Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Gelation of particles with short-range attraction

Abstract

Nanoscale or colloidal particles are important in many realms of science and technology. They can dramatically change the properties of materials, imparting solid-like behaviour to a wide variety of complex fluids1,2. This behaviour arises when particles aggregate to form mesoscopic clusters and networks. The essential component leading to aggregation is an interparticle attraction, which can be generated by many physical and chemical mechanisms. In the limit of irreversible aggregation, infinitely strong interparticle bonds lead to diffusion-limited cluster aggregation3 (DLCA). This is understood as a purely kinetic phenomenon that can form solid-like gels at arbitrarily low particle volume fraction4,5. Far more important technologically are systems with weaker attractions, where gel formation requires higher volume fractions. Numerous scenarios for gelation have been proposed, including DLCA6, kinetic or dynamic arrest4,7,8,9,10, phase separation5,6,11,12,13,14,15,16, percolation4,12,17,18 and jamming8. No consensus has emerged and, despite its ubiquity and significance, gelation is far from understood—even the location of the gelation phase boundary is not agreed on5. Here we report experiments showing that gelation of spherical particles with isotropic, short-range attractions is initiated by spinodal decomposition; this thermodynamic instability triggers the formation of density fluctuations, leading to spanning clusters that dynamically arrest to create a gel. This simple picture of gelation does not depend on microscopic system-specific details, and should thus apply broadly to any particle system with short-range attractions. Our results suggest that gelation—often considered a purely kinetic phenomenon4,8,9,10—is in fact a direct consequence of equilibrium liquid–gas phase separation5,13,14,15. Without exception, we observe gelation in all of our samples predicted by theory and simulation to phase-separate; this suggests that it is phase separation, not percolation12, that corresponds to gelation in models for attractive spheres.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Composition and structure of experimental gel and fluid samples.
Figure 2: Comparisons among cluster mass distributions n(s ) for ξ = 0.059.
Figure 3: Comparison of n(s ) mapping of experimental cp to kBT/U.
Figure 4: Spinodal decomposition in samples that form gels.

References

  1. Mezzenga, R., Schurtenberger, P., Burbidge, A. & Michel, M. Understanding foods as soft materials. Nature Mater. 4, 729–740 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gauckler, L. J., Graule, Th. & Baader, F. Ceramic forming using enzyme catalyzed reactions. Mater. Chem. Phys. 61, 78–102 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lin, M. Y. et al. Universality in colloid aggregation. Nature 339, 360–362 (1989)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kroy, K., Cates, M. E. & Poon, W. C. K. Cluster mode-coupling approach to weak gelation in attractive colloids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 148302 (2004)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zaccarelli, E. Colloidal gels: Equilibrium and non-equilibrium routes. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 19, 323101 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. de Hoog, E. H. A., Kegel, W. K., van Blaaderen, A. & Lekkerkerker, H. N. W. Direct observation of crystallization and aggregation in a phase-separating colloid-polymer suspension. Phys. Rev. E 64, 021407 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cardinaux, F., Gibaud, T., Stradner, A. & Schurtenberger, P. Interplay between spinodal decomposition and glass formation in proteins exhibiting short-range attractions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 118301 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Trappe, V., Prasad, V., Cipelletti, L., Segre, P. N. & Weitz, D. A. Jamming phase diagram for attractive particles. Nature 411, 772–775 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bergenholtz, J., Poon, W. C. K. & Fuchs, M. Gelation in model colloid-polymer mixtures. Langmuir 19, 4493–4503 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Puertas, A. M., Fuchs, M. & Cates, M. E. Competition between glass transition and liquid-gas phase separation in attracting colloids. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 19, 205140 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pusey, P. N., Pirie, A. D. & Poon, W. C. K. Dynamics of colloid-polymer mixtures. Physica A 201, 322–331 (1993)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Poon, W. C. K. & Haw, M. D. Mesoscopic structure formation in colloidal aggregation and gelation. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 73, 71–126 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Foffi, G., De Michele, C., Sciortino, F. & Tartaglia, P. Scaling of dynamics with the range of interaction in short-range attractive colloids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 078301 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Charbonneau, P. & Reichman, D. R. Systematic characterization of thermodynamic and dynamical phase behavior in systems with short-ranged attraction. Phys. Rev. E 75, 011507 (2007)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Buzzaccaro, S., Rusconi, R. & Piazza, R. “Sticky” hard spheres: Equation of state, phase diagram, and metastable gels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 098301 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tanaka, H., Nishikawa, Y. & Koyama, T. Network-forming phase separation of colloidal suspensions. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 17, L143–L153 (2005)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Verduin, H. & Dhont, J. K. G. Phase diagram of a model adhesive hard-sphere dispersion. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 172, 425–437 (1995)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Grant, M. C. & Russel, W. B. Volume-fraction dependence of elastic moduli and transition temperatures for colloidal silica gels. Phys. Rev. E 47, 2606–2614 (1993)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Carpineti, M. & Giglio, M. Spinodal-type dynamics in fractal aggregation of colloidal clusters. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3327–3330 (1992)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, J., Shih, W. Y., Sarikaya, M. & Aksay, I. A. Fractal colloidal aggregates with finite interparticle interactions: Energy dependence of the fractal dimension. Phys. Rev. A 41, 3206–3213 (1990)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Allain, C., Cloitre, M. & Wafra, M. Aggregation and sedimentation in colloidal suspensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1478–1481 (1995)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lu, P. J., Conrad, J. C., Wyss, H. M., Schofield, A. B. & Weitz, D. A. Fluids of clusters in attractive colloids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 028306 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shah, S. A., Chen, Y. L., Schweizer, K. S. & Zukoski, C. F. Phase behavior and concentration fluctuations in suspensions of hard spheres and nearly ideal polymers. J. Chem. Phys. 118, 3350–3361 (2003)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lu, P. J., Sims, P. A., Oki, H., Macarthur, J. B. & Weitz, D. A. Target-locking acquisition with real-time confocal (TARC) microscopy. Opt. Express 15, 8702–8712 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Noro, M. G. & Frenkel, D. Extended corresponding-states behavior for particles with variable range attractions. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 2941–2944 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bolhuis, P. G., Louis, A. A. & Hansen, J.-P. Influence of polymer-excluded volume on the phase-behavior of colloid-polymer mixtures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 128302 (2002)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Royall, C. P., Louis, A. A. & Tanaka, H. Measuring colloidal interactions with confocal microscopy. J. Chem. Phys. 127, 044507 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Miller, M. A. & Frenkel, D. Competition of percolation and phase separation in a fluid of adhesive hard spheres. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 135702 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sciortino, F. & Tartaglia, P. Structure factor scaling during irreversible cluster-cluster aggregation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 282–285 (1995)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Furukawa, H. A dynamic scaling assumption for phase separation. Adv. Phys. 34, 703–750 (1985)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Frisken, B. J. Revisiting the method of cumulants for the analysis of dynamic light-scattering data. Appl. Opt. 40, 4087–4091 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lekkerkerker, H. N. W., Poon, W. C. K., Pusey, P. N., Stroobants, A. & Warren, P. B. Phase behavior of colloid+polymer mixtures. Europhys. Lett. 20, 559–564 (1992)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Asakura, S. & Oosawa, F. On interaction between two bodies immersed in a solution of macromolecules. J. Chem. Phys. 22, 1255–1256 (1954)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Vliegenthart, G. A., Lodge, J. F. M. & Lekkerkerker, H. N. W. Strong weak and metastable liquids structural and dynamical aspects of the liquid state. Physica A 263, 378–388 (1999)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Allen, M. P. & Tildesley, D. J. Computer Simulation of Liquids (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK, 1989)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Rapaport, D. C. The Art of Molecular Dynamic Simulation (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

P.J.L. thanks D. Maas, M. Christiansen and S. Raghavachary for assistance in producing the renderings and movies. This work was supported by NASA, the NSF, the Harvard MRSEC, MIUR-Prin and the Marie Curie Research and Training Network on Dynamical Arrested States of Soft Matter and Colloids.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter J. Lu.

Supplementary information

The file contains Supplementary Movie 1.

Three dimensional reconstruction (56x56x56μm3) of a typical fluid phase sample, here with ø=0.045, ξ=0.059, and cp=3.20 mg/mL, also illustrated in Fig. 1c. The structure is a snapshot of a single configuration in time, in the long-time steady-state limit, rotating to demonstrate that the clusters are small (fewer than fifty particles) and do not span the sample. The fluid’s clusters are colored by their mass s (number of particles) according to the color bar, with monomers and dimers rendered in transparent grey. (MOV 61703 kb)

The file contains Supplementary Movie 2.

Early-time evolution of a gel sample with ø=0.045, ξ=0.059 and cp=3.31 mg/mL, also illustrated in Fig. 1d. Time elapsed after mixing indicated by the counter in the upper left. Three-dimensional reconstruction (56x56x56μm3) shown at left, with a two-dimensional confocal microscope image at upper right. The static structure factor S(q) is shown as a function of scattering vector q at lower right. Clusters are colored by their mass, as in Figs. 1c-d and Supplementary Video 1. After mixing, the sample undergoes spinodal decomposition. Clusters in the sample grow, manifest in S(q) as the growth and narrowing of a peak, which moves to lower q as a function of time. After two hours, all clusters have merged into a single spanning cluster that arrests, forming a gel. The peak in S(q) no longer evolves, and while the spanning cluster fluctuates thermally and exchanges monomers with a sparse colloidal gas phase, no significant structural arrangements occur. (MOV 47794 kb)

The file contains Supplementary Movie 3.

Long-time evolution of the gel sample at ø=0.045 and ξ=0.059 and cp=3.31 mg/mL, also illustrated in Fig. 1d and Supplementary Video 2. Time elapsed after mixing indicated by the counter in the upper left. Three-dimensional reconstruction (56x56x56μm3) shown at left, with two-dimensional confocal microscope image at upper right. The gel is in the steady state: the structure remains essentially unchanged throughout the entire 100,000 second observation period, even as the spanning cluster exchanges monomers with the surrounding dilute colloidal gas. This exchange is highlighted in the lower right-hand panel: new gel particles that appear for the first time in a frame are highlighted in green, indicating condensation onto the gel from the gas; monomers that disappear in the subsequent frame are highlighted in red, indicating evaporation from the spanning cluster into the gas phase. (MOV 43940 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lu, P., Zaccarelli, E., Ciulla, F. et al. Gelation of particles with short-range attraction. Nature 453, 499–503 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06931

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06931

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing