Letter | Published:

The effect of permafrost thaw on old carbon release and net carbon exchange from tundra

Nature volume 459, pages 556559 (28 May 2009) | Download Citation



Permafrost soils in boreal and Arctic ecosystems store almost twice as much carbon1,2 as is currently present in the atmosphere3. Permafrost thaw and the microbial decomposition of previously frozen organic carbon is considered one of the most likely positive climate feedbacks from terrestrial ecosystems to the atmosphere in a warmer world1,2,4,5,6,7. The rate of carbon release from permafrost soils is highly uncertain, but it is crucial for predicting the strength and timing of this carbon-cycle feedback effect, and thus how important permafrost thaw will be for climate change this century and beyond1,2,4,5,6,7. Sustained transfers of carbon to the atmosphere that could cause a significant positive feedback to climate change must come from old carbon, which forms the bulk of the permafrost carbon pool that accumulated over thousands of years8,9,10,11. Here we measure net ecosystem carbon exchange and the radiocarbon age of ecosystem respiration in a tundra landscape undergoing permafrost thaw12 to determine the influence of old carbon loss on ecosystem carbon balance. We find that areas that thawed over the past 15 years had 40 per cent more annual losses of old carbon than minimally thawed areas, but had overall net ecosystem carbon uptake as increased plant growth offset these losses. In contrast, areas that thawed decades earlier lost even more old carbon, a 78 per cent increase over minimally thawed areas; this old carbon loss contributed to overall net ecosystem carbon release despite increased plant growth. Our data document significant losses of soil carbon with permafrost thaw that, over decadal timescales, overwhelms increased plant carbon uptake13,14,15 at rates that could make permafrost a large biospheric carbon source in a warmer world.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    et al. Vulnerability of permafrost carbon to climate change: Implications for the global carbon cycle. Bioscience 58, 701–714 (2008)

  2. 2.

    , & Permafrost and the global carbon budget. Science 312, 1612–1613 (2006)

  3. 3.

    , & in The First State of the Carbon Cycle Report (SOCCR) — Synthesis and Assessment Product 2.2 (eds King, A.W. et al.) 21–28 (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Climatic Data Center, 2007)

  4. 4.

    , , & Feedbacks of terrestrial ecosystems to climate change. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 32, 1–29 (2007)

  5. 5.

    & Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature 440, 165–173 (2006)

  6. 6.

    & Terrestrial ecosystem carbon dynamics and climate feedbacks. Nature 451, 289–292 (2008)

  7. 7.

    et al. Recent change of Arctic tundra ecosystems from a net carbon dioxide sink to a source. Nature 361, 520–523 (1993)

  8. 8.

    , , & Dynamics of soil carbon during deglaciation of the Laurentide ice sheet. Science 258, 1921–1924 (1992)

  9. 9.

    et al. Paleoenvironmental and paleoclimatic records from permafrost deposits in the Arctic region of Northern Siberia. Quat. Int. 89, 97–118 (2002)

  10. 10.

    et al. Permafrost carbon: Stock and decomposability of a globally significant carbon pool. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33 10.1029/2006GL027484 (2006)

  11. 11.

    et al. Siberian peatlands a net carbon sink and global methane source since the early Holocene. Science 303, 353–356 (2004)

  12. 12.

    Characteristics of the recent warming of permafrost in Alaska. J. Geophys. Res. 112 (F2). 10.1029/2006JF000578 (2007)

  13. 13.

    , , & Interannual variations in satellite-sensed vegetation index data from 1981 to 1991. J. Geophys. Res. 103 (D6). 6145–6160 (1998)

  14. 14.

    , & Climate change – Increasing shrub abundance in the Arctic. Nature 411, 546–547 (2001)

  15. 15.

    et al. Role of land-surface changes in Arctic summer warming. Science 310, 657–660 (2005)

  16. 16.

    et al. Acclimation of ecosystem CO2 exchange in the Alaskan Arctic in response to decadal climate warming. Nature 406, 978–981 (2000)

  17. 17.

    , & The changing landscape of Canada's western boreal forest: The current dynamics of permafrost. Can. J. For. Res. 30, 283–287 (2000)

  18. 18.

    The recent warming of permafrost in Alaska. Glob. Planet. Change 49, 187–202 (2005)

  19. 19.

    & Evidence for warming and thawing of discontinuous permafrost in Alaska. Permafrost Periglac. Process. 10, 17–37 (1999)

  20. 20.

    , , & Plant species composition and productivity following permafrost thaw and thermokarst in Alaskan tundra. Ecosystems 10, 280–292 (2007)

  21. 21.

    Age of soil organic matter and soil respiration: Radiocarbon constraints on belowground C dynamics. Ecol. Appl. 10, 399–411 (2000)

  22. 22.

    & Radiocarbon – A unique tracer of global carbon cycle dynamics. Radiocarbon 42, 69–80 (2000)

  23. 23.

    & Source partitioning using stable isotopes: Coping with too many sources. Oecologia 136, 261–269 (2003)

  24. 24.

    et al. Global change and the carbon balance of Arctic ecosystems. Bioscience 42, 433–441 (1992)

  25. 25.

    & A projection of severe near-surface permafrost degradation during the 21st century. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32 L24401 10.1029/2005GL025080 (2005)

  26. 26.

    Near-surface permafrost degradation: How severe during the 21st century? Geophys. Res. Lett. 34 (9) 10.1029/2007GL029323 (2007)

  27. 27.

    et al. Ecosystem carbon storage in arctic tundra reduced by long-term nutrient fertilization. Nature 431, 440–443 (2004)

  28. 28.

    Temperature and plant species control over litter decomposition in Alaskan tundra. Ecol. Monogr. 66, 503–522 (1996)

  29. 29.

    , , & Potential carbon release from permafrost soils of Northeastern Siberia. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 2336–2351 (2006)

  30. 30.

    et al. Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 18866–18870 (2007)

Download references


This work was made possible by assistance from G. Adema, T. Chapin, S. DeBiasio, L. Gutierrez, M. Mack, M. Schieber, E. Tissier, C. Trucco, W. Vicars, E. Wilson, C. Wuthrich, L. Yocum, and the researchers and technicians of the Bonanza Creek LTER. This work relied on funds from the following sources: NASA New Investigator Program, NSF Bonanza Creek LTER Program, NSF DEB Ecosystems Program, and a cooperative agreement with the National Park Service.

Author Contributions E.A.G.S. conceived the experiment. E.A.G.S. and J.G.V. designed the experiment and wrote the paper. E.A.G.S., J.G.V., K.G.C. and H.L. performed research. All authors commented on the analysis and presentation of the data and were involved in the writing.

Author information

Author notes

    • Edward A. G. Schuur
    •  & Jason G. Vogel

    These authors contributed equally to this work.


  1. Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA

    • Edward A. G. Schuur
    • , Jason G. Vogel
    • , Kathryn G. Crummer
    •  & Hanna Lee
  2. Department of Environmental Science, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, USA

    • James O. Sickman
  3. Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Alaska 99775, USA

    • T. E. Osterkamp


  1. Search for Edward A. G. Schuur in:

  2. Search for Jason G. Vogel in:

  3. Search for Kathryn G. Crummer in:

  4. Search for Hanna Lee in:

  5. Search for James O. Sickman in:

  6. Search for T. E. Osterkamp in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward A. G. Schuur.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Methods and Data, Supplementary References, Supplementary Figures 1-6 with Legends and Supplementary Tables 1-6.

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.