Subjects

Abstract

The prompt γ-ray emission from γ-ray bursts (GRBs) should be detectable out to distances of z > 10 (ref. 1), and should therefore provide an excellent probe of the evolution of cosmic star formation, reionization of the intergalactic medium, and the metal enrichment history of the Universe1,2,3,4. Hitherto, the highest measured redshift for a GRB has been z = 4.50 (ref. 5). Here we report the optical spectrum of the afterglow of GRB 050904 obtained 3.4 days after the burst; the spectrum shows a clear continuum at the long-wavelength end of the spectrum with a sharp cut-off at around 9,000 Å due to Lyman α absorption at z ≈ 6.3 (with a damping wing). A system of absorption lines of heavy elements at z = 6.295 ± 0.002 was also detected, yielding the precise measurement of the redshift. The Si ii fine-structure lines suggest a dense, metal-enriched environment around the progenitor of the GRB.

Main

GRB 050904 was a long burst (duration T90 = 225 s) detected by the Swift γ-ray burst satellite on 4 September 2005, 01:51:44 ut (Universal time; refs 6, 7). Its position was immediately disseminated via the GRB Coordinates Network. Although the optical observations at the Palomar 60″ telescope carried out 3.5 hours after the trigger did not reveal a new source with upper limits of R > 20.8 mag and I > 19.7 mag (ref. 8), a relatively bright near infrared source with J ≈ 17.5 mag was detected three hours after the burst in the Swift X-ray telescope error circle9, which showed a temporal decay with an index of -1.20, fully consistent with being a typical GRB afterglow. Analysis of the near-infrared colours, combined with the non-detection in the optical bands, led to the suggestion that the burst originated at a high redshift10, 5.3 < z < 9.0. A refined photometric redshift of was reported based on European Southern Observatory (ESO) Very Large Telescope (VLT) observations in the J, H, K and I bands11.

We observed the field of GRB 050904 with the Faint Object Camera And Spectrograph (FOCAS)12 on the 8.2-m Subaru Telescope on top of Mauna Kea, Hawaii, starting on the night of 6 September 2005. In the z′ band image (600-s exposure, mid-epoch on 7 September, 8:04 ut), we detected the afterglow at z′(AB) = 23.71 ± 0.14 mag, but we failed to detect it in the IC band even with a longer exposure (900 s), which implied that the Lyman break should be present around λ ≈ 8,500–9,000 Å.

We then obtained a grism spectrum of the afterglow candidate, which exhibited a sharp cut-off at λ ≈ 9,000 Å with strong depletion of the continuum at shorter wavelengths, strikingly similar to the spectra of quasars13 at z > 6 except for the absence of a broad Lyα emission line. The emission is very weak in the wavelength range shorter than 8,900 Å. In particular, the flux is consistent with zero in the ranges 8,500–8,900 Å and 7,000–7,500 Å that extend shortward of the Lyα and Lyβ wavelengths for z ≈ 6.3. This is a clear signature of absorption by neutral hydrogen in the intergalactic medium at z > 6, and marks the first detection of a Gunn–Peterson trough14 from an object other than high-z quasars15. We also find weak emission features at 7,500–8,300 Å which are presumably leakage flux from the continuum emission that is also found in quasar spectra at similar redshifts.

At the longer-wavelength end of the spectrum is a flat continuum with a series of absorption lines, which we identify as S ii, Si ii, O i, and C ii lines at a common redshift of z = 6.295 ± 0.002. We believe that this is the redshift of the GRB host galaxy, since no other absorption line system was observed at a redshift consistent with that of the Lyα break. This firm spectroscopic identification of the redshift breaks the previous record of GRB 000131 at z = 4.50 (ref. 5).

