Article | Published:

Indian and African plate motions driven by the push force of the Réunion plume head

Nature volume 475, pages 4752 (07 July 2011) | Download Citation

Abstract

Mantle plumes are thought to play an important part in the Earth’s tectonics, yet it has been difficult to isolate the effect that plumes have on plate motions. Here we analyse the plate motions involved in two apparently disparate events—the unusually rapid motion of India between 67 and 52 million years ago and a contemporaneous, transitory slowing of Africa’s motion—and show that the events are coupled, with the common element being the position of the Indian and African plates relative to the location of the Réunion plume head. The synchroneity of these events suggests that they were both driven by the force of the Réunion plume head. The recognition of this plume force has substantial tectonic implications: the speed-up and slowdown of India, the possible cessation of convergence between Africa and Eurasia in the Palaeocene epoch and the enigmatic bends of the fracture zones on the Southwest Indian Ridge can all be attributed to the Réunion plume.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. A Geologic Time Scale 2004 (eds , & ) (Cambridge University Press, 2004)

  2. 2.

    & The evolution of the Indian Ocean since the Late Cretaceous. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 25, 437–528 (1971)

  3. 3.

    & Evolution of the east central Indian Ocean, with emphasis on the tectonic setting of the Ninetyeast Ridge. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 85, 683–702 (1974)

  4. 4.

    & Paleogeographic maps of the Indian Ocean bordering continents since the Upper Jurassic. J. Geophys. Res. 93, 11791–11808 (1988)

  5. 5.

    , , & An early India–Asia contact: paleomagnetic constraints from Ninetyeast Ridge, ODP Leg 121. Geology 20, 395–398 (1992)

  6. 6.

    in Indian Subcontinent and Gondwana: A Palaeomagnetic and Rock Magnetic Perspective (eds & ) Vol. 44, 129–175 (Mem. Geol. Soc. India, 1999)

  7. 7.

    & Global plate motions relative to the hotspots 64 to 56 Ma. J. Geophys. Res. 89, 9927–9936 (1984)

  8. 8.

    & On the relative importance of the driving forces of plate motion. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 43, 163–200 (1975)

  9. 9.

    et al. Geological evolution of the Tethys belt from the Atlantic to the Pamirs since the Lias. Tectonophysics 123, 241–315 (1986)

  10. 10.

    , , , & in Alpine Tectonics (eds , & ) Vol. 45, 265–283 (Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ., 1989)

  11. 11.

    & in The Western North Atlantic Region DNAG Vol. M (eds & ) 379–404 (Geological Society of America, 1986)

  12. 12.

    , , & Cenozoic evolution of Neotethys and implications for the causes of plate motions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30 2036 10.1029/2003GL017992 (2003)

  13. 13.

    & Hotspots, mantle plumes, flood basalts, and true polar wander. Rev. Geophys. 29, 31–50 (1991)

  14. 14.

    et al. Deccan flood basalts at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary? Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 80, 361–374 (1986)

  15. 15.

    , , & Paleomagnetism and age determinations of the Deccan traps (India): results of a Nagpur–Bombay traverse and review of earlier work. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 29, 159–190 (1991)

  16. 16.

    Age and duration of the Deccan Traps, India: a review of radiometric and paleomagnetic constraints. Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci. 111, 115–123 (2002)

  17. 17.

    Quidelleur, X. Fluteau, F., Courtillot, V. & Bajpai, S. 40K–40Ar dating of the Main Deccan large igneous province: further evidence of KTB age and short duration. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 263, 1–15 (2007)

  18. 18.

    Melt production rates in mantle plumes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 342, 137–153 (1993)

  19. 19.

    , , & Variation of effective elastic thickness and melt production along the Deccan–Réunion hotspot track. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 264, 9–21 (2007)

  20. 20.

    & A model for the evolution of the Indian Ocean and the breakup of Gondwanaland. J. Geophys. Res. 84, 6803–6830 (1979)

  21. 21.

    & Magmatism at rift zones: the generation of volcanic continental margins and flood basalts. J. Geophys. Res. 94, 7685–7729 (1989)

  22. 22.

    Structure et evolution de la lithosphere oceanique dans l'ocean Indien: apport des anomalies magnetiques. Thesis (Univ. Louis Pasteur, 1991)

  23. 23.

    Deep mantle convective plumes and plate motions. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull. 56, 203–213 (1972)

  24. 24.

    Latest pulse of Earth: evidence for a mid-Cretaceous superplume. Geology 19, 547–550 (1991)

  25. 25.

