Letter | Published:

Origin of the orbital architecture of the giant planets of the Solar System

Naturevolume 435pages459461 (2005) | Download Citation



Planetary formation theories1,2 suggest that the giant planets formed on circular and coplanar orbits. The eccentricities of Jupiter, Saturn and Uranus, however, reach values of 6 per cent, 9 per cent and 8 per cent, respectively. In addition, the inclinations of the orbital planes of Saturn, Uranus and Neptune take maximum values of 2 degrees with respect to the mean orbital plane of Jupiter. Existing models for the excitation of the eccentricity of extrasolar giant planets3,4,5 have not been successfully applied to the Solar System. Here we show that a planetary system with initial quasi-circular, coplanar orbits would have evolved to the current orbital configuration, provided that Jupiter and Saturn crossed their 1:2 orbital resonance. We show that this resonance crossing could have occurred as the giant planets migrated owing to their interaction with a disk of planetesimals6,7. Our model reproduces all the important characteristics of the giant planets' orbits, namely their final semimajor axes, eccentricities and mutual inclinations.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    Pollack, J. B. et al. Formation of the giant planets by concurrent accretion of solids and gas. Icarus 164, 62–85 (1996)

  2. 2

    Lubow, S. H., Seibert, M. & Artymowicz, P. Disk accretion onto high-mass planets. Astrophys. J. 526, 1001–1012 (1999)

  3. 3

    Goldreich, P. & Sari, R. Eccentricity evolution for planets in gaseous disks. Astrophys. J. 585, 1024–1037 (2003)

  4. 4

    Papaloizou, J. C. B., Nelson, R. P. & Masset, F. Orbital eccentricity growth through disk-companion tidal interaction. Astron. Astrophys. 366, 263–275 (2001)

  5. 5

    Zakamska, N. L. & Tremaine, S. Excitation and propagation of eccentricity disturbances in planetary systems. Astron. J. 128, 869–877 (2004)

  6. 6

    Fernandez, J. A. & Ip, W.-H. Some dynamical aspects of the accretion of Uranus and Neptune—The exchange of orbital angular momentum with planetesimals. Icarus 58, 109–120 (1984)

  7. 7

    Malhotra, R. The origin of Pluto's orbit: implications for the Solar System beyond Neptune. Astron. J. 110, 420–432 (1995)

  8. 8

    Hahn, J. M. & Malhotra, R. Orbital evolution of planets embedded in a planetesimal disk. Astron. J. 117, 3041–3053 (1999)

  9. 9

    Gomes, R. The origin of the Kuiper Belt high-inclination population. Icarus 161, 404–418 (2003)

  10. 10

    Levison, H. F. & Morbidelli, A. The formation of the Kuiper belt by the outward transport of bodies during Neptune's migration. Nature 426, 419–421 (2003)

  11. 11

    Gomes, R. S., Morbidelli, A. & Levison, H. F. Planetary migration in a planetesimal disk: Why did Neptune stop at 30 AU? Icarus 170, 492–507 (2004)

  12. 12

    Kokubo, E. & Ida, S. Orbital evolution of protoplanets embedded in a swarm of planetesimals. Icarus 114, 247–257 (1995)

  13. 13

    Duncan, M. J., Levison, H. F. & Lee, M. H. A multiple time step symplectic algorithm for integrating close encounters. Astron. J. 116, 2067–2077 (1998)

  14. 14

    Chambers, J. E. A hybrid symplectic integrator that permits close encounters between massive bodies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 304, 793–799 (1999)

  15. 15

    Murray, C. & Dermott, S. F. Solar System Dynamics (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999)

  16. 16

    Stern, S. A. On the number of planets in the outer solar system—Evidence of a substantial population of 1000-km bodies. Icarus 90, 271–281 (1991)

  17. 17

    Morbidelli, A., Levison, H. F., Tsiganis, K. & Gomes, R. Chaotic capture of Jupiter's Trojan asteroids in the early Solar System. Nature doi:10.1038/nature03540 (this issue)

  18. 18

    Gomes, R., Tsiganis, K., Morbidelli, A. & Levison, H. F. Origin of the cataclysmic Late Heavy Bombardment period of the terrestrial planets. Nature doi:10.1038/nature03676 (this issue)

Download references


R.G. is grateful to the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico for financial support of his sabbatical year in the OCA observatory in Nice. The work of K.T. was supported by an EC Marie Curie Individual Fellowship. A.M. and H.F.L. thank the CNRS and the NSF for funding the collaboration between the OCA and the SwRI groups. H.F.L. is grateful to NASA's Origins and PG&G programmes.

Author information


  1. Observatoire de la Côte d' Azur, CNRS, BP 4229, 06304, Nice, Cedex 4, France

    • K. Tsiganis
    • , R. Gomes
    • , A. Morbidelli
    •  & H. F. Levison
  2. GEA/OV/UFRJ and ON/MCT, Ladeira do Pedro Antonio, 43-Centro 20.080-090, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

    • R. Gomes
  3. Department of Space Studies, Southwest Research Institute, 1050 Walnut Street, Suite 400, Boulder, Colorado, 80302, USA

    • H. F. Levison


  1. Search for K. Tsiganis in:

  2. Search for R. Gomes in:

  3. Search for A. Morbidelli in:

  4. Search for H. F. Levison in:

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Morbidelli.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplementary Discussion

    A detailed illustration of the 1:2 MMR crossing of Jupiter and Saturn. This file also includes Supplementary Figure S1. (PDF 1509 kb)

About this article

Publication history



Issue Date



Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.