Nature 479, 113–116 (2011)
We measured1 changes in intelligence quotient (IQ) between time 1 and time 2 in teenage subjects and searched their brains for regions where changes in IQ predicted changes in grey matter density (GMD). We found highly significant effects in two localized brain regions, after correcting for multiple comparisons across the whole brain. This provided an unbiased inference that longitudinal changes in IQ were meaningful rather than attributable to measurement error. In post hoc analyses, we quantified the (standardized) effect sizes2 by reporting that 20% of the variance in verbal IQ (VIQ) at time 2 and 13% of the variance in performance IQ (PIQ) at time 2 could be explained by changes in GMD at the most significant voxel in the regions identified by the whole brain analyses. These (in-sample) effect sizes pertain to the sample studied and should not be confused with out-of-sample predictions3: that is, IQ predictability given new or independent subjects. Out-of-sample predictions finesse the inherent sampling bias of (in-sample) effect sizes—known in neuroimaging as ‘the non-independence problem’.
Here we report out-of-sample estimates of effect size using a split-half procedure (and take the opportunity to compare VIQ and PIQ effects by including both in the same model). This involved splitting our sample into two groups (group 1 with n = 17 and group 2 with n = 16). One group was used to select voxels in which IQ changes predict GMD changes and the other group was used to predict IQ change from GMD change in these voxels. We found that GMD changes in group 2 (in voxels selected using group 1) predicted 16% of time-2 VIQ and 11% of time-2 PIQ. Conversely, GMD changes in group 1 (in voxels selected using group 2) predicted 16% of time-2 VIQ and 15% of time-2 PIQ (see Fig. 1 for details). These out-of-sample predictions are consistent with our original effect sizes. However, the split-half procedure is one of several procedures we could have used: an alternative approach—that minimizes type II (false negative) errors during voxel selection—is based on ‘leave one out’ procedures4 and provides unbiased out-of-sample predictions of IQ change from GMD for each subject, in voxels identified in the other subjects. We will report this analysis elsewhere.
Ramsden, S. et al. Verbal and non-verbal intelligence changes in the teenage brain. Nature 479, 113–116 (2011)
Wilkinson, L. APA task force on statistical inference statistical methods in psychology journals: guidelines and explanations. Am. Psychol. 54, 594–604 (1999)
Leeb, H. Evaluation and selection of models for out-of-sample prediction when the sample size is small relative to the complexity of the data-generating process. Bernoulli 14, 661–690 (2008)
Martens, H. A. & Dardenne, P. Validation and verification of regression in small data sets. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 44, 99–121 (1998)
About this article
Cite this article
Ramsden, S., Richardson, F., Josse, G. et al. Addendum: Verbal and non-verbal intelligence changes in the teenage brain. Nature 485, 666 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11113