From a closer examination of the absorption lines, we find that they are not saturated and can be used to estimate the column densities of the heavy elements as shown in Table 1. Using the standard photospheric solar abundances16 we obtain the metallicity of these elements as [C/H] = -2.4, [O/H] = -2.3, [Si/H] = -2.6, and [S/H] = -1.0, where log[NHi (cm-2)] ≈ 21.3 is assumed from a damped Lyα system model for the Lyα damping wing presented below. These values may not represent the typical abundances in the GRB host galaxy for several reasons. First, they are derived using only a single ionization state for each element. Depletion due to dust condensation may modify the Si abundance in particular. And second, the spatial distribution of the heavy elements may be significantly different from that of hydrogen. It is possible that the heavy elements are distributed only locally around the GRB source in a metal-enriched circumstellar shell, while the neutral hydrogen is distributed on a larger scale in or outside the host galaxy.

Table 1: Absorption lines detected in the spectrum of the optical afterglow of GRB 050904

Further analysis of the Si lines allows us to constrain the scale of the absorbing metals. Using the equivalent width ratio of the fine-structure transition lines Si ii* λ = 1,264.7 Å and Si ii λ = 1,260.4 Å, the electron density ne can be constrained17 as log[ne(cm-3)] = 2.3 ± 0.7 for a reasonable temperature range of 103 K < T < 105 K. Combined with the column density and the abundance of Si derived above and assuming a hydrogen ionization fraction of 0.1, we obtain the physical depth of the absorbing system to be 0.4 pc with an uncertainty of a factor of 10, reflecting the statistical errors and the possible temperature range. These fine-structure lines have been found in GRB afterglow spectra18,19,20, whereas they have never been clearly detected in quasar damped Lyα systems18. This is consistent with a local origin for the absorption such as a metal-enriched molecular cloud in the star-forming region or a dense metal-enriched shell nebula swept-up by a progenitor wind prior to the GRB onset suggested for GRB 021004 (refs 21, 22) and GRB 030226 (ref. 23). The column density of C ii is also consistent with the calculation for a carbon-rich Wolf–Rayet wind24.

As shown in Fig. 1, the Lyα cut-off exhibits the signature of a damping wing redward of the Lyα wavelength. To our knowledge, this is the first detection of significant neutral hydrogen absorption at z6, allowing us to explore the distribution of neutral hydrogen in the vicinity of a GRB, in the host galaxy, and/or in intergalactic space at very high redshifts. Such a study is difficult with high-z quasars owing to their enormous ultraviolet flux, which ionizes the surrounding environment, and owing to the presence of a strong Lyα emission line.

Figure 1: The spectrum of the afterglow of GRB 050904.
Figure 1

It covers the wavelengths 7,000–10,000 Å with a resolution R = λλ ≈ 1,000 at 9,000 Å. It was taken with Subaru/FOCAS at mid-epoch on 7 September, 12:05 ut, 3.4 days after the burst, for a total exposure of 4.0 hours. The abscissa is the observed wavelength converted to that in vacuum. The spectrum is smoothed to a resolution R = λλ ≈ 600 at 9,000 Å. The locations of the identified absorption lines (see Table 1) at z = 4.840 and z = 6.295, as well as the wavelengths of Lyα and Lyβ at z = 6.295, are shown with vertical dotted lines. The one-sigma errors are shown with an offset of -1.0 at the bottom of the panel. In the inset, the solid line shows a model for the damping wing of Lyα absorption with a neutral hydrogen column density log[NHi (cm-2)] = 21.3 at a redshift of z = 6.3, overlaid on the observed spectrum in the wavelength range of 8,700–9,500 Å. The dotted line indicates the unabsorbed continuum model following a power-law (fνν-1) function as typically observed for GRB afterglows. We note that only the red wing is relevant to the fit, because the emission blueward of Lyα is absorbed by the IGM.

There are two possibilities for the nature of the absorber. It may be a damped Lyα system associated with the host galaxy, which has been observed in the afterglows of several GRBs at lower redshifts18,19,20. The other possibility is the neutral hydrogen in the intergalactic medium (IGM) left over from the pre-reionization era2. If the latter is the case, we can now measure the neutral fraction of the IGM at z6, giving important information on the reionization history of the Universe. We find that the wing shape can be reproduced either by a damped Lyα system (see inset of Fig. 1) or by the IGM. A comprehensive spectral fitting analysis is necessary to examine these possibilities, which is beyond the scope of this Letter.

With the detection of metal absorption lines, we have shown that GRBs are found in metal-enriched regions even at such an early phase of the Universe as z > 6. It is, therefore, possible that we would detect the metal absorption lines even from GRBs originating from the metal-free first-generation stars, because their environment may be self-polluted by pre-burst winds, as suggested by the present observation. We can expect to obtain afterglow spectra with much higher quality for GRBs at even higher redshifts in the immediate future, considering that Swift is constantly localizing faint GRBs, and that our spectrum was taken when the afterglow had faded by more than an order of magnitude since its first detection in the J band. Such future data will give us even better opportunities to probe the formation of stars and galaxies in the early Universe.

References

  1. 1.

    & Gamma-ray bursts as a probe of the very high redshift Universe. Astrophys. J. 536, 1–18 (2000)

  2. 2.

    Reionization of the Intergalactic Medium and the damping wing of the Gunn-Peterson trough. Astrophys. J. 501, 15–22 (1998)

  3. 3.

    Cosmological gamma-ray bursts and evolution of galaxies. Astrophys. J. 486, L71–L74 (1997)

  4. 4.

    & Expected number and flux distribution of gamma-ray burst afterglows with high redshifts. Astrophys. J. 540, 687–696 (2000)

  5. 5.

    et al. VLT identification of the optical afterglow of the gamma-ray burst GRB 000131 at z = 4.50. Astron. Astrophys. 364, L54–L61 (2000)

  6. 6.

    et al. GRB050904: Swift-BAT detection of a probable burst. GCN Circ. 3910 (2005)

  7. 7.

    et al. GRB 050904 BAT refined analysis of complete data set. GCN Circ. 3938 (2005)

  8. 8.

    & GRB050904: P60 observations. GCN Circ. 3912 (2005)

  9. 9.

    et al. GRB 050904: SOAR/PROMPT observations. GCN Circ. 3913 (2005)

  10. 10.

    et al. GRB 050904: possible high-redshift GRB. GCN Circ. 3914 (2005)

  11. 11.

    et al. GRB 050904: photometric redshift. GCN Circ. 3924 (2005)

  12. 12.

    et al. FOCAS: The Faint Object Camera and Spectrograph for the Subaru Telescope. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 54, 819–832 (2002)

  13. 13.

    , , & Probing the ionization state of the Universe at z > 6. Astron. J. 126, 1–14 (2003)

  14. 14.

    & On the density of neutral hydrogen in intergalactic space. Astrophys. J. 142, 1633–1641 (1965)

  15. 15.

    et al. Evidence for reionization at z6: Detection of a Gunn-Peterson trough in a z = 6.28 quasar. Astron. J. 122, 2850–2857 (2001)

  16. 16.

    & Standard solar composition. Space Sci. Rev. 85, 161–174 (1998)

  17. 17.

    & Physical conditions in quasi-stellar object absorbers from fine-structure absorption lines. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 329, 135–148 (2002)

  18. 18.

    et al. The host of GRB 030323 at z = 3.372: A very high column density DLA system with a low metallicity. Astron. Astrophys. 419, 927–940 (2004)

  19. 19.

    Chen, H.-W., Prochaska, J. X., Bloom, J. S. & Thompson, I. B. Echelle spectroscopy of a GRB afterglow at z = 3.969: A new probe of the interstellar and intergalactic media in the young Universe. Astrophys. J. Lett. (in the press); preprint at (2005).

  20. 20.

    Berger, E. et al. Spectroscopy of GRB 050505 at z = 4.275: A logN(HI) = 22.1 DLA host galaxy and the nature of the progenitor. Astrophys. J. (submitted); preprint at (2005).

  21. 21.

    et al. GRB 021004: A possible shell nebula around a Wolf-Rayet star gamma-ray burst progenitor. Astrophys. J. 595, 935–949 (2003)

  22. 22.

    et al. GRB 021004: A massive progenitor star surrounded by shells. Astrophys. J. 588, 387–399 (2003)

  23. 23.

    et al. Probing a gamma-ray burst progenitor at a redshift of z = 2: A comprehensive observing campaign of the afterglow of GRB 030226. Astron. J. 128, 1942–1954 (2004)

  24. 24.

    van Marle, A.-J., Langer, N. & Garcia-Segura, G. Constraints on gamma-ray burst and supernova progenitors through circumstellar absorption lines. Astron. Astrophys. (in the press); preprint at (2005).

  25. 25.

    Physical Processes in the Interstellar Medium 51 (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1978)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is based on data collected at the Subaru Telescope, which is operated by the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan. We are grateful for support by the observatory. N.K. acknowledges support by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan and the Tokyo Tech COE-21 programme ‘Nanometer-scale Quantum Physics’. We thank S. Barthelmy for maintaining the GRB Coordinates Network, and the Swift team for providing rapid GRB localizations.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 152-8551, Japan

    • N. Kawai
    • , R. Sato
    •  & Y. Yatsu
  2. National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, Osawa 2-21-1, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan

    • G. Kosugi
    • , T. Yamada
    • , M. Iye
    • , W. Aoki
    • , Y. Mizumoto
    • , R. Ogasawara
    • , Y. Shirasaki
    • , T. Takata
    •  & J. Watanabe
  3. Subaru Telescope, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 650 North A'ohoku Place, Hilo, Hawaii 96720, USA

    • K. Aoki
    • , T. Hattori
    • , H. Furusawa
    • , Y. Komiyama
    • , J. Noumaru
    • , K. Sekiguchi
    •  & H. Terada
  4. Department of Astronomy, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8502, Japan

    • T. Totani
    •  & K. Ohta
  5. University of California at Berkeley, Space Sciences Laboratory, 7 Gauss Way, Berkeley, California 94720-7450, USA

    • K. Hurley
  6. Department of Physical Science, Hiroshima University, 1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Hiroshima 739-8526, Japan

    • K. S. Kawabata
  7. Institute of Astronomy, University of Tokyo, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-0015, Japan

    • N. Kobayashi
  8. Department of Astronomy, University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan

    • K. Nomoto
  9. RIKEN (Institute of Physical and Chemical Research), 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan

    • M. Suzuki
    •  & T. Tamagawa
  10. Department of Physics, Aoyama Gakuin University, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 229-8558, Japan

    • A. Yoshida

Authors

  1. Search for N. Kawai in:

  2. Search for G. Kosugi in:

  3. Search for K. Aoki in:

  4. Search for T. Yamada in:

  5. Search for T. Totani in:

  6. Search for K. Ohta in:

  7. Search for M. Iye in:

  8. Search for T. Hattori in:

  9. Search for W. Aoki in:

  10. Search for H. Furusawa in:

  11. Search for K. Hurley in:

  12. Search for K. S. Kawabata in:

  13. Search for N. Kobayashi in:

  14. Search for Y. Komiyama in:

  15. Search for Y. Mizumoto in:

  16. Search for K. Nomoto in:

  17. Search for J. Noumaru in:

  18. Search for R. Ogasawara in:

  19. Search for R. Sato in:

  20. Search for K. Sekiguchi in:

  21. Search for Y. Shirasaki in:

  22. Search for M. Suzuki in:

  23. Search for T. Takata in:

  24. Search for T. Tamagawa in:

  25. Search for H. Terada in:

  26. Search for J. Watanabe in:

  27. Search for Y. Yatsu in:

  28. Search for A. Yoshida in:

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Kawai.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04498

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.