    , , & Observational hints for a plume-fed, suboceanic asthenosphere and its role in mantle convection. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 12753–12767 (1995)

  26. 26.

    , & Motion between the Indian, Antarctica and African plates in the early Cenozoic. Geophys. J. Int. 183, 127–149 (2010)

  27. 27.

    , & The Cenozoic and Late Cretaceous evolution of the Indian Ocean: uncertainties in the reconstructed positions of the Indian, African and Antarctic plates. Basin Res. 1, 23–40 (1988)

  28. 28.

    & Evolution of the Eastern Indian Ocean since the Late Cretaceous: constraints from Geosat altimetry. J. Geophys. Res. 94, 13755–13782 (1989)

  29. 29.

    , , , & in Caribbean Basins (ed. ) Vol. 4, 33–59 (Elsevier Science, 1999)

  30. 30.

    Tectonic evolution of the Southern Ocean between Antarctica, South America and Africa over the last 84 Ma. PhD thesis (University of Oxford, 1997)

  31. 31.

    , , & Evolution of the Southwest Indian Ridge from the Late Cretaceous (Anomaly 34) to the Middle Eocene (Anomaly 20). Tectonophysics 155, 235–260 (1988)

  32. 32.

    , & Revised plate motions relative to the hotspots from combined Atlantic and Indian Ocean hotspot tracks. Geology 21, 275–278 (1993)

  33. 33.

    , , , & Global plate motion frames: toward a unified model. Rev. Geophys. 46, RG3004 (2008)

  34. 34.

    , & Flood basalts and hotspot tracks: plume heads and tails. Science 246, 103–107 (1989)

  35. 35.

    Plate dynamics: Caribbean map corrections and hotspot push. Geophys. J. Int. 100, 423–431 (1990)

  36. 36.

    , , & Acceleration and deceleration of India-Asia convergence since the Cretaceous: roles of mantle plumes and continental collision. J. Geophys. Res. doi:10.1029/2010JB008051. (in the press)

  37. 37.

    & &. Funiciello, R. Opening of Sirte Basin: result of slab avalanche? Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 285, 210–216 (2009)

  38. 38.

    & Cenozoic tectonics of Asia: effects of a continental collision. Science 189, 419–426 (1975)

  39. 39.

    & India-Eurasia collision chronology has implications for shortening and driving mechanism of plates. Nature 311, 615–621 (1984)

  40. 40.

    , & Sedimentary record of the northward flight of India and its collision with Eurasia (Ladakh Himalaya, India). Geodin. Acta 1, 297–312 (1987)

  41. 41.

    The history of ridge-crest offset at the Falkland-Agulhas fracture zone from a small-circle geophysical profile. Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc. 59, 131–145 (1979)

  42. 42.

    & Seafloor spreading in the Weddell Sea and Southwest Atlantic since the Late Cretaceous. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 117, 475–495 (1993)

  43. 43.

    & The oldest magnetic anomalies in the Australian-Antarctic Basin: are they isochrons? J. Geophys. Res. 104, 661–677 (1999)

  44. 44.

    & 50-Ma initiation of Hawaiian-Emperor bend records major change in Pacific plate motion. Science 313, 1281–1284 (2006)

  45. 45.

    , & History and Dynamics of Global Plate MotionsIn (eds , & ) AGU Monogr. 121, 359–376 (2000)

  46. 46.

    , & Prediction of Emperor-Hawaii seamount locations from a revised model of global plate motion and mantle flow. Nature 430, 167–173 (2004)

  47. 47.

    , , & The bent Hawaiian-Emperor hotspot track: inheriting the mantle wind. Science 324, 50–53 (2009)

  48. 48.

    et al. Major Australian-Antarctic plate reorganization at Hawaiian-Emperor bend time. Science 318, 83–86 (2007)

  49. 49.

    & Marine gravity anomaly from Geosat and ERS-1 satellite altimetry. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 10039–10054 (1997)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Stock for discussions. R. Gordon and D. Müller made comments on the manuscript. Funding was provided by NSF grant ANT-0944345 (to S.C.C.).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California 92093-0220, USA

    • Steven C. Cande
    •  & Dave R. Stegman

Authors

  1. Search for Steven C. Cande in:

  2. Search for Dave R. Stegman in:

Contributions

Both authors contributed equally to the ideas and design of the research. S.C.C. developed the new methodology and performed kinematic analysis. Both authors contributed to writing the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven C. Cande.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Figure 1 and legend and Supplementary Tables 1-5.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10174

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.