Acorn worms, also known as enteropneust (literally, ‘gut-breathing’) hemichordates, are marine invertebrates that share features with echinoderms and chordates. Together, these three phyla comprise the deuterostomes. Here we report the draft genome sequences of two acorn worms, Saccoglossus kowalevskii and Ptychodera flava. By comparing them with diverse bilaterian genomes, we identify shared traits that were probably inherited from the last common deuterostome ancestor, and then explore evolutionary trajectories leading from this ancestor to hemichordates, echinoderms and chordates. The hemichordate genomes exhibit extensive conserved synteny with amphioxus and other bilaterians, and deeply conserved non-coding sequences that are candidates for conserved gene-regulatory elements. Notably, hemichordates possess a deuterostome-specific genomic cluster of four ordered transcription factor genes, the expression of which is associated with the development of pharyngeal ‘gill’ slits, the foremost morphological innovation of early deuterostomes, and is probably central to their filter-feeding lifestyle. Comparative analysis reveals numerous deuterostome-specific gene novelties, including genes found in deuterostomes and marine microbes, but not other animals. The putative functions of these genes can be linked to physiological, metabolic and developmental specializations of the filter-feeding ancestor.


The prominent pharyngeal gill slits, rigid stomochord, and midline nerve cords of acorn worms led 19th century zoologists to designate them as ‘hemichordates’ and group them with vertebrates and other chordates1,2,3,4, but their early embryos and larvae also linked them to echinoderms5,6. Current molecular phylogenies strongly support the affinities of hemichordates and echinoderms as sister phyla, together called ambulacrarians7, and unite ambulacrarians and chordates within the deuterostomes (see glossary in Supplementary Note 1). Of all the shared derived morphological characters proposed between hemichordates and chordates, the pharyngeal gill slits have emerged with unambiguous morphological and molecular support, notably the shared expression of the pax1/9 gene8,9,10. These structures were ancestral deuterostome characters elaborated upon the bilaterian ancestral body plan, but the gill slits were subsequently lost in extant echinoderms and amniotes11. Since extant invertebrate deuterostomes use this apparatus for efficient suspension and/or deposit feeding, the early Cambrian or Precambrian deuterostome ancestor probably also shared this lifestyle. This perspective on the last common deuterostome ancestor informs our understanding of the subsequent evolution of hemichordates, echinoderms and chordates10,12,13,14,15,16.

Hemichordates share bilateral symmetry, gill slits, soft bodies and early axial patterning with chordates, making them key comparators for inferring the ancestral genomic features of deuterostomes. To this end, we sequenced and analysed the genomes of acorn worms belonging to the two main lineages of enteropneust hemichordates (Supplementary Note 1): Saccoglossus kowalevskii (Harrimaniidae; Atlantic, North America, Fig. 1a) and Ptychodera flava (Ptychoderidae; Pacific, pan-tropical, Fig. 1b). Both have characteristic three-part bodies comprising proboscis, collar and trunk, the last with tens to hundreds of pairs of gill slits. While S. kowalevskii develops directly to a juvenile worm with these traits within days (Fig. 1c, e), P. flava develops indirectly through a feeding larva that metamorphoses to a juvenile worm after months in the plankton (Fig. 1d, e). Our analyses begin to integrate macroscopic information about morphology, organismal physiology, and descriptive embryology of these deuterostomes with genomic information about gene homologies, gene arrangements, gene novelties and non-coding elements.

Figure 1: Hemichordate model systems and their embryonic development.
Figure 1

The hemichordate phylum includes the enteropneusts (acorn worms) and pterobranchs (minute, colonial, tube-dwelling; not shown). a, c, Saccoglossus kowalevskii (Harrimaniid (direct developing) enteropneust) adult (a) and juvenile (c) with gill slits. b, d, Ptychodera flava (Ptychoderid (indirect developing) enteropneust) adult (b) and the tornaria stage larva (d). Gill slits labelled with an asterisk in a and b. e, Comparison of the direct and indirect modes of development of the two hemichordates, indicating the long pelagic larval period in Ptychodera until the settlement and metamorphosis as a juvenile.


We sequenced the two acorn worm genomes by random shotgun methods with a variety of read types (Methods; Supplementary Note 2), each starting from sperm from a single outbred diploid individual. The haploid lengths of the two genomes are both about 1 Gbp (Extended Data Fig. 1), but differ in nucleotide heterozygosity. Both acorn worm genomes were annotated using extensive transcriptome data as well as standard homology-based and de novo methods (Supplementary Note 3). Counting gene models with at least one detectable orthologue in another sequenced metazoan species, we find that Ptychodera and Saccoglossus encode at least 18,556 and 19,270 genes, respectively (Methods). Additional de novo gene predictions include divergent and/or novel genes (Extended Data Fig. 1). Despite the ancient divergence of the Saccoglossus and Ptychodera lineages (more than 370 million years ago, see below) and their different modes of development, the two acorn worm genomes have similar bulk gene content, as discussed later (Extended Data Fig. 2 and Supplementary Note 4), and similar repetitive landscapes (Supplementary Note 5).

Deuterostome phylogeny

Deuterostome relationships were originally inferred from developmental and morphological characters2,5,17 and these hypotheses were later tested and refined with molecular data6,7. Aspects of deuterostome phylogeny continue to be controversial, however, notably the position of the sessile pterobranchs among hemichordates, and the surprising association of Xenoturbella18 and acoelomorph flatworms with ambulacrarians19 proposed by some studies. We explored these issues using genome-wide analyses of the newly sequenced hemichordate genomes augmented with extensive new RNAseq from five echinoderms, three additional hemichordates (including a rhabdopleurid pterobranch) and two acoels (Fig. 2, Extended Data Fig. 3, Methods and Supplementary Note 6). We recovered the monophyly of hemichordates, echinoderms, ambulacrarians and deuterostomes, using not only amino acid characters but also presence–absence characters for introns and coding indels (Supplementary Note 4). Our analyses also placed pterobranch hemichordates as the sister-group to enteropneusts7 rather than within them12. These phylogenetic analyses imply that genomic traits shared by chordates and ambulacrarians can be attributed to the last common deuterostome ancestor (see below). Using a relaxed molecular clock, we estimate a Cambrian origin of hemichordates (Methods, Extended Data Fig. 3 and Supplementary Note 6).

Figure 2: Phylogenetic placement of deuterostome taxa within the metazoan tree.
Figure 2

Maximum-likelihood tree obtained with a super-matrix of 506,428 amino-acid residues gathered from 1,564 orthologous genes in 52 species (65.1% occupancy) and using a LG+Γ model partitioned for each gene. Filled circles at nodes denote maximal bootstrap support. Taxa highlighted in bold are newly sequenced genomes and transcriptomes introduced in this study. Bar indicates the number of substitutions per site.

We also performed several analyses to assess the controversial relationships between Xenoturbella, acoelomorphs and deuterostomes (Supplementary Note 6). With conventional site-homogeneous models, acoels remain outside deuterostomes20,21,22,23 (Fig. 2, Supplementary Figs 6.1 and 6.2). Alternative models24, however, show equivocal branching of acoels depending on the inclusion of the current sparse data for Xenoturbella (Supplementary Note 6). Notably, without Xenoturbella, acoels are positioned as a bilaterian sister group (Supplementary Fig. 6.3)20,21,22,23. Although we cannot rule out a deuterostome placement for Xenoturbella, our analyses generally do not support a grouping of acoels with deuterostomes19.

The gene set of the deuterostome ancestor

By comparative analysis, we identified 8,716 families of homologous genes whose distributions in sequenced extant genomes imply their presence in the deuterostome ancestor (Methods; Supplementary Note 4). Owing to gene duplication and other processes the descendants of these ancestral genes account for ~14,000 genes in extant deuterostome genomes including human (Supplementary Table 4.1.2). The distributions of gene functions, domain compositions, and gene family sizes of hemichordates resemble those of amphioxus, sea urchin, and sequenced lophotrochozoans more than those of ecdysozoans; vertebrates also form a distinct group (Extended Data Fig. 2, Supplementary Note 4 and Supplementary Fig. 4.2).

Exon–intron structures of genes are generally well conserved among hemichordates, chordates, and many non-deuterostome metazoans, allowing us to infer 2,061 ancestral deuterostome splice sites (Supplementary Note 4). Among orthologous bilaterian genes we found 23 introns and 4 coding sequence indels present only in deuterostomes (shared between at least one ambulacrarian and chordate), suggesting that these shared derived characters may be useful to diagnose clade membership of new candidate organisms (Supplementary Note 4).

Based on whole-genome alignments, we identified 6,533 conserved non-coding elements (CNE) longer than 50 bp that are found in all of the five deuterostomes Saccoglossus, Ptychodera, amphioxus, sea urchin, and human (Methods; Supplementary Note 8). The identified CNEs overlap extensively with human long non-coding RNAs (3,611 CNE loci; 55%, Fisher’s exact test P value < 2.2 × 10−16). Those alignments usually do not exceed 250 bp (as has been reported among vertebrates25) and occur in clusters (Supplementary Note 8). Among these conserved sequences is a previously identified vertebrate brain and neural tube specific enhancer, located close to the sox14/21 orthologue in all five species26.

Conserved gene linkage

Ancient gene linkages (‘macro-synteny’27) are often preserved in extant bilaterian genomes27,28. Comparative analysis revealed 17 ancestral linkage groups across chordates, including amphioxus and Ciona27. While the contiguity of the draft of the sea urchin genome assembly29 is too limited to determine whether it shares this chromosome-scale organization, we find that the Saccoglossus genome clearly shares these chordate-defined linkage groups (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Note 7), implying that these chromosome-scale linkages were also present in the ancestral deuterostome.

Figure 3: High level of linkage conservation in Saccoglossus.
Figure 3

a, Macro-synteny dot plot between Saccoglossus and amphioxus; each dot represents two orthologous genes linked in the two species, and ordered according to their macro-syntenic linkage. Amphioxus scaffolds are organized according to the 17 ancestral linkage groups (ALGs) inferred by comparison of the amphioxus and vertebrate genomes27. Intersection areas of highest dot density are marked by numbers along the top of the plot, identifying each of the 17 putative ALGs. Axes represent orthologous gene group index along the genome. b, Branch-length estimation for loss and gain of synteny blocks with MrBayes, see Supplementary Note 7 for details. Short branches in hemichordates (in bold) indicate a high level of micro-syntenic retention in their genomes.

On a more local scale, we find hundreds of tightly linked conserved gene clusters of three or more genes (‘micro-synteny’; Methods; Supplementary Note 7) including Hox30 and ParaHox31 clusters in both acorn worms (Extended Data Fig. 4), as also found in echinoderms32,33. Saccoglossus and amphioxus share more micro-syntenic linkages with each other than either does with sea urchin, vertebrates, or available protostome genomes (Methods, Fig. 3b and Extended Data Figs 5 and 6). Conservation of micro-syntenic linkages can occur due to low rates of genomic rearrangement or, more interestingly, as a result of selection to retain linkages between genes and their regulatory elements located in neighbouring genes28.

A deuterostome pharyngeal gene cluster

One conserved deuterostome-specific micro-syntenic cluster with functional implications for deuterostome biology is a cluster of genes expressed in the pharyngeal slits and surrounding pharyngeal endoderm (Fig. 4; Supplementary Note 9). This six-gene cluster contains four transcription factor genes in the order nkx2.1, nkx2.2, pax1/9 and foxA, along with two non-transcription-factor genes slc25A21 and mipol1, whose introns harbour regulatory elements for pax1/9 and foxA, respectively34,35,36. The cluster was first found conserved across vertebrates including humans (see chromosome 14; 1.1 Mb length from nkx2.1 to foxA1)34,37. In S. kowalevskii, it is intact with the same gene order as in vertebrates (0.5 Mb length from nkx2.1 to foxA), implying that it was present in the deuterostome and ambulacrarian ancestors. The full ordered gene cluster also exists on a single scaffold in the crown-of-thorns sea star Acanthaster planci. Since these genes are not clustered in available protostome genomes, there is no evidence for deeper bilaterian ancestry. Two non-coding elements that are conserved across vertebrates and amphioxus38 are found in the hemichordate and A. planci clusters at similar locations (A2 and A4, in Fig. 4a).

Figure 4: Conservation of a pharyngeal gene cluster across deuterostomes.
Figure 4

a, Linkage and order of six genes including the four genes encoding transcription factors Nkx2.1, Nkx2.2, Pax1/9 and FoxA, and two genes encoding non-transcription factors Slc25A21 (solute transporter) and Mipol1 (mirror-image polydactyly 1 protein), which are putative ‘bystander’ genes containing regulatory elements of pax1/9 and foxA, respectively. The pairings of slc25A21 with pax1/9 and of mipol1 with foxA occur also in protostomes, indicating bilaterian ancestry. The cluster is not present in protostomes such as Lottia (Lophotrochozoa), Drosophila melanogaster, Caenorhabditis elegans (Ecdysozoa), or in the cnidarian, Nematostella. SLC25A6 (the slc25A21 paralogue on human chromosome 20) is a potential pseudogene. The dots marking A2 and A4 indicate two conserved non-coding sequences first recognized in vertebrates and amphioxus36, also present in S. kowalevskii and, partially, in P. flava and A. planci. b, The four transcription factor genes of the cluster are expressed in the pharyngeal/foregut endoderm of the Saccoglossus juvenile: nkx2.1 is expressed in a band of endoderm at the level of the forming gill pore, especially ventral and posterior to it (arrow), and in a separate ectodermal domain in the proboscis. It is also known as thyroid transcription factor 1 due to its expression in the pharyngeal thyroid rudiment in vertebrates. The nkx2.2 gene is expressed in pharyngeal endoderm just ventral to the forming gill pore, shown in side view (arrow indicates gill pore) and ventral view; and pax1/9 is expressed in the gill pore rudiment itself. In S. kowalevskii, this is its only expression domain, whereas in vertebrates it is also expressed in axial mesoderm. The foxA gene is expressed widely in endoderm but is repressed at the site of gill pore formation (arrow). An external view of gill pores is shown; up to 100 bilateral pairs are present in adults, indicative of the large size of the pharynx.

The pax1/9 gene, at the centre of the cluster, is expressed in the pharyngeal endodermal primordium of the gill slit in hemichordates, tunicates, amphioxus, fish, and amphibians8,9, and in the branchial pouch endoderm of amniotes (which do not complete the last steps of gill slit formation), as well as other locations in vertebrates. The nkx2.1 (thyroid transcription factor 1) gene is also expressed in the hemichordate pharyngeal endoderm in a band passing through the gill slit, but not localized to a thyroid-like organ39. Here we also examined the expression of nkx2.2 and foxA in S. kowalevskii. We find that nkx2.2, which is expressed in the ventral hindbrain in vertebrates, is expressed in pharyngeal ventral endoderm in S. kowalevskii, close to the gill slit (Fig. 4b), and that foxA is expressed throughout endoderm but repressed in the gill slit region (Fig. 4b). The co-expression of this ordered cluster of the four transcription factors during pharyngeal development strongly supports the functional importance of their genomic clustering.

The presence of this cluster in the crown-of-thorns sea star, an echinoderm that lacks gill pores, and in amniote vertebrates that lack gill slits, suggests that the cluster’s ancestral role was in pharyngeal apparatus patterning as a whole, of which overt slits (perforations of apposed endoderm and ectoderm) were but one part, and the cluster is retained in these cases because of its continuing contribution to pharynx development. Genomic regions of the pharyngeal cluster have been implicated in long-range promoter–enhancer interactions, supporting the regulatory importance of this gene linkage (see Supplementary Note 9)40. Alternatively, genome rearrangement in these lineages may be too slow to disrupt the cluster even without functional constraint. Here we propose that the clustering of the four ordered transcription factors, and their bystander genes, on the deuterostome stem served a regulatory role in the evolution of the pharyngeal apparatus, the foremost morphological innovation of deuterostomes.

Deuterostome novelties

We found >30 deuterostome genes with sequences that differ markedly from those of other metazoans, related to functional innovation in deuterostomes. Some plausibly arose from accelerated sequence change on the deuterostome stem from distant but identifiable bilaterian homologues, others represent new protein domain combinations in deuterostomes, while others lack identifiable sequence and domain homologues in other animals. In the latter group, we found over a dozen deuterostome genes that have readily identified relatives in marine microbes, often cyanobacteria or eukaryotic micro-algae, but are not known in other metazoans (Extended Data Table 1 and Extended Data Fig. 7; Supplementary Notes 10.4 and 10.5). Such genes include two of the novel deuterostome sequences associated with sialic acid metabolism (found in many microbes41, see below), enzymes that modify proteins (for example, protein arginine deiminase) and RNA (for example, FATSO methyladenosine demethylase) as well as others that provide specialized reactions of secondary metabolism (Extended Data Table 1 and Extended Data Fig. 7; Supplementary Note 10.5). Possible explanations for the unusual phylogenetic distribution of these genes include horizontal transfer on the deuterostome stem from early marine microbes (which were plausibly commensals, pathogens, or food sources of stem deuterostomes), or convergent gene loss and/or extensive sequence divergence along five or more opisthokont lineages (Supplementary Note 10.2).

Regardless of their mechanism of origination, the various deuterostome novelties and gene family expansions of sialic acid metabolism are noteworthy. Deuterostomes are unique among metazoans in their high level and diverse linkage of addition of sialic acid (also known as neuraminic acid), a nine carbon negatively charged sugar, to the terminal sugars of glycoproteins, mucins and glycolipids42. We find expanded families of enzymes for several of these reactions in hemichordates (Fig. 5a and Extended Data Table 1). Based on the presence/absence of relevant enzymes we infer that 5 of the 11 steps of the pathways of sialic acid formation, addition to termini, and removal are not found in protostomes or other metazoans, and are deuterostome novelties (Fig. 5a and Supplementary Note 10), whereas the other steps use enzymes similar to those of the more limited pathway of some protostomes (for example, insects such as Drosophila)43.

Figure 5: Examples of deuterostome gene novelties.
Figure 5

a, Steps of biosynthesis of sialic acid and its addition to and removal from glycoproteins. bd, Novel genes in TGFβ signalling pathways. The encoded proteins are shown and include Lefty (b), an antagonist of Nodal signalling, which activates Smad2/3-dependent transcription when not antagonized; Univin (c), an agonist of Nodal signalling, also called Vg1, DVR1, and GDF1; and TGFβ2 (d), a ligand that activates Smad2/3-dependent transcription by binding to a deuterostome-specific TGFβ receptor type II, which contains a novel ectodomain (not shown). Also shown in d is the novel protein thrombospondin 1 that activates TGFβ2 by releasing it from an inactive complex, by way of its TSP1 domains. Red boxes around protein names indicate their deuterostome novelty. Green boxes around the names indicate genes with pan-metazoan/bilaterian ancestry and without accelerated sequence change in the deuterostome lineage.

The importance of glycoproteins for muco-ciliary feeding and other hemichordate activities is further supported by novel and expanded families of genes encoding the polypeptide backbones of glycoproteins, those with von Willebrand type-D and/or cysteine-rich domains (PTHR11339 classifier), including mucins, present in hemichordates and amphioxus as large tandemly duplicated clusters (with varied expression patterns as shown in Extended Data Fig. 8), but not in sea urchin, which has a different mode of feeding (Supplementary Note 10). As in amphioxus, the pharynx of Saccoglossus is heavily ciliated44,45, and cells of the pharyngeal walls in hemichordates and the ventral endostyle in amphioxus secrete abundant mucins and glycoproteins46. Similarly, in the deuterostome ancestor these glycoproteins probably enhanced the muco-ciliary filter-feeding capture of food particles from the microbe-rich marine environment and protected its inner and outer tissue surfaces.

Novelty in the TGFβ signalling pathway

The signalling ligands Lefty (a Nodal antagonist) and Univin/Vg1/GDF147 (a Nodal agonist) are deuterostome innovations that modulate Nodal signalling during the major developmental events of endomesoderm induction and axial patterning in vertebrates, axial patterning in hemichordates and echinoderms, and left–right patterning in all deuterostomes48 (see Fig. 5b–d and Extended Data Fig. 9a, b). Univin is tightly linked to the related bilaterian bmp2/4 in the sea urchin genome49 and also, we now report, in hemichordates and amphioxus, supporting its origin by tandem duplication and divergence from an ancestral bmp2/4-type gene, as suggested previously49.

TGFβ2 signalling (TGFβ1, 2 and 3 in vertebrates) is a deuterostome innovation that controls cell growth, proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis at later developmental stages. Accompanying the novel TGFβ2 ligand, the type II receptor has a novel ectodomain. The extracellular matrix protein thrombospondin 1, which activates TGFβ2 in vertebrates, contains a deuterostome-unique combination of domains including three thrombospondin type 1 (TSP1) domains that bind the TGFβ2 pro-domain region. While these signalling novelties have clear sequence similarity to pan-bilaterian components, they form long stem branch clades on the phylogenetic trees, indicating extensive sequence divergence on the deuterostome stem (Supplementary Note 10). Together, these innovations appear to contribute to the increased amount and complex patterning of Smad2/3-mediated signalling in deuterostomes compared with protostomes and other metazoans.


The two acorn worms whose genomes are described here represent the two main enteropneust lineages, separated by at least 370 million years and differing in their developmental modes. These analyses reveal (1) extensive conserved macro-synteny among deuterostomes; (2) a widely conserved deuterostome-specific cluster of six ordered genes, including four transcription factor genes that are expressed during the development of pharyngeal gill slits and the branchial apparatus, the most prominent morphological innovation of the deuterostome ancestor; and (3) numerous gene novelties shared among deuterostomes, many expanded into large families, with putative protein functions that imply physiological, metabolic and developmental specializations of the filter-feeding deuterostome ancestor. Some of these genes lack identifiable orthologues in other metazoans but do resemble microbial sequences and domain types. In addition to their contributions towards defining the deuterostome ancestor and illuminating chordate origins, the two genomes should inform hypotheses of larval evolution by providing a basis for future comparisons of direct-developing and indirect-developing acorn worms, which achieve remarkably similar adult forms by distinct embryological routes (Fig. 1).


No statistical methods were used to predetermine sample size. The experiments were not randomized and the investigators were not blinded to allocation during experiments and outcome assessment.


Sperm DNA from adult males was extracted for sequencing as described in Supplementary Note 2. A single male was used for each species to minimize the impact of heterozygosity on assembly. For Saccoglossus, approximately eightfold redundant random shotgun coverage (totalling 8.1 Gb) was obtained with Sanger dideoxy sequencing at the Baylor College of Medicine Genome Center, including 34,279 BAC ends and 459,052 fosmid ends. For Ptychodera, 1.3 Gb in Sanger shotgun sequences, 15.3 Gb in Roche 454 pyrosequence reads, and 52-Gb paired-end sequences with Illumina MiSeq, along with mate-pairs, were generated at the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University. More sequencing details are available in Supplementary Note 2.

Genome assemblies

We assembled the Saccoglossus genome with Arachne50, combined with BAC/fosmid pair information to produce the final assembly. This Saccoglossus assembly includes 7,282 total scaffold sequences spanning a total length of 758 Mb. The relatively modest nucleotide heterozygosity (0.5%) of S. kowalevskii, coupled with longer read lengths, enabled assembly of a single composite reference sequence. Half of the assembly is in scaffolds longer than 552 kb (the N50 scaffold length), and 82% of the assembled sequence is found in 1,602 scaffolds longer than 100 kb. For Ptychodera we used the Platanus51 assembler. The resulting total scaffold length was 1,229 Mb, with half the assembly in scaffolds longer than 196 kb (N50 scaffold length). P. flava exhibited a notably higher heterozygosity (1.3% single nucleotide heterozygosity with frequent indels) than S. kowalevskii, presumably related to its pelagic dispersal and larger effective population size52. We therefore initially produced stringent separate assemblies of the two divergent haplotypes, and found that many scaffolds had a closely related second scaffold with ~94% BLASTN identity (over longer stretches, including indels). To avoid reporting both haplotypes at these loci, scaffolds with less than 6% divergence over at least 75% of their length were merged into a single haploid reference for comparative analysis. To further classify regions with ‘double’ depth and single haplotype regions we implemented a Hidden Markov Model classifier. We find that at least 63% of the initial Platanus assembly constitutes merged haplotypes. The inferred SNP rate for those regions is 1.3%, while for the remaining haplotype regions it is below 0.1%. Further details of assemblies are described in Supplementary Note 2.

Gene predictions

Transcriptome data for both species were used, along with homology-guided and ab initio methods, to predict protein-coding genes (Supplementary Note 3). For Saccoglossus, 8.6 million RNAseq reads were generated from 7 adult tissues and 15 developmental stages using Roche 454 sequencing, along with previously deposited ESTs in GenBank. For Ptychodera, extensive EST data from egg, blastulae, gastrulae, larvae, juveniles, adult proboscis, stomochord, and gills defining 34,159 cDNA clones53, and 879,000 Roche/454 RNAseq reads from a mixed library of developmental stages54 were used. The Saccoglossus genome was annotated using JGI gene prediction pipeline55, while Augustus56 was used to produce gene models for Ptychodera. We find a total of 34,239 gene predictions for Saccoglossus (68% with transcript evidence) and 34,687 for Ptychodera (43% with transcript evidence), although these are overestimates of the true gene number due to fragmented gene predictions, mis-annotated repetitive sequences, and spurious predictions. As described in the main text, 18–19,000 gene models in each species have known annotations and/or orthologues in other species.

Gene family analysis

Gene family clustering was done using a progressive (leaf to root) BLASTP-based clustering algorithm, where at a given phylogenetic node the gene families are constructed taking into account protein similarities among ingroups and outgroups57. For the inference of deuterostome gene families we use the bilaterian node of the clustering. To call gene families present in the deuterostome ancestor, we required (1) at least two ambulacrarian orthologues out of the three available ambulacrarian genomes and at least two chordate orthologues, or (2) at least two deuterostomes (chordates and/or ambulacrarians) and two outgroups in the bilaterian level clusters.

Transposable elements

Repetitive sequences were identified using RepeatScout58, followed by manual curation and annotation using both a Repbase release (version 20140131)59 and BLASTX-based search against a custom collection of transposons, using a previously described repeat identification and annotation pipeline57 (Supplementary Note 5). The assemblies were then masked with RepeatMasker version open-4.0.560. The repetitive complements of the two hemichordate genomes are summarized in Supplementary Table 5.1.

Phylogenetic analysis

Phylogenetic analyses were done using metazoan-level gene family clusters based on whole-genome sequences (Supplementary Note 4), selecting a single orthologue per genome with the best cumulative BLASTP to other species, and best reciprocal BLASTP hits to species with transcriptome-only information (Supplementary Note 6). Single gene alignments were built using Muscle61 and filtered using Trimal62 for each orthologue, and were concatenated, yielding a supermatrix of 506,428 positions with 34.9% missing data. This supermatrix was analysed with ExaML assuming a site-homogenous LG+Γ4 model partitioned for each gene63. A slow-fast analysis was conducted to stratify marker genes based on the length of the branch leading to acoels in individual trees. A subset of the slowest 10% of genes was analysed with the site-heterogenous CAT+GTR+Γ4 model using Phylobayes24. Molecular dating was carried out using Phylobayes24 using the log-normal relaxed clock model and the calibrations described in Supplementary Table 6.2.

Synteny analysis

Macro- and micro-syntenic linkages were calculated as described in Supplementary Note 7. For Fig. 3a, we merged the amphioxus scaffolds into 17 pre-defined scaffold groups as suggested in ref. 27. These 17 merged scaffold groups represent the 17 ancestral linkage groups (ALGs) shared in chordates. Then we calculated the orthologous gene groups shared by each amphioxus ALG–Saccoglossus scaffold pair and generated the dot plot as described in Supplementary Note 7. For micro-synteny we required at least three genes (separated by a maximum of ten genes) to be present in pairwise comparisons. Under random reshuffling of the genome, this yields 10% false positives in pairwise genome comparisons, that is, we observe approximately one-tenth as many micro-syntenic blocks between the two genomes when gene orders are shuffled. This false-positive rate, however, falls to 1% when considering more than two species. For our inference of deuterostome ancestral and novel synteny we therefore focus on blocks present in at least three species (and both ingroup representatives, that is, ambulacrarians and chordates). This yields 698 blocks that can be traced back to the deuterostome ancestor, including 71 blocks found exclusively in deuterostome species (shared among ambulacrarians and chordates), including the pharyngeal cluster discussed in Fig. 4.

Whole-genome alignment

Whole-genome alignments were conducted with MEGABLAST64 using parameters previously reported65. We assessed the distribution of the resulting 12,722 aligned loci across known gene annotations in ENSEMBL66, previously identified conserved pan-vertebrate elements65, as well as known enhancers in human according to LBL database67.

Gene novelties

Deuterostome gene novelties were assessed initially through bilaterian gene clusters (Supplementary Note 10) by requiring at least two species on both ambulacrarian and chordate side to be present. The novelties were further automatically subdivided into four categories: G1 (gain type I), with no BLASTP hit outside of deuterostomes; G2 (gain type II), with a novel PFAM domain present only in deuterostomes; G3 (gain type III) having a novel PFAM combination unique to deuterostomes; and G4 (gain type IV), those that do not fall under any of the G1–3 categories and define novelties due to acceleration in the substitution rate on the deuterostome stem. To confirm the novel nature, especially for G4 novelties, we have constructed phylogenies for the members and non-deuterostome BLASTP hits (up to an e-value of 1 × 10−20) using MAFFT-alignment-based FastTree calculations. The trees were assessed for the accelerated rate of evolution at the deuterostome stem (Supplementary Fig. 9.1.1). The final result is provided in the Supplementary Information.

Curation of candidates for horizontal gene transfer on the deuterostome stem

We examined in detail gene families found broadly in deuterostomes whose encoded peptides were readily alignable to microbial sequences but had no detectable similarity in non-deuterostome animals. Criteria for evaluation included: (1) the hemichordate gene matches microbial genes at least ten orders of magnitude in the e-value better than it matches sequences of non-deuterostome metazoans (most of the putative HGTs we describe have no non-deuterostome metazoan hit at all); (2) it has a defined genomic locus among bona fide metazoan genes; (3) it shares an exon–intron structure with genes of chordates and other ambulacraria; and (4) when a low bitscore match is found to a non-deuterostome metazoan sequence, that sequence is identified as containing different domains (domain structure according to CDD68) and/or different exon–intron structure, implying dubious relatedness. When phylogenetic trees are constructed for these HGT-candidate proteins, the trees contain numerous branches for microbial sequences and none for non-deuterostome metazoan sequences, or only very long branches for dubiously relatives, and hence the trees differ greatly from the metazoan species tree, except within the deuterostome clade.

Code availability

Original data and code can be accessed at https://groups.oist.jp/molgenu.


Primary accessions


Data deposits

Sequencing data have been deposited in NCBI BioProject under accession number PRJNA12887 (Saccoglossus kowalevskii) and DDBJ under accession number PRJDB3182 (Ptychodera flava).


  1. 1.

    The later stages in the development of Balanoglossus Kowalevskii, with a suggestion as to the affinities of the Enteropneusta. 2 parts. Q. J. Microsc. Sci. 25, 81–122 (1885)

  2. 2.

    Memoirs: the ancestry of the Chordata. Q. J. Microsc. Sci . 2, 535–572 (1886)

  3. 3.

