Letter | Published:

dUTP incorporation into genomic DNA is linked to transcription in yeast

Nature volume 459, pages 11501153 (25 June 2009) | Download Citation



Highly activated transcription is associated with eukaryotic genome instability, resulting in increased rates of mitotic recombination and mutagenesis. The association between high transcription and genome stability is probably due to a variety of factors including an enhanced accumulation of DNA damage, transcription-associated supercoiling, collision between replication forks and the transcription machinery, and the persistence of RNA–DNA hybrids1. In the case of transcription-associated mutagenesis, we previously showed that there is a direct proportionality between the level of transcription and the mutation rate in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae2, and that the molecular nature of the mutations is affected by highly activated transcription2,3. Here we show that the accumulation of apurinic/apyrimidinic sites is greatly enhanced in highly transcribed yeast DNA. We further demonstrate that most apurinic/apyrimidinic sites in highly transcribed DNA are derived from the removal of uracil, the presence of which is linked to direct incorporation of dUTP in place of dTTP. These results show an unexpected relationship between transcription and the fidelity of DNA synthesis, and raise intriguing cell biological issues with regard to nucleotide pool compartmentalization.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    The connection between transcription and genomic instability. EMBO J. 21, 195–201 (2002)

  2. 2.

    , , , & Transcription-associated mutagenesis in yeast is directly proportional to the level of gene expression and influenced by the direction of DNA replication. DNA Repair (Amst.) 6, 1285–1296 (2007)

  3. 3.

    , , & Identification of a distinctive mutation spectrum associated with high levels of transcription in yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 4801–4809 (2004)

  4. 4.

    & Removal of frameshift intermediates by mismatch repair proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 4766–4773 (1999)

  5. 5.

    & DNA polymerase ζ introduces multiple mutations when bypassing spontaneous DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell 6, 1491–1499 (2000)

  6. 6.

    & Roles of RAD6 epistasis group members in spontaneous Polζ-dependent translesion synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 169, 1939–1955 (2005)

  7. 7.

    & Abasic sites in DNA: repair and biological consequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst.) 3, 1–12 (2004)

  8. 8.

    , , & The yeast structural gene (APN1) for the major apurinic endonuclease: homology to E. coli endonucelase IV. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87, 4193–4197 (1985)

  9. 9.

    et al. Substrate specificities of Ntg1 and Ntg2 proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for oxidized DNA bases are not identical. Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 5270–5276 (1998)

  10. 10.

    , , & Overlapping specificities of base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, recombination, and translesion synthesis pathways for DNA base damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 2929–2935 (1999)

  11. 11.

    et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ntg1p and Ntg2p: broad specificity N-glycosylases for the repair of oxidative DNA damage in the nucleus and mitochondria. Biochemistry 38, 11298–11306 (1999)

  12. 12.

    , , , & dUTP pyrophosphatase is an essential enzyme in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 12, 4425–4431 (1993)

  13. 13.

    , & dUTPase activity is critical to maintain genetic stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 2056–2066 (2006)

  14. 14.

    , , , & Multifunctional yeast high-copy-number shuttle vectors. Gene 110, 119–122 (1992)

  15. 15.

    & in Genetic Recombination: Reviews and Protocols Vol. 262 (ed, Waldman, A. S.) 3–12 (Humana, 2004)

Download references


We thank S. Boiteux for providing the p424-GAL-DUT1 plasmid. We thank members of the laboratory and T. Petes for discussions and comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (R01 GM038464).

Author Contributions N.K. and S.J.-R. jointly designed experiments and wrote the manuscript. All experiments were performed by N.K.

Author information


  1. Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA

    • Nayun Kim
    •  & Sue Jinks-Robertson


  1. Search for Nayun Kim in:

  2. Search for Sue Jinks-Robertson in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sue Jinks-Robertson.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Tables 1-3, Supplementary References and Supplementary Figure 1 with Legend.

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.