Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A partially differentiated interior for (1) Ceres deduced from its gravity field and shape


Remote observations of the asteroid (1) Ceres from ground- and space-based telescopes have provided its approximate density and shape, leading to a range of models for the interior of Ceres, from homogeneous to fully differentiated1,2,3,4,5,6. A previously missing parameter that can place a strong constraint on the interior of Ceres is its moment of inertia, which requires the measurement of its gravitational variation1,7 together with either precession rate8,9 or a validated assumption of hydrostatic equilibrium10. However, Earth-based remote observations cannot measure gravity variations and the magnitude of the precession rate is too small to be detected9. Here we report gravity and shape measurements of Ceres obtained from the Dawn spacecraft, showing that it is in hydrostatic equilibrium with its inferred normalized mean moment of inertia of 0.37. These data show that Ceres is a partially differentiated body, with a rocky core overlaid by a volatile-rich shell, as predicted in some studies1,4,6. Furthermore, we show that the gravity signal is strongly suppressed compared to that predicted by the topographic variation. This indicates that Ceres is isostatically compensated11, such that topographic highs are supported by displacement of a denser interior. In contrast to the asteroid (4) Vesta8,12, this strong compensation points to the presence of a lower-viscosity layer at depth, probably reflecting a thermal rather than compositional gradient1,4. To further investigate the interior structure, we assume a two-layer model for the interior of Ceres with a core density of 2,460–2,900 kilograms per cubic metre (that is, composed of CI and CM chondrites13), which yields an outer-shell thickness of 70–190 kilometres. The density of this outer shell is 1,680–1,950 kilograms per cubic metre, indicating a mixture of volatiles and denser materials such as silicates and salts14. Although the gravity and shape data confirm that the interior of Ceres evolved thermally1,4,6, its partially differentiated interior indicates an evolution more complex than has been envisioned for mid-sized (less than 1,000 kilometres across) ice-rich rocky bodies.

This is a preview of subscription content

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Mollweide projection of topography and the Bouguer anomaly.
Figure 2: Ceres gravity and error magnitude spectra of normalized spherical harmonic coefficients7,8.
Figure 3: Ceres core and shell densities computed by numerical integration of Clairaut’s equations of hydrostatic equilibrium9.


  1. McCord, T. B. & Sotin, C. Ceres: evolution and current state. Geophys. Res. Lett. 110, E05009 (2005)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Thomas, P. C. et al. Differentiation of the asteroid Ceres as revealed by its shape. Nature 437, 224–226 (2005)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zolotov, M. Y. On the composition and differentiation of Ceres. Icarus 204, 183–193 (2009)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Castillo-Rogez, J. C. & McCord, T. B. Ceres’ evolution and present state constrained by shape data. Icarus 205, 443–459 (2010)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Castillo-Rogez, J. C. Ceres—neither a porous nor salty ball. Icarus 215, 599–602 (2011)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Neveu, M. & Desch, S. J. Geochemistry, thermal evolution, and cryovolcanism on Ceres with a muddy ice mantle. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 10,197–10,206 (2015)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Heiskanen, W. A. & Moritz, H. Physical Geodesy (W. H. Freeman and Company, 1967)

  8. Konopliv, A. S. et al. The Vesta gravity field, spin pole and rotation period, landmark positions, and ephemeris from the Dawn tracking and optical data. Icarus 240, 103–117 (2014)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rambaux, N. et al. Third-order development of shape, gravity, and moment of inertia for highly celestial bodies. Application to Ceres. Astron. Astrophys. 584, A127 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson, J. D. et al. Gravitational constraints on the internal structure of Ganymede. Nature 384, 541–543 (1996)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kucinskas, A. B. & Turcotte, D. L. Isostatic compensation of equatorial highlands on Venus. Icarus 112, 104–116 (1994)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bills, B. G. et al. Harmonic and statistical analyses of the gravity and topography of Vesta. Icarus 240, 161–173 (2014)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Consolmagno, G. J. et al. The significance of meteorite density and porosity. Chem. Erde 68, 1–29 (2008)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. De Sanctis, M. C. et al. Ammoniated phyllosilicates with a likely outer Solar System origin on (1) Ceres. Nature 528, 241–244 (2015)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Russell, C. T. et al. Dawn arrives at Ceres: exploration of a small volatile-rich world. Science (in the press)

  16. Gaskell, R. W. et al. Characterizing and navigating small bodies with imaging data. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 43, 1049–1061 (2008)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Preusker, F. et al. Shape model, reference system definition, and cartographic mapping standards for comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko—stereo-photogrammetric analysis of Rosetta/OSIRIS image data. Astron. Astrophys. 583, A33 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Peale, S. J. Excitation and relaxation of the wobble, precession, and libration of the Moon. J. Geophys. Res. 81, 1813–1827 (1976)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rambaux, N. et al. Constraining Ceres’ interior from its rotational motion. Astron. Astrophys. 535, A43 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Buczkowski, D. et al. The geomorphology of Ceres. Science (in the press)

  21. Hiesinger, H. et al. Cratering on Ceres: implications for its crust and evolution. Science (in the press)

  22. Ruesch, O. et al. Cryovolcanism on Ceres. Science (in the press)

  23. Radau, R. Sur la loi des densités a l’intérieur de la Terre. Compt. Rend. 100, 972–974 (1885)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Darwin, G. H. The theory of the figure of the Earth carried to the second order of small quantities. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 60, 82–124 (1900)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Showman, A. P. & Malhotra, R. The Galilean satellites. Science 286, 77–84 (1999)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Iess, L. et al. Gravity field, shape, and moment of inertia of Titan. Science 327, 1367–1369 (2010)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gao, Pa & Stevenson, D. J. Nonhydrostatic effects and the determination of icy satellite moments of inertia. Icarus 226, 1185–1191 (2013)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kargel, J. S. et al. Europa’s crust and ocean: origin, composition, and the prospects for life. Icarus 148, 226–265 (2000)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Castillo-Rogez, J. C. & Young, E. Origin and evolution of volatile-rich asteroids. In Planetesimals: Early Differentiation and Consequences for Planets (eds Elkins-Tanton, L. & Weiss, B. ) Ch. 4 (Cambridge Univ. Press, in the press)

  30. Nathues, A. et al. Sublimation in bright spots on (1) Ceres. Nature 528, 237–240 (2015)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This research was carried out in part at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. We thank the Dawn operations team for the development, cruise, orbital insertion and operations of the Dawn spacecraft at Ceres. R.S.P. thanks W. M. Folkner, E. M. Mazarico, and M. D. Rayman for comments and suggestions. N.R. is grateful to the CNU, Section 34, for supporting a six-month full-time research project through CRCT-2015 funding delivered by the MESR and acknowledges funding from the French National Programme of Planetology (PNP). M.J.T. acknowledges funding by the CNES. Government sponsorship acknowledged. All rights reserved.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



R.S.P., A.S.K. and A.T.V. performed data analysis and calibration. R.S.P., B.G.B., N.R., J.C.C.-R., C.A.R., A.I.E., M.T.Z., R.R.F., M.J.T., C.T.R., A.N. and F.P. contributed to the interpretation of the data. All authors contributed to the discussion of the results and to writing the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. S. Park.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

The gravity science and framing camera data is available through the PDS Small Bodies Node website (

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Range of values for the degree-2 zonal gravity coefficient for Ceres.

We assume a two-layer model for Ceres and vary the density and radius of the core by solving Clairaut’s equations of rotational equilibrium at third order9. The best-fitting solution for J2 = 264.99 × 10−4 (blue line) is compared with the direct approach of Gao and Stevenson27 (red line), which generally shows a good agreement except at high core-density values. The white area at the upper right corresponds to solutions with shell density below 900 kg m−3.

Extended Data Table 1 Gravity spherical harmonic coefficients of Ceres7
Extended Data Table 2 Various best-fitting ellipsoid estimates of the shape of Ceres with respect to the centre of mass

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, R., Konopliv, A., Bills, B. et al. A partially differentiated interior for (1) Ceres deduced from its gravity field and shape. Nature 537, 515–517 (2016).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing