Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Seismic waves increase permeability

Abstract

Earthquakes have been observed to affect hydrological systems in a variety of ways—water well levels can change dramatically, streams can become fuller and spring discharges can increase at the time of earthquakes1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Distant earthquakes may even increase the permeability in faults8. Most of these hydrological observations can be explained by some form of permeability increase1,5. Here we use the response of water well levels to solid Earth tides to measure permeability over a 20-year period. At the time of each of seven earthquakes in Southern California, we observe transient changes of up to 24° in the phase of the water level response to the dilatational volumetric strain of the semidiurnal tidal components of wells at the Piñon Flat Observatory in Southern California. After the earthquakes, the phase gradually returns to the background value at a rate of less than 0.1° per day. We use a model of axisymmetric flow driven by an imposed head oscillation through a single, laterally extensive, confined, homogeneous and isotropic aquifer to relate the phase response to aquifer properties9. We interpret the changes in phase response as due to changes in permeability. At the time of the earthquakes, the permeability at the site increases by a factor as high as three. The permeability increase depends roughly linearly on the amplitude of seismic-wave peak ground velocity in the range of 0.21–2.1 cm s-1. Such permeability increases are of interest to hydrologists and oil reservoir engineers as they affect fluid flow and might determine long-term evolution of hydrological and oil-bearing systems. They may also be interesting to seismologists, as the resulting pore pressure changes can affect earthquakes by changing normal stresses on faults10.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Water level from wells CIB and CIC.
Figure 2: Map of Southern California, showing epicentres of earthquakes considered in this study, as selected by the criterion in Fig. 1.
Figure 3: Phase of the semidiurnal tide for the water level in the wells CIB and CIC, relative to the areal strain.
Figure 4: Change in permeability for the well–aquifer systems CIB (circles) and CIC (squares) at the time of each of the earthquakes, plotted against peak ground velocity measured at PFO.

References

  1. 1

    Rojstaczer, S. & Wolf, S. Permeability changes associated with large earthquakes: An example from Loma Prieta, California. Geology 20, 211–214 (1992)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Muir-Wood, R. & King, G. Hydrological signatures of earthquake strain. J. Geophys. Res. 98, 22035–22068 (1993)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Roeloffs, E. Poroelastic techniques in the study of earthquakes-related hydrologic phenomena. Adv. Geophys. 37, 135–195 (1996)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Matsumoto, N. Regression-analysis for anomalous changes of ground-water level due to earthquakes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 19, 1193–1196 (1992)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Brodsky, E. E., Roeloffs, E., Woodcock, D., Gall, I. & Manga, M. A mechanism for sustained groundwater pressure changes induced by distant earthquakes. J. Geophys. Res. 108, doi:10.1029/2002JB002321 (2003)

  6. 6

    Montgomery, D. & Manga, M. Stream flow and water well responses to earthquakes. Science 300, 2047–2049 (2003)

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Manga, M., Brodsky, E. E. & Boone, M. Response of stream flow to multiple earthquakes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, doi:10.1029/2002GL016618 (2003)

  8. 8

    Kitagawa, Y., Fujimori, K. & Koizumi, N. Temporal change in permeability of the rock estimated from repeated water injection experiments near the Nojima fault in Awaji Island, Japan. Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, doi:10.1029/2001GL014030 (2002)

  9. 9

    Hsieh, P., Bredehoeft, J. & Farr, J. Determination of aquifer transmissivity from earthtide analysis. Water Resour. Res. 23, 1824–1832 (1987)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Raleigh, C., Healy, J. & Bredehoeft, J. An experiment in earthquake control at Rangely, Colorado. Science 191, 1230–1237 (1976)

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Bower, D. R. & Heaton, K. C. Response of an aquifer near Ottawa to tidal forcing and the Alaskan earthquake of 1964. Can. J. Earth Sci. 15, 331–340 (1978)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Davis, E. E. & Elderfield, H. Hydrogeology of the Oceanic Lithosphere Fig. 8.16 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Wyatt, F. Displacement of surface monuments: horizontal motion. J. Geophys. Res. 87, 979–989 (1982)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Love, A. E. H. Mathematical Theory of Elasticity 298 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1927)

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Coble, R. The effects of the Alaskan earthquake of March 27, 1964, on ground water in Iowa. Iowa Acad. Sci. 72, 323–332 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    King, C. Y., Azuma, S., Igarashi, G., Ohno, M., Saito, H. & Wakita, H. Earthquake-related water-level changes at 16 closely clustered wells in Tono, Central Japan. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 13073–13082 (1999)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Brace, W. A note on permeability changes in geologic material due to stress. Pure Appl. Geophys. 116, 627–633 (1978)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Beresnev, I. A. & Johnson, P. A. Elastic-wave stimulation of oil production: A review of methods and results. Geophysics 85, 1000–1017 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Bower, D. R. Bedrock fracture parameters from the interpretation of well tides. J. Geophys. Res. 88, 5025–5035 (1983)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Cooper, H., Bredeheoft, J., Papadopulos, I. & Bennett, R. The response of well-aquifer systems to seismic waves. J. Geophys. Res. 70, 3915–3926 (1965)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Kanamori, H. et al. Determinations of earthquake energy release and ML using Terrascope. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 83, 330–346 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Hardebeck, J. L. & Shearer, P. M. Using s/p amplitude ratios to constrain the focal mechanisms of small earthquakes. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93, 2434–2444 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

These measurements would not have been available without the long-term support of the PFO by the NSF, SCEC, the Vetlesen fund of the Scripps Institution, and the US Geological Survey; and the efforts of F. Wyatt, L. Weuve, S. Bralla, and S. Docktor. We gratefully acknowledge comments and discussion from E. Cochran, P. Davis, Z. Peng, A. Sagy and J. Vidale. J.E.E. was supported by a CIED scholarship and an NSF award.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean E. Elkhoury.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Notes

This file contains Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Figures 1–5 and additional references. (PDF 4597 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elkhoury, J., Brodsky, E. & Agnew, D. Seismic waves increase permeability. Nature 441, 1135–1138 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04798

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing