Abstract
In the winter of 1811–1812, near the town of New Madrid in the central United States and more than 2,000 km from the nearest plate boundary, three earthquakes within three months shook the entire eastern half of the country and liquefied the ground over distances far greater than any historic earthquake in North America1,2. The origin and modern significance of these earthquakes, however, is highly contentious3. Geological evidence demonstrates that liquefaction due to strong ground shaking, similar in scale to that generated by the New Madrid earthquakes, has occurred at least three and possibly four times in the past 2,000 years (refs 4–6), consistent with recurrence statistics derived from regional seismicity7. Here we show direct evidence for rapid strain rates in the area determined from a continuously operated global positioning system (GPS) network. Rates of strain are of the order of 10-7 per year, comparable in magnitude to those across active plate boundaries, and are consistent with known active faults within the region. These results have significant implications for the definition of seismic hazard and for processes that drive intraplate seismicity.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nuttli, O. W. The Mississipi Valley earthquakes of 1811–1812: intensities, ground motion and magnitudes. Bull. Seismol. Sci. Am. 63, 227–248 (1973)
Johnston, A. C. & Schweig, E. S. The enigma of the New Madrid earthquakes of 1811–1812. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 24, 339–384 (1996)
The 2000 New Madrid Source workshop: reassessing New Madrid . Eos 81, 397–403 (2000)
Tuttle, M. P. & Schweig, E. S. Archeological and pedological evidence for large prehistoric earthquakes in the New Madrid seismic zone, central United States. Geology 23, 253–256 (1995)
Tuttle, M. P. The use of liquefaction features in paleoseismology: Lessons learned in the New Madrid seismic zone, central United States. J. Seismol. 5, 361–380 (2001)
Tuttle, M. P. et al. The earthquake potential of the New Madrid seismic zone. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92, 2080–2089 (2002)
Johnston, A. C. & Nava, S. J. Recurrence rates and probability estimates for the New Madrid Seismic Zone. J. Geophys. Res. 90, 6737–6753 (1985)
Hudnut, K. W., Bock, Y., Galetzka, J. E., Webb, F. H. & Young, W. H. in Seismotectonics in Convergent Plate Boundaries (eds Fujinawa, Y. & Yoshida, A.) 167–189 (Terrapub, Tokyo, 2002)
Weber, J. et al. Estimation of intraplate strain accumulation in the New Madrid seismic zone from repeat GPS surveys. Tectonics 17, 250–266 (1998)
Newman, A. et al. Slow deformation and lower seismic hazard at the New Madrid Seismic Zone. Science 284, 619–621 (1999)
McClusky, S. et al. Global positioning system constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 5695–5719 (2000)
Battaglia, M., Murray, M. H., Serpelloni, E. & Bürgmann, R. The Adriatic region: an independent microplate within the Africa-Eurasia collision zone. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, doi: 10.1029/2004GL019723 (2004)
Langbein, J. & Johnson, H. Correlated errors in geodetic time series: Implications for time-dependent deformation. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 591–604 (1997)
Russ, D. P. Style and significance of surface deformation in the vicinity of New Madrid, Missouri. US Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap., 1236-H (1982)
Kelson, K. I., Simpson, G. D., Van Arsdale, R. B., Haraden, C. C. & Lettis, W. R. Multiple late Holocene earthquakes along the Reelfoot Fault, central New Madrid seismic zone. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 6151–6170 (1996)
Fuller, M. L. The New Madrid Earthquake 1–119 (US Geol. Surv. Bull. 494, US Geological Survey, Washington/Denver, 1912)
Van Arsdale, R. B., Stahle, D. W., Cleaveland, M. K. & Guccione, M. J. Earthquake signals in tree-ring data from the New Madrid Seismic Zone and implications for paleoseismicity. Geology 26, 515–518 (1998)
England, P. & Molnar, P. Active deformation of Asia; from kinematics to dynamics. Science 278, 647–650 (1997)
Kenner, S. J. & Segall, P. A mechanical model for intraplate earthquakes; application to the New Madrid seismic zone. Science 289, 2329–2332 (2000)
Pollitz, F. F., Kellogg, L. & Burgmann, R. Sinking mafic body in a reactivated lower crust: A mechanism for stress concentration at the New Madrid Seismic Zone. Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 91, 1882–1897 (2002)
Grollimund, B. & Zoback, M. D. Did deglaciation trigger intraplate seismicity in the New Madrid seismic zone? Geology 29, 175–178 (2001)
Hudnut, K. W. et al. Continuous GPS observations of postseismic deformation following the 16 October 1999 Hector Mine, California, earthquake (Mw 7.1). Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92, 1403–1422 (2002)
Freed, A. et al. Deep lithospheric mantle and heterogeneous crustal flow following the 2002 Denali, Alaska earthquake. Eos 85(Fall Meet. Suppl.), abstr. G12A–03 (2004)
Segall, P. Postseismic Deformation: Different mechanisms in different times and places. Eos 85(Fall Meet. Suppl.), abstr. G12A–01 (2004)
Zoback, M. D. Seismic hazard at the New Madrid seismic zone; discussion and reply. Science 285, 664 (1999)
Schweig, E. S., Gomberg, J. S. & Tuttle, M. P. Forum comment: Caution urged in revising earthquake hazard estimates at the New Madrid Seismic Zone. Eos 80, 197 (1999)
Newman, A. et al. Forum reply: New results justify open discussion of alternative models. Eos 80, 197, 199 (1999)
Stein, S. et al. Should Memphis build for California's earthquakes? Eos 84(177), 184–185 (2003)
Stein, S. & Newman, A. Characteristic and uncharacteristic earthquakes as possible artifacts: applications to the New Madrid and Wabash seismic zones. Seismol. Res. Lett. 75, 173–187 (2004)
Tuttle, M. P. et al. Evidence for New Madrid earthquakes in A. D. 300 and 2350 B. C. at the Burkett archeological site. Seismol. Res. Lett. (in the press)
Acknowledgements
We thank the NSF Mid-America Earthquake Center and the US Geological Survey for supporting this work. We thank colleagues, particularly A. Johnston, at CERI and E. Schweig at the USGS for discussions.Author Contributions R.S. and M.A.E. jointly wrote the paper and designed, constructed, and maintained the GAMA network. J.P. performed the GPS data analysis, and R.B.V.A. contributed to the interpretations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smalley, R., Ellis, M., Paul, J. et al. Space geodetic evidence for rapid strain rates in the New Madrid seismic zone of central USA. Nature 435, 1088–1090 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03642
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03642
This article is cited by
-
Hydrologically-driven crustal stresses and seismicity in the New Madrid Seismic Zone
Nature Communications (2017)
-
Seth Stein: The quake killer
Nature (2011)
-
GPS/GNSS Current Bibliography
GPS Solutions (2006)
-
Tectonic strain in plate interiors?
Nature (2005)
-
Seismology: Tectonic strain in plate interiors? (Reply)
Nature (2005)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.