suppressed by thermal fluctuations, according to the Mermin–Wagner theorem5; however, these thermal fluctuations can be counteracted by magnetic anisotropy. Previous efforts, based on defect and composition engineering6,7,8,9,10, or the proximity effect, introduced magnetic responses only locally or extrinsically. Here we report intrinsic long-range ferromagnetic order in pristine Cr2Ge2Te6 atomic layers, as revealed by scanning magneto-optic Kerr microscopy. In this magnetically soft, two-dimensional van der Waals ferromagnet, we achieve unprecedented control of the transition temperature (between ferromagnetic and paramagnetic states) using very small fields (smaller than 0.3 tesla). This result is in contrast to the insensitivity of the transition temperature to magnetic fields in the three-dimensional regime. We found that the small applied field leads to an effective anisotropy that is much greater than the near-zero magnetocrystalline anisotropy, opening up a large spin-wave excitation gap. We explain the observed phenomenon using renormalized spin-wave theory and conclude that the unusual field dependence of the transition temperature is a hallmark of soft, two-dimensional ferromagnetic van der Waals crystals. Cr2Ge2Te6 is a nearly ideal two-dimensional Heisenberg ferromagnet and so will be useful for studying fundamental spin behaviours, opening the door to exploring new applications such as ultra-compact spintronics.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Schematics of spin-wave excitations in two and three dimensions.
Figure 2: Observation of ferromagnetism in bilayer Cr2Ge2Te6 and temperature-dependent Kerr rotation of few-layer and bulk Cr2Ge2Te6 crystals.
Figure 3: Ferromagnetic hysteresis loop with single-domain remanence in a six-layer Cr2Ge2Te6 crystal.
Figure 4: Magnetic field control of the transition temperature of few-layer Cr2Ge2Te6 crystals.


  1. 1

    Han, W., Kawakami, R. K., Gmitra, M. & Fabian, J. Graphene spintronics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 794–807 (2014)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Ohno, H. et al. Electric-field control of ferromagnetism. Nature 408, 944–946 (2000)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Chang, C.-Z. et al. Experimental observation of the quantum anomalous Hall effect in a magnetic topological insulator. Science 340, 167–170 (2013)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Wang, Z., Tang, C., Sachs, R., Barlas, Y. & Shi, J. Proximity-induced ferromagnetism in graphene revealed by the anomalous Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 016603 (2015)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Mermin, N. D . & Wagner, H. Absence of ferromagnetism or antiferromagnetism in one- or two-dimensional isotropic Heisenberg models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 1133–1136 (1966)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Gonzalez-Herrero, H. et al. Atomic-scale control of graphene magnetism by using hydrogen atoms. Science 352, 437–441 (2016)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Nair, R. R. et al. Spin-half paramagnetism in graphene induced by point defects. Nat. Phys. 8, 199–202 (2012)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    McCreary, K. M., Swartz, A. G., Han, W., Fabian, J. & Kawakami, R. K. Magnetic moment formation in graphene detected by scattering of pure spin currents. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 186604 (2012)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Červenka, J., Katsnelson, M. I. & Flipse, C. F. J. Room-temperature ferromagnetism in graphite driven by two-dimensional networks of point defects. Nat. Phys. 5, 840–844 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Uchoa, B., Kotov, V. N., Peres, N. M. R. & Neto, A. H. C. Localized magnetic states in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 026805 (2008)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Geim, A. K. & Novoselov, K. S. The rise of graphene. Nat. Mater. 6, 183–191 (2007)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Mak, K. F., McGill, K. L., Park, J. & McEuen, P. L. The valley Hall effect in MoS2 transistors. Science 344, 1489–1492 (2014)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Xia, F., Mueller, T., Lin, Y.-M., Valdes-Garcia, A. & Avouris, P. Ultrafast graphene photodetector. Nat. Nanotechnol. 4, 839–843 (2009)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Kou, X. et al. Scale-invariant quantum anomalous Hall effect in magnetic topological insulators beyond the two-dimensional limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 137201 (2014)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Jung, J., Pereg-Barnea, T. & MacDonald, A. H. Theory of interedge superexchange in zigzag edge magnetism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 227205 (2009)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Son, Y. W., Cohen, M. L. & Louie, S. G. Half-metallic graphene nanoribbons. Nature 444, 347–349 (2006)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Dresselhaus, M. S. Intercalation in Layered Materials (Plenum Press, 1986)

  18. 18

    Castro, E. V., Peres, N. M. R., Stauber, T. & Silva, N. A. P. Low-density ferromagnetism in biased bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 186803 (2008)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Cao, T., Li, Z. & Louie, S. G. Tunable magnetism and half-metallicity in hole-doped monolayer GaSe. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 236602 (2015)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Carteaux, V., Brunet, D., Ouvrard, G. & Andre, G. Crystallographic, magnetic and electronic structures of a new layered ferromagnetic compound Cr2Ge2Te6 . J. Phys. Condens. Matter 7, 69–87 (1995)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Ji, H. et al. A ferromagnetic insulating substrate for the epitaxial growth of topological insulators. J. Appl. Phys. 114, 114907 (2013)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Xia, J., Beyersdorf, P. T., Fejer, M. M. & Kapitulnik, A. Modified Sagnac interferometer for high-sensitivity magneto-optic measurements at cryogenic temperatures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 062508 (2006)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Li, Y. & Baberschke, K. Dimensional crossover in ultrathin Ni(111) films on W(110). Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1208–1211 (1992)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Zhang, R. & Willis, R. F. Thickness-dependent Curie temperatures of ultrathin magnetic films: effect of the range of spin-spin interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2665–2668 (2001)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Bloch, M. Magnon renormalization in ferromagnets near the Curie point. Phys. Rev. Lett. 9, 286–287 (1962)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Giannozzi, P. et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Hirakawa, K. Kosterlitz-Thouless transition in two-dimensional planar ferromagnet K2CuF4 . J. Appl. Phys. 53, 1893–1898 (1982)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Weber, M. J. Handbook of Optical Materials section 1.6.3 (CRC Press, 2003)

  29. 29

    Kaplan, B. & Gehring, G. A. The domain structure in ultrathin magnetic films. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 128, 111–116 (1993)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Alegria, L. D. et al. Large anomalous Hall effect in ferromagnetic insulator-topological insulator heterostructures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 053512 (2014)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Yu, Y. et al. Gate-tunable phase transitions in thin flakes of 1T-TaS2 . Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 270–276 (2015)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Kuo, C.-T. et al. Exfoliation and Raman spectroscopic fingerprint of few-layer NiPS3 van der Waals crystals. Sci. Rep. 6, 20904 (2016)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Li, L. et al. Direct observation of the layer-dependent electronic structure in phosphorene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 21–25 (2017)

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Cococcioni, M. & de Gironcoli, S. Linear response approach to the calculation of the effective interaction parameters in the LDA+U method. Phys. Rev. B 71, 035105 (2005)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Xiang, H., Lee, C., Kooc, H.-J., Gong, X. & Whangbo, M.-H. Magnetic properties and energy-mapping analysis. Dalton Trans. 42, 823–853 (2013)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Holstein, T. & Primakoff, H. Field dependence of the intrinsic domain magnetization of a ferromagnet. Phys. Rev. 58, 1098–1113 (1940)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Corciovei, A. Spin-wave theory of ferromagnetic thin films. Phys. Rev. 130, 2223–2229 (1963)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank J.-G. Zheng for help with AFM measurement at UC Irvine, and R. Birgeneau for providing SQUID Magnetometry at UC Berkeley. This work was primarily supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division under Contract No. DE-AC02-05-CH11231 (van der Waals heterostructures program, KCWF16). The computational resource was provided by the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, which is supported by the US DOE. The bulk crystal growth at Princeton University was supported by the NSF MRSEC programme, grant NSF DMR-1420541, and the measurements at UC Irvine were partially supported by NSF DMR-1350122.

Author information




C.G. and X.Z. conceived and initiated the research and designed the experiments; C.G. performed the Sagnac MOKE measurements with assistance from L.L., A.S. and Y.X., under the guidance of J.X.; Z.L. and T.C. performed theoretical calculations under the guidance of S.G.L.; H.J. synthesized Cr2Ge2Te6 bulk crystals under the guidance of R.J.C.; C.G. prepared and characterized few-layer samples with assistance from Y.X., W.B. and C.W.; and C.G., Z.L., T.C., Y.W., Z.Q.Q., S.G.L., J.X. and X.Z. analysed the data and wrote the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Steven G. Louie, Jing Xia or Xiang Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Magnetization characterizations of a bulk Cr2Ge2Te6 crystal.

a, Photo of bulk Cr2Ge2Te6 platelets. b, Magnetization characterization by SQUID at 4 K, showing that Cr2Ge2Te6 has an out-of-plane easy axis. c, Temperature-dependent magnetization characterization under a 0.075-T out-of-plane field, showing by SQUID, consistent with our Kerr rotation result (; in Fig. 2j).

Extended Data Figure 2 Characterizations of monolayer and bilayer Cr2Ge2Te6 flakes.

a, A representative optical image of exfoliated bilayer flakes. White arrows point to bilayer flakes. b, An optical image of a specific bilayer flake. c, The environmental AFM image of the bilayer flake in b, showing that a large monolayer flake attaches to the bilayer flake (left). The corresponding AFM height profiles are also shown (right). d, e, Optical (d) and SEM (e) images of thin Cr2Ge2Te6 flakes. The SEM image reveals an additional flake (circled by a white dashed line in e, adjacent to the bilayer strip), which might be a degraded monolayer flake (degradation can be seen from the bubble-like features).

Extended Data Figure 3 Evolution of optical contrast and Raman spectra of bilayer Cr2Ge2Te6 flakes in air.

a, Evolution of optical contrast of a bilayer Cr2Ge2Te6 flake in air. After 90 min of exposure to air (highlighted by the yellow dashed arrow), the optical contrast of the bilayer flake begins to reduce slowly. Error bars are the standard deviation of the optical contrast of the flake of various regions. Insets show optical images of the flake as freshly exfoliated and after overnight exposure in air. b, The evolution of the Raman spectra of another bilayer Cr2Ge2Te6 flake. To avoid laser-triggered degradation, Raman spectra were acquired when the sample was pumped back to vacuum (10−5–10−6 torr). The peaks in the range 100–150 cm−1 are features of bilayer Cr2Ge2Te6 and the peak at 520 cm−1 is from Si.

Extended Data Figure 4 Optical and AFM images of few-layer samples.

a, b, Optical images of bilayer (2L) and three-layer (3L) flakes (a) and a four-layer (4L) flake (b). Numbers in a and b are the optical contrasts in the green channel of the flakes; errors are standard deviations. c, d, AFM images of five-layer (5L; c) and six-layer (6L; d) samples, with the corresponding height profiles.

Extended Data Figure 5 The sample-end experimental set-up of Sagnac MOKE.

a, For the temperature-dependent Kerr image study of 2–5-layer samples under a 0.075-T field, the specimen is loaded on a stage surrounded by a cylindrical permanent magnet and the effective magnetic field perpendicular to the specimen surface is approximately 0.075 T, measured by a Gauss meter. A quarter wave plate is placed on the quartz window. Therefore, the raw signal includes a sample Kerr rotation signal and a background signal, primarily from the Faraday effect of the quartz window. The background signal can readily be obtained by data acquisition on the bare SiO2 substrate. A description of the remaining part of the optical set-up connecting to the polarization maintaining fibre can be found in ref. 22. b, For the study of magnetic field control of transition temperatures, a slightly modified experimental set-up is used. The cylindrical magnet in a provides a magnetic field of only very limited strength. To compare the contrasting fields, we machined the heights of copper stages to accommodate the heights of different disk magnets with contrasting field strengths: 0.065 T and 0.3 T. c, For the hysteresis study, we made a superconducting coil to accommodate the chamber. Owing to the connection between the superconducting coil and the sample stage in our set-up, the superconducting coil cannot be used for temperature-dependent studies. WD, working distance.

Extended Data Figure 6 Temperature evolution of the remanent magnetization of a six-layer Cr2Ge2Te6 flake.

At 4.7 K, after ‘saturating’ the six-layer Cr2Ge2Te6 flake by a 0.6-T magnetic field, the remanent magnetization is obtained by removing the field. Subsequently, under zero-field, the temperature is increased, during which process the Kerr rotation angle is tracked. This measurement shows an intrinsic ferromagnetic phase transition temperature of a six-layer Cr2Ge2Te6 flake close to 10 K. Error bars, standard error of sample signals.

Extended Data Figure 7 Positioning a target flake.

a, The pre-defined patterns of metal pads. b, A scanned map of the reflectance of the specimen. The colour represents the reflected light intensity. The reflectance of metal pads can vary because some pads were peeled off during the exfoliation process. c, A smaller-size scanning. The units of the numbers on the axes in b and c are millimetres.

Extended Data Figure 8 Magnetic interlayer coupling and single-ion anisotropy as a function of on-site Hubbard U in bulk Cr2Ge2Te6.

Blue circles represent single-ion anisotropy, and the magnetic anisotropy is out-of-plane (negative single-ion anisotropy) for U > 0.2 eV. Red squares represent interlayer magnetic coupling, which is ferromagnetic (negative) for U < 1.7 eV. Bulk Cr2Ge2Te6 is a ferromagnet with an out-of-plane easy axis. Therefore, the range 0.2 eV < U < 1.7 eV (shaded area) could qualitatively reproduce the bulk magnetic property. We set U = 0.5 eV in the subsequent calculations, because the experimentally estimated single-ion anisotropy in the bulk is small.

Extended Data Figure 9 Crystal structure consisting of magnetic ion Cr only.

Illustration of in-plane (left) and out-of-plane (right) nearest-neighbour exchange interactions. The ABC-type stacked hexagonal lattice is a reduced illustration of atomic arrangement of Cr in bulk Cr2Ge2Te6 crystals. J1, J2 and J3 (Jz1, Jz2 and Jz3) represent the first, second and third in-plane (out-of-plane) nearest-neighbour spin–spin exchange interactions, respectively. Positive and negative J values represent antiferromagnetic and ferromagnetic exchange interactions. Each Cr site carries a spin S = 3/2 in theoretical simulations. Blue and orange circles represent the Cr ions on A and B sublattices, respectively.

Extended Data Figure 10 Magnetic-field-dependent under different values of anisotropy in RSWT.

Calculated magnetic-field-dependent of monolayer (1L), bilayer (2L), three-layer (3L) and six-layer (6L) samples using A = 0, A = −0.01 meV and A = −0.001 meV in RSWT, as well as that of the bulk, with A = −0.05 meV. The x axis (B field) is plotted on a logarithmic scale. The efficient field control of transition temperature is clearly seen for small anisotropies in 2D layers.

Related audio

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gong, C., Li, L., Li, Z. et al. Discovery of intrinsic ferromagnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals crystals. Nature 546, 265–269 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links