    Anatomie des Balanoglossus delle Chiaje (Mémoires de l'Académie Impériale des Sciences de St. Pétersbourg: Imperatorskaja Akademija Nauk, 1866)

  4. 4.

    The history of Balanoglossus and tornaria. Memoirs of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 9, 421–436 (1873)

  5. 5.

    Über die systematische Stellung von Balanoglossus. Zool. Anz. 4, 139–157 (1881)

  6. 6.

    The phylogenetic position of the pterobranch hemichordates based on 18S rDNA sequence data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 4, 72–76 (1995)

  7. 7.

    et al. Phylogenomic resolution of the hemichordate and echinoderm clade. Curr. Biol. 24, 2827–2832 (2014)

  8. 8.

    , , & Developmental expression of Pax1/9 genes in urochordate and hemichordate gills: insight into function and evolution of the pharyngeal epithelium. Development 126, 2539–2550 (1999)

  9. 9.

    , & A stem-deuterostome origin of the vertebrate pharyngeal transcriptional network. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 279, 237–246 (2012)

  10. 10.

    , , , & The deuterostome context of chordate origins. Nature 520, 456–465 (2015)

  11. 11.

    & Deciphering deuterostome phylogeny: molecular, morphological and palaeontological perspectives. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 363, 1557–1568 (2008)

  12. 12.

    , & Evolution of the chordate body plan: new insights from phylogenetic analyses of deuterostome phyla. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4469–4474 (2000)

  13. 13.

    , & Hemichordates and the origin of chordates. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 15, 461–467 (2005)

  14. 14.

    & The gill slits and pre-oral ciliary organ of Protoglossus (Hemichordata: Enteropneusta) are filter-feeding structures. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 98, 898–906 (2009)

  15. 15.

    , & Man is but a worm: chordate origins. Genesis 46, 605–613 (2008)

  16. 16.

    , & Scenarios for the making of vertebrates. Nature 520, 450–455 (2015)

  17. 17.

    The invertebrates: smaller coelomate groups chaetognatha, hemichordata, pogonophora, phoronida, ectoprocta, brachipoda, sipunculida, the coelomate bilateria Vol. 5. (McGraw-Hill, 1959)

  18. 18.

    et al. Deuterostome phylogeny reveals monophyletic chordates and the new phylum Xenoturbellida. Nature 444, 85–88 (2006)

  19. 19.

    et al. Acoelomorph flatworms are deuterostomes related to Xenoturbella. Nature 470, 255–258 (2011)

  20. 20.

    , , , & Mitochondrial genome data support the basal position of Acoelomorpha and the polyphyly of the Platyhelminthes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 33, 321–332 (2004)

  21. 21.

    et al. Assessing the root of bilaterian animals with scalable phylogenomic methods. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 276, 4261–4270 (2009)

  22. 22.

    et al. Higher-level metazoan relationships: recent progress and remaining questions. Org. Divers. Evol. 11, 151–172 (2011)

  23. 23.

    , , & Whole-body acoel regeneration is controlled by Wnt and Bmp-Admp signaling. Curr. Biol. 24, 1107–1113 (2014)

  24. 24.

    , & PhyloBayes 3: a Bayesian software package for phylogenetic reconstruction and molecular dating. Bioinformatics 25, 2286–2288 (2009)

  25. 25.

    , , , & Conserved function of lincRNAs in vertebrate embryonic development despite rapid sequence evolution. Cell 147, 1537–1550 (2011)

  26. 26.

    et al. Transphyletic conservation of developmental regulatory state in animal evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 14186–14191 (2011)

  27. 27.

    et al. The amphioxus genome and the evolution of the chordate karyotype. Nature 453, 1064–1071 (2008)

  28. 28.

    et al. Extensive conservation of ancient microsynteny across metazoans due to cis-regulatory constraints. Genome Res. 22, 2356–2367 (2012)

  29. 29.

    et al. The genome of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Science 314, 941–952 (2006)

  30. 30.

    et al. Identical genomic organization of two hemichordate hox clusters. Curr. Biol. 22, 2053–2058 (2012)

  31. 31.

    et al. Identification of an intact ParaHox cluster with temporal colinearity but altered spatial colinearity in the hemichordate Ptychodera flava. BMC Evol. Biol. 13, 129 (2013)

  32. 32.

    et al. Unusual gene order and organization of the sea urchin hox cluster. J. Exp. Zoolog. B Mol. Dev. Evol. 306, 45–58 (2006)

  33. 33.

    et al. Genomic organization of Hox and ParaHox clusters in the echinoderm, Acanthaster planci. Genesis 52, 952–958 (2014)

  34. 34.

    et al. Identification of cis-regulatory elements in the mouse Pax9/Nkx2–9 genomic region: implication for evolutionary conserved synteny. Genetics 165, 235–242 (2003)

  35. 35.

    et al. Dorsoventral patterning in hemichordates: insights into early chordate evolution. PLoS Biol. 4, e291 (2006)

  36. 36.

    , , , & Comparison of Pax1/9 locus reveals 500-Myr-old syntenic block and evolutionary conserved noncoding regions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 784–791 (2007)

  37. 37.

    et al. Comparative analysis of the genomic organization of Pax9 and its conserved physical association with Nkx2–9 in the human, mouse, and pufferfish genomes. Mamm. Genome 12, 232–237 (2001)

  38. 38.

    , , & Up-regulation of C/EBP by thyroid hormones: a case demonstrating the vertebrate-like thyroid hormone signaling pathway in amphioxus. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 313, 57–63 (2009)

  39. 39.

    et al. Anteroposterior patterning in hemichordates and the origins of the chordate nervous system. Cell 113, 853–865 (2003)

  40. 40.

    et al. A transposon-based chromosomal engineering method to survey a large cis-regulatory landscape in mice. Nature Genet. 41, 946–952 (2009)

  41. 41.

    , , , & New insights on the sialidase protein family revealed by a phylogenetic analysis in metazoa. PLoS ONE 7, e44193 (2012)

  42. 42.

    , , & The animal sialyltransferases and sialyltransferase-related genes: a phylogenetic approach. Glycobiology 15, 805–817 (2005)

  43. 43.

    et al. Evolutionary history of the alpha2,8-sialyltransferase (ST8Sia) gene family: tandem duplications in early deuterostomes explain most of the diversity found in the vertebrate ST8Sia genes. BMC Evol. Biol. 8, 258 (2008)

  44. 44.

    Fine structure and function of pharynx cilia in Glossobalanus minutus Kowalewsky (Enteropneusta). Acta Zoologica 69, 1–12 (1988)

  45. 45.

    & A detailed description of the development of the hemichordate Saccoglossus kowalevskii using SEM, TEM, Histology and 3D-reconstructions. Front. Zool. 10, 53 (2013)

  46. 46.

    , & Endostyle-like features of the dorsal epibranchial ridge of an enteropneust and the hypothesis of dorsal-ventral axis inversion in chordates. Invertebr. Biol. 118, 202–212 (1999)

  47. 47.

    & Maternal Oct1/2 is required for Nodal and Vg1/Univin expression during dorsal-ventral axis specification in the sea urchin embryo. Dev. Biol. 357, 440–449 (2011)

  48. 48.

    TGFβ signalling in context. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 616–630 (2012)

  49. 49.

    et al. Cis-regulatory analysis of nodal and maternal control of dorsal-ventral axis formation by Univin, a TGF-β related to Vg1. Development 134, 3649–3664 (2007)

  50. 50.

    et al. Whole-genome sequence assembly for mammalian genomes: Arachne 2. Genome Res. 13, 91–96 (2003)

  51. 51.

    et al. Efficient de novo assembly of highly heterozygous genomes from whole-genome shotgun short reads. Genome Res. 24, 1384–1395 (2014)

  52. 52.

    et al. Comparative population genomics in animals uncovers the determinants of genetic diversity. Nature 515, 261–263 (2014)

  53. 53.

    et al. A cDNA resource for gene expression studies of a hemichordate, Ptychodera flava. Zoolog. Sci. 31, 414–420 (2014)

  54. 54.

    et al. Sequencing and analysis of the transcriptome of the acorn worm Ptychodera flava, an indirect developing hemichordate. Mar. Genomics 15, 35–43 (2014)

  55. 55.

    & Ab initio gene finding in Drosophila genomic DNA. Genome Res. 10, 516–522 (2000)

  56. 56.

    & Gene prediction with a hidden Markov model and a new intron submodel. Bioinformatics 19 (Suppl. 2), ii215–ii225 (2003)

  57. 57.

    et al. Insights into bilaterian evolution from three spiralian genomes. Nature (2013)

  58. 58.

    , & De novo identification of repeat families in large genomes. Bioinformatics 21 (Suppl. 1), i351–i358 (2005)

  59. 59.

    et al. Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 110, 462–467 (2005)

  60. 60.

    , & RepeatMasker . (2007)

  61. 61.

    MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 5, 113 (2004)

  62. 62.

    , & trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25, 1972–1973 (2009)

  63. 63.

    & ExaML: Exascale maximum likelihood: program and documentation. See (2013)

  64. 64.

    et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389–3402 (1997)

  65. 65.

    , , , & Ancient vertebrate conserved noncoding elements have been evolving rapidly in teleost fishes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 1205–1215 (2011)

  66. 66.

    et al. Ensembl 2015. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D662–D669 (2015)

  67. 67.

    , , & VISTA Enhancer Browser–a database of tissue-specific human enhancers. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D88–D92 (2007)

  68. 68.

    et al. CDD: NCBI’s conserved domain database. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D222–D226 (2015)

  69. 69.

    , , & An integrated holo-enhancer unit defines tissue and gene specificity of the Fgf8 regulatory landscape. Dev. Cell 24, 530–542 (2013)

Download references


The Ptychodera flava genome project was supported by MEXT and OIST, Japan. This research was supported by USPHS grant HD42724 and NASA grant FDNAG2–1605 to J.G.; USPHS grant HD37277 to M.W.K.; NASA - NNX13AI68G to C.L. F.M. was funded by FP7/ERC grant [268513]. O.S. and D.S.R, and T.K. and N.S. were supported by the Molecular Genetics Unit and Marine Genomics Unit of the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, respectively. Y.-H.S. and J.-K.Y. are supported by Academia Sinica and Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan. L.P. was supported by NIH grant R01HD073104. The Saccoglossus kowalevskii genome project was supported by a grant from the National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health (U54 HG003273) to R.A.G.

Author information

Author notes

    • Takeshi Kawashima
    • , Jia-Xing Yue
    • , Robert M. Freeman
    •  & Nicholas H. Putnam

    Present addresses: University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-572, Japan (T.K.); Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging, Nice (IRCAN), CNRS UMR 7284, INSERM U 1081, Nice 06107, France (J.-X.Y.); FAS Research Computing, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA (R.M.F.); Dovetail Genomics, Santa Cruz, California 95060, USA (N.H.P.).

    • Oleg Simakov
    •  & Takeshi Kawashima

    These authors contributed equally to this work.


  1. Molecular Genetics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Onna, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan

    • Oleg Simakov
    •  & Daniel S. Rokhsar
  2. Department of Molecular Evolution, Centre for Organismal Studies, University of Heidelberg, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany

    • Oleg Simakov
  3. Marine Genomics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Onna, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan

    • Takeshi Kawashima
    • , Kanako Hisata
    • , Eiichi Shoguchi
    • , Fuki Gyoja
    • , Kenneth W. Baughman
    •  & Noriyuki Satoh
  4. Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK

    • Ferdinand Marlétaz
  5. HudsonAlpha Institute of Biotechnology, Huntsville, Alabama 35806, USA

    • Jerry Jenkins
    •  & Jeremy Schmutz
  6. DNA Sequencing Section, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Onna, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan

    • Ryo Koyanagi
    • , Manabu Fujie
    • , Hiroki Goto
    • , Miyuki Kanda
    • , Nana Arakaki
    •  & Shinichi Yamasaki
  7. Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley California 94720-3200, USA

    • Therese Mitros
    • , Jessen Bredeson
    • , Michael Wu
    • , Daniel S. Rokhsar
    •  & John Gerhart
  8. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Rice University, Houston, Texas 77005, USA

    • Jia-Xing Yue
    •  & Nicholas H. Putnam
  9. Institute of Cellular and Organismic Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan

    • Yi-Chih Chen
    • , Yi-Hsien Su
    •  & Jr-Kai Yu
  10. Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA

    • Robert M. Freeman
    • , Leonid Peshkin
    •  & Marc W. Kirschner
  11. Marine Biological Laboratory, Graduate School of Science, Hiroshima University, Onomichi, Hiroshima 722-0073, Japan

    • Akane Sasaki
    •  & Kunifumi Tagawa
  12. Natural Science Center for Basic Research and Development, Gene Science Division, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8527, Japan

    • Tomoe Hikosaka-Katayama
  13. Marine Biological Association of the UK, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth PL1 2PB, UK

    • Atsuko Sato
  14. Department of Biology, Hopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, California 93950, USA

    • Judith Levine
    • , Paul Gonzalez
    • , Jens H. Fritzenwanker
    •  & Christopher J. Lowe
  15. Départment de sciences biologiques, University of Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada

    • Christopher Cameron
  16. University of North Caroline at Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA

    • Ariel M. Pani
  17. Human Genome Sequencing Center, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, MS BCM226, Houston, Texas 77030, USA

    • Jiaxin Qu
    • , Andrew Cree
    • , Yan Ding
    • , Huyen H. Dinh
    • , Shannon Dugan
    • , Michael Holder
    • , Shalini N. Jhangiani
    • , Christie L. Kovar
    • , Sandra L. Lee
    • , Lora R. Lewis
    • , Donna Morton
    • , Lynne V. Nazareth
    • , Geoffrey Okwuonu
    • , Jireh Santibanez
    • , Rui Chen
    • , Stephen Richards
    • , Donna M. Muzny
    • , Kim C. Worley
    •  & Richard A. Gibbs
  18. Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK

    • Andrew Gillis
  19. Institute for Biogenesis Research, University of Hawaii, Hawaii 96822, USA

    • Tom Humphreys
  20. National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Shizuoka 411-8540, Japan

    • Asao Fujiyama
  21. US Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, California 94598, USA

    • Daniel S. Rokhsar


  1. Search for Oleg Simakov in:

  2. Search for Takeshi Kawashima in:

  3. Search for Ferdinand Marlétaz in:

  4. Search for Jerry Jenkins in:

  5. Search for Ryo Koyanagi in:

  6. Search for Therese Mitros in:

  7. Search for Kanako Hisata in:

  8. Search for Jessen Bredeson in:

  9. Search for Eiichi Shoguchi in:

  10. Search for Fuki Gyoja in:

  11. Search for Jia-Xing Yue in:

  12. Search for Yi-Chih Chen in:

  13. Search for Robert M. Freeman in:

  14. Search for Akane Sasaki in:

  15. Search for Tomoe Hikosaka-Katayama in:

  16. Search for Atsuko Sato in:

  17. Search for Manabu Fujie in:

  18. Search for Kenneth W. Baughman in:

  19. Search for Judith Levine in:

  20. Search for Paul Gonzalez in:

  21. Search for Christopher Cameron in:

  22. Search for Jens H. Fritzenwanker in:

  23. Search for Ariel M. Pani in:

  24. Search for Hiroki Goto in:

  25. Search for Miyuki Kanda in:

  26. Search for Nana Arakaki in:

  27. Search for Shinichi Yamasaki in:

  28. Search for Jiaxin Qu in:

  29. Search for Andrew Cree in:

  30. Search for Yan Ding in:

  31. Search for Huyen H. Dinh in:

  32. Search for Shannon Dugan in:

  33. Search for Michael Holder in:

  34. Search for Shalini N. Jhangiani in:

  35. Search for Christie L. Kovar in:

  36. Search for Sandra L. Lee in:

  37. Search for Lora R. Lewis in:

  38. Search for Donna Morton in:

  39. Search for Lynne V. Nazareth in:

  40. Search for Geoffrey Okwuonu in:

  41. Search for Jireh Santibanez in:

  42. Search for Rui Chen in:

  43. Search for Stephen Richards in:

  44. Search for Donna M. Muzny in:

  45. Search for Andrew Gillis in:

  46. Search for Leonid Peshkin in:

  47. Search for Michael Wu in:

  48. Search for Tom Humphreys in:

  49. Search for Yi-Hsien Su in:

  50. Search for Nicholas H. Putnam in:

  51. Search for Jeremy Schmutz in:

  52. Search for Asao Fujiyama in:

  53. Search for Jr-Kai Yu in:

  54. Search for Kunifumi Tagawa in:

  55. Search for Kim C. Worley in:

  56. Search for Richard A. Gibbs in:

  57. Search for Marc W. Kirschner in:

  58. Search for Christopher J. Lowe in:

  59. Search for Noriyuki Satoh in:

  60. Search for Daniel S. Rokhsar in:

  61. Search for John Gerhart in:


J.Q., K.C.W. assembled the initial S. kowalevskii genomic assembly and performed quality assessments of the genome assemblies. Ptychodera collection, genome sequencing, and assembly: T.K., K.T., A.S., R.K., H.G., M.F., M.I.K., N.A., S.Y., A.F., T.H. Rhabdopleura collection: A.S. Saccoglossus RNA sequencing and analysis: R.M.F., M.W.K., R.C., C.L.K., S.L.L., M.H., S.R., D.M.M., K.C.W. Genome sequence production: A.C., Y.D., H.H.D., S.D., M.H., S.N.J., C.L.K., S.L.L., L.R.L., D.M., L.V.N., G.O., J.Sa., S.R., K.C.W., D.M.M., L.P., B.F., M.W.K. Saccoglossus sequence finishing: S.D., Y.D., D.M.M. Final Saccoglossus assembly: J.J., J.Sc. Saccoglossus gene modelling and validation: T.M., J.B., J.H.F., A.M.P., M.W. Ptychodera gene modelling and analyses: T.K., R.K., K.H., E.S., F.G., K.W.B., K.T., O.S., J.G., N.S. Gene family analyses: O.S., T.K., F.M., L.P., R.M.F., C.L., J.G. Synteny: N.H.P., O.S., J.-X.Y. Repeats: O.S. Saccoglossus sequencing and assembly project management: S.R., D.M.M., K.C.W., R.A.G. Ptychodera expression analysis: Y.-C.C., Y.-H.S., J.-K.Y. Phylogenetic analyses: F.M. Additional EST collections: T.H.-K., K.T., A.S., A.T.S., J.P., P.G., C.C., C.L. HGT and novelties: J.G., O.S. Pharyngeal cluster analysis and expression: J.G., O.S., N.S., K.B., A.G. Project coordination, manuscript writing: O.S., T.K., F.M., K.T., N.S., J.G., C.L., D.S.R.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Oleg Simakov or Noriyuki Satoh or Daniel S. Rokhsar or John Gerhart.

Extended data

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Text and Data, Supplementary Figures and Supplementary Tables – see contents page for more details.

Zip files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Data

    This zipped file contains 3 Supplementary Data files.

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.