Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Structure of spinach photosystem II–LHCII supercomplex at 3.2 Å resolution

This article has been updated


During photosynthesis, the plant photosystem II core complex receives excitation energy from the peripheral light-harvesting complex II (LHCII). The pathways along which excitation energy is transferred between them, and their assembly mechanisms, remain to be deciphered through high-resolution structural studies. Here we report the structure of a 1.1-megadalton spinach photosystem II–LHCII supercomplex solved at 3.2 Å resolution through single-particle cryo-electron microscopy. The structure reveals a homodimeric supramolecular system in which each monomer contains 25 protein subunits, 105 chlorophylls, 28 carotenoids and other cofactors. Three extrinsic subunits (PsbO, PsbP and PsbQ), which are essential for optimal oxygen-evolving activity of photosystem II, form a triangular crown that shields the Mn4CaO5-binding domains of CP43 and D1. One major trimeric and two minor monomeric LHCIIs associate with each core-complex monomer, and the antenna–core interactions are reinforced by three small intrinsic subunits (PsbW, PsbH and PsbZ). By analysing the closely connected interfacial chlorophylls, we have obtained detailed insights into the energy-transfer pathways between the antenna and core complexes.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Single-particle cryo-EM analyses of spinach PSII–LHCII supercomplex.
Figure 2: Overall architecture of spinach PSII–LHCII supercomplex.
Figure 3: The extrinsic subunits of spinach PSII.
Figure 4: Antenna–core and antenna–antenna interactions in the PSII–LHCII supercomplex.
Figure 5: Energy transfer pathways from antenna complexes to reaction centres.

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Electron Microscopy Data Bank

Protein Data Bank

Data deposits

The cryo-EM map of the spinach PSII–LHCII supercomplex has been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank with accession code EMD-6617. The corresponding structure model has been deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession code 3JCU.

Change history

  • 01 June 2016

    The received date year was corrected from 2015 to 2016.


  1. 1

    Nelson, N. & Junge, W. Structure and energy transfer in photosystems of oxygenic photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 84, 659–683 (2015)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Shen, J.-R. The structure of photosystem II and the mechanism of water oxidation in photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 66, 23–48 (2015)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Vinyard, D. J., Ananyev, G. M. & Dismukes, G. C. Photosystem II: The reaction center of oxygenic photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 82, 577–606 (2013)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Pan, X., Liu, Z., Li, M. & Chang, W. Architecture and function of plant light-harvesting complexes II. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 23, 515–525 (2013)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Barros, T. & Kühlbrandt, W. Crystallisation, structure and function of plant light-harvesting Complex II. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1787, 753–772 (2009)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Croce, R. & van Amerongen, H. Natural strategies for photosynthetic light harvesting. Nature Chem. Biol. 10, 492–501 (2014)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Umena, Y., Kawakami, K., Shen, J.-R. & Kamiya, N. Crystal structure of oxygen-evolving photosystem II at a resolution of 1.9 Å. Nature 473, 55–60 (2011)

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Suga, M. et al. Native structure of photosystem II at 1.95 Å resolution viewed by femtosecond X-ray pulses. Nature 517, 99–103 (2015)

    CAS  PubMed Central  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Rhee, K.-H., Morris, E. P., Barber, J. & Kuhlbrandt, W. Three-dimensional structure of the plant photosystem II reaction centre at 8 Å resolution. Nature 396, 283–286 (1998)

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Hankamer, B., Morris, E. P. & Barber, J. Revealing the structure of the oxygen-evolving core dimer of photosystem II by cryoelectron crystallography. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 6, 560–564 (1999)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Hankamer, B., Morris, E., Nield, J., Gerle, C. & Barber, J. Three-dimensional structure of the photosystem II core dimer of higher plants determined by electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 135, 262–269 (2001)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Liu, Z. et al. Crystal structure of spinach major light-harvesting complex at 2.72 Å resolution. Nature 428, 287–292 (2004)

