Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# Flavour-changing neutral currents making and breaking the standard model

## Abstract

The standard model of particle physics is our best description yet of fundamental particles and their interactions, but it is known to be incomplete. As yet undiscovered particles and interactions might exist. One of the most powerful ways to search for new particles is by studying processes known as flavour-changing neutral current decays, whereby a quark changes its flavour without altering its electric charge. One example of such a transition is the decay of a beauty quark into a strange quark. Here we review some intriguing anomalies in these decays, which have revealed potential cracks in the standard model—hinting at the existence of new phenomena.

This is a preview of subscription content

## Access options

\$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

## References

1. ATLAS Collaboration. The ATLAS experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. J. Instrum. 3, S08003 (2008)

2. CMS Collaboration. The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC. J. Instrum. 3, S08004 (2008)

3. Evans, L. et al. LHC machine. J. Instrum. 3, S08001 (2008)

4. LHCb Collaboration. The LHCb detector at the LHC. J. Instrum. 3, S08005 (2008)

5. Bjorken, B. J. & Glashow, S. L. Elementary particles and SU(4). Phys. Lett. 11, 255–257 (1964)

6. Glashow, S. L., Iliopoulos, J. & Maiani, L. Weak interactions with lepton–hadron symmetry. Phys. Rev. D 2, 1285–1292 (1970).Proposed a mechanism for the suppression of FCNCs, and predicted the existence of a fourth quark—the charm quark

7. Aubert, J. J. et al. Experimental observation of a heavy particle J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 1404–1406 (1974)

8. Augustin, J. E. et al. Discovery of a narrow resonance in e+e annihilation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 1406–1408 (1974)

9. BaBar Collaboration. The BaBar detector. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 479, 1–116 (2002)

10. Belle Collaboration. The Belle detector. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 479, 117–232 (2002)

11. Ellis, J. Beyond the standard model with the LHC. Nature 448, 297–301 (2007)

12. Altmannshofer, W. & Straub, D. M. New physics in BKμμ? Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2646 (2013)

13. Bobeth, C., Ewerth, T., Kruger, F. & Urban, J. Analysis of neutral Higgs-boson contributions to the decays B s+ and → Kℓ+. Phys. Rev. D 64, 074014 (2001)

14. Babu, K. & Kolda, C. F. Higgs-mediated B0μ+μ in minimal supersymmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 228–231 (2000)

15. Huang, C.-S., Liao, W. & Yan, Q.-S. Promising process to distinguish super-symmetric models with large tanβ from the standard model: BX s μ+μ. Phys. Rev. D 59, 011701 (1999)

16. Rai Choudhury, S. & Gaur, N. Dileptonic decay of B s meson in SUSY models with large tanβ. Phys. Lett. B 451, 86–92 (1999)

17. Bobeth, C. et al. B s,d+ in the standard model with reduced theoretical uncertainty. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 101801 (2014)

18. HPQCD Collaboration. B and B s meson decay constants from lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D 86, 034506 (2012)

19. Fermilab Lattice & MILC Collaborations. B- and D-meson decay constants from three-flavor lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D 85, 114506 (2012)

20. RBC–UKQCD Collaborations. B-meson decay constants with domain wall light quarks and nonperturbatively tuned relativistic b-quarks. AIP Conf. Proc. 1560, 368 (2013)

21. Cabibbo, N. Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 531–533 (1963)

22. Kobayashi, M. & Maskawa, T. CP violation in the renormalizable theory of weak interaction. Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 652–657 (1973)

23. CMS Collaboration & LHCb Collaboration. Observation of the rare μ+μ decay from the combined analysis of CMS and LHCb data. Nature 522, 68–72 (2015).After three decades of searching, the first observation of the very rare decay  → μ+μ, made by the CMS and LHCb collaborations

24. ATLAS Collaboration. Study of the rare decays of and B0 into muon pairs from data collected during the LHC run 1 with the ATLAS detector. Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 513 (2016)

25. LHCb Collaboration. Differential branching fractions and isospin asymmetries of BK()μ+μ decays. J. High Energy Phys. 6, 133 (2014)

26. LHCb Collaboration. Angular analysis and differential branching fraction of the decay φμ+μ. J. High Energy Phys. 9, 179 (2015)

27. LHCb Collaboration. Measurements of the S-wave fraction in B0K+πμ+μ decays and the B0K(892)0μ+μ differential branching fraction. J. High Energy Phys. 11, 47 (2016)

28. Bobeth, C., Hiller, G. & Piranishvili, G. Angular distributions of → λ++ decays. J. High Energy Phys. 12, 040 (2007)

29. Bordone, M., Isidori, G. & Pattori, A. On the standard model predictions for R K and R K . Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 440 (2016)

30. LHCb Collaboration. Test of lepton universality using B+ → K++ decays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 151601 (2014).Most precise measurement of the lepton universality ratio R K

31. BaBar Collaboration. Measurement of branching fractions and rate asymmetries in the rare decays BK()+. Phys. Rev. D 86, 032012 (2012)

32. Belle Collaboration. Measurement of the differential branching fraction and forward-backward asymmetry for BK()+. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 171801 (2009)

33. Belle Collaboration. Improved measurement of the electroweak penguin process BX s +. Phys. Rev. D72, 092005 (2005)

34. BaBar Collaboration. Measurement of the BX s + branching fraction and search for direct CP violation from a sum of exclusive final states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 211802 (2014)

35. LHCb Collaboration. Angular analysis of the B0K0μ+μ decay using 3 fb−1 of integrated luminosity. J. High Energy Phys. 2, 104 (2016).Most precise results yet from angular analysis of the decay B0 K0μ+μ, showing a discrepancy with standard model predictions for the observables that describe the angular distribution, including the observable

36. Belle Collaboration. Lepton-flavor-dependent angular analysis of BK+. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 111801 (2017)

37. Blake, T., Lanfranchi, G., Straub, D. M. & Rare, B. Decays as tests of the standard model. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 92, 50–91 (2017)

38. Descotes-Genon, S., Hofer, L., Matias, J. & Virto, J. On the impact of power corrections in the prediction of BKμ+μ observables. J. High Energy Phys. 12, 125 (2014)

39. Pich, A. Effective field theory: course. In Probing the Standard Model of Particle Interactions: Proc. Summer School in Theoretical Physics (eds Gupta, R. et al.) 949–1049 (Elsevier, 1998); preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9806303

40. Wilson, K. G. & Zimmermann, W. Operator product expansions and composite field operators in the general framework of quantum field theory. Commun. Math. Phys. 24, 87–106 (1972)

41. Descotes-Genon, S., Hurth, T., Matias, J. & Virto, J. Optimizing the basis of BK+ observables in the full kinematic range. J. High Energy Phys. 5, 137 (2013).First proposal to use angular observables such as, which have reduced uncertainties from strong-force interactions

42. Descotes-Genon, S., Matias, J. & Virto, J. Understanding the BKμ+μ anomaly. Phys. Rev. D 88, 074002 (2013)

43. Altmannshofer, W., Gori, S., Pospelov, M. & Yavin, I. Quark flavor transitions in L μL τ models. Phys. Rev. D 89, 095033 (2014)

44. Mahmoudi, F., Neshatpour, S. & Virto, J. BK μ+μ optimised observables in the MSSM. Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2927 (2014)

45. Crivellin, A., D’Ambrosio, G. & Heeck, J. Explaining hμ±τ, BKμ+μ and B+μ/BKe+e in a two-Higgs-doublet model with gauged L μL τ . Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 151801 (2015)

46. Descotes-Genon, S., Hofer, L., Matias, J. & Virto, J. Global analysis of bsℓℓ anomalies. J. High Energy Phys. 6, 92 (2016)

47. Hurth, T., Mahmoudi, F. & Neshatpour, S. On the anomalies in the latest LHCb data. Nucl. Phys. B 909, 737–777 (2016)

48. Jäger, S. & Martin Camalich, J. On BVℓℓ at small dilepton invariant mass, power corrections, and new physics. J. High Energy Phys. 5, 43 (2013)

49. Beaujean, F., Bobeth, C. & van Dyk, D. Comprehensive Bayesian analysis of rare (semi)leptonic and radiative B decays. Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2897 (2014); erratum 74, 3179 (2014)

50. Hurth, T. & Mahmoudi, F. On the LHCb anomaly in BK+. J. High Energy Phys. 4, 97 (2014)

51. Gauld, R., Goertz, F. & Haisch, U. An explicit Z′-boson explanation of the BKμ+μ anomaly. J. High Energy Phys. 1, 69 (2014)

52. Datta, A., Duraisamy, M. & Ghosh, D. Explaining the BKμ+μ data with scalar interactions. Phys. Rev. D 89, 071501 (2014)

53. Lyon, J . & Zwicky, R. Resonances gone topsy turvy - the charm of QCD or new physics in bsℓ+? Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.0566 (2014)

54. Altmannshofer, W. & Straub, D. M. New physics in bs transitions after LHC Run 1. Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 382 (2015).Global analysis of FCNC anomalies involving the beauty quark, hinting at a significant contribution from a new-physics particle.

55. Altmannshofer, W., Gori, S., Profumo, S. & Queiroz, F. S. Explaining dark matter and B decay anomalies with an L μ− L τ model. J. High Energy Phys. 12, 106 (2016)

56. Pati, J. C. & Salam, A. Lepton number as the fourth color. Phys. Rev. D 10, 275–289 (1974); erratum 11, 703 (1975)

57. Bauer, M. & Neubert, M. Minimal leptoquark explanation for the, R K, and (g − 2)µ anomalies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 141802 (2016)

58. Fajfer, S. & Konik, N. Vector leptoquark resolution of R K and puzzles. Phys. Lett. B 755, 270–274 (2016)

59. Gripaios, B., Nardecchia, M. & Renner, S. A. Composite leptoquarks and anomalies in B-meson decays. J. High Energy Phys. 5, 6 (2015)

60. Khodjamirian, A., Mannel, T. & Wang, Y. BK + decay at large hadronic recoil. J. High Energy Phys. 2, 10 (2013)

61. Khodjamirian, A., Mannel, T., Pivovarov, A. & Wang, Y.-M. Charm-loop effect in BK()+ and BKγ. J. High Energy Phys. 9, 89 (2010)

62. Belle II Collaboration. Belle II technical design report. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.0352 (2010)

## Acknowledgements

K.A.P. acknowledges support from the European Science and Technology Facilities Council under grant number ST/K001256/1; F.A. acknowledges support from the Netherlands Foundation for Fundamental Research of Matter (FOM) and the Netherlands Foundation of Scientific Research Institutes (NWO-I); M.-O.B. acknowledges support from CERN; and P.O. acknowledges support from the Swiss National Science Foundation under grant number BSSGI0_155990.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

All authors contributed to writing and editing the manuscript.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Owen.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Reviewer Information Nature thanks P. Urquijo and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Archilli, F., Bettler, MO., Owen, P. et al. Flavour-changing neutral currents making and breaking the standard model. Nature 546, 221–226 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21721

• Accepted:

• Published:

• Issue Date:

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21721