Letter | Published:

Non-classical light generated by quantum-noise-driven cavity optomechanics

Nature volume 488, pages 476480 (23 August 2012) | Download Citation

Abstract

Optomechanical systems1, in which light drives and is affected by the motion of a massive object, will comprise a new framework for nonlinear quantum optics, with applications ranging from the storage2,3,4 and transduction5,6 of quantum information to enhanced detection sensitivity in gravitational wave detectors7,8. However, quantum optical effects in optomechanical systems have remained obscure, because their detection requires the object’s motion to be dominated by vacuum fluctuations in the optical radiation pressure; so far, direct observations have been stymied by technical and thermal noise. Here we report an implementation of cavity optomechanics9,10 using ultracold atoms in which the collective atomic motion is dominantly driven by quantum fluctuations in radiation pressure. The back-action of this motion onto the cavity light field produces ponderomotive squeezing11,12. We detect this quantum phenomenon by measuring sub-shot-noise optical squeezing. Furthermore, the system acts as a low-power, high-gain, nonlinear parametric amplifier for optical fluctuations, demonstrating a gain of 20 dB with a pump corresponding to an average of only seven intracavity photons. These findings may pave the way for low-power quantum optical devices, surpassing quantum limits on position and force sensing13,14, and the control and measurement of motion in quantum gases.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & Cavity optomechanics: back-action at the mesoscale. Science 321, 1172–1176 (2008)

  2. 2.

    et al. Circuit cavity electromechanics in the strong-coupling regime. Nature 471, 204–208 (2011)

  3. 3.

    et al. Optomechanically induced transparency. Science 330, 1520–1523 (2010)

  4. 4.

    et al. Electromagnetically induced transparency and slow light with optomechanics. Nature 472, 69–73 (2011)

  5. 5.

    & Proposal for an optomechanical traveling wave phonon–photon translator. N. J. Phys. 13, 013017 (2011)

  6. 6.

    & From cavity electromechanics to cavity optomechanics. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 264, 012025 (2011)

  7. 7.

    , , , & Conversion of conventional gravitational-wave interferometers into quantum non-demolition interferometers by modifying their input and/or output optics. Phys. Rev. D 65, 022002 (2001)

  8. 8.

    et al. Squeezed-state source using radiation-pressure-induced rigidity. Phys. Rev. A 73, 023801 (2006)

  9. 9.

    , , & Cavity non-linear optics at low photon numbers from collective atomic motion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 213601 (2007)

  10. 10.

    , , & Cavity optomechanics with a Bose-Einstein condensate. Science 322, 235–238 (2008)

  11. 11.

    et al. Quantum-noise reduction using a cavity with a movable mirror. Phys. Rev. A 49, 1337–1343 (1994)

  12. 12.

    & Quantum noise reduction by radiation pressure. Phys. Rev. A 49, 4055–4065 (1994)

  13. 13.

    Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer. Phys. Rev. D 23, 1693–1708 (1981)

  14. 14.

    , , , & Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1155–1208 (2010)

  15. 15.

    et al. Sideband cooling of micromechanical motion to the quantum ground state. Nature 475, 359–363 (2011)

  16. 16.

    et al. Laser cooling of a nanomechanical oscillator into its quantum ground state. Nature 478, 89–92 (2011)

  17. 17.

    et al. An upper limit on the stochastic gravitational-wave background of cosmological origin. Nature 460, 990–994 (2009)

  18. 18.

    & Ponderomotive effects of electromagnetic radiation. Sov. Phys. JETP 24, 653–655 (1967)

  19. 19.

    Quantum-mechanical radiation-pressure fluctuations in an interferometer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 75–79 (1980)

  20. 20.

    , , , & Classical signature of ponderomotive squeezing in a suspended mirror resonator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 073601 (2010)

  21. 21.

    , , , & Backaction amplification and quantum limits in optomechanical measurements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 133602 (2010)

  22. 22.

    , , , & Linear amplifier model for optomechanical systems. Phys. Rev. A 85, 013812 (2012)

  23. 23.

    , & Single-photon optomechanics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 063602 (2011)

  24. 24.

    Photon blockade effect in optomechanical systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 063601 (2011)

  25. 25.

    , , & Observation of quantum-measurement backaction with an ultracold atomic gas. Nature Phys. 4, 561–564 (2008)

  26. 26.

    et al. Tunable cavity optomechanics with ultracold atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 133602 (2010)

  27. 27.

    , , , & Optical detection of the quantization of collective atomic motion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 133601 (2012)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge C. McLeod for assistance with the manuscript. This work was supported by the AFSOR and NSF. T.B. acknowledges support from the FQRNT.

Author information

Author notes

    • Thomas P. Purdy

    Present address: JILA, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA.

Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA

    • Daniel W. C. Brooks
    • , Thierry Botter
    • , Sydney Schreppler
    • , Thomas P. Purdy
    • , Nathan Brahms
    •  & Dan M. Stamper-Kurn
  2. Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA

    • Dan M. Stamper-Kurn

Authors

  1. Search for Daniel W. C. Brooks in:

  2. Search for Thierry Botter in:

  3. Search for Sydney Schreppler in:

  4. Search for Thomas P. Purdy in:

  5. Search for Nathan Brahms in:

  6. Search for Dan M. Stamper-Kurn in:

Contributions

T.P.P. contributed to the design of the experiment and the development of the theory. All other authors contributed to the design of the experiment, the development of the theory, data acquisition and analysis.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel W. C. Brooks.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Text and Data, Supplementary Figures 1-7, Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary References. This file was replaced on 06 September 2012 to correct a missing factor of 1/omega_m in the first relation of equation S4.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11325

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.