Subjects

Abstract

The population cycles of rodents at northern latitudes have puzzled people for centuries1,2, and their impact is manifest throughout the alpine ecosystem2,3. Climate change is known to be able to drive animal population dynamics between stable and cyclic phases4,5, and has been suggested to cause the recent changes in cyclic dynamics of rodents and their predators3,6,7,8,9. But although predator–rodent interactions are commonly argued to be the cause of the Fennoscandian rodent cycles1,10,11,12,13, the role of the environment in the modulation of such dynamics is often poorly understood in natural systems8,9,14. Hence, quantitative links between climate-driven processes and rodent dynamics have so far been lacking. Here we show that winter weather and snow conditions, together with density dependence in the net population growth rate, account for the observed population dynamics of the rodent community dominated by lemmings (Lemmus lemmus) in an alpine Norwegian core habitat between 1970 and 1997, and predict the observed absence of rodent peak years after 1994. These local rodent dynamics are coherent with alpine bird dynamics both locally and over all of southern Norway, consistent with the influence of large-scale fluctuations in winter conditions. The relationship between commonly available meteorological data and snow conditions indicates that changes in temperature and humidity, and thus conditions in the subnivean space, seem to markedly affect the dynamics of alpine rodents and their linked groups. The pattern of less regular rodent peaks, and corresponding changes in the overall dynamics of the alpine ecosystem, thus seems likely to prevail over a growing area under projected climate change.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    The long-term study of voles, mice and lemmings: homage to Robert Collett. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 512 (1995)

  2. 2.

    & (eds) The Biology of Lemmings. (Academic, 1993)

  3. 3.

    & Trophic interaction cycles in tundra ecosystems and the impact of climate change. Bioscience 55, 311–322 (2005)

  4. 4.

    Theoretical perspectives on resource pulses. Ecology 89, 671–681 (2008)

  5. 5.

    et al. Age, sex, density, winter weather, and population crashes in Soay sheep. Science 292, 1499–1500 (2001)

  6. 6.

    , , & Limit cycles in Norwegian lemmings: tensions between phase-dependence and density-dependence. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264, 31–38 (1997)

  7. 7.

    Long-term decline in numbers of cyclic voles in boreal Sweden: analysis and presentation of hypotheses. Oikos 107, 376–392 (2004)

  8. 8.

    , & Fading out of vole and predator cycles? Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 2045–2049 (2005)

  9. 9.

    , & Collapsing population cycles. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 79–86 (2008)

  10. 10.

    , & Trophic interactions in population cycles of voles and lemmings: a modelling study and a review-synthesis. Adv. Ecol. Res. 33, 75–160 (2003)

  11. 11.

    et al. Mortality of lemmings, Lemmus lemmus, at peak density in a mountainous area of Norway. J. Zool. 243, 831–835 (1997)

  12. 12.

    & Contrasting alternative hypotheses about rodent cycles by translating them into parameterized models. Ecol. Lett. 4, 267–276 (2001)

  13. 13.

    , & Is the heart of Fennoscandian rodent cycle still beating? A 14-year study of small mammals and Tengmalm’s owls in northern Norway. Ecography 25, 81–87 (2002)

  14. 14.

    et al. Changes over time in the spatiotemporal dynamics of cyclic populations of field voles (Microtus agrestis L.). Am. Nat. 167, 583–590 (2006)

  15. 15.

    & Intrinsic and climatic determinants of population demography: The winter dynamics of tundra voles. Ecology 83, 3449–3456 (2002)

  16. 16.

    & Small rodent winter survival: snow conditions limit access to food resources. J. Anim. Ecol. 75, 156–166 (2006)

  17. 17.

    & Vole cycles, snow depth, and fox predation. Oikos 70, 156–160 (1994)

  18. 18.

    , & Population cycles in Arctic lemmings: winter reproduction and predation by weasels. Arctic and Alpine Research 6, 1–12 (1974)

  19. 19.

    Life in the Cold: An Introduction to Winter Ecology (University Press of New England, 1996)

  20. 20.

    & Population ecology and energy relationships of Clethrionomys gapperi in a Colorado subalpine forest. J. Mamm. 59, 576–598 (1978)

  21. 21.

    & Long-term microtine dynamics in North Fennoscandian tundra – the vole cycle and the lemming chaos. Ecography 15, 226–236 (1992)

  22. 22.

    , , & Phase- and density-dependent population dynamics in Norwegian lemmings: Interaction between deterministic and stochastic processes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 265, 1957–1968 (1998)

  23. 23.

    et al. Small-rodent dynamics and predation. Ecology 82, 1505–1520 (2001)

  24. 24.

    et al. Diabetes and myocarditis in voles and lemmings at cyclic peak densities – induced by Ljungan virus? Oecologia 150, 1–7 (2006)

  25. 25.

    & Population biology of infectious diseases: Part I. Nature 280, 361–367 (1979)

  26. 26.

    et al. Functional and numerical responses of four lemming predators in high arctic Greenland. Oikos 113, 193–216 (2006)

  27. 27.

    , , & How much do weasels shape microtine cycles in the northern Fennoscandian taiga? Oikos 50, 353–365 (1987)

  28. 28.

    , & Vole population cycles in northern and southern Europe: Is there a need for different explanations for single pattern? J. Anim. Ecol. 75, 340–349 (2006)

  29. 29.

    , & A late-winter to early-spring temperature reconstruction for southeastern Norway 1758 to 2006. Ann. Glaciol. 46, 404–408 (2007)

  30. 30.

    , , & Temperature and precipitation scenarios for Norway: comparison of results from dynamical and empirical downscaling. Clim. Res. 25, 15–27 (2003)

  31. 31.

    & On the mechanistic underpinning of discrete-time population models with complex dynamics. J. Theor. Biol. 228, 261–269 (2004)

  32. 32.

    , , & Analysing multiple time series and extending significance testing in wavelet analysis. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 359, 11–23 (2008)

  33. 33.

    et al. Wavelet analysis of ecological time series. Oecologia 156, 287–304 (2008)

  34. 34.

    et al. Hardangervidda. Ecol. Bull. 20, 225–264 (1975)

  35. 35.

    Population cycles in voles and lemmings: density dependence and phase dependence in a stochastic world. Oikos 87, 427–461 (1999)

  36. 36.

    et al. Structure and dynamics of some high mountain bird communities of South Norway: a 19-year study of passerines. Ornis Norvegica 25, 19–48 (2002)

  37. 37.

    et al. Structure and dynamics of a high mountain wetland bird community in southern Norway: An 18-year study of waders and gulls. Ornis Norvegica 30, 4–20 (2007)

  38. 38.

    Decadal trends in the North Atlantic Oscillation: Regional temperatures and precipitation. Science 269, 676–679 (1995)

  39. 39.

    et al. Studying climate effects on ecology through the use of climate indices: the North Atlantic Oscillation, El Niño Southern Oscillation and beyond. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, 2087–2096 (2003)

  40. 40.

    Norwegian Meteorological Institute. 〈〉 (2008)

  41. 41.

    & Numerical and behavioral effects within a pulse-driven system: consequences for shared prey. Ecology 89, 635–646 (2008)

  42. 42.

    et al. Can noise induce chaos? Oikos 102, 329–339 (2003)

Download references

Acknowledgements

E. Leslie, D. Svalastog and a number of other field workers helped gather the data used in this paper, T. Rouyer provided advice on performing wavelet analyses in R, and R. A. Ims provided valuable input on an earlier version of the paper. Funding has been provided by the Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, the University of Oslo, the Nansen Fund, the Research Council of Norway and the Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Oslo.

Author Contributions K.L.K. designed the project, analysed data, contributed to interpreting the results and wrote the paper; H.S. and N.C.S. designed the project and wrote the paper; A.M., J.O.V. and A.M.E. contributed to interpreting the results and wrote the paper; E.Ø., I.M. and T.S. contributed with data; B.C. provided analysis; and E.F. contributed with data and wrote the paper

Author information

Author notes

    • Harald Steen

    Present address: Norwegian Polar Institute, N- 9296 Tromsø, Norway.

Affiliations

  1. Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis,

    • Kyrre L. Kausrud
    • , Atle Mysterud
    • , Jon Olav Vik
    • , Anne Maria Eikeset
    •  & Nils Chr. Stenseth
  2. Department of Biology, University of Oslo, PO Box 1066 Blindern, N-0316 Oslo, Norway

    • Harald Steen
    • , Eivind Østbye
    •  & Ivar Mysterud
  3. CNRS UMR 7625, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 46 rue d’Ulm, 75230 Paris, France

    • Bernard Cazelles
  4. IRD GEODES, 32 Avenue Henri Varagnat, 93142 Bondy cedex, France

    • Bernard Cazelles
  5. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Gaustadalleen 21, N-0349 Oslo, Norway

    • Erik Framstad
  6. Department of Biology, University of Bergen, Realfagbygget, Allegaten 41, N-5007 Bergen, Norway

    • Torstein Solhøy

Authors

  1. Search for Kyrre L. Kausrud in:

  2. Search for Atle Mysterud in:

  3. Search for Harald Steen in:

  4. Search for Jon Olav Vik in:

  5. Search for Eivind Østbye in:

  6. Search for Bernard Cazelles in:

  7. Search for Erik Framstad in:

  8. Search for Anne Maria Eikeset in:

  9. Search for Ivar Mysterud in:

  10. Search for Torstein Solhøy in:

  11. Search for Nils Chr. Stenseth in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nils Chr. Stenseth.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    This file contains Supplementary Notes, Supplementary Figures 5-14 with Legends, Supplementary Tables 1-5, and Supplementary References.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07442

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.