Letter | Published:

Stable creeping fault segments can become destructive as a result of dynamic weakening

Nature volume 493, pages 518521 (24 January 2013) | Download Citation



Faults in Earth’s crust accommodate slow relative motion between tectonic plates through either similarly slow slip or fast, seismic-wave-producing rupture events perceived as earthquakes1,2,3. These types of behaviour are often assumed to be separated in space and to occur on two different types of fault segment: one with stable, rate-strengthening friction and the other with rate-weakening friction that leads to stick-slip2,3,4,5. The 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake with moment magnitude Mw = 9.0 challenged such assumptions by accumulating its largest seismic slip in the area that had been assumed to be creeping6,7,8,9,10. Here we propose a model in which stable, rate-strengthening behaviour at low slip rates11,12 is combined with coseismic weakening due to rapid shear heating of pore fluids13,14,15,16, allowing unstable slip to occur in segments that can creep between events. The model parameters are based on laboratory measurements on samples from the fault of the Mw 7.6 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake17. The long-term slip behaviour of the model, which we examine using a unique numerical approach that includes all wave effects16,18, reproduces and explains a number of both long-term and coseismic observations—some of them seemingly contradictory—about the faults at which the Tohoku-Oki and Chi-Chi earthquakes occurred, including there being more high-frequency radiation from areas of lower slip8,19,20,21, the largest seismic slip in the Tohoku-Oki earthquake having occurred in a potentially creeping segment6,7, the overall pattern of previous events in the area8 and the complexity of the Tohoku-Oki rupture9. The implication that earthquake rupture may break through large portions of creeping segments, which are at present considered to be barriers, requires a re-evaluation of seismic hazard in many areas.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    et al. Earthquake potential along the northern Hayward fault, California. Science 289, 1178–1182 (2000)

  2. 2.

    , , , & Heterogeneous coupling of the Sumatran megathrust constrained by geodetic and paleogeodetic measurements. J. Geophys. Res. 113, B05305 (2008)

  3. 3.

    et al. Seismic and aseismic slip on the central Peru megathrust. Nature 465, 78–81 (2010)

  4. 4.

    , & The asperity model and the nature of large subduction zone earthquakes. Earthq. Predict. Res. 1, 3–71 (1982)

  5. 5.

    , & Towards inferring earthquake patterns from geodetic observations of interseismic coupling. Nature Geosci. 3, 363–369 (2010)

  6. 6.

    et al. Tectonic features of the Japan Trench convergent margin off Sanriku, northeastern Japan, revealed by multichannel seismic reflection data. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 16,403–16,413 (2000)

  7. 7.

    & Geodetic imaging of plate motions, slip rates, and partitioning of deformation in Japan. J. Geophys. Res. 115, B02410 (2010)

  8. 8.

    et al. The 2011 magnitude 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake: mosaicking the megathrust from seconds to centuries. Science 332, 1421–1425 (2011)

  9. 9.

    , & Shallow dynamic overshoot and energetic deep rupture in the 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Science 332, 1426–1429 (2011)

  10. 10.

    , , , & Sources of shaking and flooding during the Tohoku-Oki earthquake: a mixture of rupture styles. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 333–334, 91–100 (2012)

  11. 11.

    in Treatise on Geophysics Vol. 4 (ed. Kanamori, H.) 107–129 (Elsevier, 2007)

  12. 12.

    Earthquakes and friction laws. Nature 391, 37–42 (1998)

  13. 13.

    Interaction between temperature and pore-fluid pressure during earthquake faulting: a mechanism for partial or total stress relief. Nature 243, 66–68 (1973)

  14. 14.

    A fault constitutive relation accounting for thermal pressurization of pore fluid. J. Geophys. Res. 107, 2363 (2002)

  15. 15.

    Heating and weakening of faults during earthquake slip. J. Geophys. Res. 111, B05311 (2006)

  16. 16.

    & Three-dimensional earthquake sequence simulations with evolving temperature and pore pressure due to shear heating: effect of heterogeneous hydraulic diffusivity. J. Geophys. Res. 115, B12314 (2010)

  17. 17.

    & Frictional and transport properties of the Chelungpu fault from shallow borehole data and their correlation with seismic behavior during the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake. J. Geophys. Res. 114, B01502 (2009)

  18. 18.

    & Three-dimensional boundary integral modeling of spontaneous earthquake sequences and aseismic slip. J. Geophys. Res. 114, B09303 (2009)

  19. 19.

    et al. Spatial slip distribution of the September 20, 1999, Shi-Shi, Taiwan, earthquake (Mw7.6)–inverted from teleseismic data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 3417–3420 (2000)

  20. 20.

    et al. Evidence for fault lubrication during the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake (Mw7.6). Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 1244 (2003)

  21. 21.

    , & A window into the complexity of the dynamic rupture of the 2011 Mw 9 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L00G07 (2011)

  22. 22.

    et al. Coseismic fluid-rock interactions at high temperatures in the Chelungpu fault. Nature Geosci. 1, 679–683 (2008)

  23. 23.

    & High velocity frictional properties of gabbro. Geophys. Res. Lett. 24, 699–702 (1997)

  24. 24.

    in Treatise on Geophysics Vol. 4 (ed. Kanamori, H.) 131–152 (Elsevier, 2007)

  25. 25.

    et al. 3D modeling of the cycle of a great Tohoku-Oki earthquake, considering frictional behavior at low to high slip velocities. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L21305 (2011)

  26. 26.

    et al. Low-angle reverse faulting during two earthquakes on the northern part of the Chelungpu fault, deduced from the Fengyuan trench, central Taiwan. Terr. Atmos. Ocean. Sci. 18, 55–66 (2007)

  27. 27.

    , , , & Stuck in the mud? Earthquake nucleation and propagation through accretionary forearcs. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L18303 (2011)

  28. 28.

    , , & Dilatant strengthening as a mechanism for slow slip events. J. Geophys. Res. 115, B12305 (2010)

  29. 29.

    et al. Implications for prediction and hazard assessment from the 2004 Parkfield earthquake. Nature 437, 969–974 (2005)

  30. 30.

    et al. Seismic slip propagation to the updip end of plate boundary subduction interface faults: vitrinite reflectance geothermometry on Integrated Ocean Drilling Program NanTro SEIZE cores. Geology 39, 395–398 (2011)

  31. 31.

    , & Rate and state dependent friction and the stability of sliding between elastically deformable solids. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 49, 1865–1898 (2001)

  32. 32.

    Modeling of rock friction: 1. Experimental results and constitutive equations. J. Geophys. Res. 84, 2161–2168 (1979)

  33. 33.

    in Mechanical Behavior of Crustal Rocks (eds Carter, N. L., Logan, J. M. & Stearns, D. W.) 103–120 (Geophys. Monogr. Ser. 24, American Geophysical Union, 1981)

  34. 34.

    Slip instability and state variable friction laws. J. Geophys. Res. 88, 10359–10370 (1983)

  35. 35.

    Frictional heating, fluid pressure, and the resistance to fault motion. J. Geophys. Res. 85, 6097–6112 (1980)

  36. 36.

    , , & Elastodynamic analysis for slow tectonic loading with spontaneous rupture episodes on faults with rate- and state-dependent friction. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 23765–23789 (2000)

Download references


This study was supported by the US National Science Foundation (NSF) (grant EAR 0548277), the Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC) and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. The SCEC is funded by NSF Cooperative Agreement EAR-0106924 and USGS Cooperative Agreement 02HQAG0008. This is SCEC contribution no. 1675 and Caltech Tectonics Observatory contribution no. 213. Numerical simulations for this study were performed on the CITerra Dell cluster at the Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences of the California Institute of Technology.

Author information


  1. Institute for Research on Earth Evolution, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 236-0001, Japan

    • Hiroyuki Noda
  2. Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences

    • Nadia Lapusta
  3. Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA

    • Nadia Lapusta


  1. Search for Hiroyuki Noda in:

  2. Search for Nadia Lapusta in:


Both authors contributed to developing the main ideas, interpreting the results and producing the manuscript. H.N. designed, carried out and analysed the numerical experiments described in the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroyuki Noda.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Text, Supplementary References, Supplementary Tables 1-2 and Supplementary Figures 1-5.


  1. 1.

    Evolution of slip rate distribution from 4300 to 4800 years.

    In this period, whole patch B creeps before model-spanning events. Note that the timesteps between frames vary for orders of magnitude between interseismic and coseismic periods. For details, see Supplementary Information section 2.

  2. 2.

    Evolution of slip rate distribution from 3500 to 4000 years.

    In this period, model-spaning events take place while patch B is partially locked. For details, see Supplementary Information section 2.

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.