Gating machinery of InsP3R channels revealed by electron cryomicroscopy

Abstract

Inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors (InsP3Rs) are ubiquitous ion channels responsible for cytosolic Ca2+ signalling and essential for a broad array of cellular processes ranging from contraction to secretion, and from proliferation to cell death. Despite decades of research on InsP3Rs, a mechanistic understanding of their structure–function relationship is lacking. Here we present the first, to our knowledge, near-atomic (4.7 Å) resolution electron cryomicroscopy structure of the tetrameric mammalian type 1 InsP3R channel in its apo-state. At this resolution, we are able to trace unambiguously 85% of the protein backbone, allowing us to identify the structural elements involved in gating and modulation of this 1.3-megadalton channel. Although the central Ca2+-conduction pathway is similar to other ion channels, including the closely related ryanodine receptor, the cytosolic carboxy termini are uniquely arranged in a left-handed α-helical bundle, directly interacting with the amino-terminal domains of adjacent subunits. This configuration suggests a molecular mechanism for allosteric regulation of channel gating by intracellular signals.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Overview of InsP3R1 structure.
Figure 2: Structure of the transmembrane domains.
Figure 3: Detailed structure of the Ca2+ conduction pathway.
Figure 4: Structural coupling between the CTD and InsP3-binding domains.
Figure 5: Cytosolic intra- and inter-subunit interactions.
Figure 6: Model for coupling mechanism of InsP3R1 activation by InsP3.

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Electron Microscopy Data Bank

Protein Data Bank

Data deposits

Cryo-EM density map of InsP3R1 has been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank under accession number EMD-6369. The model coordinates have been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank under accession number 3JAV.

References

  1. 1

    Serysheva, I. I. & Ludtke, S. J. 3D structure of IP3 receptor. Curr. Topics Memb. 66C, 171–189 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Ludtke, S. J. et al. Flexible architecture of IP3R1 by Cryo-EM. Structure 19, 1192–1199 (2011)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Murray, S. C. et al. Validation of cryo-EM structure of IP3R1 channel. Structure 21, 900–909 (2013)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Bosanac, I. et al. Structure of the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor binding core in complex with its ligand. Nature 420, 696–700 (2002)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Bosanac, I. et al. Crystal structure of the ligand binding suppressor domain of type 1 inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor. Mol. Cell 17, 193–203 (2005)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Lin, C. C., Baek, K. & Lu, Z. Apo and InsP-bound crystal structures of the ligand-binding domain of an InsP receptor. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 1172–1174 (2011)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Seo, M. D. et al. Structural and functional conservation of key domains in InsP3 and ryanodine receptors. Nature 483, 108–112 (2012)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Nakagawa, T., Okano, H., Furuichi, T., Aruga, J. & Mikoshiba, K. The subtypes of the mouse inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor are expressed in a tissue-specific and developmentally specific manner. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 88, 6244–6248 (1991)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Nucifora, F. C. Jr, Li, S. H., Danoff, S., Ullrich, A. & Ross, C. A. Molecular cloning of a cDNA for the human inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor type 1, and the identification of a third alternatively spliced variant. Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res. 32, 291–296 (1995)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Danoff, S. K. et al. Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors: distinct neuronal and nonneuronal forms derived by alternative splicing differ in phosphorylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 88, 2951–2955 (1991)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Doyle, D. A. et al. The structure of the potassium channel: molecular basis of K+ conduction and selectivity. Science 280, 69–77 (1998)

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Schug, Z. T. et al. Molecular characterization of the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor pore-forming segment. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 2939–2948 (2008)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Fulton, J., Heald, S., Badayl, Y. & Simonson, J. Understanding the effects of concentration on the solvation structure of Ca2+ in aqueous solution. I: the perspective on local structure from EXAFS and XANES. J. Phys. Chem. 107, 4688–4696 (2003)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Gillespie, D., Xu, L. & Meissner, G. Selecting ions by size in a calcium channel: the ryanodine receptor case study. Biophys. J. 107, 2263–2273 (2014)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Kuo, A. et al. Crystal structure of the potassium channel KirBac1.1 in the closed state. Science 300, 1922–1926 (2003)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Long, S. B., Campbell, E. B. & Mackinnon, R. Crystal structure of a mammalian voltage-dependent Shaker family K+ channel. Science 309, 897–903 (2005)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Tao, X., Avalos, J. L., Chen, J. & MacKinnon, R. Crystal structure of the eukaryotic strong inward-rectifier K+ channel Kir2.2 at 3.1 Å resolution. Science 326, 1668–1674 (2009)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Miyazawa, A., Fujiyoshi, Y. & Unwin, N. Structure and gating mechanism of the acetylcholine receptor pore. Nature 423, 949–955 (2003)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Chang, G., Spencer, R. H., Lee, A. T., Barclay, M. T. & Rees, D. C. Structure of the MscL homolog from Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a gated mechanosensitive ion channel. Science 282, 2220–2226 (1998)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Serysheva, I. I. Toward a high-resolution structure of IP3R channel. Cell Calcium 56, 125–132 (2014)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Uchida, K., Miyauchi, H., Furuichi, T., Michikawa, T. & Mikoshiba, K. Critical regions for activation gating of the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 16551–16560 (2003)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Tu, H. et al. Functional and biochemical analysis of the type 1 inositol (1,4,5)-trisphosphate receptor calcium sensor. Biophys. J. 85, 290–299 (2003)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Miyakawa, T. et al. Ca2+-sensor region of IP3 receptor controls intracellular Ca2+ signaling. EMBO J. 20, 1674–1680 (2001)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Yamazaki, H., Chan, J., Ikura, M., Michikawa, T. & Mikoshiba, K. Tyr-167/Trp-168 in type 1/3 inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor mediates functional coupling between ligand binding and channel opening. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 36081–36091 (2010)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Soulsby, M. D., Alzayady, K., Xu, Q. & Wojcikiewicz, R. J. The contribution of serine residues 1588 and 1755 to phosphorylation of the type I inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor by PKA and PKG. FEBS Lett. 557, 181–184 (2004)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Schug, Z. T. & Joseph, S. K. The role of the S4–S5 linker and C-terminal tail in inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor function. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 24431–24440 (2006)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Zalk, R. et al. Structure of a mammalian ryanodine receptor. Nature 517, 44–49 (2015)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Yan, Z. et al. Structure of the rabbit ryanodine receptor RyR1 at near-atomic resolution. Nature 517, 50–55 (2015)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Efremov, R. G., Leitner, A., Aebersold, R. & Raunser, S. Architecture and conformational switch mechanism of the ryanodine receptor. Nature 517, 39–43 (2015)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Boehning, D. & Joseph, S. K. Direct association of ligand-binding and pore domains in homo- and heterotetrameric inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors. EMBO J. 19, 5450–5459 (2000)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Yoshikawa, F., Iwasaki, H., Michikawa, T., Furuichi, T. & Mikoshiba, K. Trypsinized cerebellar inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor. Structural and functional coupling of cleaved ligand binding and channel domains. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 316–327 (1999)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Bhanumathy, C., da Fonseca, P. C., Morris, E. P. & Joseph, S. K. Identification of functionally critical residues in the channel domain of inositol trisphosphate receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 43674–43684 (2012)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Galvan, D. L. & Mignery, G. A. Carboxyl-terminal sequences critical for inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor subunit assembly. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 48248–48260 (2002)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Malovannaya, A. et al. Streamlined analysis schema for high-throughput identification of endogenous protein complexes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 2431–2436 (2010)

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Li, X. et al. Electron counting and beam-induced motion correction enable near-atomic-resolution single-particle cryo-EM. Nature Methods 10, 584–590 (2013)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Mindell, J. A. & Grigorieff, N. Accurate determination of local defocus and specimen tilt in electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 142, 334–347 (2003)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Tang, G. et al. EMAN2: an extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 157, 38–46 (2007)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Henderson, R. et al. Outcome of the first electron microscopy validation task force meeting. Structure 20, 205–214 (2012)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Scheres, S. H. & Chen, S. Prevention of overfitting in cryo-EM structure determination. Nature Methods 9, 853–854 (2012)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Rosenthal, P. B. & Henderson, R. Optimal determination of particle orientation, absolute hand, and contrast loss in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 333, 721–745 (2003)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Kucukelbir, A., Sigworth, F. J. & Tagare, H. D. Quantifying the local resolution of cryo-EM density maps. Nature Methods 11, 63–65 (2014)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Baker, M. L. et al. Modeling protein structure at near atomic resolutions with Gorgon. J. Struct. Biol. 174, 360–373 (2011)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Jiang, W., Baker, M. L., Ludtke, S. J. & Chiu, W. Bridging the information gap: computational tools for intermediate resolution structure interpretation. J. Mol. Biol. 308, 1033–1044 (2001)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Cole, C., Barber, J. D. & Barton, G. J. The Jpred 3 secondary structure prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, W197–W201 (2008)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Kelley, L. A. & Sternberg, M. J. Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre server. Nature Protocols 4, 363–371 (2009)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Abeysinghe, S., Baker, M. L., Chiu, W. & Ju, T. Semi-isometric registration of line features for flexible fitting of protein structures. Comput. Graph. Forum 29, 2243–2252 (2010)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Baker, M. L., Baker, M. R., Hryc, C. F. & Dimaio, F. Analyses of subnanometer resolution cryo-EM density maps. Methods Enzymol. 483, 1–29 (2010)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Baker, M. L., Zhang, J., Ludtke, S. J. & Chiu, W. Cryo-EM of macromolecular assemblies at near-atomic resolution. Nature Protocols 5, 1697–1708 (2010)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Baker, M. L., Baker, M. R., Hryc, C. F., Ju, T. & Chiu, W. Gorgon and pathwalking: macromolecular modeling tools for subnanometer resolution density maps. Biopolymers 97, 655–668 (2012)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51

    Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52

    Baker, M. R., Rees, I., Ludtke, S. J., Chiu, W. & Baker, M. L. Constructing and validating initial Calpha models from subnanometer resolution density maps with pathwalking. Structure 20, 450–463 (2012)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53

    Li, Y. & Zhang, Y. REMO: A new protocol to refine full atomic protein models from C-alpha traces by optimizing hydrogen-bonding networks. Proteins 76, 665–676 (2009)

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54

    Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 213–221 (2010)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55

    de Beer, T. A., Berka, K., Thornton, J. M. & Laskowski, R. A. PDBsum additions. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D292–D296 (2014)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56

    Krissinel, E. & Henrick, K. Inference of macromolecular assemblies from crystalline state. J. Mol. Biol. 372, 774–797 (2007)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank S. Murray for his assistance with RELION1.3. This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01GM072804, R21AR063255, S10OD016279, P41GM103832, R01GM079429, R01GM080139 and R21GM100229), the American Heart Association (14RNT1980029), the Muscular Dystrophy Association (295138) and National Science Foundation (DBI-1356306). We gratefully acknowledge the assistance and computing resources provided by the Center for Computational and Integrative Biomedical Research of Baylor College of Medicine and the Texas Advanced Computing Center at the University of Texas at Austin in the completion of this work.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

I.I.S. conceived the project; G.F. and I.I.S. purified and characterized the protein; G.F., Z.W. and I.I.S. performed cryo-EM experiments, including cryospecimen preparation and data acquisition; G.F., Z.W., P.A.S., S.J.L. and I.I.S. analysed data; M.L.B. and M.R.B. built an atomic model; M.L.B., M.R.B., I.I.S. and W.C. interpreted the model; I.I.S., W.C., M.L.B. and M.R.B. wrote a manuscript with contributions from all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irina I. Serysheva.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Cryo-EM of the purified InsP3R1.

a, Representative electron image of ice-embedded InsP3R1 taken at a defocus of 2.1 μm and recorded using the K2 Summit camera. Shown image is motion-corrected. b, Fourier power spectrum of the micrograph shown in a with Thon rings extending to 3.8 Å. c, 2D projections of the InsP3R1 map from the last iteration of refinement by RELION1.3 (rows 1 and 4) and EMAN2.1 (rows 2 and 5) are shown with corresponding 2D class averages (rows 3 and 6).

Extended Data Figure 2 Resolution estimation of cryo-EM 3D reconstruction.

a, The gold-standard FSC curve for the final cryo-EM 3D reconstruction generated with RELION1.3 (black) and EMAN2.1 (green). The overall resolution is 4.7 Å using the FSC cut-off = 0.143. b, Shown is the FSC curve between the cryo-EM density map generated with RELION1.3 and the molecular model (blue, FSC cut-off is 0.5) and the FSC curve between the 3D reconstructions generated with EMAN2.1 and RELION1.3 (red, FSC cut-off is 0.25). c, The cryo-EM density map of InsP3R1 generated with RELION1.3 is colour-coded based on ResMap (Methods). The map is depicted as viewed along the membrane plane (left) or as a slab of the density (dashed box in left panel) coincident with the four-fold channel axis (right). The cryo-EM density map exhibits local resolution variation ranging from 3.6 Å to 6.5 Å with the most highly resolved densities in the TMD, while parts of the peripheral densities in the cytoplasmic region are of lower resolution. The low resolution peripheral density in the transmembrane region is attributed to detergent bound to the protein. d, Euler angle distribution of all particles used for the final 3D reconstruction. Each view is represented by a sphere, for which the size is proportional to the number of particles for this specific view.

Extended Data Figure 3 3D cryo-EM density map of the tetrameric InsP3R1 visualized in three orthogonal orientations.

InsP3R1 viewed from the cytosol (top), along the membrane plane (middle) and from the lumen (bottom). Four individual subunits are colour-coded. The map is rendered at a threshold level corresponding to a molecular mass of 1.3 MDa.

Extended Data Figure 4 Building an atomic model of InsP3R1.

a, Linear representation of a primary structure of InsP3R1 protein (GI accession 17380349). Ten domains identified in the cryo-EM density map are colour-coded. Three sites of alternative splicing (residues 318–332/SI, 918–926/SIII and 1692–1731/SII) are indicated below the sequence bar. Putative binding sites for several channel-specific ligands are indicated above the domains (ATP, ATP-binding CaM/CaBP, calmodulin/Ca2+ binding protein; CGA, chromogranin A; cyt c, cytochrome c; Httexp, huntingtin; PKA, protein kinase A; RIH, RyR/InsP3R homology; yellow circles denote Ca2+-binding20). The panel below shows a linear diagram of the protein sequence colour-coded based on the approach used for modelling different regions in the primary structure. The spaces between the bars correspond to unmodelled sequence (see also Extended Data Fig. 5). b, The structure of the N-terminal domain (NTD) based on cryo-EM density map (red) is shown overlapped with the X-ray crystal structures of NTD (r.m.s.d. values = 1.3–1.4 Å): 1XZZ (blue); 3T8Sa (cyan); 3T8Sb (green); 3UJ4 (yellow); and 3UJ0 (magenta). c, Cryo-EM density map is viewed along the membrane plane. Densities corresponding to the individual domains of one subunit of InsP3R1 are colour-coded as in a. d, Models for solenoid-like α-helical domains are shown superimposed on their corresponding cryo-EM densities. ARM1–ARM3, armadillo repeat domains1–3; HD, α-helical domain. The densities of ARM2 domain are less resolved than those of ARM1 and ARM3 but are sufficient to trace the backbone.

Extended Data Figure 5 Sequence alignment of selected InsP3R channels.

rInsP3R1, Rattus norvegicus (GI accession 17380349); hInsP3R1, Homo sapiens (GI accession 519668682); hInsP3R2, Homo sapiens (GI accession 259016258); hInsP3R3, Homo sapiens (GI accession 209572633); the primary sequence numbering includes the first methionine. The numbering of residues is given below the sequences, secondary structure elements are indicated above the sequences and colour-coded in correspondence to the domains shown in Fig. 1b; dashed lines indicate regions that were not sufficiently resolved to be modelled. Given the enormous size of InsP3R proteins, the full-length sequence alignment was divided into two panels: sequence alignment for the transmembrane domains is shown in Extended Data Fig. 7a (note, overlap at the loop between the helices α90 and α91).

Extended Data Figure 6 Representative cryo-EM densities.

ac, The cryo-EM densities for some regions are shown overlaid with the corresponding model: cytosolic helices (a); transmembrane helices (b); the constriction point at Phe2586 within the ion conduction pathway (c), view from the cytosol along the four-fold axis, colour-coded by subunit.

Extended Data Figure 7 Structural conservation of the pore among tetrameric cation channels.

a, Alignment of the channel-forming domains; residues discussed in the text are labelled as following: blue circles, negatively charged residues; red circles, positively charged His2541; yellow highlight, N-glycosylation sites (Asn2476 and Asn2504); green highlight, selectivity filter; blue highlight, conserved Gly2587; green box, hydrophobic constriction region and Phe2586 shown in green; dark blue, Zn2+-finger-like residues Cys2611/Cys2614 and His2631/His2636; blue box, tetramerization region. b, Structural comparison of pore-forming elements of InsP3R1, RyR1, Kv1.2–2.1, NavRh, TRPV1 (PDB accessions: 3J8H, 2R9R, 4DXW and 3J5P, respectively). Note substantial overlap between structures.

Extended Data Figure 8 Comparison of InsP3R1 and RyR1 structures.

a, Two opposing subunits of InsP3R1 and RyR1 (PDB accession 3J8H) are viewed along the membrane plane. One InsP3R1 subunit is colour-coded by domain (left). Structurally consistent domains in one RyR1 subunit are colour-coded using InsP3R1 domain architecture. Domains of RyR1 not in common are shown in grey. b, TMDs of RyR1 (tan) and InsP3R1 (coloured by subunit) are superimposed using Chimera’s Matchmaker and viewed from the cytosol (left) and lumen (right). The r.m.s.d. between 80 atom pairs is 2.0 Å. For clarity, P-helices are not shown. c, Structural comparison of the selectivity filter (red) in InsP3R1 with that in some tetrameric cation channels: RyR1, TRPV1, TRPA1, CavAb (PDB accessions: 3J8H, 3J5Q, 3J9P and 4MS2, respectively). Two opposing subunits are shown; TM5 and TM6 helices are coloured tan, P-helices are in green.

Extended Data Figure 9 The putative cytosolic Ca2+ sensor in InsP3R1.

a, Cut-open side view of the cryo-EM density map of InsP3R1 is shown with the structures of the Ca2+ sensor region for InsP3R1 (residues 1952–2270) and RyR1 (residues 3877–4251; PDB accession 3J8H); the EF-hand of RyR1 includes residues 4071–4130. b, Close-up view of the overlapped Ca2+ sensor structures for InsP3R1 (colour-coded by domain as in Fig. 1) and RyR1 (tan). The conserved Glu2101/InsP3R1 and Glu4032/RyR1 are shown in red. c, Sequence alignment of the predicted Ca2+ sensor regions comprising the conserved Glu2101/InsP3R1 and Glu4032/RyR1 (red) (rInsP3R1/GI code:17380349; hInsP3R1/GI code: 519668682; hInsP3R2/GI code: 259016258; hInsP3R3/GI code: 209572633; RyR1/GI code: 134134; RyR2/GI code: 308153559; RyR3/GI code: 75074791); green highlight denotes completely conserved residues; yellow highlight denotes identical residues.

Extended Data Figure 10 Structural coupling in the CTD.

a, A bundle of the CTD helices is viewed perpendicular to the channel axis at the position of a predicted inter-subunit saltbridge between residues Gln2700 and Lys2701. The right panel shows the predicted salt bridge normal to the channel axis. Helices are colour-coded per subunit. b, Structures of the CTD and β-TF2 domains are superimposed on their corresponding cryo-EM densities and the surfaces are colour-coded according to electrostatic charges calculated for the model: blue denotes positive charges; red denotes negative charges. Shown is a side view with the cytoplasmic side facing up. c, Close-up view of the interface between the CTD and β-TF2 domains of two neighbouring subunits; viewed from cytosol perpendicular to the membrane plane.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains a Supplementary Discussion and Supplementary References. (PDF 141 kb)

Cryo-EM density map of IP3R1 at near-atomic resolution

This animation shows the overall structure of the tetrameric IP3R1 and individual channel subunits. (MOV 12663 kb)

Domain-organization of IP3R1

This animation shows the domain organization of the individual IP3R1 subunit and their arrangement within the tetrameric IP3R1 assembly. (MOV 26048 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fan, G., Baker, M., Wang, Z. et al. Gating machinery of InsP3R channels revealed by electron cryomicroscopy. Nature 527, 336–341 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15249

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing