Abstract
Since the time of Darwin1, evolutionary biologists have been fascinated by the spectacular adaptations to insect pollination exhibited by orchids. However, despite being the most diverse plant family on Earth2, the Orchidaceae lack a definitive fossil record and thus many aspects of their evolutionary history remain obscure. Here we report an exquisitely preserved orchid pollinarium (of Meliorchis caribea gen. et sp. nov.) attached to the mesoscutellum of an extinct stingless bee, Proplebeia dominicana, recovered from Miocene amber in the Dominican Republic, that is 15–20 million years (Myr) old3. This discovery constitutes both the first unambiguous fossil of Orchidaceae4 and an unprecedented direct fossil observation of a plant–pollinator interaction5,6. By applying cladistic methods to a morphological character matrix, we resolve the phylogenetic position of M. caribea within the extant subtribe Goodyerinae (subfamily Orchidoideae). We use the ages of other fossil monocots and M. caribea to calibrate a molecular phylogenetic tree of the Orchidaceae. Our results indicate that the most recent common ancestor of extant orchids lived in the Late Cretaceous (76–84 Myr ago), and also suggest that the dramatic radiation of orchids began shortly after the mass extinctions at the K/T boundary. These results further support the hypothesis of an ancient origin for Orchidaceae.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Darwin, C. On the Various Contrivances by which British and Foreign Orchids are Fertilised by Insects, and on the Good Effects of Intercrossing (J. Murray, London, 1862)
Dressler, R. L. The Orchids: Natural History and Classification (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1981)
Iturralde-Vinent, M. E. & MacPhee, R. D. E. Age and paleogeography of Dominican amber. Science 273, 1850–1852 (1996)
Schmid, R. & Schmid, M. J. in Orchid Biology: Reviews and Perspectives Vol. 1 (ed. Arditti J.) 17–45 (Cornell Univ. Press, London, 1977)
Grimaldi, D. & Engel, M. S. Evolution of the Insects (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2005)
Peñalver, E., Engel, M. S. & Grimaldi, D. Fig wasps in Dominican amber (Hymenoptera: Agaonidae). Am. Mus. Novit. 3541, 1–16 (2006)
Camargo, J. M. F., Grimaldi, D. & Pedro, S. R. M. The extinct fauna of stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini) in Dominican amber: Two new species and redescription of the male of Proplebeia dominicana (Wille and Chandler). Am. Mus. Novit. 3293, 1–24 (2000)
Freudenstein, J. V. & Rasmussen, F. N. Sectile pollinia and relationships in Orchidaceae. Plant Syst. Evol. 205, 125–146 (1997)
Singer, R. B. & Sazima, M. Flower morphology and pollination mechanism in three sympatric Goodyerinae orchids from southeastern Brazil. Ann. Bot. (Lond.) 88, 989–997 (2001)
Poinar, G. O. & Danforth, B. N. A fossil bee from Early Cretaceous Burmese amber. Science 314, 614 (2006)
Ren, D. Flower-associated Brachycera flies as fossil evidence for Jurassic angiosperm origins. Science 280, 85–88 (1998)
Grimaldi, D. The co-radiations of pollinating insects and angiosperms in the Cretaceous. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 86, 373–406 (1999)
Crepet, W. L., Friis, E. M., Nixon, K. C., Lack, A. J. & Jarzembowski, E. A. Fossil evidence for the evolution of biotic pollination. Phil.Trans. R. Soc. London.B 333, 187–195 (1991)
Crepet, W. L. Some aspects of the pollination biology of Middle Eocene angiosperms. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 27, 213–238 (1979)
Gandolfo, M. A., Nixon, K. C. & Crepet, W. L. Cretaceous flowers of Nymphaeaceae and implications for complex insect entrapment pollination mechanisms in early Angiosperms. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 8056–8060 (2004)
Heard, T. A. The role of stingless bees in crop pollination. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 44, 183–206 (1999)
Roubik, D. W. Deceptive orchids with Meliponini as pollinators. Plant Syst. Evol. 222, 271–279 (2000)
Freudenstein, J. V. & Rasmussen, F. N. What does morphology tell us about orchid relationships?—A cladistic analysis. Am. J. Bot. 86, 225–248 (1999)
Herendeen, P. S. & Crane, P. S. in Monocotyledons: Systematics and Evolution (eds Rudall, P. J., Cribb, P. J., Cutler, D. F. & Humphries, C. J.) 1–21 (Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 1995)
Crepet, W. L. Insect pollination: a paleontological perspective. Bioscience 29, 102–107 (1979)
Labandeira, C. C. Paleobiology: how old is the flower and the fly? Science 280 57–59 10.1126/science.280.5360.57 (1998)
Chase, M. W. in Genera Orchidacearum Vol. 2 (eds Pridgeon, A. M., Cribb, P. J., Chase, M. W. & Rasmussen, F. N.) 1–5 (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 2001)
Wikström, N., Savolainen, V. & Chase, M. W. Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 2211–2220 (2001)
Bremer, K. Early Cretaceous lineages of monocot flowering plants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 4707–4711 (2000)
Janssen, T. & Bremer, K. The age of major monocot groups inferred from 800+ rbcL sequences. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 146, 385–398 (2004)
van der Berg, C. et al. An overview of the phylogenetic relationships within Epidendroideae inferred from multiple DNA regions and recircumscription of Epidendreae and Arethuseae (Orchidaeceae). Am. J. Bot. 92, 613–624 (2005)
Cameron, K. M. et al. A phylogenetic anlaysis of the Orchidaceae: evidence from rbcl nucleotide sequences. Am. J. Bot. 86, 208–224 (1999)
Freudenstein, J. V. et al. An expanded plastid DNA phylogeny of Orchidaceae and analysis of jackknife branch support strategy. Am. J. Bot. 91, 149–157 (2004)
Sanderson, M. J. r8s: inferring absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times in the absence of a molecular clock. Bioinformatics 19, 301–302 (2003)
Friis, E. M., Pedersen, K. R. & Crane, P. R. Araceae from the Early Cretaceous of Portugal: Evidence on the emergence of monocotyledons. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 16565–16570 (2004)
Acknowledgements
We thank Y. Goldman for facilitating access to the amber inclusion discussed here, G. Romero for his assistance in the examination of herbarium specimens, and G. Alpert and D. Smith for assistance in the production of the fossil microphotographs. We thank B. Archibald, C. Bell, M. Chase, A. Knoll, R. van der Ham, D. Hewitt, C. Jaramillo, M. Patten, E. Pringle, J. Pringle and T. Quental for useful comments. This research was sponsored by grants from the Barbour Fund (Museum of Comparative Zoology) and the National Science Foundation (DDIG) to S.R.R. and N.E.P., and a grant from the Fulbright Junior Scholar programme to B.G.
Author Contributions S.R.R., B.G. and N.E.P. procured and curated the specimen. S.R.R., B.G. and R.B.S. reviewed herbaria specimens, analysed ancestral floral morphology, and coded and analysed morphological characters. S.R.R. and C.R.M. designed dating approaches and considered their interpretation. S.R.R. wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints. The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
This file contains Supplementary Figure 1 with Legend, detailing the fossil-calibrated molecular clock analyses presented in Figure 4; Supplementary Methods 1-6, showing the morphological character codes and the matrix used to explore the phylogenetic placement of M. caribea, the methodology used in the phylogenetic analyses and divergence time estimation, and additional comments on the palaeontology of fossil calibrations; Supplementary Tables 1-3, indicating herbarium specimens examined, age estimates obtained with different methods, and GenBank accession numbers; and Supplementary Notes, indicating additional cited references. (PDF 534 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ramírez, S., Gravendeel, B., Singer, R. et al. Dating the origin of the Orchidaceae from a fossil orchid with its pollinator. Nature 448, 1042–1045 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06039
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06039
This article is cited by
-
Effects of geographic isolation on the Bulbophyllum chloroplast genomes
BMC Plant Biology (2022)
-
Plastid phylogenomics resolves ambiguous relationships within the orchid family and provides a solid timeframe for biogeography and macroevolution
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
An exploration of the complex biogeographical history of the Neotropical banner-wing damselflies (Odonata: Polythoridae)
BMC Evolutionary Biology (2020)
-
Unique and common traits in mycorrhizal symbioses
Nature Reviews Microbiology (2020)
-
Savanna tree evolutionary ages inform the reconstruction of the paleoenvironment of our hominin ancestors
Scientific Reports (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.