Hippocampal remapping and grid realignment in entorhinal cortex


A fundamental property of many associative memory networks is the ability to decorrelate overlapping input patterns before information is stored1,2,3,4,5. In the hippocampus, this neuronal pattern separation is expressed as the tendency of ensembles of place cells6 to undergo extensive ‘remapping’ in response to changes in the sensory or motivational inputs to the hippocampus7,8,9,10,11,12,13. Remapping is expressed under some conditions as a change of firing rates in the presence of a stable place code (‘rate remapping’)14, and under other conditions as a complete reorganization of the hippocampal place code in which both place and rate of firing take statistically independent values (‘global remapping’)14. Here we show that the nature of hippocampal remapping can be predicted by ensemble dynamics in place-selective grid cells in the medial entorhinal cortex15,16, one synapse upstream of the hippocampus. Whereas rate remapping is associated with stable grid fields, global remapping is always accompanied by a coordinate shift in the firing vertices of the grid cells. Grid fields of co-localized medial entorhinal cortex cells move and rotate in concert during this realignment. In contrast to the multiple environment-specific representations coded by place cells in the hippocampus, local ensembles of grid cells thus maintain a constant spatial phase structure, allowing position to be represented and updated by the same translation mechanism in all environments encountered by the animal.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Procedures for inducing global remapping and rate remapping in hippocampal area CA3.
Figure 2: Realignment of entorhinal grid fields during hippocampal global remapping between different boxes in the same location.
Figure 3: Realignment of entorhinal grid fields during hippocampal global remapping between two rooms.
Figure 4: Unaltered alignment of entorhinal grid fields during rate remapping in CA3.


  1. 1

    Marr, D. Simple memory: a theory of archicortex. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 262, 23–81 (1971)

  2. 2

    McNaughton, B. L. & Nadel, L. in Neuroscience and Connectionist Theory (eds Gluck, M. A. & Rumelhart, D. E.) 1–63 (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1989)

  3. 3

    Treves, A. & Rolls, E. T. Computational constraints suggest the need for two distinct input systems to the hippocampal CA3 network. Hippocampus 2, 189–199 (1992)

  4. 4

    Kesner, R. P., Gilbert, P. E. & Wallenstein, G. V. Testing neural network models of memory with behavioral experiments. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 10, 260–265 (2000)

  5. 5

    Leutgeb, S., Leutgeb, J. K., Moser, M.-B. & Moser, E. I. Place cells, spatial maps and the population code for memory. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 15, 738–746 (2005)

  6. 6

    O’Keefe, J. & Nadel, L. The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map (Clarendon, Oxford, 1978)

  7. 7

    Bostock, E., Muller, R. U. & Kubie, J. L. Experience-dependent modifications of hippocampal place cell firing. Hippocampus 1, 193–205 (1991)

  8. 8

    Markus, E. J. et al. Interactions between location and task affect the spatial and directional firing of hippocampal neurons. J. Neurosci. 15, 7079–7094 (1995)

  9. 9

    Kentros, C. et al. Abolition of long-term stability of new hippocampal place cell maps by NMDA receptor blockade. Science 280, 2121–2126 (1998)

  10. 10

    Wood, E. R., Dudchenko, P. A., Robitsek, R. J. & Eichenbaum, H. Hippocampal neurons encode information about different types of memory episodes occurring in the same location. Neuron 27, 623–633 (2000)

  11. 11

    Frank, L. M., Brown, E. N. & Wilson, M. Trajectory encoding in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex. Neuron 27, 169–178 (2000)

  12. 12

    Lever, C., Wills, T., Cacucci, F., Burgess, N. & O’Keefe, J. Long-term plasticity in hippocampal place-cell representation of environmental geometry. Nature 416, 90–94 (2002)

  13. 13

    Leutgeb, S., Leutgeb, J. K., Treves, A., Moser, M.-B. & Moser, E. I. Distinct ensemble codes in hippocampal areas CA3 and CA1. Science 305, 1295–1298 (2004)

  14. 14

    Leutgeb, S. et al. Independent codes for spatial and episodic memory in the hippocampus. Science 309, 619–623 (2005)

  15. 15

    Fyhn, M., Molden, S., Witter, M. P., Moser, E. I. & Moser, M.-B. Spatial representation in the entorhinal cortex. Science 305, 1258–1264 (2004)

  16. 16

    Hafting, T., Fyhn, M., Molden, S., Moser, M.-B. & Moser, E. I. Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex. Nature 436, 801–806 (2005)

  17. 17

    Steffenach, H.-A., Witter, M. P., Moser, M.-B. & Moser, E. I. Spatial memory in the rat requires the dorsolateral band of the entorhinal cortex. Neuron 45, 301–313 (2005)

  18. 18

    Sargolini, F. et al. Conjunctive representation of position, direction and velocity in entorhinal cortex. Science 312, 754–758 (2006)

  19. 19

    McNaughton, B. L., Battaglia, F. P., Jensen, O., Moser, E. I. & Moser, M.-B. Path integration and the neural basis of the ‘cognitive map’. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 7, 663–678 (2006)

  20. 20

    Solstad, T., Moser, E. I. & Einevoll, G. T. From grid cells to place cells: a mathematical model. Hippocampus 16, 1026–1031 (2006)

  21. 21

    Wills, T. J., Lever, C., Cacucci, F., Burgess, N. & O’Keefe, J. Attractor dynamics in the hippocampal representation of the local environment. Science 308, 873–876 (2005)

  22. 22

    Anderson, M. I. & Jeffery, K. J. Heterogeneous modulation of place cell firing by changes in context. J. Neurosci. 23, 8827–8835 (2003)

  23. 23

    Quirk, G. J., Muller, R. U. & Kubie, J. L. The firing of hippocampal place cells in the dark depends on the rat’s recent experience. J. Neurosci. 10, 2008–2017 (1990)

  24. 24

    Redish, A. D. & Touretzky, D. S. Cognitive maps beyond the hippocampus. Hippocampus 7, 15–35 (1997)

  25. 25

    Sharp, P. E. Complimentary roles for hippocampal versus subicular/entorhinal place cells in coding place, context, and events. Hippocampus 9, 432–443 (1999)

  26. 26

    Fuhs, M. C. & Touretzky, D. S. A spin glass model of path integration in rat medial entorhinal cortex. J. Neurosci. 26, 4266–4276 (2006)

  27. 27

    Leutgeb, J. K., Leutgeb, S., Moser, M.-B. & Moser, E. I. Pattern separation in dentate gyrus and CA3 of the hippocampus. Science 315 doi: 10.1126/science.1135801 (16 February 2007)

  28. 28

    Hargreaves, E. L., Rao, G., Lee, I. & Knierim, J. J. Major dissociation between medial and lateral entorhinal input to the dorsal hippocampus. Science 308, 1792–1794 (2005)

  29. 29

    Naber, P. A., Caballero-Bleda, M., Jorritsma-Byham, B. & Witter, M. P. Parallel input to the hippocampal memory system through peri- and postrhinal cortices. Neuroreport 8, 2617–2621 (1997)

  30. 30

    Battaglia, F. P. & Treves, A. Attractor neural networks storing multiple space representations: a model for hippocampal place fields. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Phys. Plasmas Fluids Relat. Interdiscip. Top. 58, 7738–7753 (1998)

Download references


We thank S. Leutgeb, T. Solstad, B. L. McNaughton and M. P. Witter for discussion, R. Skjerpeng for programming, and I. Hammer, K. Haugen, K. Jenssen and H. Waade for technical assistance. This work was supported by a Centre of Excellence grant from the Norwegian Research Council.

Author Contributions M.F., T.H., M.-B.M. and E.I.M. planned experiments and analyses. M.F., T.H. and M.-B.M. performed the experiments and analysed the data. A.T. gave advice on analyses, and E.I.M. wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the manuscript.

Author information

Correspondence to Edvard I. Moser.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-12 with Legends, Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Tables 1-3, Supplementary Discussion and Supplementary Notes with additional references. Supplementary Figures 1-3 show representative recording locations in MEC and CA3, examples of global remapping and rate remapping in CA3 (rate maps for the complete cell sample in one animal and for all cells that were active in both environments in all animals), and crosscorrelation matrices for the entire set of grid-cell ensembles. Supplementary Figures 4-12 show additional crosscorrelations for individual cells and cell ensembles, simultaneous recordings from MEC and CA3, experiments addressing contiguity of grid realignment in MEC and global remapping in CA3, analyses of ensemble coactivity and rate distribution across grid vertices, and two models for global remapping in hippocampus during grid realignment in MEC. Supplementary Tables 1-3 show numbers of cells and experiments for individual rats, averaged firing properties of MEC and CA3 cells, and behavioural data. (PDF 9054 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fyhn, M., Hafting, T., Treves, A. et al. Hippocampal remapping and grid realignment in entorhinal cortex. Nature 446, 190–194 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05601

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.