Among extant tetrapods, salamanders are unique in showing a reversed preaxial polarity in patterning of the skeletal elements of the limbs, and in displaying the highest capacity for regeneration, including full limb and tail regeneration. These features are particularly striking as tetrapod limb development has otherwise been shown to be a highly conserved process1,2. It remains elusive whether the capacity to regenerate limbs in salamanders is mechanistically and evolutionarily linked to the aberrant pattern of limb development; both are features classically regarded as unique to urodeles3. New molecular data suggest that salamander-specific orphan genes play a central role in limb regeneration and may also be involved in the preaxial patterning during limb development4,5. Here we show that preaxial polarity in limb development was present in various groups of temnospondyl amphibians of the Carboniferous and Permian periods, including the dissorophoids Apateon and Micromelerpeton, as well as the stereospondylomorph Sclerocephalus. Limb regeneration has also been reported in Micromelerpeton6, demonstrating that both features were already present together in antecedents of modern salamanders 290 million years ago. Furthermore, data from lepospondyl ‘microsaurs’ on the amniote stem indicate that these taxa may have shown some capacity for limb regeneration and were capable of tail regeneration7, including re-patterning of the caudal vertebral column that is otherwise only seen in salamander tail regeneration. The data from fossils suggest that salamander-like regeneration is an ancient feature of tetrapods that was subsequently lost at least once in the lineage leading to amniotes. Salamanders are the only modern tetrapods that retained regenerative capacities as well as preaxial polarity in limb development.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Shubin, N., Tabin, C. & Carroll, S. B. Fossils, genes and the evolution of animal limbs. Nature 388, 639–648 (1997)
Zeller, R., Lopez-Rios, J. & Zuniga, A. Vertebrate limb bud development: moving towards integrative analysis of organogenesis. Nature Rev. Genet. 10, 845–858 (2009)
Fröbisch, N. B. & Shubin, N. H. Salamander limb development: integrating genes, morphology, and fossils. Dev. Dyn. 240, 1087–1099 (2011)
Brockes, J. P. & Gates, P. Mechanisms underlying vertebrate limb regeneration: lessons from the salamander. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 42, 625–630 (2014)
Brockes, J. in Salamanders in Regeneration Research: Methods and Protocols (eds Kumar, A. & András, S. ) Ch. 1 (Springer, 2015)
Fröbisch, N. B., Bickelmann, C. & Witzmann, F. Early evolution of limb regeneration in tetrapods: evidence from a 300-million-year-old amphibian. Proc. Biol. Sci. (2014)
Carroll, R. L. & Gaskill, P. The Order Microsauria. 122 (American Philosophical Society, 1978)
Shubin, N. H. & Alberch, P. A morphogenetic approach to the origin and basic organisation of the tetrapod limb. Evol. Biol. 20, 319–387 (1986)
Shubin, N. H. & Wake, D. B. in Amphibian Biology Vol. 5 (eds Heatwole, H. & Davies, M. ) 1782–1808 (Surrey Beatty & Sons PTY limited, 2003)
Gardiner, D. M. & Bryant, S. V. in Fins into Limbs (ed. Hall, B. K. ) 163–182 (Univ. Chicago Press, 2007)
Simon, A. & Tanaka, E. M. Limb regeneration. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Dev. Biol. 2, 291–300 (2013)
Anderson, J. S., Reisz, R. R., Fröbisch, N. B., Scott, D. & Sumida, S. S. A stem batrachian from the Early Permian of Texas and the origin of frogs and salamanders. Nature 453, 515–518 (2008)
Ruta, M. & Coates, M. I. Dates, nodes and character conflict: addressing the lissamphibian origin problem. J. Syst. Palaeontology 5, 69–122 (2007)
Marjanović, D. & Laurin, M. The origin(s) of extant amphibians: a review with emphasis on the “lepospondyl hypothesis”. Geodiversitas 35, 207–272 (2013)
Schoch, R. R. Life cycles, plasticity and palaeoecology in temnospondyl amphibians. Palaeontology 57, 517–529 (2014)
Fröbisch, N. B., Carroll, R. L. & Schoch, R. R. Limb ossification in the Paleozoic branchiosaurid Apateon (Temnospondyli) and the early evolution of preaxial dominance in tetrapod limb development. Evol. Dev. 9, 69–75 (2007)
Fröbisch, N. B. Ossification patterns in the tetrapod limb – conservation and divergence from morphogenetic events. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 83, 571–600 (2008)
Schmalhausen, J. J. Die Entwicklung des Extremitätenskelettes von Salamandrella kayserlingii. Anat. Anz. 37, 431–446 (1910)
Schoch, R. R. Early larval ontogeny of the Permo-Carboniferous temnospondyl Sclerocephalus. Paleontology 46, 1055–1072 (2003)
Witzmann, F. & Pfretzschner, H.-U. Larval ontogeny of Micromelerpeton credneri (Temnospondyli, Dissorophoidea). J. Vert. Paleontol. 23, 750–768 (2003)
Olori, J. Skeletal morphogenesis of Microbrachis and Hyloplesion (Tetrapoda: Lepospondyli), and implications for the developmental patterns of extinct, early tetrapods. PLoS ONE 10, e0128333 (2015)
Conant, E. B. Regeneration in the African lungfish, Protopterus. I. Gross aspects. J. Exp. Zool. 174, 15–31 (1970)
Holtzer, H., Holtzer, S. & Avery, G. An experimental analysis of the development of the spinal column IV. Morphogenesis of tail vertebrae during regeneration. J. Morphol. 96, 145–171 (1955)
Vaglia, J. L., Babcock, S. K. & Harris, R. N. Tail development and regeneration throughout the life cycle of the four-toed salamander Hemidactylium scutatum. J. Morphol. 233, 15–29 (1997)
Beck, C. W., Izpisúa Belmonte, J. C. & Christen, B. Beyond early development: Xenopus as an emerging model for the study of regenerative mechanisms. Dev. Dyn. 238, 1226–1248 (2009)
Fisher, R. E. et al. A histological comparison of the original and regenerated tail in the green anole, Anolis carolinensis. Anat. Rec. 295, 1609–1619 (2012)
Alibardi, L. Morphological and Cellular Aspects of Tail and Limb Regeneration in Lizards. (Springer, 2010)
Holtzer, S. W. The inductive activity of the spinal cord in urodele tail regeneration. J. Morphol. 99, 1–39 (1956)
We thank B. Ekrt, J. Müller, U. Göhlich, S. Walsh, C. Mehling, P. Barrett and R. Schoch for access to the collections under their care. H. J. Götz took the photograph in Fig. 3c; S. Lokatis took the photograph in Fig. 3b. This research was funded by an DFG Emmy Noether Grant (FR 2647/5-1) to N.B.F.; the Jackson School of Geosciences, the Banks Fellowship, Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Estes Memorial Grant and Paleontological Society Lane Student Award to J.C.O.; and the Feodor-Lynen Fellowship of the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation to F.W.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Fröbisch, N., Bickelmann, C., Olori, J. et al. Deep-time evolution of regeneration and preaxial polarity in tetrapod limb development. Nature 527, 231–234 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15397
The Science of Nature (2021)
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (2020)
von Willebrand factor D and EGF domains is an evolutionarily conserved and required feature of blastemas capable of multitissue appendage regeneration
Evolution & Development (2020)
Developmental Dynamics (2020)
Appendage regeneration in anamniotes utilizes genes active during larval‐metamorphic stages that have been lost or altered in amniotes: The case for studying lizard tail regeneration
Journal of Morphology (2020)