Methane has the second-largest global radiative forcing impact of anthropogenic greenhouse gases after carbon dioxide, but our understanding of the global atmospheric methane budget is incomplete. The global fossil fuel industry (production and usage of natural gas, oil and coal) is thought to contribute 15 to 22 per cent of methane emissions1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 to the total atmospheric methane budget11. However, questions remain regarding methane emission trends as a result of fossil fuel industrial activity and the contribution to total methane emissions of sources from the fossil fuel industry and from natural geological seepage12,13, which are often co-located. Here we re-evaluate the global methane budget and the contribution of the fossil fuel industry to methane emissions based on long-term global methane and methane carbon isotope records. We compile the largest isotopic methane source signature database so far, including fossil fuel, microbial and biomass-burning methane emission sources. We find that total fossil fuel methane emissions (fossil fuel industry plus natural geological seepage) are not increasing over time, but are 60 to 110 per cent greater than current estimates1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 owing to large revisions in isotope source signatures. We show that this is consistent with the observed global latitudinal methane gradient. After accounting for natural geological methane seepage12,13, we find that methane emissions from natural gas, oil and coal production and their usage are 20 to 60 per cent greater than inventories1,2. Our findings imply a greater potential for the fossil fuel industry to mitigate anthropogenic climate forcing, but we also find that methane emissions from natural gas as a fraction of production have declined from approximately 8 per cent to approximately 2 per cent over the past three decades.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
US Environmental Protection Agency. Summary Report: Global Anthropogenic Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions: 1990–2030 https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/Downloads/EPAactivities/Summary_Global_NonCO2_Projections_Dec2012.pdf (Office of Atmospheric Programs, Climate Change Division, US EPA, 2012)
European Commission—Joint Research Centre (JRC)/Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL). Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR), release version 4.2, http://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu (2014)
Bousquet, P. et al. Contribution of anthropogenic and natural sources to atmospheric methane variability. Nature 443, 439–443 (2006)
Mikaloff Fletcher, S. E., Tans, P. P., Bruhwiler, L. M., Miller, J. B. & Heimann, M. CH4 sources estimated from atmospheric observations of CH4 and its 13C/12C isotopic ratios: 1. Inverse modeling of source processes. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 18, GB4004 (2004)
Fraser, A. et al. Estimating regional methane surface fluxes: the relative importance of surface and GOSAT mole fraction measurements. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 5697–5713 (2013)
Wang, J. S. et al. A 3-D model analysis of the slowdown and interannual variability in the methane growth rate from 1988 to 1997. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 18, GB3011 (2004)
Chen, Y.-H. & Prinn, R. G. Estimation of atmospheric methane emissions between 1996 and 2001 using a three-dimensional global chemical transport model. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 111, D10307 (2006)
Bergamaschi, P. et al. Inverse modeling of global and regional CH4 emissions using SCIAMACHY satellite retrievals. J. Geophys. Res. 114, D22301 (2009)
Schwietzke, S., Griffin, W. M., Matthews, H. S. & Bruhwiler, L. M. P. Natural gas fugitive emissions rates constrained by global atmospheric methane and ethane. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 7714–7722 (2014)
Quay, P. et al. The isotopic composition of atmospheric methane. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 13, 445–461 (1999)
Kirschke, S. et al. Three decades of global methane sources and sinks. Nat. Geosci. 6, 813–823 (2013)
Etiope, G., Lassey, K. R., Klusman, R. W. & Boschi, E. Reappraisal of the fossil methane budget and related emission from geologic sources. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L09307 (2008)
Ciais, P. et al. in Working Group I Contribution To The IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. Climate Change 2013—The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al..) Ch. 6, 465–570 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013)
Sherwood, O., Schwietzke, S., Arling, V. & Etiope, G. Global Inventory of Fossil and Non-fossil Methane δ13C Source Signature Measurements for Improved Atmospheric Modeling http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/d13C-src-inv/ (NOAA/ESRL/GMD, 2016)
Alvarez, R. A., Pacala, S. W., Winebrake, J. J., Chameides, W. L. & Hamburg, S. P. Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 6435–6440 (2012)
US Energy Information Administration International Energy Statistics database http://www.eia.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/IEDIndex3.cfm?tid=3&pid=3&aid=1 (2016)
Whiticar, M. J. in Organic Geochemistry (eds Durand, B. & Behar, F. ) Vol. 16, 531–548 (Pergamon, 1990)
Milkov, A. V. Worldwide distribution and significance of secondary microbial methane formed during petroleum biodegradation in conventional reservoirs. Org. Geochem. 42, 184–207 (2011)
Meslé, M., Dromart, G. & Oger, P. Microbial methanogenesis in subsurface oil and coal. Res. Microbiol. 164, 959–972 (2013)
NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Global Monitoring Division Global Greenhouse Gas Reference Networkhttp://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/iadv (2016)
Schaefer, H. et al. A 21st century shift from fossil-fuel to biogenic methane emissions indicated by 13CH4 . Science 352, 80–84 (2016)
US Environmental Protection Agency. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2014https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/us-greenhouse-gas-inventory-report-1990-2014 (2016)
Randerson, J. T., Chen, Y., van der Werf, G. R., Rogers, B. M. & Morton, D. C. Global burned area and biomass burning emissions from small fires. J. Geophys. Res. 117, G04012 (2012)
Sapart, C. J. et al. Natural and anthropogenic variations in methane sources during the past two millennia. Nature 490, 85–88 (2012)
Mischler, J. A. et al. Carbon and hydrogen isotopic composition of methane over the last 1000 years. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 23, GB4024 (2009)
Sowers, T. Atmospheric methane isotope records covering the Holocene period. Quat. Sci. Rev. 29, 213–221 (2010)
Krol, M. et al. The two-way nested global chemistry-transport zoom model TM5: algorithm and applications. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 5, 417–432 (2005)
Schwietzke, S., Griffin, W. M., Matthews, H. S. & Bruhwiler, L. M. P. Global bottom-up fossil fuel fugitive methane and ethane emissions inventory for atmospheric modeling. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2, 1992–2001 (2014)
International Energy Agency Coal Mine Methane in China: A Budding Asset with the Potential to Bloomhttps://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/china_cmm_report.pdf (2009)
Lassey, K. R., Lowe, D. C. & Smith, A. M. The atmospheric cycling of radiomethane and the ‘fossil fraction’ of the methane source. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 7, 2141–2149 (2007)
We thank J. Randerson, K. Johnson, A. Cole, C. Itle, T. Wirth, T. Capehart, S. Montzka, and R. Klusman for comments and discussions. We acknowledge M. Schoell and A. Ionescu for contributing δ13Csource data. This research was supported by a National Research Council RAP fellowship and a CIRES IRP grant.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
This file contains a list of acronyms, the box-model descriptions, atmospheric measurements used, isotopic signature database details (data, explanations, and weighting schemes, paleo CH4 budget analysis, global latitudinal CH4 gradient simulations (TM5 model), and all sensitivity analyses. (PDF 2893 kb)
About this article
Cite this article
Schwietzke, S., Sherwood, O., Bruhwiler, L. et al. Upward revision of global fossil fuel methane emissions based on isotope database. Nature 538, 88–91 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19797
Regulated synthesis of Eutectic Ni3S2/NiS nanorods for quasi-solid-state hybrid supercapacitors with high energy density
Journal of Power Sources (2021)
Marine Pollution Bulletin (2020)
Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry (2020)
Effect of the Nuclearity and Coordination of Cu and Fe Sites in β Zeolites on the Oxidation of Hydrocarbons
ACS Catalysis (2020)
Geophysical Research Letters (2020)