Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Genetic variation increases during biological invasion by a Cuban lizard

Abstract

A genetic paradox1,2 exists in invasion biology: how do introduced populations, whose genetic variation has probably been depleted by population bottlenecks, persist and adapt to new conditions? Lessons from conservation genetics show that reduced genetic variation due to genetic drift and founder effects limits the ability of a population to adapt, and small population size increases the risk of extinction1,3,4. Nonetheless, many introduced species experiencing these same conditions during initial introductions persist, expand their ranges, evolve rapidly and become invasive. To address this issue, we studied the brown anole, a worldwide invasive lizard. Genetic analyses indicate that at least eight introductions have occurred in Florida from across this lizard's native range, blending genetic variation from different geographic source populations and producing populations that contain substantially more, not less, genetic variation than native populations. Moreover, recently introduced brown anole populations around the world originate from Florida, and some have maintained these elevated levels of genetic variation. Here we show that one key to invasion success may be the occurrence of multiple introductions that transform among-population variation in native ranges to within-population variation in introduced areas. Furthermore, these genetically variable populations may be particularly potent sources for introductions elsewhere. The growing problem of invasive species introductions brings considerable economic and biological costs5,6. If these costs are to be mitigated, a greater understanding of the causes, progression and consequences of biological invasions is needed7.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Phylogenetic tree of A. sagrei. The tree is from a bayesian analysis of all unique mtDNA haplotypes sampled from the introduced and native ranges of A. sagrei (Supplementary Table S2).
Figure 2: Source of genetic variation in introduced A. sagrei populations.
Figure 3: Genetic variation increases during the biological invasion.

References

  1. Allendorf, F. W. & Lundquist, L. L. Introduction: population biology, evolution, and control of invasive species. Conserv. Biol. 17, 24–30 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sakai, A. K. et al. The population biology of invasive species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32, 305–332 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Frankham, R., Ballou, J. D. & Briscoe, D. A. Introduction to Conservation Genetics (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Frankham, R. & Ralls, K. Conservation biology: inbreeding leads to extinction. Nature 392, 441–442 (1998)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pimentel, D., Lach, L., Zuniga, R. & Morrison, D. Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. Bioscience 50, 53–65 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilcove, D. S., Rothstein, D., Dubow, J., Phillips, A. & Losos, E. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48, 607–615 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mack, R. N. et al. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl. 10, 689–710 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kolar, C. S. & Lodge, D. M. Ecological predictions and risk assessment for alien fishes in North America. Science 298, 1233–1235 (2002)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, C. E. Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 386–391 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Queller, D. C. Pax Argentinica. Nature 405, 519–520 (2000)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huey, R. B., Gilchrist, G. W., Carlson, M. L., Berrigan, D. B. & Serra, L. Rapid evolution of a geographic cline in size in an introduced population. Science 287, 308–309 (2000)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Losos, J. B., Marks, J. C. & Schoener, T. W. Habitat use and ecological interactions of an introduced and a native species of Anolis lizard on Grand Cayman, with a review of the outcomes of anole introductions. Oecologia 95, 525–532 (1993)

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Campbell, T. S. Analysis of the effects of an exotic lizard (Anolis sagrei) on a native lizard (Anolis carolinensis) in Florida, using islands as experimental units. PhD thesis, Univ. Tennessee (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gerber, G. P. & Echternacht, A. C. Evidence for asymmetrical intraguild predation between native and introduced Anolis lizards. Oecologia 124, 599–607 (2000)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Williams, E. E. The ecology of colonization as seen in the zoogeography of anoline lizards on small islands. Q. Rev. Biol. 44, 345–389 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Campbell, T. S. Northern range expansion of the brown anole (Anolis sagrei) in Florida and Georgia. Herpetol. Rev. 27, 155–157 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, J. C. Anolis sagrei in Florida: phenetics of a colonizing species I. Meristic characters. Copeia 1985, 182–194 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Novak, S. J. & Mack, R. N. Genetic variation in Bromus tectorum (Poaceae): comparison between native and introduced populations. Heredity 71, 167–176 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Facon, B. et al. A molecular phylogeography approach to biological invasions of the New World by parthenogenetic Thiarid snails. Mol. Ecol. 12, 3027–3039 (2003)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Williamson, M. Biological Invasions (Chapman & Hall, London, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tsutsui, N. D., Suarez, A. V., Holway, D. A. & Case, T. J. Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 5948–5953 (2000)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee, J. C. Anolis sagrei in Florida: phenetics of a colonizing species III. West Indian and Middle American comparisons. Copeia 1992, 942–954 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Campbell, T. S. & Echternacht, A. C. Introduced species as moving targets: changes in body sizes of introduced lizards following experimental introductions and historical invasions. Biol. Invasions 5, 193–212 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ellstrand, N. C. & Schierenbeck, K. A. Hybridization as a stimulus for the evolution of invasiveness in plants? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 7043–7050 (2000)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mooney, H. A. & Cleland, E. E. The evolutionary impact of invasive species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 5446–5451 (2001)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ehrlich, P. R. in Biological Invasions: A Global Perspective (eds Drake, J. A. et al.) 315–328 (Wiley, Chichester, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Roderick, G. K. & Navajas, M. Genes in new environments: genetics and evolution in biological control. Nature Rev. Genet. 4, 889–899 (2003)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Macey, J. R., Larson, A., Ananjeva, N. B. & Papenfuss, T. J. Evolutionary shifts in three major structural features of the mitochondrial genome among iguanian lizards. J. Mol. Evol. 44, 660–674 (1997)

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Ronquist, F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17, 754–755 (2001)

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nylander, J.A.A. MrModeltest v1.0b (Department of Systematic Zoology, Uppsala University, 2002).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank T. Campbell, D. Cardace, P. Colbert, K. de Queiroz, A. Echternacht, J. Gaskin, L. Harmon, J. Knouft, K. Kozak, R. Muller, G. Norval, S. Poe, R. Powell, V. Rivalta Gonzalez, A. Torres Barboza and A. Wright for advice and assistance, and the National Science Foundation and the Environmental Protection Agency Science to Achieve Results (STAR) program for funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason J. Kolbe.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

The SI file contains 3 figures with legends, 3 tables with legends, and associated references and notes. (DOC 633 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kolbe, J., Glor, R., Rodríguez Schettino, L. et al. Genetic variation increases during biological invasion by a Cuban lizard. Nature 431, 177–181 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02807

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02807

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing