Letter | Published:

Dislocation nucleation governed softening and maximum strength in nano-twinned metals

Nature volume 464, pages 877880 (08 April 2010) | Download Citation

Abstract

In conventional metals, there is plenty of space for dislocations—line defects whose motion results in permanent material deformation—to multiply, so that the metal strengths are controlled by dislocation interactions with grain boundaries1,2 and other obstacles3,4. For nanostructured materials, in contrast, dislocation multiplication is severely confined by the nanometre-scale geometries so that continued plasticity can be expected to be source-controlled. Nano-grained polycrystalline materials were found to be strong but brittle5,6,7,8,9, because both nucleation and motion of dislocations are effectively suppressed by the nanoscale crystallites. Here we report a dislocation-nucleation-controlled mechanism in nano-twinned metals10,11 in which there are plenty of dislocation nucleation sites but dislocation motion is not confined. We show that dislocation nucleation governs the strength of such materials, resulting in their softening below a critical twin thickness. Large-scale molecular dynamics simulations and a kinetic theory of dislocation nucleation in nano-twinned metals show that there exists a transition in deformation mechanism, occurring at a critical twin-boundary spacing for which strength is maximized. At this point, the classical Hall–Petch type of strengthening due to dislocation pile-up and cutting through twin planes switches to a dislocation-nucleation-controlled softening mechanism with twin-boundary migration resulting from nucleation and motion of partial dislocations parallel to the twin planes. Most previous studies12,13 did not consider a sufficient range of twin thickness and therefore missed this strength-softening regime. The simulations indicate that the critical twin-boundary spacing for the onset of softening in nano-twinned copper and the maximum strength depend on the grain size: the smaller the grain size, the smaller the critical twin-boundary spacing, and the higher the maximum strength of the material.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    The deformation and ageing of mild steel: III. Discussion of results. Proc. Phys. Soc. Lond. B 64, 747–753 (1951)

  2. 2.

    The cleavage strength of polycrystals. J. Iron Steel Inst. 174, 25–28 (1953)

  3. 3.

    & Theory of Dislocations 2nd edn, 764–790 (John Wiley and Sons, 1982)

  4. 4.

    , & Dislocation mean free paths and strain hardening of crystals. Science 320, 1745–1748 (2008)

  5. 5.

    , & Mechanical properties of nanocrystalline materials. Prog. Mater. Sci. 51, 427–556 (2006)

  6. 6.

    Nanocrystals: the strongest size. Nature 391, 532–533 (1998)

  7. 7.

    , & Softening of nanocrystalline metals at very small grain sizes. Nature 391, 561–563 (1998)

  8. 8.

    & A maximum in the strength of nanocrystalline copper. Science 301, 1357–1359 (2003)

  9. 9.

    , , , & Deformation of nanocrystalline materials by molecular-dynamics simulation: relationship to experiments? Acta Mater. 53, 1–40 (2005)

  10. 10.

    , , , & Ultrahigh strength and high electrical conductivity in copper. Science 304, 422–426 (2004)

  11. 11.

    , , & Revealing the maximum strength in nano-twinned copper. Science 323, 607–610 (2009)

  12. 12.

    & Molecular dynamics simulation of plastic deformation of nanotwinned copper. J. Appl. Phys. 102, 083511 (2007)

  13. 13.

    & Deformation characteristics and stress-strain response of nanotwinned copper via molecular dynamics simulation. Acta Mater. 57, 4364–4373 (2009)

  14. 14.

    , , & On the validity of the Hall-Petch relationship in nanocrystalline materials. Scr. Metall. Mater. 23, 1679–1684 (1989)

  15. 15.

    , , , & Deformation of electrodeposited nanocrystalline nickel. Acta Mater. 51, 387–405 (2003)

  16. 16.

    et al. Grain boundary-mediated plasticity in nanocrystalline nickel. Science 305, 654–657 (2004)

  17. 17.

    , , & Competing plastic deformation mechanisms in nanophase metals. Phys. Rev. B 60, 22–25 (1999)

  18. 18.

    , , & Deformation twinning in nanocrystalline Al by molecular-dynamics simulation. Acta Mater. 50, 5005–5020 (2002)

  19. 19.

    , , & Sample dimensions influence strength and crystal plasticity. Science 305, 986–989 (2004)

  20. 20.

    , & Size dependence of mechanical properties of gold at the micron scale in the absence of strain gradients. Acta Mater. 53, 1821–1830 (2005)

  21. 21.

    , , , & Mechanical annealing and source-limited deformation in submicrometre-diameter Ni crystals. Nature Mater. 7, 115–119 (2007)

  22. 22.

    & Nanoscale deformation: seeing is believing. Nature Mater. 7, 97–98 (2008)

  23. 23.

    , & The influence of twins on the mechanical properties of nc-Al. Acta Mater. 52, 2259–2268 (2004)

  24. 24.

    , , , & Interfacial plasticity governs strain rate sensitivity and ductility in nanostructured metals. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 3031–3036 (2007)

  25. 25.

    & Deformation twinning. Prog. Mater. Sci. 39, 1–157 (1995)

  26. 26.

    , & Stacking fault energies and slip in nanocrystalline metals. Nature Mater. 3, 399–403 (2004)

  27. 27.

    , & In situ observation of twin boundary migration in copper with nanoscale twins during tensile deformation. Phil. Mag. Lett. 87, 935–942 (2007)

  28. 28.

    & Are some nano-twinned fcc metals optimal for strength, ductility and grain stability? Acta Mater. 57, 4835–4844 (2009)

  29. 29.

    , , , & Structural stability and lattice defects in copper: ab initio, tight-binding, and embedded-atom calculations. Phys. Rev. B 63, 224106 (2001)

  30. 30.

    A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 511–519 (1984)

  31. 31.

    , & Reversible multiple time scale molecular dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 97, 1990–2001 (1992)

  32. 32.

    , & Grain-boundary structures in polycrystalline metals at the nanoscale. Phys. Rev. B 62, 831–838 (2000)

Download references

Acknowledgements

X.L. and H.G. acknowledge financial support by the NSF through the MRSEC Program (award number DMR-0520651) and grant CMMI-0758535 at Brown University. The simulations reported were performed on NSF TeraGrid resources provided by NICS under MSS090036 (H.G.) and DMR090083 (Y.W.), with additional support from the Computational Mechanics Research Facility at Brown University and the Alabama Supercomputer Center. Helpful discussions with J. D. Embury, W. D. Nix, H. Mughrabi, M. A. Meyers and R. Taylor are gratefully acknowledged. L.L. and K.L. acknowledge financial support by the NSFC (grant numbers 50621091, 50725103 and 50890171) and the MOST of China (grant number 2005CB623604).

Author Contributions All authors contributed equally to this work. H.G., K.L. and L.L. conceived the project. X.L. and Y.W. performed molecular dynamics simulations. All authors analysed data, developed the model, discussed the results and wrote the paper.

Author information

Author notes

    • Yujie Wei

    Present address: State Key Laboratory of Nonlinear Mechanics, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.

Affiliations

  1. Division of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA

    • Xiaoyan Li
    •  & Huajian Gao
  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487, USA

    • Yujie Wei
  3. Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China

    • Lei Lu
    •  & Ke Lu

Authors

  1. Search for Xiaoyan Li in:

  2. Search for Yujie Wei in:

  3. Search for Lei Lu in:

  4. Search for Ke Lu in:

  5. Search for Huajian Gao in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yujie Wei or Huajian Gao.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Figures S1-S9, Supplementary Discussions 1-4, Supplementary References and legends for Supplementary Movies 1-6.

Videos

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Movie 1

    This movie file contains an animation of nano-twinned Cu with grain size d=10nm and twin boundary spacing λ=0.63nm under uniaxial tension (see Supplementary Information file for full legend).

  2. 2.

    Supplementary Movie 2

    Animation of nano-twinned Cu with grain size d=10nm and twin boundary spacing λ=3.75nm under uniaxial tension (see Supplementary Information file for full legend).

  3. 3.

    Supplementary Movie 3

    This movie file contains an animation of nano-twinned Cu with grain size d=20nm and twin boundary spacing λ=0.83nm under uniaxial tension (see Supplementary Information file for full legend).

  4. 4.

    Supplementary Movie 4

    This movie file contains an animation of nano-twinned Cu with grain size d=20nm and twin boundary spacing λ=6.25nm under uniaxial tension (see Supplementary Information file for full legend).

  5. 5.

    Supplementary Movie 5

    This movie file contains an animation of evolution of dislocation structures within one grain of nano-twinned Cu with grain size d=20nm and twin boundary spacing λ=0.83nm under uniaxial tension (see Supplementary Information file for full legend).

  6. 6.

    Supplementary Movie 6

    This movie file contains an animation of evolution of dislocation structures within one grain of nano-twinned Cu with grain size d=20nm and twin boundary spacing λ=6.25nm under uniaxial tension (see Supplementary Information file for full legend).

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08929

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.