Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Substrate interactions and promiscuity in a viral DNA packaging motor

Abstract

The ASCE (additional strand, conserved E) superfamily of proteins consists of structurally similar ATPases associated with diverse cellular activities involving metabolism and transport of proteins and nucleic acids in all forms of life1. A subset of these enzymes consists of multimeric ringed pumps responsible for DNA transport in processes including genome packaging in adenoviruses, herpesviruses, poxviruses and tailed bacteriophages2. Although their mechanism of mechanochemical conversion is beginning to be understood3, little is known about how these motors engage their nucleic acid substrates. Questions remain as to whether the motors contact a single DNA element, such as a phosphate or a base, or whether contacts are distributed over several parts of the DNA. Furthermore, the role of these contacts in the mechanochemical cycle is unknown. Here we use the genome packaging motor of the Bacillus subtilis bacteriophage ϕ29 (ref. 4) to address these questions. The full mechanochemical cycle of the motor, in which the ATPase is a pentameric-ring5 of gene product 16 (gp16), involves two phases—an ATP-loading dwell followed by a translocation burst of four 2.5-base-pair (bp) steps6 triggered by hydrolysis product release7. By challenging the motor with a variety of modified DNA substrates, we show that during the dwell phase important contacts are made with adjacent phosphates every 10-bp on the 5′–3′ strand in the direction of packaging. As well as providing stable, long-lived contacts, these phosphate interactions also regulate the chemical cycle. In contrast, during the burst phase, we find that DNA translocation is driven against large forces by extensive contacts, some of which are not specific to the chemical moieties of DNA. Such promiscuous, nonspecific contacts may reflect common translocase–substrate interactions for both the nucleic acid and protein translocases of the ASCE superfamily1.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Packaging of neutral DNA analogues.
Figure 2: High-resolution dynamics at a neutral-DNA insert.
Figure 3: Substrate promiscuity.
Figure 4: The motor–DNA contacts.

References

  1. 1

    Iyer, L. M., Makarova, K. S., Koonin, E. V. & Aravind, L. Comparative genomics of the FtsK-HerA superfamily of pumping ATPases: implications for the origins of chromosome segregation, cell division and viral capsid packaging. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 5260–5279 (2004)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Burroughs, A. M., Iyer, L. M. & Aravind, L. Comparative Genomics and Evolutionary Trajectories of Viral ATP Dependent DNA-Packaging Systems 48–65 (Basel, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Hopfner, K. P. & Michaelis, J. Mechanisms of nucleic acid translocases: lessons from structural biology and single-molecule biophysics. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 17, 87–95 (2007)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Grimes, S., Jardine, P. J. & Anderson, D. Bacteriophage φ29 DNA packaging. Adv. Virus Res. 58, 255–294 (2002)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Morais, M. C. et al. Defining molecular and domain boundaries in the bacteriophage φ29 DNA packaging motor. Structure 16, 1267–1274 (2008)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Moffitt, J. R. et al. Intersubunit coordination in a homomeric ring ATPase. Nature 457, 446–450 (2009)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Chemla, Y. R. et al. Mechanism of force generation of a viral DNA packaging motor. Cell 122, 683–692 (2005)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Thiviyanathan, V. et al. Structure of hybrid backbone methylphosphonate DNA heteroduplexes: effect of R and S stereochemistry. Biochemistry 41, 827–838 (2002)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Strauss, J. K. & Maher, L. J. DNA bending by asymmetric phosphate neutralization. Science 266, 1829–1834 (1994)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Eoff, R. L., Spurling, T. L. & Raney, K. D. Chemically modified DNA substrates implicate the importance of electrostatic interactions for DNA unwinding by Dda helicase. Biochemistry 44, 666–674 (2005)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Kawaoka, J., Jankowsky, E. & Pyle, A. M. Backbone tracking by the SF2 helicase NPH-II. Nature Struct. Biol. 11, 526–530 (2004)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    SenGupta, D. J. & Borowiec, J. A. Strand-specific recognition of a synthetic DNA replication fork by the SV40 large tumor antigen. Science 256, 1656–1661 (1992)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Mancini, E. J. et al. Atomic snapshots of an RNA packaging motor reveal conformational changes linking ATP hydrolysis to RNA translocation. Cell 118, 743–755 (2004)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Dillingham, M. S., Soultanas, P. & Wigley, D. B. Site-directed mutagenesis of motif III in PcrA helicase reveals a role in coupling ATP hydrolysis to strand separation. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 3310–3317 (1999)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Howard, J. Mechanics of Motor Proteins and the Cytoskeleton 1st edn 62 (Sinauer Associates, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Stanley, L. K. et al. When a helicase is not a helicase: dsDNA tracking by the motor protein EcoR124I. EMBO J. 25, 2230–2239 (2006)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Enemark, E. J. & Joshua-Tor, L. Mechanism of DNA translocation in a replicative hexameric helicase. Nature 442, 270–275 (2006)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Pearson, R. K. & Fox, M. S. Effects of DNA heterologies on bacteriophage lambda packaging. Genetics 118, 5–12 (1988)

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Moll, W. D. & Guo, P. Translocation of nicked but not gapped DNA by the packaging motor of bacteriophage φ29. J. Mol. Biol. 351, 100–107 (2005)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Oram, M., Sabanayagam, C. & Black, L. W. Modulation of the packaging reaction of bacteriophage t4 terminase by DNA structure. J. Mol. Biol. 381, 61–72 (2008)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Agresti, A. Categorical Data Analysis Chs 5–6 (Wiley-Interscience, 2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Shen, J., Gai, D., Patrick, A., Greenleaf, W. B. & Chen, X. S. The roles of the residues on the channel β-hairpin and loop structures of simian virus 40 hexameric helicase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 11248–11253 (2005)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Barkow, S. R., Levchenko, I., Baker, T. A. & Sauer, R. T. Polypeptide translocation by the AAA+ ClpXP protease machine. Chem. Biol. 16, 605–612 (2009)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Mulkidjanian, A. Y., Makarova, K. S., Galperin, M. Y. & Koonin, E. V. Inventing the dynamo machine: the evolution of the F-type and V-type ATPases. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 5, 892–899 (2007)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Smith, D. E. et al. The bacteriophage φ29 portal motor can package DNA against a large internal force. Nature 413, 748–752 (2001)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Lewis, J. & Sauro, J. When 100% really isn’t 100%: improving the accuracy of small-sample estimates of completion rates. J. Usability Stud. 1, 136–150 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Agresti, A. & Coull, B. Approximate is better than “exact” for interval estimation of binomial proportions. Am. Stat. 52, 119–126 (1998)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Rickgauer, J. P. et al. Portal motor velocity and internal force resisting viral DNA packaging in bacteriophage ϕ29. Biophys. J. 94, 159–167 (2008)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Smith, S. B., Cui, Y. & Bustamante, C. Optical-trap force transducer that operates by direct measurement of light momentum. Methods Enzymol. 361, 134–162 (2003)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Moffitt, J. R., Chemla, Y. R., Izhaky, D. & Bustamante, C. Differential detection of dual traps improves the spatial resolution of optical tweezers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 9006–9011 (2006)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank C. L. Hetherington, M. Kopaczynska, A. Spakowitz and J. M. Berger for critical discussions, and D. Reid, M. T. Couvillon and N. L. S. Chavez for preliminary work leading to this publication. K.A. acknowledges the PMMB fellowship through the Burroughs Wellcome Fund, A.T.P. the NIH Molecular Biophysics Training Grant, A.K. the Human Frontier Science Program Cross-Disciplinary Fellowship, J.R.M. the NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, and Y.R.C. the Burroughs Wellcome Fund Career Award at the Scientific Interface for funding. This research was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants GM-071552, DE-003606 and GM-059604. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Author Contributions K.A., A.T.P., A.K. and J.R.M. conducted the experiments; K.A., A.T.P., A.K., J.R.M. and Y.R.C. performed the analysis; S.G., P.J.J. and D.L.A. prepared and provided experimental materials; and K.A., A.T.P., A.K., J.R.M., Y.R.C., S.G., P.J.J. and C.B. wrote the paper. K.A., A.T.P., A.K. and J.R.M. contributed equally to this work.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Bustamante.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Tables 1-6, a Supplementary Discussion, Supplementary Data, Supplementary Figures 1-2 with Legends and Supplementary References. (PDF 596 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aathavan, K., Politzer, A., Kaplan, A. et al. Substrate interactions and promiscuity in a viral DNA packaging motor. Nature 461, 669–673 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08443

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing