The standard model of particle physics is our best description yet of fundamental particles and their interactions, but it is known to be incomplete. As yet undiscovered particles and interactions might exist. One of the most powerful ways to search for new particles is by studying processes known as flavour-changing neutral current decays, whereby a quark changes its flavour without altering its electric charge. One example of such a transition is the decay of a beauty quark into a strange quark. Here we review some intriguing anomalies in these decays, which have revealed potential cracks in the standard model—hinting at the existence of new phenomena.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Nature+
Get immediate online access to the entire Nature family of 50+ journals
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
ATLAS Collaboration. The ATLAS experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. J. Instrum. 3, S08003 (2008)
CMS Collaboration. The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC. J. Instrum. 3, S08004 (2008)
Evans, L. et al. LHC machine. J. Instrum. 3, S08001 (2008)
LHCb Collaboration. The LHCb detector at the LHC. J. Instrum. 3, S08005 (2008)
Bjorken, B. J. & Glashow, S. L. Elementary particles and SU(4). Phys. Lett. 11, 255–257 (1964)
Glashow, S. L., Iliopoulos, J. & Maiani, L. Weak interactions with lepton–hadron symmetry. Phys. Rev. D 2, 1285–1292 (1970).Proposed a mechanism for the suppression of FCNCs, and predicted the existence of a fourth quark—the charm quark
Aubert, J. J. et al. Experimental observation of a heavy particle J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 1404–1406 (1974)
Augustin, J. E. et al. Discovery of a narrow resonance in e+e− annihilation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 1406–1408 (1974)
BaBar Collaboration. The BaBar detector. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 479, 1–116 (2002)
Belle Collaboration. The Belle detector. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 479, 117–232 (2002)
Ellis, J. Beyond the standard model with the LHC. Nature 448, 297–301 (2007)
Altmannshofer, W. & Straub, D. M. New physics in B → K∗μμ? Eur. Phys. J. C 73, 2646 (2013)
Bobeth, C., Ewerth, T., Kruger, F. & Urban, J. Analysis of neutral Higgs-boson contributions to the decays B s → ℓ+ℓ− and → Kℓ+ℓ−. Phys. Rev. D 64, 074014 (2001)
Babu, K. & Kolda, C. F. Higgs-mediated B0 → μ+μ− in minimal supersymmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 228–231 (2000)
Huang, C.-S., Liao, W. & Yan, Q.-S. Promising process to distinguish super-symmetric models with large tanβ from the standard model: B → X s μ+μ−. Phys. Rev. D 59, 011701 (1999)
Rai Choudhury, S. & Gaur, N. Dileptonic decay of B s meson in SUSY models with large tanβ. Phys. Lett. B 451, 86–92 (1999)
Bobeth, C. et al. B s,d → ℓ+ℓ− in the standard model with reduced theoretical uncertainty. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 101801 (2014)
HPQCD Collaboration. B and B s meson decay constants from lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D 86, 034506 (2012)
Fermilab Lattice & MILC Collaborations. B- and D-meson decay constants from three-flavor lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D 85, 114506 (2012)
RBC–UKQCD Collaborations. B-meson decay constants with domain wall light quarks and nonperturbatively tuned relativistic b-quarks. AIP Conf. Proc. 1560, 368 (2013)
Cabibbo, N. Unitary symmetry and leptonic decays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 10, 531–533 (1963)
Kobayashi, M. & Maskawa, T. CP violation in the renormalizable theory of weak interaction. Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 652–657 (1973)
CMS Collaboration & LHCb Collaboration. Observation of the rare → μ+μ− decay from the combined analysis of CMS and LHCb data. Nature 522, 68–72 (2015).After three decades of searching, the first observation of the very rare decay → μ+μ−, made by the CMS and LHCb collaborations
ATLAS Collaboration. Study of the rare decays of and B0 into muon pairs from data collected during the LHC run 1 with the ATLAS detector. Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 513 (2016)
LHCb Collaboration. Differential branching fractions and isospin asymmetries of B → K(∗)μ+μ− decays. J. High Energy Phys. 6, 133 (2014)
LHCb Collaboration. Angular analysis and differential branching fraction of the decay → φμ+μ−. J. High Energy Phys. 9, 179 (2015)
LHCb Collaboration. Measurements of the S-wave fraction in B0 → K+π−μ+μ− decays and the B0 → K∗(892)0μ+μ− differential branching fraction. J. High Energy Phys. 11, 47 (2016)
Bobeth, C., Hiller, G. & Piranishvili, G. Angular distributions of → λ+ℓ+ℓ− decays. J. High Energy Phys. 12, 040 (2007)
Bordone, M., Isidori, G. & Pattori, A. On the standard model predictions for R K and R K∗ . Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 440 (2016)
LHCb Collaboration. Test of lepton universality using B+ → K+ℓ+ℓ− decays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 151601 (2014).Most precise measurement of the lepton universality ratio R K
BaBar Collaboration. Measurement of branching fractions and rate asymmetries in the rare decays B → K(∗)ℓ+ℓ−. Phys. Rev. D 86, 032012 (2012)
Belle Collaboration. Measurement of the differential branching fraction and forward-backward asymmetry for B → K(∗)ℓ+ℓ−. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 171801 (2009)
Belle Collaboration. Improved measurement of the electroweak penguin process B → X s ℓ+ℓ−. Phys. Rev. D72, 092005 (2005)
BaBar Collaboration. Measurement of the B → X s ℓ+ℓ− branching fraction and search for direct CP violation from a sum of exclusive final states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 211802 (2014)
LHCb Collaboration. Angular analysis of the B0 → K∗0μ+μ− decay using 3 fb−1 of integrated luminosity. J. High Energy Phys. 2, 104 (2016).Most precise results yet from angular analysis of the decay B0→ K∗0μ+μ−, showing a discrepancy with standard model predictions for the observables that describe the angular distribution, including the observable
Belle Collaboration. Lepton-flavor-dependent angular analysis of B → K∗ℓ+ℓ−. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 111801 (2017)
Blake, T., Lanfranchi, G., Straub, D. M. & Rare, B. Decays as tests of the standard model. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 92, 50–91 (2017)
Descotes-Genon, S., Hofer, L., Matias, J. & Virto, J. On the impact of power corrections in the prediction of B → K∗μ+μ− observables. J. High Energy Phys. 12, 125 (2014)
Pich, A. Effective field theory: course. In Probing the Standard Model of Particle Interactions: Proc. Summer School in Theoretical Physics (eds Gupta, R. et al.) 949–1049 (Elsevier, 1998); preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9806303
Wilson, K. G. & Zimmermann, W. Operator product expansions and composite field operators in the general framework of quantum field theory. Commun. Math. Phys. 24, 87–106 (1972)
Descotes-Genon, S., Hurth, T., Matias, J. & Virto, J. Optimizing the basis of B → K∗ℓ+ℓ− observables in the full kinematic range. J. High Energy Phys. 5, 137 (2013).First proposal to use angular observables such as, which have reduced uncertainties from strong-force interactions
Descotes-Genon, S., Matias, J. & Virto, J. Understanding the B → K∗μ+μ− anomaly. Phys. Rev. D 88, 074002 (2013)
Altmannshofer, W., Gori, S., Pospelov, M. & Yavin, I. Quark flavor transitions in L μ − L τ models. Phys. Rev. D 89, 095033 (2014)
Mahmoudi, F., Neshatpour, S. & Virto, J. B → K ∗μ+μ− optimised observables in the MSSM. Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2927 (2014)
Crivellin, A., D’Ambrosio, G. & Heeck, J. Explaining h → μ±τ∓, B → K∗μ+μ− and B → Kμ+μ−/B → Ke+e− in a two-Higgs-doublet model with gauged L μ − L τ . Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 151801 (2015)
Descotes-Genon, S., Hofer, L., Matias, J. & Virto, J. Global analysis of b → sℓℓ anomalies. J. High Energy Phys. 6, 92 (2016)
Hurth, T., Mahmoudi, F. & Neshatpour, S. On the anomalies in the latest LHCb data. Nucl. Phys. B 909, 737–777 (2016)
Jäger, S. & Martin Camalich, J. On B → Vℓℓ at small dilepton invariant mass, power corrections, and new physics. J. High Energy Phys. 5, 43 (2013)
Beaujean, F., Bobeth, C. & van Dyk, D. Comprehensive Bayesian analysis of rare (semi)leptonic and radiative B decays. Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2897 (2014); erratum 74, 3179 (2014)
Hurth, T. & Mahmoudi, F. On the LHCb anomaly in B → K∗ℓ+ℓ−. J. High Energy Phys. 4, 97 (2014)
Gauld, R., Goertz, F. & Haisch, U. An explicit Z′-boson explanation of the B → K∗μ+μ− anomaly. J. High Energy Phys. 1, 69 (2014)
Datta, A., Duraisamy, M. & Ghosh, D. Explaining the B → K∗μ+μ− data with scalar interactions. Phys. Rev. D 89, 071501 (2014)
Lyon, J . & Zwicky, R. Resonances gone topsy turvy - the charm of QCD or new physics in b → sℓ+ℓ−? Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.0566 (2014)
Altmannshofer, W. & Straub, D. M. New physics in b → s transitions after LHC Run 1. Eur. Phys. J. C 75, 382 (2015).Global analysis of FCNC anomalies involving the beauty quark, hinting at a significant contribution from a new-physics particle.
Altmannshofer, W., Gori, S., Profumo, S. & Queiroz, F. S. Explaining dark matter and B decay anomalies with an L μ− L τ model. J. High Energy Phys. 12, 106 (2016)
Pati, J. C. & Salam, A. Lepton number as the fourth color. Phys. Rev. D 10, 275–289 (1974); erratum 11, 703 (1975)
Bauer, M. & Neubert, M. Minimal leptoquark explanation for the, R K, and (g − 2)µ anomalies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 141802 (2016)
Fajfer, S. & Konik, N. Vector leptoquark resolution of R K and puzzles. Phys. Lett. B 755, 270–274 (2016)
Gripaios, B., Nardecchia, M. & Renner, S. A. Composite leptoquarks and anomalies in B-meson decays. J. High Energy Phys. 5, 6 (2015)
Khodjamirian, A., Mannel, T. & Wang, Y. B → K ℓ+ℓ− decay at large hadronic recoil. J. High Energy Phys. 2, 10 (2013)
Khodjamirian, A., Mannel, T., Pivovarov, A. & Wang, Y.-M. Charm-loop effect in B → K(∗)ℓ+ℓ− and B → K∗γ. J. High Energy Phys. 9, 89 (2010)
Belle II Collaboration. Belle II technical design report. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.0352 (2010)
K.A.P. acknowledges support from the European Science and Technology Facilities Council under grant number ST/K001256/1; F.A. acknowledges support from the Netherlands Foundation for Fundamental Research of Matter (FOM) and the Netherlands Foundation of Scientific Research Institutes (NWO-I); M.-O.B. acknowledges support from CERN; and P.O. acknowledges support from the Swiss National Science Foundation under grant number BSSGI0_155990.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Reviewer Information Nature thanks P. Urquijo and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Archilli, F., Bettler, MO., Owen, P. et al. Flavour-changing neutral currents making and breaking the standard model. Nature 546, 221–226 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21721