Letter | Published:

Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity

Nature volume 428, pages 748751 (15 April 2004) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

Contrary to our rich phenomenological visual experience, our visual short-term memory system can maintain representations of only three to four objects at any given moment1,2. For over a century, the capacity of visual memory has been shown to vary substantially across individuals, ranging from 1.5 to about 5 objects3,4,5,6,7. Although numerous studies have recently begun to characterize the neural substrates of visual memory processes8,9,10,11,12, a neurophysiological index of storage capacity limitations has not yet been established. Here, we provide electrophysiological evidence for lateralized activity in humans that reflects the encoding and maintenance of items in visual memory. The amplitude of this activity is strongly modulated by the number of objects being held in the memory at the time, but approaches a limit asymptotically for arrays that meet or exceed storage capacity. Indeed, the precise limit is determined by each individual's memory capacity, such that the activity from low-capacity individuals reaches this plateau much sooner than that from high-capacity individuals. Consequently, this measure provides a strong neurophysiological predictor of an individual's capacity, allowing the demonstration of a direct relationship between neural activity and memory capacity.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature 390, 279–281 (1997)

  2. 2.

    The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychol. Monogr. 74, Whole No. 498 (1960)

  3. 3.

    , & Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 27, 92–114 (2001)

  4. 4.

    The power of numerical discrimination. Nature 3, 281–282 (1871)

  5. 5.

    , & in Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control (eds Miyake, A. & Shah, P.) 102–134 (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 1999)

  6. 6.

    The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev. 63, 81–97 (1956)

  7. 7.

    The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behav. Brain Sci. 24, 87–185 (2001)

  8. 8.

    et al. Spatial working memory in humans as revealed by PET. Nature 363, 623–625 (1993)

  9. 9.

    , , & Transient and sustained activity in a distributed neural system for human working memory. Nature 386, 608–611 (1997)

  10. 10.

    et al. Temporal dynamics of brain activation during a working memory task. Nature 386, 604–608 (1997)

  11. 11.

    , & Neural mechanisms of visual working memory in prefrontal cortex of the macaque. J. Neurosci. 16, 5154–5167 (1996)

  12. 12.

    & Neuronal firing in the inferotemporal cortex of the monkey in a visual memory task. J. Neurosci. 2, 361–375 (1982)

  13. 13.

    , , , & Multiple visuospatial working memory buffers: Evidence from spatiotemporal patterns of brain activity. Neuropsychologia 35, 195–209 (1997)

  14. 14.

    , , & Short-term memory storage and retention: An event-related brain potential study. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 76, 419–439 (1990)

  15. 15.

    The contralateral organization of visual processing: A theoretical concept and a research tool. Psychophysiology 35, 638–647 (1998)

  16. 16.

    & Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search. Nature 400, 867–869 (1999)

  17. 17.

    , & Activity of neurons in anterior inferior temporal cortex during a short-term memory task. J. Neurosci. 13, 1460–1478 (1993)

  18. 18.

    Exploring the central executive. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 49, 5–28 (1996)

  19. 19.

    , & Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: Electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 353, 1257–1270 (1998)

  20. 20.

    & The roles of prefrontal brain regions in components of working memory. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 6558–6563 (1999)

  21. 21.

    , , & Working memory and preparation elicit different patterns of slow wave event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology 32, 399–410 (1995)

  22. 22.

    & A subsequent-memory effect in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Cogn. Brain Res. 16, 162–166 (2003)

  23. 23.

    , , , & Load-dependent roles of frontal brain regions in the maintenance of working memory. Neuroimage 9, 216–226 (1999)

  24. 24.

    & Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Percept. Psychophys. 40, 225–240 (1986)

  25. 25.

    Familiarity and visual change detection. Percept. Psychophys. 44, 369–378 (1988)

  26. 26.

    Visuo-Spatial Working Memory (Erlbaum, Hove, UK, 1995)

  27. 27.

    & Working memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 132, 47–70 (2003)

  28. 28.

    & Working memory and language comprehension: A meta-analysis. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 3, 422–433 (1996)

  29. 29.

    & Reasoning ability is (little more than) working memory capacity. Intelligence 14, 398–433 (1990)

  30. 30.

    , & Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24, 1656–1674 (1998)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research reported here was supported by a grant from the US National Institute of Mental Health.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1227, USA

    • Edward K. Vogel
    •  & Maro G. Machizawa

Authors

  1. Search for Edward K. Vogel in:

  2. Search for Maro G. Machizawa in:

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward K. Vogel.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02447

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.