The discovery of Uranus' and Neptune's non-dipolar, non-axisymmetric magnetic fields1,2,3,4 destroyed the picture—established by Earth, Jupiter and Saturn5,6—that planetary magnetic fields are dominated by axial dipoles. Although various explanations for these unusual fields have been proposed3,7,8,9,10, the cause of such field morphologies remains unexplained. Planetary magnetic fields are generated by complex fluid motions in electrically conducting regions of the planets (a process known as dynamo action), and so are intimately linked to the structure and evolution of planetary interiors. Determining why Uranus and Neptune have different field morphologies is not only critical for studying the interiors of these planets, but also essential for understanding the dynamics of magnetic-field generation in all planets. Here we present three-dimensional numerical dynamo simulations that model the dynamo source region as a convecting thin shell surrounding a stably stratified fluid interior. We show that this convective-region geometry produces magnetic fields similar in morphology to those of Uranus and Neptune. The fields are non-dipolar and non-axisymmetric, and result from a combination of the stable fluid's response to electromagnetic stress and the small length scales imposed by the thin shell.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $3.90 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Ness, N. F. et al. Magnetic fields at Uranus. Science 233, 85–89 (1986)
Ness, N. F. et al. Magnetic fields at Neptune. Science 246, 1473–1478 (1989)
Connerney, J. E. P., Acuna, M. H. & Ness, N. F. The magnetic field of Uranus. J. Geophys. Res. 92, 15329–15336 (1987)
Connerney, J. E. P., Acuna, M. H. & Ness, N. F. The magnetic field of Neptune. J. Geophys. Res. 96, 19023–19042 (1991)
Connerney, J. E. P. Magnetic fields of the outer planets. J. Geophys. Res. 98, 18659–18679 (1993)
Russell, C. T. Magnetic fields of the terrestrial planets. J. Geophys. Res. 98, 18681–18695 (1993)
Ruzmaikin, A. A. & Starchenko, S. V. On the origin of Uranus and Neptune magnetic fields. Icarus 93, 82–87 (1991)
Podolak, M., Hubbard, W. B. & Stevenson, D. J. in Uranus (eds Bergstralh, J. T., Miner, E. D. & Matthews, M. S.) 29–61 (Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, 1991)
Hubbard, W. B., Podolak, M. & Stevenson, D. J. in Neptune and Triton (ed. Cruikshank, D. P.) 109–138 (Univ. Arizona Press, Tucson, 1995)
Holme, R. Three-dimensional kinematic dynamos with equatorial symmetry: application to the magnetic fields of Uranus and Neptune. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 102, 105–122 (1997)
Hubbard, W. B. et al. Interior structure of Neptune—comparison with Uranus. Science 253, 648–651 (1991)
Nellis, W. J. et al. The nature of the interior of Uranus based on studies of planetary ices at high dynamic pressure. Science 240, 779–781 (1988)
Kuang, W. & Bloxham, J. An earth-like numerical dynamo model. Nature 389, 371–374 (1997)
Kuang, W. J. & Bloxham, J. Numerical modelling of magnetohydrodynamic convection in a rapidly rotating spherical shell: weak and strong field dynamo action. J. Comput. Phys. 153, 51–81 (1999)
Glatzmaier, G. A. & Roberts, P. H. A 3-dimensional convective dynamo solution with rotating and finitely conducting inner core and mantle. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 91, 63–75 (1995)
Glatzmaier, G. A. & Roberts, P. H. A 3-dimensional self-consistent computer simulation of a geomagnetic field reversal. Nature 377, 203–209 (1995)
Dormy, E., Valet, J. P. & Courtillot, V. Numerical models of the geodynamo and observational constraints. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 1, 2000GC000062 (2000)
Grote, E., Busse, F. H. & Tilgner, A. Regular and chaotic spherical dynamos. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 117, 259–272 (2000)
Grote, E. & Busse, F. H. Hemispherical dynamos generated by convection in rotating spherical shells. Phys. Rev. E 62, 4457–4460 (2000)
Kutzner, C. & Christensen, U. R. From stable dipolar towards reversing numerical dynamos. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 131, 29–45 (2002)
Ishihara, N. & Kida, S. Equatorial magnetic dipole field intensification by convection vortices in a rotating spherical shell. Fluid Dyn. Res. 31, 253–274 (2002)
Aubert, J. & Wicht, J. Axial versus equatorial dipolar dynamo models with implications for planetary magnetic fields. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. (in the press)
Roberts, P. H. & Glatzmaier, G. A. The geodynamo, past, present and future. Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dynam. 94, 47–84 (2001)
Hollerbach, R. & Jones, C. A. Influence of the Earth's inner core on geomagnetic fluctuations and reversals. Nature 365, 541–543 (1993)
Wicht, J. Inner core conductivity in numerical dynamo simulations. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 132, 281–302 (2002)
Marley, M., Gomez, P. & Podolak, M. Monte Carlo interior models for Uranus and Neptune. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 23349–23353 (1995)
Zhang, K. K. & Schubert, G. Teleconvection: remotely driven thermal convection in rotating stratified spherical layers. Science 290, 1944–1947 (2000)
Jones, C. A., Longbottom, A. W. & Hollerbach, R. A self-consistent convection driven geodynamo model, using a mean field approximation. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 92, 119–141 (1995)
Merrill, R. T., McElhinny, M. W. & McFadden, P. L. The Magnetic Field of the Earth 31 (Academic, San Diego, 1996)
Holme, R. & Bloxham, J. The magnetic fields of Uranus and Neptune: methods and models. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 2177–2200 (1996)
We thank D. Stevenson for comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by NSERC and NSF.
The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.
About this article
Cite this article
Stanley, S., Bloxham, J. Convective-region geometry as the cause of Uranus' and Neptune's unusual magnetic fields. Nature 428, 151–153 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02376
Science Advances (2020)
Astronomy & Astrophysics (2020)
Stability of H3O at extreme conditions and implications for the magnetic fields of Uranus and Neptune
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (2020)
ACS Earth and Space Chemistry (2020)