Article | Published:

Root microbiota drive direct integration of phosphate stress and immunity

Nature volume 543, pages 513518 (23 March 2017) | Download Citation


Plants live in biogeochemically diverse soils with diverse microbiota. Plant organs associate intimately with a subset of these microbes, and the structure of the microbial community can be altered by soil nutrient content. Plant-associated microbes can compete with the plant and with each other for nutrients, but may also carry traits that increase the productivity of the plant. It is unknown how the plant immune system coordinates microbial recognition with nutritional cues during microbiome assembly. Here we establish that a genetic network controlling the phosphate stress response influences the structure of the root microbiome community, even under non-stress phosphate conditions. We define a molecular mechanism regulating coordination between nutrition and defence in the presence of a synthetic bacterial community. We further demonstrate that the master transcriptional regulators of phosphate stress response in Arabidopsis thaliana also directly repress defence, consistent with plant prioritization of nutritional stress over defence. Our work will further efforts to define and deploy useful microbes to enhance plant performance.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    , , , & Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64, 807–838 (2013)

  2. 2.

    et al. Salicylic acid modulates colonization of the root microbiome by specific bacterial taxa. Science 349, 860–864 (2015)

  3. 3.

    et al. Microbiota and host nutrition across plant and animal kingdoms. Cell Host Microbe 17, 603–616 (2015)

  4. 4.

    , , & Multiple soil nutrient competition between plants, microbes, and mineral surfaces: model development, parameterization, and example applications in several tropical forests. Biogeosciences 13, 341–363 (2016)

  5. 5.

    & Soil microorganisms mediating phosphorus availability update on microbial phosphorus. Plant Physiol. 156, 989–996 (2011)

  6. 6.

    Phosphate acquisition. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 50, 665–693 (1999)

  7. 7.

    , & Plant adaptations to severely phosphorus-impoverished soils. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 25, 23–31 (2015)

  8. 8.

    et al. Root endophyte Colletotrichum tofieldiae confers plant fitness benefits that are phosphate status dependent. Cell 165, 464–474 (2016)

  9. 9.

    Cellular programs for arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 15, 691–698 (2012)

  10. 10.

    et al. Survival trade-offs in plant roots during colonization by closely related beneficial and pathogenic fungi. Nat. Commun. 7, 11362 (2016)

  11. 11.

    et al. Transgenic plants that express the phytoplasma effector SAP11 show altered phosphate starvation and defense responses. Plant Physiol. 164, 1456–1469 (2014)

  12. 12.

    et al. Small RNA profiling reveals phosphorus deficiency as a contributing factor in symptom expression for citrus huanglongbing disease. Mol. Plant 6, 301–310 (2013)

  13. 13.

    et al. A central regulatory system largely controls transcriptional activation and repression responses to phosphate starvation in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001102 (2010)

  14. 14.

    , , & Phosphate transport in Arabidopsis: Pht1;1 and Pht1;4 play a major role in phosphate acquisition from both low- and high-phosphate environments. Plant J. 39, 629–642 (2004)

  15. 15.

    , , , & PHOSPHATE TRANSPORTER TRAFFIC FACILITATOR1 is a plant-specific SEC12-related protein that enables the endoplasmic reticulum exit of a high-affinity phosphate transporter in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 17, 3500–3512 (2005)

  16. 16.

    et al. Identification of downstream components of ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme PHOSPHATE2 by quantitative membrane proteomics in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Cell 25, 4044–4060 (2013)

  17. 17.

    , & Nitrogen limitation adaptation, a target of microRNA827, mediates degradation of plasma membrane-localized phosphate transporters to maintain phosphate homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 25, 4061–4074 (2013)

  18. 18.

    . et al. SPX1 is a phosphate-dependent inhibitor of Phosphate Starvation Response 1 in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 14947–14952 (2014)

  19. 19.

    et al. Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome. Nature 488, 86–90 (2012)

  20. 20.

    et al. Phosphate starvation responses are mediated by sugar signaling in Arabidopsis. Planta 225, 907–918 (2007)

  21. 21.

    et al. Arabidopsis basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors MYC2, MYC3, and MYC4 regulate glucosinolate biosynthesis, insect performance, and feeding behavior. Plant Cell 25, 3117–3132 (2013)

  22. 22.

    et al. Identification of primary and secondary metabolites with phosphorus status-dependent abundance in Arabidopsis, and of the transcription factor PHR1 as a major regulator of metabolic changes during phosphorus limitation. Plant Cell Environ. 38, 172–187 (2015)

  23. 23.

    et al. EXPRSS: an Illumina based high-throughput expression-profiling method to reveal transcriptional dynamics. BMC Genomics 15, 341 (2014)

  24. 24.

    , , & Phosphate deficiency induces the jasmonate pathway and enhances resistance to insect herbivory. Plant Physiol. 171, 632–644 (2016)

  25. 25.

    Assay of inorganic phosphate, total phosphate and phosphatases. Methods Enzymol. 8, 115–118 (1966)

  26. 26.

    , , & Creation of DICOM-aware applications using ImageJ. J. Digit. Imaging 18, 91–99 (2005)

  27. 27.

    , , & WinRHIZO, a root-measuring system with a unique overlap correction method. HortScience 30, 906 (1995)

  28. 28.

    et al. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J. 6, 1621–1624 (2012)

  29. 29.

    , , , & Practical innovations for high-throughput amplicon sequencing. Nat. Methods 10, 999–1002 (2013)

  30. 30.

    UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 10, 996–998 (2013)

  31. 31.

    , , & Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 5261–5267 (2007)

  32. 32.

    , , & MT-Toolbox: improved amplicon sequencing using molecule tags. BMC Bioinformatics 15, 284 (2014)

  33. 33.

    , , & Parsing ecological signal from noise in next generation amplicon sequencing. New Phytol. 205, 1389–1393 (2015)

  34. 34.

    ., ., ., & Specific Arabidopsis HSP90.2 alleles recapitulate RAR1 cochaperone function in plant NB-LRR disease resistance protein regulation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 9556–9563 (2009)

  35. 35.

    , & Improved method for the isolation of RNA from plant tissues. Anal. Biochem. 163, 16–20 (1987)

  36. 36.

    Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. Journal. 17, 10–12 (2011)

  37. 37.

    , & TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics 25, 1105–1111 (2009)

  38. 38.

    , & HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166–169 (2015)

  39. 39.

    , & Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 4288–4297 (2012)

  40. 40.

    , & edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010)

  41. 41.

    & A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 11, R25 (2010)

  42. 42.

    & Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 57, 289–300 (1995)

  43. 43.

    et al. Genome-wide reprogramming of metabolism and regulatory networks of Arabidopsis in response to phosphorus. Plant Cell Environ. 30, 85–112 (2007)

  44. 44.

    . et al. A genome-wide transcriptional analysis using Arabidopsis thaliana Affymetrix gene chips determined plant responses to phosphate deprivation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 11934–11939 (2005)

  45. 45.

    et al. WRKY6 transcription factor restricts arsenate uptake and transposon activation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 25, 2944–2957 (2013)

  46. 46.

    et al. gplots: Various R programming tools for plotting data. R package version. 3.0.1 (2016)

  47. 47.

    , & PlantGSEA: a gene set enrichment analysis toolkit for plant community. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, W98–W103 (2013)

  48. 48.

    et al. Pseudomonas syringae type III effector HopBB1 fine tunes pathogen virulence by degrading host transcriptional repressors. Cell Host Microbe 21, 156–168 (2017)

  49. 49.

    . R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (2014)

  50. 50.

    Sur Herrera Paredes. AMOR 0.0-14. Zenodo. (2016)

  51. 51.

    knitr: A feneral-purpose package for dynamic report generation in R. R package version 1.12.3 (2016)

  52. 52.

    ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. (Springer-Verlag, 2009)

  53. 53.

    et al. vegan: Community ecology package. R package version 2.3-5 (2016)

  54. 54.

    & Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: A useful method of constrained ordination for ecology. Ecology 84, 511–525 (2003)

  55. 55.

    , & It’s DE-licious: a recipe for differential expression analyses of RNA-seq experiments using quasi-likelihood methods in edgeR. Methods Mol. Biol. 1418, 391–416 (2016)

Download references


Support by NSF INSPIRE grant IOS-1343020 and DOE-USDA Feedstock Award DE-SC001043 to J.L.D. S.H.P. was supported by NIH Training Grant T32 GM067553-06 and is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute International Student Research Fellow. P.J.P.L.T. was supported by The Pew Latin American Fellows Program in the Biomedical Sciences. J.L.D. is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, supported by the HHMI and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (GBMF3030). M.E.F. and O.M.F. are supported by NIH NRSA Fellowships F32-GM112345-02 and F32-GM117758-01, respectively. N.W.B. was supported by NIH NRSA Fellowship F32-GM103156. J.P.-A. is funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO BIO2014-60453-R and EUI2008-03748). We thank S. Barth and E. Getzen for technical assistance, the Dangl laboratory microbiome group for useful discussions and S. Grant, D. Lundberg, F. El Kasmi, P. Schulze-Lefert and his colleagues for critical comments on the manuscript. Supplement contains additional data. Raw sequence data are available at the EBI Sequence Read Archive accession PRJEB15671 for microbiome 16S profiling, and at the Gene Expression Omnibus accessions GSE87339 for transcriptomic experiments. J.L.D. is a co-founder of, and shareholder in, and S.H.P. collaborates with, AgBiome LLC, a corporation whose goal is to use plant-associated microbes to improve plant productivity.

Author information

Author notes

    • Laura de Lorenzo
    •  & Natalie W. Breakfield

    Present addresses: NewLeaf Symbiotics, St. Louis, Missouri 63132, USA (N.W.B.); Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40546, USA (L.d.L.).

    • Gabriel Castrillo
    • , Paulo José Pereira Lima Teixeira
    •  & Sur Herrera Paredes

    These authors contributed equally to this work.


  1. Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3280, USA

    • Gabriel Castrillo
    • , Paulo José Pereira Lima Teixeira
    • , Sur Herrera Paredes
    • , Theresa F. Law
    • , Meghan E. Feltcher
    • , Omri M. Finkel
    • , Natalie W. Breakfield
    • , Corbin D. Jones
    •  & Jeffery L. Dangl
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3280, USA

    • Gabriel Castrillo
    • , Paulo José Pereira Lima Teixeira
    • , Sur Herrera Paredes
    • , Theresa F. Law
    • , Meghan E. Feltcher
    • , Omri M. Finkel
    • , Natalie W. Breakfield
    •  & Jeffery L. Dangl
  3. Curriculum in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3280, USA

    • Sur Herrera Paredes
    • , Corbin D. Jones
    •  & Jeffery L. Dangl
  4. Department of Plant Molecular Genetics, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, CNB-CSIC, Darwin 3, 28049 Madrid, Spain

    • Laura de Lorenzo
    •  & Javier Paz-Ares
  5. Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA

    • Piotr Mieczkowski
    •  & Corbin D. Jones
  6. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3280, USA

    • Piotr Mieczkowski
    •  & Corbin D. Jones
  7. Carolina Center for Genome Sciences, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3280, USA

    • Piotr Mieczkowski
    • , Corbin D. Jones
    •  & Jeffery L. Dangl
  8. Curriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3280, USA

    • Corbin D. Jones
    •  & Jeffery L. Dangl
  9. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3280, USA

    • Jeffery L. Dangl


  1. Search for Gabriel Castrillo in:

  2. Search for Paulo José Pereira Lima Teixeira in:

  3. Search for Sur Herrera Paredes in:

  4. Search for Theresa F. Law in:

  5. Search for Laura de Lorenzo in:

  6. Search for Meghan E. Feltcher in:

  7. Search for Omri M. Finkel in:

  8. Search for Natalie W. Breakfield in:

  9. Search for Piotr Mieczkowski in:

  10. Search for Corbin D. Jones in:

  11. Search for Javier Paz-Ares in:

  12. Search for Jeffery L. Dangl in:


G.C., P.J.P.L.T., S.H.P. and J.L.D. designed the project, G.C., S.H.P., T.F.L. and M.E.F. set up the experiments, collected samples and organized construction of 16S sequencing libraries. G.C. and T.F.L. performed control experiments related with PSR induced by the SynCom. G.C., N.W.B., M.E.F. and T.F.L. set up the experiments, collected samples and isolated RNA. P.J.P.L.T. organized, performed construction of RNA-seq libraries and analysed RNA-seq data. S.H.P. analysed 16S sequencing data. S.H.P. and P.J.P.L.T. oversaw data deposition. G.C., T.F.L. and P.J.P.L.T. performed pathology experiments. G.C., P.J.P.L.T., S.H.P., T.F.L., O.M.F. and J.L.D. analysed data and created figures. L.d.L. performed the ChIP–seq experiment. C.D.J. and P.M. advised on sequencing process and statistical methods. G.C., P.J.P.L.T., S.H.P. and J.L.D. wrote the manuscript with input from O.M.F., C.D.J. and J.P.-A.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffery L. Dangl.

Reviewer Information Nature thanks P. Finnegan and the other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Extended data

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Text 1-5 and additional references.

Zip files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This zipped file contains Supplementary Tables 1-16, Supplementary Datasets 1-2 together with legends for both the Supplementary Tables and Supplementary Data.

About this article

Publication history





Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.