Nonlinear atom interferometer surpasses classical precision limit

Article metrics

Abstract

Interference is fundamental to wave dynamics and quantum mechanics. The quantum wave properties of particles are exploited in metrology using atom interferometers, allowing for high-precision inertia measurements1,2. Furthermore, the state-of-the-art time standard is based on an interferometric technique known as Ramsey spectroscopy. However, the precision of an interferometer is limited by classical statistics owing to the finite number of atoms used to deduce the quantity of interest3. Here we show experimentally that the classical precision limit can be surpassed using nonlinear atom interferometry with a Bose–Einstein condensate. Controlled interactions between the atoms lead to non-classical entangled states within the interferometer; this represents an alternative approach to the use of non-classical input states4,5,6,7,8. Extending quantum interferometry9 to the regime of large atom number, we find that phase sensitivity is enhanced by 15 per cent relative to that in an ideal classical measurement. Our nonlinear atomic beam splitter follows the ‘one-axis-twisting’ scheme10 and implements interaction control using a narrow Feshbach resonance. We perform noise tomography of the quantum state within the interferometer and detect coherent spin squeezing with a squeezing factor of -8.2 dB (refs 11–15). The results provide information on the many-particle quantum state, and imply the entanglement of 170 atoms16.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Comparison of linear and nonlinear interferometry.
Figure 2: Direct experimental demonstration of precision beyond the standard quantum limit.
Figure 3: Characterization of the quantum state within the nonlinear interferometer.

References

  1. 1

    Gustavson, T. L., Bouyer, P. & Kasevich, M. A. Precision rotation measurements with an atom interferometer gyroscope. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2046–2049 (1997)

  2. 2

    Fixler, J., Foster, G., McGuirk, J. & Kasevich, M. Atom interferometer measurement of the Newtonian constant of gravity. Science 315, 74–77 (2007)

  3. 3

    Santarelli, G. et al. Quantum projection noise in an atomic fountain: a high stability cesium frequency standard. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4619–4622 (1999)

  4. 4

    Hald, J., Sørensen, J. L., Schori, C. & Polzik, E. S. Spin squeezed atoms: a macroscopic entangled ensemble created by light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1319–1322 (1999)

  5. 5

    Kuzmich, A., Mandel, L. & Bigelow, N. P. Generation of spin squeezing via continuous quantum nondemolition measurement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1594–1597 (2000)

  6. 6

    Meyer, V. et al. Experimental demonstration of entanglement-enhanced rotation angle estimation using trapped ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5870–5873 (2001)

  7. 7

    Leibfried, D. et al. Toward Heisenberg-limited spectroscopy with multiparticle entangled states. Science 304, 1476–1478 (2004)

  8. 8

    Roos, C. F., Chwalla, M., Kim, K., Riebe, M. & Blatt, R. ‘Designer atoms’ for quantum metrology. Nature 443, 316–319 (2006)

  9. 9

    Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S. & Maccone, L. Quantum-enhanced measurements: beating the standard quantum limit. Science 306, 1330–1336 (2004)

  10. 10

    Kitagawa, M. & Ueda, M. Squeezed spin states. Phys. Rev. A 47, 5138–5143 (1993)

  11. 11

    Wineland, D., Bollinger, J., Itano, W. & Heinzen, D. Squeezed atomic states and projection noise in spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. A 50, 67–88 (1994)

  12. 12

    Sørensen, A., Duan, L., Cirac, J. & Zoller, P. Many-particle entanglement with Bose–Einstein condensates. Nature 409, 63–66 (2001)

  13. 13

    Esteve, J., Gross, C., Weller, A., Giovanazzi, S. & Oberthaler, M. K. Squeezing and entanglement in a Bose–Einstein condensate. Nature 455, 1216–1219 (2008)

  14. 14

    Leroux, I. D., Schleier-Smith, M. H. & Vuletić, V. Implementation of cavity squeezing of a collective atomic spin. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 073602 (2010)

  15. 15

    Appel, J. et al. Mesoscopic atomic entanglement for precision measurements beyond the standard quantum limit. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 10960–10965 (2009)

  16. 16

    Sørensen, A. & Mølmer, K. Entanglement and extreme spin squeezing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4431–4434 (2001)

  17. 17

    Cronin, A. D., Schmiedmayer, J. & Pritchard, D. E. Optics and interferometry with atoms and molecules. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1051–1129 (2009)

  18. 18

    Pezzé, L. & Smerzi, A. Entanglement, nonlinear dynamics, and the Heisenberg limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 100401 (2009)

  19. 19

    Esteve, J. et al. Observations of density fluctuations in an elongated Bose gas: ideal gas and quasicondensate regimes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 130403 (2006)

  20. 20

    Widera, A. et al. Entanglement interferometry for precision measurement of atomic scattering properties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 160406 (2004)

  21. 21

    Erhard, M., Schmaljohann, H., Kronjäger, J., Bongs, K. & Sengstock, K. Measurement of a mixed-spin-channel Feshbach resonance in 87Rb. Phys. Rev. A 69, 032705 (2004)

  22. 22

    Kaufman, A. M. et al. Radio-frequency dressing of multiple Feshbach resonances. Phys. Rev. A 80, 050701 (2009)

  23. 23

    Sinatra, A. & Castin, Y. Binary mixtures of Bose-Einstein condensates: phase dynamics and spatial dynamics. Eur. Phys. J. D 8, 319–332 (2000)

  24. 24

    Li, Y., Treutlein, P., Reichel, J. & Sinatra, A. Spin squeezing in a bimodal condensate: spatial dynamics and particle losses. Eur. Phys. J. B 68, 365–381 (2009)

  25. 25

    Steel, M. & Collett, M. Quantum state of two trapped Bose-Einstein condensates with a Josephson coupling. Phys. Rev. A 57, 2920–2930 (1998)

  26. 26

    Fernholz, T. et al. Spin squeezing of atomic ensembles via nuclear-electronic spin entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 073601 (2008)

  27. 27

    Ferrini, G., Spehner, D., Minguzzi, A. & Hekking, F. W. J. Anomalous decoherence rate of macroscopic superpositions in Bose Josephson junctions. Preprint at 〈http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.0655〉 (2009)

  28. 28

    Li, Y., Castin, Y. & Sinatra, A. Optimum spin squeezing in Bose-Einstein condensates with particle losses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 210401 (2008)

  29. 29

    Tóth, G., Knapp, C., Gühne, O. & Briegel, H. J. Optimal spin squeezing inequalities detect bound entanglement in spin models. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 250405 (2007)

  30. 30

    Reinaudi, G., Lahaye, T., Wang, Z. & Guéry-Odelin, D. Strong saturation absorption imaging of dense clouds of ultracold atoms. Opt. Lett. 32, 3143–3145 (2007)

  31. 31

    Riedel, M. F. et al. Atom-chip-based generation of entanglement for quantum metrology. Nature 10.1038/nature08988 (this issue); preprint at 〈http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.1651〉 (2010)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J.-P. Ronzheimer for technical assistance throughout the realization of this project and acknowledge discussions with Y. Li and A. Sinatra. We gratefully acknowledge support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, the German-Israeli Foundation, the Heidelberg Center of Quantum Dynamics, the ExtreMe Matter Institute and the European Commission Future and Emerging Technologies Open Scheme project MIDAS (Macroscopic Interference Devices for Atomic and Solid-State Systems). C.G. acknowledges support from the Landesgraduiertenförderung Baden-Württemberg.

Author Contributions All authors contributed extensively to the work presented in this paper.

Author information

Correspondence to M. K. Oberthaler.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

This file contains Supplementary Data and Supplementary Figures I-III with legends. (PDF 275 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gross, C., Zibold, T., Nicklas, E. et al. Nonlinear atom interferometer surpasses classical precision limit. Nature 464, 1165–1169 (2010) doi:10.1038/nature08919

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.