    CAS  PubMed Central  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Standfuss, J., Terwisscha van Scheltinga, A. C., Lamborghini, M. & Kühlbrandt, W. Mechanisms of photoprotection and nonphotochemical quenching in pea light-harvesting complex at 2.5 Å resolution. EMBO J. 24, 919–928 (2005)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Pan, X. et al. Structural insights into energy regulation of light-harvesting complex CP29 from spinach. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 309–315 (2011)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Nield, J. & Barber, J. Refinement of the structural model for the Photosystem II supercomplex of higher plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1757, 353–361 (2006)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Caffarri, S., Kouril, R., Kereiche, S., Boekema, E. J. & Croce, R. Functional architecture of higher plant photosystem II supercomplexes. EMBO J. 28, 3052–3063 (2009)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Drop, B. et al. Light-harvesting complex II (LHCII) and its supramolecular organization in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1837, 63–72 (2014)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Guskov, A. et al. Cyanobacterial photosystem II at 2.9-Å resolution and the role of quinones, lipids, channels and chloride. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 334–342 (2009)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Ferreira, K. N., Iverson, T. M., Maghlaoui, K., Barber, J. & Iwata, S. Architecture of the photosynthetic oxygen-evolving center. Science 303, 1831–1838 (2004)

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Garcia-Cerdán, J. G. et al. The PsbW protein stabilizes the supramolecular organization of photosystem II in higher plants. Plant J. 65, 368–381 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Ago, H. et al. Novel features of eukaryotic photosystem II revealed by its crystal structure analysis from a red alga. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 5676–5687 (2016)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Shi, L. X. & Schroder, W. P. The low molecular mass subunits of the photosynthetic supracomplex, photosystem II. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1608, 75–96 (2004)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Ballottari, M., Mozzo, M., Croce, R., Morosinotto, T. & Bassi, R. Occupancy and functional architecture of the pigment binding sites of photosystem II antenna complex Lhcb5. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 8103–8113 (2009)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Bricker, T. M., Roose, J. L., Fagerlund, R. D., Frankel, L. K. & Eaton-Rye, J. J. The extrinsic proteins of Photosystem II. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1817, 121–142 (2012)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Ido, K. et al. Cross-linking evidence for multiple interactions of the PsbP and PsbQ proteins in a higher plant photosystem II supercomplex. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 20150–20157 (2014)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Mummadisetti, M. P. et al. Use of protein cross-linking and radiolytic footprinting to elucidate PsbP and PsbQ interactions within higher plant Photosystem II. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 16178–16183 (2014)

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Kapazoglou, A., Sagliocco, F. & Dure, L. PSII-T, a new nuclear encoded lumenal protein from photosystem II: targeting and processing in isolated chloroplasts. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 12197–12202 (1995)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Shabestari, M. H., Wolfs, C. J. A. M. & Spruijt, R. B. van Amerongen, H. & Huber, M. Exploring the structure of the 100 amino-acid residue long N-terminus of the plant antenna protein CP29. Biophys. J. 106, 1349–1358 (2014)

    CAS  PubMed Central  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Qin, X., Suga, M., Kuang, T. & Shen, J. R. Photosynthesis. Structural basis for energy transfer pathways in the plant PSI-LHCI supercomplex. Science 348, 989–995 (2015)

    CAS  PubMed Central  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Mazor, Y., Borovikova, A. & Nelson, N. The structure of plant photosystem I super-complex at 2.8 Å resolution. eLife 4, e07433 (2015)

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Caffarri, S., Passarini, F., Bassi, R. & Croce, R. A specific binding site for neoxanthin in the monomeric antenna proteins CP26 and CP29 of Photosystem II. FEBS Lett. 581, 4704–4710 (2007)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Yakushevska, A. E. et al. The structure of photosystem II in Arabidopsis: localization of the CP26 and CP29 antenna complexes. Biochemistry 42, 608–613 (2003)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    de Bianchi, S. et al. Arabidopsis mutants deleted in the light-harvesting protein Lhcb4 have a disrupted photosystem II macrostructure and are defective in photoprotection. Plant Cell 23, 2659–2679 (2011)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Ruf, S., Biehler, K. & Bock, R. A small chloroplast-encoded protein as a novel architectural component of the light-harvesting antenna. J. Cell Biol. 149, 369–378 (2000)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Baena-González, E., Gray, J. C., Tyystjärvi, E., Aro, E.-M. & Mäenpää, P. Abnormal regulation of photosynthetic electron transport in a chloroplast ycf9 inactivation mutant. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 20795–20802 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Swiatek, M. et al. The chloroplast gene ycf9 encodes a photosystem II (PSII) core subunit, PsbZ, that participates in PSII supramolecular architecture. Plant Cell 13, 1347–1368 (2001)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Remelli, R., Varotto, C., Sandona, D., Croce, R. & Bassi, R. Chlorophyll binding to monomeric light-harvesting complex. A mutation analysis of chromophore-binding residues. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 33510–33521 (1999)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Rogl, H. & Kühlbrandt, W. Mutant trimers of light-harvesting complex II exhibit altered pigment content and spectroscopic features. Biochemistry 38, 16214–16222 (1999)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Novoderezhkin, V. I., Palacios, M. A., van Amerongen, H. & van Grondelle, R. Excitation dynamics in the LHCII complex of higher plants: modeling based on the 2.72 Å crystal structure. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 10493–10504 (2005)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Novoderezhkin, V., Marin, A. & van Grondelle, R. Intra- and inter-monomeric transfers in the light harvesting LHCII complex: the Redfield-Förster picture. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 17093–17103 (2011)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Sun, R. et al. Direct energy transfer from the major antenna to the photosystem II core complexes in the absence of minor antennae in liposomes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1847, 248–261 (2015)

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Dall’Osto, L., Ünlü, C., Cazzaniga, S. & van Amerongen, H. Disturbed excitation energy transfer in Arabidopsis thaliana mutants lacking minor antenna complexes of photosystem II. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1837, 1981–1988 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Mozzo, M., Passarini, F., Bassi, R., van Amerongen, H. & Croce, R. Photoprotection in higher plants: The putative quenching site is conserved in all outer light-harvesting complexes of Photosystem II. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1777, 1263–1267 (2008)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Ahn, T. K. et al. Architecture of a charge-transfer state regulating light harvesting in a plant antenna protein. Science 320, 794–797 (2008)

    CAS  PubMed Central  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Pascal, A. A. et al. Molecular basis of photoprotection and control of photosynthetic light-harvesting. Nature 436, 134–137 (2005)

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Caffarri, S., Broess, K., Croce, R. & van Amerongen, H. Excitation energy transfer and trapping in higher plant Photosystem II complexes with different antenna sizes. Biophys. J. 100, 2094–2103 (2011)

    CAS  PubMed Central  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Bennett, D. I. G., Amarnath, K. & Fleming, G. R. A. Structure-based model of energy transfer reveals the principles of light harvesting in photosystem II supercomplexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 9164–9173 (2013)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Schägger, H. Tricine-SDS-PAGE. Nature Protocols 1, 16–22 (2006)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Färber, A., Young, A. J., Ruban, A. V., Horton, P. & Jahns, P. Dynamics of xanthophyll-cycle activity in different antenna subcomplexes in the photosynthetic membranes of higher plants (the relationship between zeaxanthin conversion and nonphotochemical fluorescence quenching). Plant Physiol. 115, 1609–1618 (1997)

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Li, X. et al. Electron counting and beam-induced motion correction enable near-atomic-resolution single-particle cryo-EM. Nature Methods 10, 584–590 (2013)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51

    Mindell, J. A. & Grigorieff, N. Accurate determination of local defocus and specimen tilt in electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 142, 334–347 (2003)

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52

    Tang, G. et al. EMAN2: an extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 38–46 (2007)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53

    Scheres, S. H. W. RELION: Implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J. Struct. Biol. 180, 519–530 (2012)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54

    Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55

    Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56

    Allahverdiyeva, Y. et al. Insights into the function of PsbR protein in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1767, 677–685 (2007)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57

    Koua, F. H. M., Umena, Y., Kawakami, K. & Shen, J.-R. Structure of Sr-substituted photosystem II at 2.1 Å resolution and its implications in the mechanism of water oxidation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 3889–3894 (2013)

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58

    Li, X. P. et al. A pigment-binding protein essential for regulation of photosynthetic light harvesting. Nature 403, 391–395 (2000)

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59

    Fan, M. et al. Crystal structures of the PsbS protein essential for photoprotection in plants. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 729–735 (2015)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60

    Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 213–221 (2010)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61

    Murshudov, G. N. et al. REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr. D 67, 355–367 (2011)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62

    Winn, M. D. et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr. D 67, 235–242 (2011)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. 63

    Green, B. R. & Durnford, D. G. The chlorophyll-carotenoid proteins of oxygenic photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 47, 685–714 (1996)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. 64

    Das, S. K. & Frank, H. A. Pigment compositions, spectral properties, and energy transfer efficiencies between the xanthophylls and chlorophylls in the major and minor pigment−protein complexes of photosystem II. Biochemistry 41, 13087–13095 (2002)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. 65

    Pascal, A. et al. Spectroscopic characterization of the spinach Lhcb4 protein (CP29), a minor light-harvesting complex of photosystem II. Eur. J. Biochem. 262, 817–823 (1999)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. 66

    van Amerongen, H. et al. Spectroscopic characterization of CP26, a chlorophyll ab binding protein of the higher plant Photosystem II complex. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1188, 227–234 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank J. P. Zhang and X. L. Zhao for their assistance in preparing thylakoid samples. Cryo-EM data collection was carried out at the Center for Biological Imaging, Core Facilities for Protein Science at the Institute of Biophysics (IBP), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), and at the National Center for Protein Science Shanghai (NCPSS), Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences/Shanghai Science Research Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China. We thank X. J. Huang, G. Ji, W. Ding, F. Sun, and other staff members at the Center for Biological Imaging (IBP, CAS); L. L. Kong, X. Y. Shi, Y. N. He, J. P. Ding, and M. Lei for their support during data collection; X. B. Liang and X. M. An for support in organizing data collection trips; F. L. Zhang, J. Zhou, and Y. Li for support in measuring the oxygen evolution activity; L. L. Niu and X. Ding for mass spectrometry; J. H. Li for assistance in fluorescence measurement; R. Bassi, A. Pinnola and R. Croce for sharing experiences in purifying plant PSII–LHCII supercomplexes; and Y. Xiang for advice on cryo-EM sample preparation and structure refinement. The project was funded by National 973 project grant 2011CBA00900, the Strategic Priority Research Program of CAS (XDB08020302) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (31570724, 31270793 and 31170703). Z.L. and X.Z. received scholarships from the ‘National Thousand (Young) Talents Program’ from the Office of Global Experts Recruitment in China.

Author information




X.W., X.S., P.C. and X.L. purified the spinach PSII–LHCII supercomplex; M.L. and P.C. characterized the spectroscopic features, protein and pigment contents, and oxygen-evolving activity of the samples; X.W., X.S. and X.Z. collected and processed cryo-EM data; X.Z. reconstructed the 3.2 Å resolution map and supervised cryo-EM structure determination; X.W. and Z.L. built and refined the structure model; X.W., M.L., X.Z. and Z.L. analysed the structure; Z.L. and W.C. conceived and coordinated the project; and the manuscript was written by X.W., M.L., X.Z. and Z.L.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mei Li or Xinzheng Zhang or Zhenfeng Liu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Reviewer Information Nature thanks Roberta Croce, Jian-Ren Shen and Thomas Walz for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Purification and characterization of the spinach PSII–LHCII supercomplex.

a, Sucrose gradient of solubilized grana membranes. The membrane preparations were first washed with 1 mM (left) or 5 mM (right) EDTA before being solubilized by α-DDM for further purification through sucrose-gradient ultracentrifugation. The content of each band is indicated based on the absorption spectrum and SDS–PAGE results, and by comparing to previously published data. The B9 fraction obtained from the grana membrane washed with 1 mM EDTA was used for cryo-EM. Note that the grana membranes washed with 1 mM EDTA yielded less B5, B6 and B7 than the sample treated with 5 mM EDTA. b, SDS–PAGE analysis of the sucrose gradient fractions. The protein composition of each Coomassie band was indicated based on the mass spectrometry and proteomics data analysis. For gel source data, see Supplementary Fig. 1. c, Room-temperature absorption spectrum of B9 sample used for cryo-EM. Its spectrum (B9 1 mM) is compared to those of B7 (dimeric PSII core without LHCII attached; B7 5 mM) and B9 samples (B9 5 mM) fractionated from grana washed with 5 mM EDTA. Note that B9 from grana membranes washed with 1 mM EDTA showed higher peaks at 470 and 650 nm, indicating that this fraction contains higher Chl b content (from LHCIIs) than the other two. The spectra are normalized to the maximum in the red region. d, Fluorescence emission spectra of B9 sample measured at room temperature. The maximum emissions were at 681 nm (upon excitation of Chl a at 436 nm), 680 nm (upon excitation of Chl b at 473 nm) and 681 nm (upon excitation of carotenoids at 500 nm). Overlapping of these three spectra suggests that nearly all pigments in the B9 sample are well coupled and no free pigments are present. e, Pigment content analysis of B9 sample by HPLC. Based on the characteristic absorption spectrum of each peak fraction, the six major pigment peaks separated from the B9 sample are identified as neoxanthin (Neo), violaxanthin (Vio), lutein (Lut), Chl b, Chl a and β-carotene (β-car).

Extended Data Figure 2 Evaluation of the resolution of the cryo-EM structure of the spinach PSII–LHCII supercomplex.

a, Fourier shell correlation (FSC) plots. Blue, gold-standard FSC curve with a value of 0.143 at 3.2 Å resolution; red, FSC curve calculated between the cryo-EM map and the refined structure model of the PSII–LHCII supercomplex. The map-model FSC has a value of 0.5 at 3.3 Å resolution. b, Local resolutions of the cryo-EM map of the spinach PSII–LHCII supercomplex estimated by Resmap. Top, side view along the membrane plane with the luminal domain facing upwards. Bottom, bottom view from the luminal side and approximately along the membrane normal (or C2 axis). c, The statistics of the structural model of the spinach PSII–LHCII supercomplex refined against the 3.2 Å resolution cryo-EM map.

Extended Data Figure 3 Structures of the large and small intrinsic subunits of spinach PSII.

a, The four large intrinsic subunits of the spinach PSII core superposed on the corresponding subunits of the TvPSII core. The protein backbones and cofactors are shown as ribbon and stick models, respectively. Silver, spinach PSII core subunits; green, TvPSII core subunits. b, The locations of 12 low-molecular-mass intrinsic subunits in the spinach PSII–LHCII supercomplex. These subunits are coloured and the rest of the supercomplex is grey. c, The densities for the low-molecular-mass intrinsic subunits are shown as blue meshes. The corresponding models are shown as cyan sticks.

Extended Data Figure 4 Cryo-EM densities and structures of the extrinsic subunits.

a, Cryo-EM densities of PsbO, PsbP, PsbQ and PsbTn. b, The binding sites of spinach PsbP, PsbQ and PsbO compared to those of the extrinsic subunits in CcPSII and TvPSII. The spinach PSII core is shown at an angle identical to that of the CcPSII/TvPSII core. PDB codes: 4YUU (CcPSII); 3WU2 (TvPSII). c, Superposition of PsbP bound in the supercomplex with the isolated PsbP. Colour code: yellow, PsbP in the supercomplex; blue, isolated PsbP (PDB code: 4RTI). Loop 3A and Loop 4A indicate the loop regions between Lys90 and Ala111 and between Arg134 and Gly142, respectively. Note the conformational change in Loop 3A (arrow) when PsbP binds to the PSII core. d, Structure of PsbQ bound in the supercomplex superposed with the isolated PsbQ. Green, PsbQ in the supercomplex; red, isolated PsbQ (PDB code: 1VYK). Note the conformational change in the elongated N-terminal region from a folded state to an extended form (arrow) when PsbQ binds to the PSII core.

Extended Data Figure 5 Cryo-EM density and structure of LHCII.

a, Cryo-EM densities of the LHCII trimer in the supercomplex. Stereo pairs are shown and the view is along the membrane plane. b, Superposition of the cryo-EM structure of an LHCII monomer with the previous crystal structure (PDB code: 1RWT). The protein backbone is shown as ribbon diagrams and the cofactors are displayed as stick models. Green, cryo-EM structure; yellow, crystal structure.

Extended Data Figure 6 Cryo-EM density and structure of CP29.

a, Stereo image of the cryo-EM density of CP29 bound in the PSII–LHCII supercomplex. b, Superposition of cryo-EM structure of full-length CP29 with the previous crystal structure. Note: Chls a601 and a616 are newly observed in the cryo-EM structure of CP29. Chl a601 might account for the electron density of Chl a615 observed in the crystal structure of spinach CP29 (ref. 14). Compared to Chl a601, a615 is much closer to a611 owing to the loss of the N-terminal domain caused by proteolysis. Chl b614 is a peripheral chlorophyll found in the crystal structure, but is probably lost during purification and therefore not observed in the cryo-EM structure. Orange, cryo-EM structure; cyan, crystal structure. c, Superposition of CP29 (orange) with the structure of an LHCII monomer (green). For the cofactors, only Chl a601 is shown; the others are omitted for clarity. d, Cryo-EM density of Chl a601 in CP29. e, Cryo-EM density of Chl a616 at the interface between CP29 and CP47. f, Superposition of Lhca3 and Lhca4 structures with that of CP29 in the PSII–LHCII supercomplex. Chl a616 (CP29) and a617 (Lhca3/4) molecules are shown as stick models; the other cofactors are omitted for clarity. Orange, CP29; magenta, Lhca3; blue, Lhca4. PDB codes: 4XK8, Lhca3 and Lhca4 from the PSI–LHCI supercomplex; 1RWT, LHCII.

Extended Data Figure 7 Cryo-EM density and structure of CP26 bound in the PSII–LHCII supercomplex.

a, Stereo images of the density and overall structure of CP26. The density is shown as grey meshes and the model is in purple. The protein backbone is shown as a ribbon model; the cofactors are presented as stick models. b, The densities for Chl b601, Chl a604, Chl b607 and Chl b608 in CP26. These four chlorophylls were not predicted in the previous work, but are clearly present in the structure. c, The density for three carotenoids in CP26. Note that the density for the epoxidized head group of neoxanthin is clearly visible, while the rest of it is fairly weak (presumably owing to low occupancy or high flexibility).

Extended Data Figure 8 Cryo-EM densities of various cofactors bound in the spinach PSII–LHCII supercomplex.

a, The densities of chlorophylls, carotenoids, Mn4CaO5 and plastoquinone molecules. b, The potential lipid densities at the interfacial regions between adjacent antenna complexes. The interfaces between LHCII and PsbW, CP26 and CP43, and LHCII and CP29 are shown from left to right. Red arrows indicate the positions of potential lipid densities. The cryo-EM densities are displayed as grey meshes and the atomic models for interpretation of the densities are shown as sticks and bullets.

Extended Data Table 1 Cofactors located within each monomer of the spinach PSII–LHCII supercomplex
Extended Data Table 2 Pigment binding sites of spinach LHCII, CP29 and CP26 in the PSII–LHCII supercomplex

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1

This file contains the source data for Extended Data Figure 1b. The boxed area is cropped and displayed in the Extended Data Figure 1b. (PDF 140 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, X., Su, X., Cao, P. et al. Structure of spinach photosystem II–LHCII supercomplex at 3.2 Å resolution. Nature 534, 69–74 (2016).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing