Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The role of spin in the kinetic control of recombination in organic photovoltaics

Abstract

In biological complexes, cascade structures promote the spatial separation of photogenerated electrons and holes, preventing their recombination1. In contrast, the photogenerated excitons in organic photovoltaic cells are dissociated at a single donor–acceptor heterojunction formed within a de-mixed blend of the donor and acceptor semiconductors2. The nanoscale morphology and high charge densities give a high rate of electron–hole encounters, which should in principle result in the formation of spin-triplet excitons, as in organic light-emitting diodes3. Although organic photovoltaic cells would have poor quantum efficiencies if every encounter led to recombination, state-of-the-art examples nevertheless demonstrate near-unity quantum efficiency4. Here we show that this suppression of recombination arises through the interplay between spin, energetics and delocalization of electronic excitations in organic semiconductors. We use time-resolved spectroscopy to study a series of model high-efficiency polymer–fullerene systems in which the lowest-energy molecular triplet exciton (T1) for the polymer is lower in energy than the intermolecular charge transfer state. We observe the formation of T1 states following bimolecular recombination, indicating that encounters of spin-uncorrelated electrons and holes generate charge transfer states with both spin-singlet (1CT) and spin-triplet (3CT) characters. We show that the formation of triplet excitons can be the main loss mechanism in organic photovoltaic cells. But we also find that, even when energetically favoured, the relaxation of 3CT states to T1 states can be strongly suppressed by wavefunction delocalization, allowing for the dissociation of 3CT states back to free charges, thereby reducing recombination and enhancing device performance. Our results point towards new design rules both for photoconversion systems, enabling the suppression of electron–hole recombination, and for organic light-emitting diodes, avoiding the formation of triplet excitons and enhancing fluorescence efficiency.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Photophysical process in an OPV and molecular structures.
Figure 2: Excited-state spectra and kinetics for PIDT-PhanQ blends.
Figure 3: Triplet and charge kinetics for PIDT-PhanQ blends.
Figure 4: Triplet and charge kinetics for PCPDTBT blends.

References

  1. 1

    Blankenship, R. E. Molecular Mechanisms of Photosynthesis ch. 7 (Blackwell Science, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Bakulin, A. A. et al. The role of driving energy and delocalized states for charge separation in organic semiconductors. Science 335, 1340–1344 (2012)

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Wallikewitz, B. H., Kabra, D., Gelinas, S. & Friend, R. H. Triplet dynamics in fluorescent polymer light-emitting diodes. Phys. Rev. B 85, 045209 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Park, S. H. et al. Bulk heterojunction solar cells with internal quantum efficiency approaching 100%. Nature Photon. 3, 297–302 (2009)

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Hu, B., Yan, L. & Shao, M. Magnetic-field effects in organic semiconducting materials and devices. Adv. Mater. 21, 1500–1516 (2009)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Morteani, A. C., Sreearunothai, P., Herz, L. M., Friend, R. H. & Silva, C. Exciton regeneration at polymeric semiconductor heterojunctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 247402 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Veldman, D., Meskers, S. C. J. & Janssen, R. A. J. The energy of charge-transfer states in electron donor–acceptor blends: insight into the energy losses in organic solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 19, 1939–1948 (2009)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Vandewal, K., Tvingstedt, K., Gadisa, A., Inganas, O. & Manca, J. V. On the origin of the open-circuit voltage of polymer-fullerene solar cells. Nature Mater. 8, 904–909 (2009)

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Hammond, M. R. et al. Molecular order in high-efficiency polymer/fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells. ACS Nano 5, 8248–8257 (2011)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Lou, S. J. et al. Effects of additives on the morphology of solution phase aggregates formed by active layer components of high-efficiency organic solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 20661–20663 (2011)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Hilczer, M. & Tachiya, M. Unified theory of geminate and bulk electron-hole recombination in organic solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 6808–6813 (2010)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Baldo, M. A. et al. Highly efficient phosphorescent emission from organic electroluminescent devices. Nature 395, 151–154 (1998)

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Uoyama, H., Goushi, K., Shizu, K., Nomura, H. & Adachi, C. Highly efficient organic light-emitting diodes from delayed fluorescence. Nature 492, 234–238 (2012)

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Deibel, C., Baumann, A. & Dyakonov, V. Polaron recombination in pristine and annealed bulk heterojunction solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 163303 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Koster, L. J. A., Mihailetchi, V. D. & Blom, P. W. M. Bimolecular recombination in polymer/fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 052104 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Guangjin, Z., Youjun, H. & Yongfang, L. 6.5% efficiency of polymer solar cells based on poly(3-hexylthiophene) and indene-C60 bisadduct by device optimization. Adv. Mater. 22, 4355–4358 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Hoke, E. T. et al. The role of electron affinity in determining whether fullerenes catalyze or inhibit photooxidation of polymers for solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 2, 1351–1357 (2012)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Schlenker, C. W. et al. Polymer triplet energy levels need not limit photocurrent collection in organic solar cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 19661–19668 (2012)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Zhang, Y. et al. Indacenodithiophene and quinoxaline-based conjugated polymers for highly efficient polymer solar cells. Chem. Mater. 23, 2289–2291 (2011)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Peet, J. et al. Efficiency enhancement in low-bandgap polymer solar cells by processing with alkane dithiols. Nature Mater. 6, 497–500 (2007)

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Di Nuzzo, D. et al. Improved film morphology reduces charge carrier recombination into the triplet excited state in a small bandgap polymer-fullerene photovoltaic cell. Adv. Mater. 22, 4321–4324 (2010)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Soon, Y. W. et al. Energy versus electron transfer in organic solar cells: a comparison of the photophysics of two indenofluorene:fullerene blend films. Chem. Sci. 2, 1111–1120 (2011)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Scharber, M. C. et al. Charge transfer excitons in low band gap polymer based solar cells and the role of processing additives. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 5077–5083 (2011)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Gélinas, S. et al. The binding energy of charge-transfer excitons localized at polymeric semiconductor heterojunctions. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 7114–7119 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Jamieson, F. C. et al. Fullerene crystallisation as a key driver of charge separation in polymer/fullerene bulk heterojunction solar cells. Chem. Sci. 3, 485–492 (2012)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Credgington, D., Hamilton, R., Atienzar, P., Nelson, J. & Durrant, J. R. Non-geminate recombination as the primary determinant of open-circuit voltage in polythiophene:fullerene blend solar cells: an analysis of the influence of device processing conditions. Adv. Funct. Mater. 21, 2744–2753 (2011)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Shockley, W. & Queisser, H. J. Detailed balance limit of efficiency of p-n junction solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 32, 510–519 (1961)

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Etzold, F. et al. The effect of solvent additives on morphology and excited-state dynamics in PCPDTBT:PCBM photovoltaic blends. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 10569–10583 (2012)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Cirmi, G. et al. Few-optical-cycle pulses in the near-infrared from a noncollinear optical parametric amplifier. Opt. Lett. 32, 2396–2398 (2007)

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Hodgkiss, J. M. et al. Exciton-charge annihilation in organic semiconductor films. Adv. Funct. Mater. 22, 1567–1577 (2012)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank N. Greenham for discussions. A.R. thanks Corpus Christi College, Cambridge for a Research Fellowship. S.G. thanks Fonds Québécois de Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies for funding. This work is supported by the EPSRC and the Winton Programme for the Physics of Sustainability. C.W.S. was supported by the National Science Foundation (DMR-1215753). D.S.G., C.-Z.L., H.-L.Y. and A.K.-Y.J. acknowledge support from the Office of Naval Research (N00014-11-1-0300). Some of the work was done at the UW NanoTech User Facility, a member of the NSF National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network. We thank J. Richards and D. Pozzo for performing grazing-incidence small-angle X-ray scattering measurements, S. Williams for transmission electron microscopy and G. Shao for help with atomic force microscopy measurements.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.R. and P.C.Y.C. performed the time-resolved measurements. S.G. developed the numerical methods. A.R., P.C.Y.C. and S.G. analysed the data. C.W.S. and D.S.G. had the idea for the structural and steady-state spectroscopic measurements. C.-Z.L. synthesized PIDT-PhanQ. H.-L.Y. and A.K.-Y.J. had the idea for the molecular design of PIDT-PhanQ. R.H.F. supervised the work. A.R., P.C.Y.C., S.G. and R.H.F. wrote the manuscript. All authors commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard H. Friend.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Text and Data, Supplementary Figures 1-16 and additional references. (PDF 2832 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rao, A., Chow, P., Gélinas, S. et al. The role of spin in the kinetic control of recombination in organic photovoltaics. Nature 500, 435–439 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12339

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing