Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A universal model for solar eruptions



Magnetically driven eruptions on the Sun, from stellar-scale coronal mass ejections1 to small-scale coronal X-ray and extreme-ultraviolet jets2,3,4, have frequently been observed to involve the ejection of the highly stressed magnetic flux of a filament5,6,7,8,9. Theoretically, these two phenomena have been thought to arise through very different mechanisms: coronal mass ejections from an ideal (non-dissipative) process, whereby the energy release does not require a change in the magnetic topology, as in the kink or torus instability10,11; and coronal jets from a resistive process2,12 involving magnetic reconnection. However, it was recently concluded from new observations that all coronal jets are driven by filament ejection, just like large mass ejections13. This suggests that the two phenomena have physically identical origin and hence that a single mechanism may be responsible, that is, either mass ejections arise from reconnection, or jets arise from an ideal instability. Here we report simulations of a coronal jet driven by filament ejection, whereby a region of highly sheared magnetic field near the solar surface becomes unstable and erupts. The results show that magnetic reconnection causes the energy release via ‘magnetic breakout’—a positive-feedback mechanism between filament ejection and reconnection. We conclude that if coronal mass ejections and jets are indeed of physically identical origin (although on different spatial scales) then magnetic reconnection (rather than an ideal process) must also underlie mass ejections, and that magnetic breakout is a universal model for solar eruptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it


Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The simulated mini-filament jet evolution.
Figure 2: Three-dimensional structure of the filament field and the jet.
Figure 3: Schematic of the breakout process.
Figure 4: Energy stored and released during the simulation.


  1. Webb, D. F. & Howard, T. A. Coronal mass ejections: observations. Living Rev. Sol. Phys. 9, 3 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Shibata, K. et al. Observations of x-ray jets with the Yohkoh soft x-ray telescope. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn 44, L173–L179 (1992)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shimojo, M. et al. Statistical study of solar x-ray jets observed with the Yohko soft x-ray telescope. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn 48, 123–136 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Savcheva, A. et al. A study of polar jet parameters based on Hinode XRT observations. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn 59, S771–S778 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shibata, K. Evidence of magnetic reconnection in solar flares and a unified model of flares. Astrophys. Space Sci. 264, 129–144 (1998)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Innes, D. E., Genetelli, A., Attie, R. & Potts, H. E. Quiet Sun mini-coronal mass ejections activated by supergranular flows. Astron. Astrophys. 495, 319–323 (2009)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Innes, D. E., McIntosh, S. W. & Pietarila, A. STEREO quadrature observations of coronal dimming at the onset of mini-CMEs. Astron. Astrophys. 517, L7 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Raouafi, N.-E., Georgoulis, M. K., Rust, D. M. & Bernasconi, P. N. Micro-sigmoids as proginators of coronal jets: is eruptive activity self-similary multi-scaled? Astrophys. J. 718, 981–987 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schrijver, C. J. Eruptions from solar ephemeral regions as an extension of the size distribution of coronal mass ejections. Astrophys. J. 710, 1480–1485 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Török, T. & Kliem, B. Confined and ejective eruptions of kink-unstable flux ropes. Astrophys. J. 630, L97–L100 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kliem, B. & Török, T. Torus instability. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 255002 (2006)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yokoyama, T. & Shibata, K. Magnetic reconnection as the origin of X-ray jets and Hα surges on the Sun. Nature 375, 42–44 (1995)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sterling, A. C., Moore, R. L., Falconer, D. A. & Adams, M. Small-scale filament eruptions as the driver of X-ray jets in solar coronal holes. Nature 523, 437–440 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, Q. M. et al. Explosive chromospheric evaporation in a circular-ribbon flare. Astrophys. J. 827, 27 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pariat, E., Antiochos, S. K. & DeVore, C. R. A model for solar polar jets. Astrophys. J. 691, 61–74 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wyper, P. F., DeVore, C. R., Karpen, J. T. & Lynch, B. J. Three-dimensional simulations of tearing and intermittency in coronal jets. Astrophys. J. 827, 4 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nishizuka, N. et al. Giant chromospheric anemone jet observed with Hinode and comparison with magnetohydrodynamic simulations: evidence of propagating Alfvén waves and magnetic reconnection. Astrophys. J. 683, L83–L86 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Antiochos, S. K. Helicity condensation as the origin of coronal and solar wind structure. Astrophys. J. 772, 72 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Martin, S. Conditions for the formation and maintenance of filaments. Sol. Phys. 182, 107–137 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Antiochos, S. K., DeVore, C. R. & Klimchuk, J. A. A model for solar coronal mass ejections. Astrophys. J. 510, 485–493 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Karpen, J. T., Antiochos, S. K. & DeVore, C. R. The mechanisms for the onset and explosive eruption of coronal mass ejections and eruptive flares. Astrophys. J. 760, 81 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shibata, K. & Uchida, Y. Sweeping-magnetic-twist mechanism for the acceleration of jets in the solar atmosphere. Sol. Phys. 103, 299–310 (1986)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Moore, R. L., Sterling, A. C. & Falconer, D. A. Magnetic untwisting in solar jets that go into the outer corona in polar coronal holes. Astrophys. J. 806, 11 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. DeVore, C. R. & Antiochos, S. K. Homologous confined filament eruptions via magnetic breakout. Astrophys. J. 680, 740–756 (2008)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shibata, K. et al. Chromospheric anemone jets as evidence of ubiquitous reconnection. Science 318, 1591–1594 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. De Pontieu, B. et al. The origins of hot plasma in the solar corona. Science 331, 55–58 (2011)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ellerman, F. Solar hydrogen “bombs”. Astrophys. J. 46, 298–300 (1917)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Vissers, G. J. M., van der Voort, L. & Rutten, R. J. Ellerman bombs at high resolution. II. Triggering, visibility, and effect on upper atmosphere. Astrophys. J. 774, 32 (2013)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Brandt, P. N. et al. Vortex flow in the solar photosphere. Nature 335, 238–240 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references


P.F.W. was supported by a Royal Astronomical Society Fellowship at Durham University and previously by a NASA Postdoctoral Program Fellowship at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. S.K.A. and C.R.D. were supported by NASA ‘Living With a Star’ and Heliophysics Supporting Research grants. The numerical simulations were supported by NASA High-End Computing allocations to C.R.D. on discover at NASA’s Center for Climate Simulation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



P.F.W. designed and performed the numerical simulations, created the graphical outputs, and drafted the manuscript. S.K.A. conceived the investigation, consulted on the simulations, and revised the manuscript. C.R.D. developed the numerical model, assisted in designing the experiments, acquired the computer resources required, and revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter F. Wyper.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Reviewer Information Nature thanks K. Shibata and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Estimate of the speed of the flux rope during the slow-rise phase.

a, Current density (saturated at 6 × 10−3 A m−2) in the z = 0 plane; x and y are the vertical and horizontal Cartesian coordinates. The green dot shows the position near the centre of the flux rope that is tracked in time. b, Inferred speed of the flux rope axis (diamond symbols); the solid line shows these data after applying a two-point boxcar smoothing.

Source data

Extended Data Figure 2 Example of a mini-filament jet.

A large coronal jet produced in conjunction with the eruption of a mini-filament23, as seen by the Solar Dynamics Observatory’s Atmospheric Imaging Assembly in Fe xii at wavelength λ = 193 Å. ac, Images prior to the jet (a), during the jet (b) and after the jet (c). The inferred coronal loop structure is depicted in white in a. We are grateful to R. L. Moore for providing the unpublished video from which these images were extracted.

Extended Data Figure 3 The block-adapted mesh during the jet, in the z = 0 plane at t = 32 min 40 s.

Each box corresponds to a block of 8 × 8 × 8 cells. Grid parameters are chosen to refine in regions of medium- to high-current density, shown as regions of white and red. The grid increases in size by a factor of four during the simulation, and the minimum resolution is 104 km.

Supplementary information

The simulated mini-filament jet evolution

See Figure 1 and text for descriptions of the evolution and field lines/shading depicted. (MOV 80354 kb)

3D visualisation of the jet

See Figure 2 and text for descriptions of the evolution and field lines/iso-surfaces depicted. (MOV 69623 kb)

Mini-filament jet example

See Extended Data Figure 2 and text for description. (MOV 123150 kb)

Evolution of the flux rope during the slow rise phase

See Extended Data Figure 1 and Methods for descriptions of the shading the method for following the flux rope. (MOV 329 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wyper, P., Antiochos, S. & DeVore, C. A universal model for solar eruptions. Nature 544, 452–455 (2017).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing