Letter | Published:

Cortical growth marks reveal extended juvenile development in New Zealand moa

Nature volume 435, pages 940943 (16 June 2005) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

Cyclical growth marks in cortical bone, deposited before attainment of adult body size, reflect osteogenetic changes caused by annual rhythms and are a general phenomenon in non-avian ectothermic and endothermic tetrapods1. However, the growth periods of ornithurines (the theropod group including all modern birds) are usually apomorphically shortened to less than a year2,3, so annual growth marks are almost unknown in this group4,5,6. Here we show that cortical growth marks are frequent in long bones of New Zealand's moa (Aves: Dinornithiformes), a recently extinct ratite order. Moa showed the exaggerated K-selected life-history strategy formerly common in the New Zealand avifauna, and in some instances took almost a decade to attain skeletal maturity. This indicates that reproductive maturity in moa was extremely delayed relative to all extant birds. The two presently recognized moa families (Dinornithidae and Emeidae) also showed different postnatal growth rates, which were associated with their relative differences in body size. Both species of giant Dinornis moa attained their massive stature (up to 240 kg live mass) by accelerating their juvenile growth rate compared to the smaller emeid moa species, rather than by extending the skeletal growth period.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    Hall, B. K. (ed.) Bone Vol. 7 (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1993)

  2. 2.

    , & Dinosaurian growth rates and bird origins. Nature 412, 405–408 (2001)

  3. 3.

    Ratites and Tinamous (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2002)

  4. 4.

    in Mesozoic Birds. Above the Heads of Dinosaurs (eds Chiappe, L. M. & Witmer, L. M.) 421–431 (Univ. of California Press, Berkeley, 2002)

  5. 5.

    , & in New Perspectives on the Origin and Early Evolution of Birds. Proceedings of the International Symposium in Honor of John H. Ostrom (eds Gauthier, J. & Gall, L. F.) 411–426 (Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale Univ., New Haven, 2001)

  6. 6.

    & Bone microstructure and developmental plasticity in birds and other dinosaurs. J. Morphol. 254, 232–246 (2002)

  7. 7.

    et al. Assessing a relationship between bone microstructure and growth rate: a fluorescent labelling study in the king penguin chick (Aptenodytes patagonicus). J. Exp. Biol. 207, 869–879 (2004)

  8. 8.

    & A comparative histological study of fossil and recent bone tissues. Part II. Tex. J. Sci. 9, 186–214 (1957)

  9. 9.

    Histological evidence for the systematic position of Hesperornis (Odontornithes: Hesperornithiformes). Auk 104, 125–129 (1987)

  10. 10.

    & A technique which may allow accurate determination of the age of adult birds. Ibis 134, 245–249 (1992)

  11. 11.

    , & A test of an osteologically based age determination technique in the double-crested cormorant Phalacrocorax auritus. Ibis 144, 143–146 (2002)

  12. 12.

    & Rapid extinction of the moas (Aves: Dinornithiformes): model, test and implications. Science 287, 2250–2254 (2000)

  13. 13.

    Catalogue of the Fossil Birds in the British Museum (Natural History) (British Museum (Nat. Hist.), London, 1891)

  14. 14.

    et al. Extreme reversed sexual size dimorphism in the extinct New Zealand moa Dinornis. Nature 425, 172–175 (2003)

  15. 15.

    , , & Nuclear DNA sequences detect species limits in ancient moa. Nature 425, 175–178 (2003)

  16. 16.

    & The Lost World of the Moa (Indiana Univ. Press, Bloomington, 2002)

  17. 17.

    Histological perspectives on growth in the birds Struthio camelus and Sagittarius serpentarius. Courier Forsch.-Inst. Senckenberg 181, 317–323 (1995)

  18. 18.

    , & Polar dinosaur bone histology. J. Vert. Paleontol. 18, 385–390 (1998)

  19. 19.

    , , & Periosteal bone growth rates in extant ratites (ostriche and emu). Implications for assessing growth in dinosaurs. Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. Paris, Sciences de la vie 323, 543–550 (2000)

  20. 20.

    , , & Expression de la dynamique de croissance dans la structure de l'os périostique chez Anas platyrhynchos. Comptes Rendus Acad. Sci. Paris, Sciences de la vie 319, 301–308 (1996)

  21. 21.

    La structure du tissue osseux envisage comme expression de differences dans la vitesse de l'accroissement. Arch. Biol. (Paris) 58, 315–330 (1947)

  22. 22.

    , & Growth in small dinosaurs and pterosaurs: the evolution of archosaurian growth strategies. J. Vert. Paleontol. 24, 555–571 (2004)

  23. 23.

    et al. Gigantism and comparative life-history parameters of tyrannosaurid dinosaurs. Nature 430, 772–775 (2004)

  24. 24.

    et al. Adaptive radiation in sauropod dinosaurs: bone histology indicates rapid evolution of giant body size through acceleration. Org. Div. Evol. 4, 165–173 (2004)

  25. 25.

    Phylogeny and evolution of the ratite birds. Ibis 116, 494–521 (1974)

  26. 26.

    et al. Complete mitochondrial genome sequences of two extinct moas clarify ratite evolution. Nature 409, 704–707 (2001)

  27. 27.

    & Evolutionary Ecology of Birds (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2002)

  28. 28.

    & Ecological basis of extinction risk in birds: habitat loss versus human persecution and introduced predators. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 12144–12148 (2000)

  29. 29.

    Determinants of loss of mammal species during the Late Quaternary ‘megafauna’ extinctions: life history and ecology, but not body size. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 2221–2227 (2002)

  30. 30.

    , & Variation in dinosaur skeletochronology indicators: implications for age assessment and physiology. Paleobiology 25, 295–304 (1999)

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to R. P. Scofield, H. A. Schlumpf, N. Carson, A. J. D. Tennyson, J. A. Bartle, M. Bunce, T. H. Worthy, L. J. Shorey, T. Robinson, R. Spiers, M. Giesen, S. Veldhuizen, A. Chinsamy-Turan, J. Horner, P. Houde and K. Padian. Funding was provided by a Banks Alecto postdoctoral fellowship from the Royal Society of London (S.T.T.) and the New Zealand Foundation for Research, Science and Technology (R.N.H.).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8020, New Zealand

    • Samuel T. Turvey
    •  & Richard N. Holdaway
  2. Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, UK

    • Samuel T. Turvey
  3. Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PR, UK

    • Owen R. Green
  4. Palaecol Research Ltd, PO Box 16569, Hornby, Christchurch 8004, New Zealand

    • Richard N. Holdaway

Authors

  1. Search for Samuel T. Turvey in:

  2. Search for Owen R. Green in:

  3. Search for Richard N. Holdaway in:

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel T. Turvey.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03635

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.