Letter | Published:

Interplay of electron–lattice interactions and superconductivity in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ

Subjects

Abstract

Formation of electron pairs is essential to superconductivity. For conventional superconductors, tunnelling spectroscopy has established that pairing is mediated by bosonic modes (phonons); a peak in the second derivative of tunnel current d2I/dV2 corresponds to each phonon mode1,2,3. For high-transition-temperature (high-Tc) superconductivity, however, no boson mediating electron pairing has been identified. One explanation could be that electron pair formation4 and related electron–boson interactions are heterogeneous at the atomic scale and therefore challenging to characterize. However, with the latest advances in d2I/dV2 spectroscopy using scanning tunnelling microscopy, it has become possible to study bosonic modes directly at the atomic scale5. Here we report d2I/dV2 imaging6,7,8 studies of the high-Tc superconductor Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ. We find intense disorder of electron–boson interaction energies at the nanometre scale, along with the expected modulations in d2I/dV2 (refs 9, 10). Changing the density of holes has minimal effects on both the average mode energies and the modulations, indicating that the bosonic modes are unrelated to electronic or magnetic structure. Instead, the modes appear to be local lattice vibrations, as substitution of 18O for 16O throughout the material reduces the average mode energy by approximately 6 per cent—the expected effect of this isotope substitution on lattice vibration frequencies5. Significantly, the mode energies are always spatially anticorrelated with the superconducting pairing-gap energies, suggesting an interplay between these lattice vibration modes and the superconductivity.

Main

Strong-coupling superconductivity theory1,2,3,11, allowed the impact of electron–phonon interactions on the superconducting density of states, DOS(E), at energy E = Δ + Ω to be predicted (Δ is the superconducting energy gap and Ω the phonon energy). McMillan and Rowell used d2I/dV2 measurements on planar normal-insulator-superconductor tunnel junctions1 to reveal these signatures at boson energies Ω = E - Δ, identifying them with independently determined phonons of energy Ω. The electron–phonon spectral function measured from these d2I/dV2 spectra yielded the correct superconducting transition temperature—a milestone of twentieth-century physics.

By contrast, no consensus exists on the electron pairing mechanism of high-Tc superconductivity. One reason is that the extensive studies of bosonic modes12,13,14,15,16,17 and related electronic self-energy changes18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26 have not resulted in the unambiguous identification of a boson mediating the pairing. Effects of electron–boson interactions (EBI) on electronic self-energies are most widely studied18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26 via angle resolved photoemission. In the Δ = 0 or nodal direction of momentum space k(π/a0,π/a0), where a0 is the unit cell dimension, sudden changes or ‘kinks’ in quasiparticle dispersion E(k) occur between 50 meV and 80 meV below the Fermi energy18,19,20,21. Several studies have addressed the issue of whether these ‘kinks’ might be due to magnetic interactions19,20. On the other hand, it has been proposed that, because of the doping independence of their energies, the ‘kinks’ are due to electron–phonon interactions21. In the antinodal directions k ≈ (π/a0,0) where Δ is maximal, self energy changes22,23,24,25 also occur between 50 meV and 90 meV below the Fermi energy. But here the effects are thought to occur at E = Δ + Ω. These modes have been discussed in terms of both magnetic interactions22,23,24 and electron–phonon25 interactions. Effects of 16O/18O isotope substitution have been found primarily on states near k ≈ (π/a0,0), providing evidence for electron interactions with lattice modes26 (to be discussed in more detail below). Another EBI study technique is superconductor–insulator–superconductor (SIS) conductance measurement in break junctions27. Despite the challenge of interpreting SIS spectra in terms of the absolute value of Ω (they are not a direct measure of the superconducting DOS28), clear EBI features are detected; they are analysed in terms of magnetic modes. A final probe of copper oxide EBI is optical spectroscopy29,30; it reveals self-energy changes that have been ascribed to magnetic interactions via a sharp mode29 or a broad continuum30. Evidently, a definite conclusion for the identity of any pairing related EBI has proven elusive.

One reason for this situation might be that some key element of the EBI phenomenology has, so far, gone undetected. For example, if electron pairing4 and any related EBI were disordered at the atomic scale, the techniques described above could not yield a complete description of the relevant nanoscale EBI phenomena because they average over space. For such reasons, atomic-resolution d2I/dV2 spectroscopy of copper oxides has recently become the focus of considerable theoretical interest6,7,8,9,10. Three of the proposed applications are: (1) if the position (r) dependence of energy-gap disorder Δ(r) were due to atomic-scale pair-potential disorder4, pairing-related EBI could be examined directly at that scale; (2) studies of specific local bosonic modes (unrelated to pairing) at defects or impurity/dopant atoms6,7,8 could improve our understanding of EBI in copper oxides; and (3) Fourier transform d2I/dV2 imaging (dubbed FT-IETS)10 may help distinguish between different bosons involved in EBI. However, until now, severe technical constraints (see Supplementary Information) have prevented implementation of d2I/dV2 imaging of the necessary spatial/energetic precision.

Here we report atomic-resolution d2I/dV2-imaging studies of a high-Tc superconductor Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ (Bi-2212). We use floating-zone-grown single crystals cleaved between the BiO planes in cryogenic ultrahigh vacuum and immediately inserted into the scanning tunnelling microscope head at 4.2 K. Figure 1a shows a topographic image of a typical BiO surface, while the inset shows the typical local density of states (LDOS) measured via a differential conductance dI/dV(E = eV) spectrum. Here we focus on the nanoscale spatial/energetic properties of the ubiquitous features at |E| > Δ in the LDOS (for example, see arrows in Fig. 1a inset).

Figure 1: Atomic-resolution d2I /d V2(r, E ) imaging of electron–boson interactions in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+ δ.
figure1

a, Typical topographic image of one of the surfaces under study (Z, surface height). The inset shows the characteristic dI/dV spectrum, which is proportional to the DOS. The ubiquitous features occurring at energy E > Δ (where Δ is the superconducting energy gap), whose spatial and energetic structure are of central interest in this paper, are indicated by arrows. b, Examples of dI/dV spectra in different regions of surface shown in a; left, the peaks in d2I/dV2 occur at the points of maximum slope of dI/dV for E > Δ as indicated by arrows; right, examples of the directly measured peaks in d2I/dV2 from the identical locations as the same-coloured dI/dV spectra in b. c, The image of superconducting energy gap values, or gap-map Δ(r), on the surface in a. d, Image of the distribution of boson energies Ω(r) = Π(r) - Δ(r) (where Π(r) are bias energies at which d2I/dV2 peaks occur) on the surface in a. This analysis scheme to find Ω(r) has proven reliable and repeatable on numerous Bi-2212 samples at a wide range of dopings and with different oxygen isotopes. In all cases, it gives statistically indistinguishable results for both the filled and empty states: E < EF and E > EF (EF, Fermi energy).

Figure 1b gives typical examples of dI/dV(E) spectra measured at different locations of Fig. 1a. The vast majority of these spectra exhibit peaks in d2I/dV2(E) occurring at the point of maximum slope in dI/dV for |E| > Δ (arrows in Fig. 1b). Examples of the directly measured magnitude of the features in d2I/dV2 are shown in Fig. 1b, where the horizontal axis has first been converted to ω = E - Δ (where Δ is the distinct local gap magnitude for each spectrum). We provisionally consider these features as possible strong-coupling superconductivity1,2,3 signatures of EBI (see Supplementary Information).

The dI/dV(r,E) and d2I/dV2(r,E) are simultaneously imaged with atomic resolution and register. From the former, the gap-map Δ(r) is derived (Fig. 1c). From the latter, the energies Π(r)at which peaks in d2I/dV2(r,E) occur are measured. Within the context of strong-coupling superconductivity theory1,2,3,9, the local boson interaction energies would then be given by Ω(r) = Π(r) - Δ(r). Some systematic uncertainties may exist in the precision with which this process yields the absolute mode energy (especially for complex band structures). Nevertheless, the mean mode energy is estimated from the Ω(r) to be with a statistical spread of ± 8 meV. This is within the range of mode energies for antinodal EBI reported in photoemission studies22,23,24,25. However, it is from analysis of the Ω(r) images (Fig. 1d, Fig. 3d–f) that a very different perspective on the EBI of Bi-2212 emerges. We see immediately that boson energies Ω(r) are heterogeneous at the 2 nm scale with 40 meV < Ω(r) < 65 meV, spanning the range of antinodal mode energies from photoemission22,23,24,25. The necessity of atomic-resolution d2I/dV2(r,E)-imaging studies to fully explore EBI signatures in high-Tc superconductors becomes manifest here.

Figure 3: Doping dependence of electron–boson interactions of Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+ δ.
figure3

a–c, Gap-map Δ(r) for three values of p, respectively 0.12, 0.18 and 0.24. d–f, Simultaneously determined Ω(r) images. Note that the colour bar is reversed here to show directly how higher Ω is correlated to lower Δ, and vice versa. Also, we can see that spatial correlations of Δ(r) and Ω(r) both change together with doping. Regions of a and d that are black are where neither the value of Δ nor Ω can be determined because there are no coherence peaks or d2I/dV2-peak features (see blue spectra in Fig. 1b).

In theory9,10, spatial modulations of d2I/dV2(r,E) nearE = Ω + Δ can contain key information about the EBI. But we detect no spatially periodic structure in unprocessed d2I/dV2(E) images in this energy range. This can be understood, however, because Δ(r) is so strongly disordered (Fig. 1c) that any EBI10 effects in d2I/dV2(r,Ω + Δ(r)) would be spatially scrambled. To search for these effects, each d2I/dV2(E) must therefore be shifted to its bosonic energy scale ω(r) = E - Δ(r), a process we refer to as ‘gap referencing’. This converts the unprocessed d2I/dV2(r,E); |E| > Δ data into a new series of d2I/dV2(r,ω) images. These vary little (except in intensity) within the energy range 40 meV < ω < 65 meV where peaks in d2I/dV2(ω) are detectable (see Supplementary Fig. 1). Remarkably, they all exhibit the same spatial modulations, which did not exist in unprocessed d2I/dV2(r,E) data before gap referencing (see Supplementary Fig. 1).

To enhance their spatial contrast, we sum the d2I/dV2(r,ω) images over the boson energy range where EBI are detected: . This energy average produces lower spatial noise compared to a single energy map. A typical resulting Γ(r) is shown in Fig. 2a; the modulations are parallel to the Cu–O bond directions and have wavelengths 5a0 with correlation length of 50 Å. We then use Γ(q), the Fourier transform of Γ(r), in Fig. 2b to determine that the modulation wavevectors are p1 ≈ 2π/a0[(0.2,0);(0,0.2)] ± 15%. Within the theoretical models9,10, such d2I/dV2(r,ω) modulations are created when electronic states, renormalized by EBI, are scattered by disorder. When scattering is modelled as due to atomic-scale variations in the pair potential4, the predictions for d2I/dV2(r,ω) modulations10 are qualitatively consistent with data in Fig. 2, if the boson is a lattice vibration mode.

Figure 2: Ubiquitous quasi-periodic spatial modulations in d 2 I /d V 2 (r, ω ) signals, after gap referencing.
figure2

a, We define the local bosonic energy scale as ω(r) = E - Δ(r). A typical map of d2I/dV2(r,ω) modulations integrated over energy then reveals directly that the quasi-periodic spatial d2I/dV2(r,ω) modulations are parallel to the Cu–O bond directions, have wavelengths of 5a0 and correlation length of 50 Å. These phenomena occur in all gap-referenced Γ(r). b, The characteristic wavevectors of these d2I/dV2(r,ω) modulations, as indicated directly by the arrow in Γ(q), the Fourier transform (FT) of Γ(r), are p1 ≈ 2π/a0[(0.2,0);(0,0.2)] ± 15%. They are dispersionless within our resolution. c, The doping dependence of these p1 are analysed by plotting the magnitude of Γ(q) along the line (0,0) to (0,2π), as shown in b. We find that very similar modulation wavevectors (black arrows) occur at all dopings (FFT, fast Fourier transform; a.u., arbitrary units).

Next we study these d2I/dV2 signatures of EBI at a sequence of different hole densities per CuO2, p: p ≈ 0.12 → p ≈ 0.24. In Fig. 3a–c we show that the average superconducting energy gap decreases from 60 meV to 20 meV with increasing doping, as expected. In strong contrast, Fig. 3d–f shows that, although changes occur in spatial correlations of Ω(r), no change is detectable in the average boson energy . In fact, histograms of Δ and Ω measured on five samples at different dopings (Fig. 4) reveal that, while the distributions of Δ evolve rapidly with doping, those of Ω appear unchanged: for all dopings. We emphasize that the doping independence of is not because the average energy of the d2I/dV2 peak is unchanged with doping; changes from ± 105 meV to over the doping range. It is the difference, , between and which remains constant. Furthermore, we find the d2I/dV2-modulation wavevectors p1 are the same for all gap-referenced Γ(r)at all dopings (see Fig. 2c).

Figure 4: Doping dependence of energy gap histograms and boson energy histograms in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+ δ.
figure4

a, Histograms of measured energy gaps Δ from a sequence of samples with different dopings, black being strongly overdoped and blue strongly underdoped. We see clearly that falls rapidly with rising doping, and that the distribution of Δ sharpens: there can be little doubt that the doping is indeed changing. b, Histograms of measured boson energies Ω, from d2I/dV2-imaging measurements performed simultaneously with a. Within the uncertainty, neither the distribution nor the mean value of = 52 ± 1 meV are influenced by doping. Furthermore, since the same value of Ω(r) is associated with different absolute values of Δ(r) at different dopings, the most plausible explanation is that the doping-independent distributions of Ω are inherent to the crystal.We note that in our >106 atomically resolved dI/dV and d2I/dV2 spectra in this study, the minimum in dI/dV always occurs near Ωdip = ± 26 meV at all dopings (see Supplementary Fig. 2).

Thus, both d2I/dV2(r,ω) modulations and are independent of doped hole-density. Which boson13,14,15,16,17 could exhibit such doping-independent EBI characteristics? The ‘resonant’ spin-1 magnetic excitation mode15 appears inconsistent with the doping independence of mode energies because its energy is 43 meV in Bi-2212 but, more importantly, is believed to be strongly doping dependent. The incommensurate, dispersive, spin density wave modes16,17 also appear inconsistent because of their characteristic strong energy- or doping-dependences. By contrast, because energies of lattice-vibration modes change little with doping, they are logical candidates for the boson detected by d2I/dV2 imaging.

Indeed, electron–lattice interactions are well known to influence copper oxide superconductivity. For example, the energy of a phonon mode at momentum transfer Q ≈ 2π/a0[(0.25,0);(0,0.25)] diminishes rapidly towards 50 meV upon cooling into the superconducting state12,13,14, as might be expected for strong phonon interactions with superconducting quasiparticles. Furthermore, studies have revealed an unusual 16O/18O isotope substitution effect26 on the electronic structure; the data point to maximum influence of lattice modes on the high energy (E ≈ - 250 meV) electronic structure near the antinodes, with a much weaker impact above Tc and at low energy. Although these results are not consistent with the simplest Eliashberg picture of electron–phonon interactions26, they do represent evidence for interactions between states near k ≈ (π/a0,0) and lattice vibrational modes. Furthermore, there have been detailed photoemission studies25 of antinodal quasiparticles coupling to a bosonic mode—ascribed to a B1 g Cu–O bond-buckling phonon from theoretical analysis. Taken in combination, these studies point to interactions between antinodal quasiparticles and Cu–O-related lattice vibrations as influencing high temperature superconductivity—although the precise implications for electron pairing mechanism remain uncertain.

To test the hypothesis that bosons detectable by d2I/dV2-imaging techniques in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ are lattice vibration modes, we prepared crystals in which the normal 16O was completely substituted by 18O (as verified by frequency shifts detected in Raman spectroscopy). Figure 5a provides the comparisons between the distributions of Ω(r) and Δ(r) in different samples containing complete substitutions of the two oxygen isotopes. For each sample, we take Δ(r) and Ω(r) and construct a two-dimensional histogram of the frequency of occurrence of spectra with a given pair of values (Δ,Ω). Each histogram is peaked along the vertical axis at the most common gap energy and along the horizontal axis at the most common boson energy . Comparison between 16O ΔΩ histogram (blue) and the 18O ΔΩ histogram (red) reveals immediately that for 18O shifts downwards by several meV compared to that of 16O. A quantitative analysis in Fig. 5b shows the distribution of boson energies Ω in two different samples containing complete substitutions of the two oxygen isotopes: 16O in blue and 18O in red. We find that the shift of upon substitution of 16O by 18O is -3.7 ± 0.8 meV. These results are found equally true for both filled E = -(Δ + Ω) and empty E = +(Δ + Ω) states, as expected for EBI in strong-coupling superconductivity theory2,3. Consequently, substitution of 18O for 16O reduces the mean boson energy scale of EBI by 6% —as expected for lattice vibrational modes involving the O atom.

Figure 5: 18 O/ 16 O isotope effects on d 2 I /d V 2 (r, ω ) spectra and the distribution of boson energies.
figure5

The substitution of 16O by 18O was demonstrated via Raman spectroscopy of both in-plane and out-of-plane oxygen vibrational mode frequencies. a, Two dimensional ΔΩ-histograms of the frequency of occurrence of a given pair of Δ,Ω values in a single spectrum. Data for 16O are in blue and 18O in red. Although the Ω vary in a fashion correlated with Δ, the shift in Ω with substitution of 16O by 18O is downwards by several meV. The vertical shift of 5.6 meV in between samples occurred inadvertently, because the hole density—as determined independently from Tc (16Tc ≈ 76 K, 18Tc ≈ 88 K)—was slightly different in the two samples. As far as we know at present, no importance should be attributed to this shift. b, The histograms for all values of Ω for samples with 16O (blue) and 18O (red). The average shift of energy with isotope substitution is -3.7 ± 0.8 meV. We find this same shift if Ω distributions are measured for both filled (E > EF) and empty (E < EF) states. c, The normalized correlations between the dopant atom locations O(r) and both Ω(r) and Δ(r). While zero-displacement dopant-gap-map O(r):Δ(r) ≈ + 0.35 as expected, and Ω(r):Δ(r) ≈ - 0.30 consistent with Fig. 3, we find that Ω(r) and O(r) are uncorrelated (solid black line).

These d2I/dV2-imaging studies alter several existing concepts of the EBI problem in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ. We demonstrate that it is modes involving lattice vibrations that generate the d2I/dV2 features in tunnelling. Further, the diminishing intensities of the d2I/dV2 peaks with coherence peak height (Fig. 1b), along with the necessity for gap referencing (Fig. 2), signify the primary involvement of the antinodal states (EΔ ,k ≈ (π,0)) in the interactions. The mean mode energy is ≈ 52 meV with a statistical spread of ± 8 meV. These modes exhibit intense atomic-scale disorder of interaction energies Ω(r), whose doping independence (Fig. 4b) points to a population native to the crystal. And perhaps most significantly, the Ω(r) are spatially anticorrelated with the superconducting energy gap disorder Δ(r) at all dopings (Fig. 3) and for both oxygen isotopes (Fig. 5a). Finally, in Fig. 5c we show the normalized correlations4 between the dopant atom locations O(r) and both Ω(r) and Δ(r). Whereas the zero-displacement correlations O(r):Δ(r) ≈ + 0.35 are as expected, and the Ω(r):Δ(r) ≈ - 0.30 correlations are consistent with Fig. 3, we find that Ω(r) and O(r) are uncorrelated. Therefore, correlations between Ω(r) and Δ(r) cannot be occurring trivially, through a similar effect of dopant disorder on both. A direct atomic-scale influence of Ω(r) on Δ(r) (or vice versa) is implied.

Taken together, these data present some intriguing new possibilities. The first is that superconducting energy gap disorder Δ(r) is a consequence of heterogeneity in the pairing potential caused by disorder in the frequencies and coupling constants of pairing-related vibrational modes31. But the strong dependence of superconducting electronic structure on hole density while the Ω(r) distributions remain unchanged (Fig. 4) appears to argue against this point of view. A second possibility is that the d2I/dV2 features are unconnected to pairing-related EBI—perhaps occurring because of inelastic stimulation of vibrational modes within the tunnel barrier itself32 or because of non-pairing-related electron lattice interactions. The primary difficulty here is that the ubiquitous anticorrelation between Ω(r) and Δ(r) cannot be explained trivially within such scenarios. A third possibility is that the d2I/dV2 features represent electron–lattice interactions related to a competing electronic ordered state (see, for example, ref. 13), and that the anticorrelation between Ω(r) and Δ(r) occurs because of this competition. To help to distinguish between these possibilities, an atomic-scale version of the McMillan–Rowell procedure1 may now become necessary.

References

  1. 1

    McMillan, W. L. & Rowell, J. M. in Superconductivity Vol. 1 (ed. Parks, R. D.) 561 (Dekker, New York, 1969)

  2. 2

    Scalapino, D. J. in Superconductivity Vol. 1 (ed. Parks, R. D.) 449 (Dekker, New York, 1969)

  3. 3

    Carbotte, J. P. Properties of boson-exchange superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 62, 1027–1157 (1990)

  4. 4

    Nunner, T. S., Andersen, B. M., Melikyan, A. & Hirschfeld, P. J. Dopant-modulated pair interaction in cuprate superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 177003 (2005)

  5. 5

    Stipe, B. C., Rezaei, M. A. & Ho, W. Single-molecule vibrational spectroscopy and microscopy. Science 280, 1732–1735 (1998)

  6. 6

    Morr, D. K. & Nyberg, R. H. Localized bosonic modes in superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 68, 060505 (2003)

  7. 7

    Han, J. H. Signature of a collective spin mode in the local tunnelling spectra of a d-wave superconductor. Phys. Rev. B 67, 094506 (2003)

  8. 8

    Balatsky, A. V., Abanov, Ar. & Zhu, J.-X. Inelastic tunnelling spectroscopy in a d-wave superconductor. Phys. Rev. B 68, 214506 (2003)

  9. 9

    Zhu, J.-X., Sun, J., Si, Q. & Balatsky, A. V. Effects of a collective spin resonance mode on the scanning tunnelling microscopy spectra of d-wave superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 017002 (2004)

  10. 10

    Zhu, J.-X. et al. Effects of τ1 scattering on Fourier-transformed inelastic tunnelling spectra in high-Tc cuprates with bosonic modes. Preprint at http://www.arXiv.org/cond-mat/0507621 (2005).

  11. 11

    Eliashberg, G. M. Interactions between electrons and lattice vibrations in a superconductor. Sov. Phys. JETP 11, 696–702 (1960)

  12. 12

    McQueeney, R. J. et al. Anomalous dispersion of LO phonons in La1.85Sr0.15CuO4 at low temperatures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 628–631 (1999)

  13. 13

    Reznik, D. et al. Electron-phonon coupling reflecting dynamic charge inhomogeneity in copper oxide superconductors. Nature 440, 1170–1173 (2006)

  14. 14

    Egami, T. Competing interactions in complex oxides: Polaron stability in manganites and cuprates. AIP Conf. Proc. 554, 38–47 (2001)

  15. 15

    Sidis, Y. et al. Magnetic resonant excitations in high-Tc superconductors. Phys. Status Solidi B 241, 1204–1210 (2004)

  16. 16

    Tranquada, J. M. et al. Quantum magnetic excitations from stripes in copper oxide superconductors. Nature 429, 534–538 (2004)

  17. 17

    Hayden, S. M., Mook, H. A., Dai, P., Perring, T. G. & Doğan, F. The structure of the high-energy spin excitations in a high-transition-temperature superconductor. Nature 429, 531–534 (2004)

  18. 18

    Bogdanov, P. V. et al. Evidence for an energy scale for quasiparticle dispersion in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2581–2584 (2000)

  19. 19

    Kaminski, A. et al. Renormalization of spectral line shape and dispersion below Tc in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ . Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1070–1073 (2001)

  20. 20

    Johnson, P. D. et al. Doping and temperature dependence of the mass enhancement observed in the cuprate Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ . Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 177007 (2001)

  21. 21

    Lanzara, A. et al. Evidence for ubiquitous strong electron-phonon coupling in high-temperature superconductors. Nature 412, 510–514 (2001)

  22. 22

    Norman, M. R. et al. Unusual dispersion and line shape of the superconducting state spectra of Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ . Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3506–3509 (1997)

  23. 23

    Borisenko, S. V. et al. Anomalous enhancement of the coupling to the magnetic resonance mode in underdoped Pb-Bi2212. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 207001 (2003)

  24. 24

    Gromko, A. D. et al. Mass-renormalized electronic excitations at (π,0) in the superconducting state of Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ . Phys. Rev. B 68, 174520 (2003)

  25. 25

    Cuk, T. et al. Coupling of the B1g phonon to the antinodal electronic states of Bi2Sr2Ca0.92Y0.08Cu2O8+δ . Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 117003 (2004)

  26. 26

    Gweon, G.-H. et al. An unusual isotope effect in a high-transition-temperature superconductor. Nature 430, 187–190 (2004)

  27. 27

    Miyakawa, N. et al. Predominantly superconducting origin of large energy gaps in underdoped Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ from tunnelling spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1018–1021 (1999)

  28. 28

    Romano, P. et al. Modelling study of the dip/hump feature in Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ tunnelling spectroscopy. Preprint at http://www.arXiv.org/cond-mat/0602405 (2006).

  29. 29

    Carbotte, J. P., Schachinger, E. & Basov, D. N. Coupling strength of charge carriers to spin fluctuations in high-temperature superconductors. Nature 401, 354–356 (1999)

  30. 30

    Hwang, J., Timusk, T. & Gu, G. D. High-transition-temperature superconductivity in the absence of the magnetic-resonance mode. Nature 427, 714–717 (2004)

  31. 31

    Zhu, J.-X. & Balatsky, A. V. Local strong coupling pairing in d-wave superconductor with inhomogeneous bosonic modes. Preprint at http://www.arXiv.org/cond-mat/0604391 (2006).

  32. 32

    Pilgram, S., Rice, T. M. & Sigrist, M. Role of inelastic tunneling through the barrier in scanning tunneling microscope experiments on cuprates. Preprint at http://www.arXiv.org/cond-mat/0605646 (2006).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the following people for discussions and communications: Ar. Abanov, P. W. Anderson, N. Ashcroft, T. P. Devereaux, T. Egami, M. Eshrig, C. Henley, P. J. Hirschfeld, A. Lanzara, D.-H. Lee, P. Littlewood, D. Morr, K. A. Müller, M. R. Norman, J. Orenstein, T. M. Rice, J. Rowell, D. J. Scalapino, Z.-X. Shen, C. M. Varma and A. Zettl. This work was supported by an LDRD from Los Alamos National Laboratory, a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Science and Education (Japan), the 21st-Century COE Program of JSPS, by Cornell University and by the Office of Naval Research; K.F. acknowledges Fellowship support from the ICAM International Materials Institute.

Author information

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Correspondence to J. C. Davis.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Figures

    This file contains Supplementary Figures 1–3 (PDF 262 kb)

Rights and permissions

To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.

About this article

Publication history

  • Received

  • Accepted

  • Issue Date

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04973

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.