Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Directional postcopulatory sexual selection revealed by artificial insemination

Nature volume 421, pages 360–363 (2003)Cite this article

Abstract

Postcopulatory sexual selection comprises both sperm competition, where the sperm from different males compete for fertilization1, and cryptic female choice, where females bias sperm use in favour of particular males2. Despite intense current interest in both processes as potential agents of directional sexual selection3, few studies have attributed the success of attractive males to events that occur exclusively after insemination. This is because the interactions between pre- and post-insemination episodes of sexual selection can be important sources of variation in paternity4. The use of artificial insemination overcomes this difficulty because it controls for variation in male fertilization success attributable to the female's perception of male quality, as well as effects due to mating order and the relative contribution of sperm from competing males5. Here, we adopt this technique and show that in guppies, when equal numbers of sperm from two males compete for fertilization, relatively colourful individuals achieve greater parentage than their less ornamented counterparts. This finding indicates that precopulatory female mating preferences can be reinforced exclusively through postcopulatory processes occurring at a physiological level. Our analysis also revealed that relatively small individuals were advantaged in sperm competition, suggesting a possible trade-off between sperm competitive ability and body growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Expected versus observed paternity distribution.
Figure 2: Effect of phenotypic traits on the proportion of offspring sired.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parker, G. A. in Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (eds Birkhead, T. R. & Møller, A. P.) 3–54 (Academic, San Diego, 1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Eberhard, W. G. Female Control: Sexual Selection by Cryptic Female Choice (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Birkhead, T. R. & Pizzari, T. Postcopulatory sexual selection. Nature Rev. Genet. 3, 262–273 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Birkhead, T. R. & Møller, A. P. (eds) Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection (Academic, San Diego, 1998)

  5. Birkhead, T. R. Defining and demonstrating postcopulatory female choice—again. Evolution 54, 1057–1060 (2000)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Simmons, L. W. Sperm Competition and its Evolutionary Consequences in the Insects (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dziuk, P. J. Factors that influence the proportion of offspring sired by a male following heterospermic insemination. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 43, 65–68 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Evans, J. P. & Magurran, A. E. Patterns of sperm precedence and predictors of paternity in the Trinidadian guppy. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 719–724 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sheldon, B. C. Male phenotype, fertility, and the persuit of extra-pair copulations by female birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 257, 25–30 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Blount, J. D., Møller, A. P. & Houston, D. C. Antioxidants, showy males and sperm quality. Ecol. Lett. 4, 393–396 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jennions, M. D. & Petrie, M. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol. Rev. 75, 21–64 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Evans, J. P. & Magurran, A. E. Multiple benefits of multiple mating in guppies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 10074–10076 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Houde, A. E. Sex, Color, and Male Choice in Guppies (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Endler, J. A. & Houde, A. E. Geographical variation in female preferences for male traits in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 49, 456–468 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Reynolds, J. D. & Gross, M. R. Female mate preference enhances offspring growth and reproduction in a fish. Poecilia reticulata. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264, 57–62 (1992)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. James, W. H. The distribution of the combinations of the sexes in mammalian litters. Genet. Res. 26, 45–53 (1975)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Constantz, G. D. in Ecology and Evolution of Livebearing Fishes (eds Meffe, G. K. & Snelson, Jr F. F.) 33–50 (Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Endler, J. A. Natural and sexual selection on colour patterns in poeciliid fishes. Environ. Biol. Fishes 9, 173–190 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Houde, A. E. Mate choice based on naturally occurring colour-pattern variation in a guppy population. Evolution 41, 1–10 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pilastro, A., Evans, J. P., Sartorelli, S. & Bisazza, A. Male phenotype predicts insemination success in guppies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 1325–1330 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pizzari, T. & Birkhead, T. R. Female feral fowl eject sperm of subdominant males. Nature 405, 787–789 (2000)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lewis, S. M. & Austad, S. N. Sexual selection in four beetles: the relationship between sperm precedence and male olfactory attractiveness. Behav. Ecol. 5, 219–224 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Edvardsson, M. & Arnqvist, G. Copulatory courtship and cryptic female choice in red flour beetles Tribolium castaneum. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 559–563 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zeh, J. A. & Zeh, D. W. The evolution of polyandry II: post-copulatory defences against genetic incompatibility. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264, 69–75 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Harvey, I. F. & Parker, G. A. ‘Sloppy’ sperm mixing and intraspecific variation in sperm precedence (P2) patterns. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 2537–2542 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Neems, R. M., Lazarus, J. & McLachlan, A. J. Lifetime reproductive success in a swarming midge: trade-offs and stabilizing selection for male body size. Behav. Ecol. 9, 279–286 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Matthews, I. M., Evans, J. P. & Magurran, A. E. Male display rate reveals ejaculate characteristics in the Trinidadian guppy Poecilia reticulata. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264, 695–700 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Marshall, T. C., Slate, J., Kruuk, L. E. B. & Pemberton, J. M. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 7, 639–655 (1998)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Krackow, S., Meelis, F. & Hardy, I. C. W. in Sex Ratios: Concepts and Research Methods (ed. Hardy, I. C. W.) 112–131 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Williams, D. A. Extra-binomial variation in logistic linear models. Appl. Stat. 31, 144–148 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank T. Birkhead, J. Kelley, B. Kempenaers, F. Neat, T. Pizzari, L. Simmons and A. Skinner for comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript, C. Romualdi for statistical advice and A. Ludlow for assistance with the preliminary artificial insemination trials. This research was supported by a Marie Curie Independent Research Fellowship from the EU and was carried out in conformity with the relevant Italian laws governing the care of animals in research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, University of Padova, via U. Bassi 58/B, Padova, 1-35131, Italy

    Jonathan P. Evans, Lorenzo Zane, Samuela Francescato & Andrea Pilastro

Authors
  1. Jonathan P. Evans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lorenzo Zane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Samuela Francescato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Andrea Pilastro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan P. Evans.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Evans, J., Zane, L., Francescato, S. et al. Directional postcopulatory sexual selection revealed by artificial insemination. Nature 421, 360–363 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01367

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01367

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing