Letter | Published:

Cannibalism in the Madagascan dinosaur Majungatholus atopus

Nature volume 422, pages 515518 (03 April 2003) | Download Citation



Many lines of evidence have been brought to bear on the question of theropod feeding ecology, including functional and physiological considerations, morphological constraints, taphonomic associations, and telling—although rare—indications of direct ingestion1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Tooth marks of theropods, although rarely described and generally left unassigned to a particular taxon, can provide unique clues into predator–prey interaction8, and can also yield insights into the extent of carcass utilization9,10. Here we describe a sample of tooth-marked dinosaur bone recovered from three well-documented localities in the Upper Cretaceous Maevarano Formation of Madagascar that provides insights into the feeding ecology of the abelisaurid theropod Majungatholus atopus11. Intensely tooth-marked elements from multiple individuals show that Majungatholus defleshed dinosaur carcasses. Furthermore, Majungatholus clearly fed upon the remains of not only sauropods, but also conspecifics, and thus was a cannibal. Cannibalism is a common ecological strategy among extant carnivores, but until now the evidence in relation to carnivorous dinosaurs has been sparse and anecdotal.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1.

    , , & A king-sized theropod coprolite. Nature 393, 680–682 (1998)

  2. 2.

    et al. Bite-force estimation for Tyrannosaurus rex from tooth-marked bones. Nature 382, 706–708 (1996)

  3. 3.

    et al. Cranial design and function in a large theropod dinosaur. Nature 409, 1033–1037 (2001)

  4. 4.

    A consideration of the trophic dynamics of a Late Cretaceous large-dinosaur community (Oldman Formation). Ecology 57, 841–857 (1976)

  5. 5.

    , , & Size, shape and serration density of theropod dinosaur lateral teeth. Mod. Geol. 16, 161–198 (1991)

  6. 6.

    & Taphonomy and paleobiological implications of Tenontosaurus-Deinonychus associations. J. Vert. Paleontol. 15, 707–712 (1995)

  7. 7.

    Gut contents from a Cretaceous tyrannosaurid: implications for theropod digestive tracts. J. Paleontol. 75, 401–406 (2001)

  8. 8.

    Feeding behaviour of carnivorous dinosaurs as determined by tooth marks on dinosaur bones. Hist. Biol. 13, 17–26 (1998)

  9. 9.

    Prey bone utilization by predatory dinosaurs. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 88, 157–166 (1991)

  10. 10.

    , , & Archaeology, toothmarks and sauropod dinosaur taphonomy. Gaia 10, 225–231 (1994)

  11. 11.

    et al. Predatory dinosaur remains from Madagascar: Implications for the Cretaceous biogeography of Gondwana. Science 280, 1048–1051 (1998)

  12. 12.

    , & Stratigraphic analysis of Upper Cretaceous rocks in the Mahajanga Basin, Madagascar: Implications for ancient and modern faunas. J. Geol. 108, 275–301 (2000)

  13. 13.

    et al. The Late Cretaceous vertebrate fauna of Madagascar: Implications for Gondwanan paleobiogeography. GSA Today 9, 1–7 (1999)

  14. 14.

    , & The osteology of Masiakasaurus knopfleri, a small abelisauroid (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. J. Vert. Paleontol. 22, 510–534 (2002)

  15. 15.

    & The last of the dinosaur titans: a new sauropod from Madagascar. Nature 412, 530–534 (2001)

  16. 16.

    & Un nouveau Crocodilien mésosuchien dans le Campanien de Madagascar: Trematochampsa oblita, n. sp. Bull. Soc. Géol. Fr. 21, 183–188 (1979)

  17. 17.

    & in Cretaceous Fossil Vertebrates (ed. Unwin, D.) 149–175 (Palaeontological Assoc., London, 1999)

  18. 18.

    Social factors influencing reproduction in wild lions. J. Zool. 177, 463–482 (1975)

  19. 19.

    The evolution and dynamics of intraspecific predation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12, 225–251 (1981)

  20. 20.

    The Behavioral Ecology of the Komodo Monitor 406 (Univ. Press of Florida, Gainesville, 1981)

  21. 21.

    Cannibalism in natural populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 6, 87–106 (1975)

  22. 22.

    , & A survey of intraspecific predation within the class Mammalia. Mammal Rev. 14, 187–198 (1984)

  23. 23.

    The Triassic dinosaur Coelophysis. Mus. North. Arizona Bull. Ser. 57, 1–160 (1989)

  24. 24.

    The Little Dinosaurs of Ghost Ranch 250 (Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1995)

  25. 25.

    The myth of cannibalism in Coelophysis bauri. J. Vert. Paleontol. 22, 57A (2002)

  26. 26.

    The prosauropod dinosaur Massospondylus carinatus Owen from Zimbabwe: Its biology, mode of life, and phylogenetic significance. Occ. Pap. Nat. Mus. Rhodesia B 6, 689–840 (1981)

Download references


We are grateful to the villagers of Berivotra, the staff of the Institute for the Conservation of Tropical Environments, and the faculty of the University of Antananarivo for logistical support, and all field crew members of the Mahajanga Basin Project for their dedicated efforts. We thank L. Betti-Nash for providing artwork for Fig. 4, and K. Chin, G. Erickson, J. Holstein, B. Koralesky, P. O'Connor, S. Sampson, W. Simpson and J. Thole for comments and discussions. This work was supported by NSF, National Geographic Society and Macalester College.

Author information


  1. *Geology Department, Macalester College, 1600 Grand Avenue, St Paul, Minnesota 55105, USA

    • Raymond R. Rogers
  2. †Department of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York 11794, USA

    • David W. Krause
  3. ‡Department of Paleontology, Science Museum of Minnesota, 120 West Kellogg Boulevard, St Paul, Minnesota 55102, USA

    • Kristina Curry Rogers


  1. Search for Raymond R. Rogers in:

  2. Search for David W. Krause in:

  3. Search for Kristina Curry Rogers in:

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raymond R. Rogers.

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.