Letter | Published:

A phase diagram for jammed matter

Nature volume 453, pages 629632 (29 May 2008) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

The problem of finding the most efficient way to pack spheres has a long history, dating back to the crystalline arrays conjectured1 by Kepler and the random geometries explored2 by Bernal. Apart from its mathematical interest, the problem has practical relevance3 in a wide range of fields, from granular processing to fruit packing. There are currently numerous experiments showing that the loosest way to pack spheres (random loose packing) gives a density of 55 per cent4,5,6. On the other hand, the most compact way to pack spheres (random close packing) results in a maximum density of 64 per cent2,4,6. Although these values seem to be robust, there is as yet no physical interpretation for them. Here we present a statistical description of jammed states7 in which random close packing can be interpreted as the ground state of the ensemble of jammed matter. Our approach demonstrates that random packings of hard spheres in three dimensions cannot exceed a density limit of 63.4 per cent. We construct a phase diagram that provides a unified view of the hard-sphere packing problem and illuminates various data, including the random-loose-packed state.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    The Kepler conjecture. Preprint at 〈〉 (2002)

  2. 2.

    & Packing of spheres: co-ordination of randomly packed spheres. Nature 188, 910–911 (1960)

  3. 3.

    & (eds) Powders & Grains 97 (Balkema, Rotterdam, 1997)

  4. 4.

    & The density of random close packing of spheres. J. Phys. D 2, 863–866 (1969)

  5. 5.

    & Random loose packings of uniform spheres and the dilatancy effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2727–2730 (1990)

  6. 6.

    Random close packing of hard spheres and disks. Phys. Rev. A 27, 1053–1061 (1983)

  7. 7.

    & Theory of powders. Physica A 157, 1080–1090 (1989)

  8. 8.

    , , , & Density fluctuations in vibrated granular materials. Phys. Rev. E 57, 1971–1982 (1998)

  9. 9.

    & Granular entropy: explicit calculations for planar assemblies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 114303 (2002)

  10. 10.

    & Stress field in granular systems: loop forces and potential formulation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 115505 (2002)

  11. 11.

    , & Stationary state volume fluctuations in a granular medium. Phys. Rev. E 71, 030301(R) (2005)

  12. 12.

    , , , & Jamming transition in granular media: A mean-field approximation and numerical simulations. Phys. Rev. E 71, 061305 (2005)

  13. 13.

    , & Local and global relations between the number of contacts and density in monodisperse sphere packs. J. Stat. Mech. P07010 (2006)

  14. 14.

    , , & Free volume distributions inside a bidimensional granular medium, in Powders and Grains 2005 (eds García-Rojo, R., Herrmann, H. J. & McNamara, S.) (Balkema, Rotterdam, 2005)

  15. 15.

    , & Definition and relevance of nonequilibrium intensive thermodynamic parameters. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 120601 (2006)

  16. 16.

    , & Thermodynamics and statistical mechanics of dense granular media. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 158001 (2006)

  17. 17.

    , , & Measuring distribution of interdroplet forces in a compressed emulsion system. Physica A 327, 201–212 (2003)

  18. 18.

    , & Is random close packing of spheres well defined? Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2064–2067 (2000)

  19. 19.

    Amorphous solids: their structure, lattice dynamics and elasticity. Phys. Rep. 296, 65–236 (1998)

  20. 20.

    & Statistical mechanics of stress transmission in disordered granular arrays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 5397–5400 (1999)

  21. 21.

    , & Packing of compressible granular materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4160–4163 (2000)

  22. 22.

    , , & Random packings of frictionless particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 075507 (2002)

  23. 23.

    , , , & Geometry of frictionless and frictional sphere packings. Phys. Rev. E 65, 031304 (2002)

  24. 24.

    & Multiplicity of generation, selection, and classification procedures for jammed hard-particle packings. J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 11849–11853 (2001)

  25. 25.

    et al. Granular dynamics in compaction and stress relaxation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 128001 (2005)

  26. 26.

    A topographic view of supercooled liquids and glass formation. Science 267, 1935–1939 (1995)

  27. 27.

    & Jamming transition in emulsions and granular materials. Phys. Rev. E 72, 011301 (2005)

  28. 28.

    & The ideal glass transition of hard spheres. J. Chem. Phys. 123, 144501 (2005)

  29. 29.

    & Landscape analysis of constraint satisfaction problems. Phys. Rev. E 76, 021122 (2007)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Science Foundation, CMMT Division and the US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Geosciences Division. We are grateful to J. Brujić, A. Yupanqui and M. Makse for stimulating discussions.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Levich Institute and Physics Department, City College of New York, New York, New York 10031, USA

    • Chaoming Song
    • , Ping Wang
    •  & Hernán A. Makse
  2. Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal do Ceará, 60451-970 Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil

    • Hernán A. Makse

Authors

  1. Search for Chaoming Song in:

  2. Search for Ping Wang in:

  3. Search for Hernán A. Makse in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hernán A. Makse.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementray Information

    The file contains Supplementary Notes which describe the details of the calculations leading to the phase diagram of jammed matter. The main theoretical result is the deffinition of the volume function based on the Voronoi volume of a particle explained in Section I. Section II describes the isostatic condition that deffines the ensemble of jammed matter through the W function. Section III explains the difference between the geometrical, z, and mechanical, Z, coordination number, which is important to deffine the canonical partition function. Section IV deffines the partition function for the ensemble of jammed states under the isostatic condition, Qiso. Section V explains how to solve the partition function Qiso which leads to the equations of state (4) and (5), and the phase diagram of Fig. 1. Finally, Section VI explains the numerical studies to test the theoretical predictions.  The file also includes Supplementary Figures 1-14 with Legends.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06981

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.