Remobilization of southern African desert dune systems by twenty-first century global warming

  • Nature volume 435, pages 12181221 (30 June 2005)
  • doi:10.1038/nature03717
  • Download Citation



Although desert dunes cover 5 per cent of the global land surface and 30 per cent of Africa, the potential impacts of twenty-first century global warming on desert dune systems are not well understood1. The inactive Sahel and southern African dune systems, which developed in multiple arid phases since the last interglacial period2, are used today by pastoral and agricultural systems3,4 that could be disrupted if climate change alters twenty-first century dune dynamics. Empirical data and model simulations have established that the interplay between dune surface erodibility (determined by vegetation cover and moisture availability) and atmospheric erosivity (determined by wind energy) is critical for dunefield dynamics5. This relationship between erodibility and erosivity is susceptible to climate-change impacts. Here we use simulations with three global climate models and a range of emission scenarios to assess the potential future activity of three Kalahari dunefields. We determine monthly values of dune activity by modifying and improving an established dune mobility index6 so that it can account for global climate model data outputs. We find that, regardless of the emission scenario used, significantly enhanced dune activity is simulated in the southern dunefield by 2039, and in the eastern and northern dunefields by 2069. By 2099 all dunefields are highly dynamic, from northern South Africa to Angola and Zambia. Our results suggest that dunefields are likely to be reactivated (the sand will become significantly exposed and move) as a consequence of twenty-first century climate warming.

  • Subscribe to Nature for full access:



Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.


  1. 1.

    in Arid Zone Geomorphology (ed. Thomas, D. S. G.) 373–412 (Wiley, Chichester, 1998)

  2. 2.

    , & Multiple episodes of aridity in southern Africa since the last interglacial period. Nature 388, 154–158 (1997)

  3. 3.

    & Sustainable Livelihoods in Kalahari Environments. Contributions to Global Debates (OUP, Oxford, 2002)

  4. 4.

    Spatial and temporal scaling of grazing impact on the species composition and productivity of Sahelian annual grasslands. J. Arid Environs 41, 277–297 (1999)

  5. 5.

    & in The Dynamics and Context of Aeolian Systems (ed. Pye, K.) 91–101 (Geol. Soc. Spec. Pub. 72, Geological Society, London, 1993)

  6. 6.

    Development of linear dunes in the southwestern Kalahari, southern Africa. J. Arid Environs 14, 233–244 (1988)

  7. 7.

    , , & Dune mobility and vegetation cover in the southwest Kalahari Desert. Earth Surf. Proc. Landforms 20, 515–529 (1995)

  8. 8.

    & Estimating wind transport of sand on vegetated surface. Earth Surf. Proc. Landforms 11, 505–514 (1986)

  9. 9.

    & Dunefield activity response to climate variability in the southwest Kalahari. Geomorphology 64, 117–132 (2005)

  10. 10.

    . Climate Change 2001 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2001)

  11. 11.

    & A monthly climatic factor for the wind erosion equation. J. Soil Wat. Conserv. 23, 103–104 (1968)

  12. 12.

    , , & Event detection and conditional averaging in unsteady aeolian systems. J. Arid Environs 39, 345–375 (1998)

  13. 13.

    , , & Dune mobility and vegetation cover in the southwest Kalahari Desert. Earth Surf. Proc. Landforms 20, 515–529 (1995)

  14. 14.

    Late Pleistocene rainfall and dune building in the Sahel. Palaeoecol. Afr. 16, 203–214 (1984)

  15. 15.

    Aeolian processes and bedforms in the Thar Desert. J. Arid Environs 25, 83–96 (1993)

  16. 16.

    , , & Dunefield activity and interactions with climatic variability in the southwest Kalahari desert. Earth Surf. Proc. Landforms 22, 165–174 (1997)

  17. 17.

    & The potential response of eolian sands to greenhouse warming and precipitation reduction on the Great Plains of the USA. J. Arid Environs 25, 905–918 (1993)

  18. 18.

    & A test of a climatic index of dune mobility using measurements from the southwestern United States. Earth Surf. Proc. Landforms 25, 197–207 (2000)

  19. 19.

    , & Challenges of calculating dunefield mobility over the 21st century. Geomorphology 59, 197–213 (2004)

  20. 20.

    & IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (IPCC, UNEP & WMO, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2000)

  21. 21.

    , & Precipitation seasonality in eastern and southern coastal Spain. Int. J. Clim. 21, 211–247 (2001)

  22. 22.

    Biosphere responses to CO2 enrichment. Ecol. Appl. 10, 1590–1619 (2000)

  23. 23.

    Climate Change and Southern Africa (CRU, Univ. of East Anglia, Norwich, 1996)

  24. 24.

    & Late Quaternary environmental change in central southern Africa: new data, synthesis, issues and prospects. Quat. Sci. Rev. 21, 783–798 (2002)

  25. 25.

    & The physics of wind erosion and its control. Adv. Agron. 15, 211–302 (1963)

  26. 26.

    & in Aeolian Geomorphology (ed. Nickling, W. G.) 75–95 (Allen and Unwin, Boston, 1986)

  27. 27.

    , , & Determining land surface fractional cover from NDVI and rainfall time series for a savanna ecosystem. Remote Sens. Environ. 13, 419–428 (2002)

  28. 28.

    & A Landsat analysis of range conditions in the Botswana Kalahari drought. Int. J. Remote Sens. 12, 1023–1051 (1991)

  29. 29.

    & The relationship of the El Nino oscillation to African rainfall. Int. J. Clim. 17, 117–135 (1997)

Download references


We thank P. Coles for draughting figures, and the University of Sheffield for financial support to M.K. H. Viles supplied Namib weather data used in model validation.

Author information


  1. School of Geography and Environment, Oxford University Centre for the Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK

    • David S. G. Thomas
    •  & Giles F. S. Wiggs
  2. Department of Earth and Life Sciences, University of Salford, Manchester M5 4WT, UK

    • Melanie Knight


  1. Search for David S. G. Thomas in:

  2. Search for Melanie Knight in:

  3. Search for Giles F. S. Wiggs in:

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David S. G. Thomas.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Figure S1

    This illustrates the classification of PAGCM into four classes, and exemplifies the data sources used to achieve this calibration of the index.


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.