Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The evolution of inaccurate mimics

Abstract

Instances of strikingly accurate Batesian mimicry (in which a palatable prey organism closely resembles an aversive model) are often cited to illustrate the power of natural selection1. Less attention has been paid to those mimics, such as many hoverfly (Syrphidae) mimics of wasps or bees, that resemble their models only poorly2,3,4. Attempts to provide an adaptive explanation for imperfect mimicry have suggested that what seems a crude resemblance to human observers may appear a close match to predators2, or that inaccurate mimics may bear a general resemblance to several different model species3,4. I show here, however, that truly inaccurate mimicry of a single model organism may be favoured over perfect resemblance, by kin selection. Signal detection theory predicts that predators will modify their level of discrimination adaptively in response to the relative frequencies and similarity of models and mimics5,6,7. If models are rare and/or weakly aversive, greater local similarity of mimics can thus lead to greater attack rates. Where individual mimics are related to others in their vicinity, kin selection will then oppose the evolution of accurate mimicry.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Predator discrimination.
Figure 2: Impact of the frequency and accuracy of mimics on predator attack rates.
Figure 3: Equilibrium probability of deterrence by mimics relative to deterrence by models.

References

  1. Wickler, W. Mimicry in Plants and Animals (Weidenfeld & Nicholson, London, 1968)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dittrich, W., Gilbert, F., Green, P., McGregor, P. & Grewcock, D. Imperfect mimicry: a pigeon's perspective. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 251, 195–200 (1993)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Howse, P. E. & Allen, J. A. Satyric mimicry: the evolution of apparent imperfection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 257, 111–114 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Edmunds, M. Why are there good and poor mimics? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 70, 459–466 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Duncan, C. J. & Sheppard, P. M. Sensory discrimination and its role in the evolution of Batesian mimicry. Behaviour 24, 269–282 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Getty, T. Discriminability and the sigmoid functional response: how optimal foragers could stabilise model-mimic complexes. Am. Nat. 125, 239–256 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Greenwood, J. J. D. Crypsis, mimicry and switching by optimal foragers. Am. Nat. 128, 294–300 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Clarendon, Oxford, 1930)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Gittleman, J. L. & Harvey, P. H. Why are distasteful prey not cryptic? Nature 286, 149–150 (1980)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Harvey, P. H. & Paxton, R. J. The evolution of aposematic coloration. Oikos 37, 391–393 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Guilford, T. The evolution of conspicuous coloration. Am. Nat. 131, S7–S21 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Frank, S. A. Foundations of Social Evolution (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rodríguez-Gironés, M. A. & Lotem, A. How to detect a cuckoo-egg: a signal-detection theory model for recognition and learning. Am. Nat. 153, 633–648 (1999)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pilecki, C. & O'Donald, P. The effects of predation on artificial mimetic polymorphisms with perfect and imperfect mimics at varying frequencies. Evolution 25, 365–370 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hetz, M. & Slobodchikoff, C. N. Predation pressure on an imperfect Batesian mimicry complex in the presence of alternative prey. Oecologia 76, 570–573 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lindström, L., Alatalo, R. V. & Mappes, J. Imperfect Batesian mimicry—the effects of the frequency and the distastefulness of the model. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264, 149–153 (1997)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mappes, J. & Alatalo, R. V. Batesian mimicry and signal accuracy. Evolution 51, 2050–2053 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brower, J. V. Z. Experimental studies of mimicry. IV. The reactions of starlings to different proportions of models and mimics. Am. Nat. 94, 271–282 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lea, R. G. & Turner, J. R. G. Experiments on mimicry: II. The effect of a Batesian mimic on its model. Behaviour 42, 131–151 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Goodale, M. A. & Sneddon, I. The effect of distastefulness of the model on the predation of artificial Batesian mimics. Anim. Behav. 25, 660–665 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pfennig, D. W., Harcombe, W. R. & Pfennig, K. S. Frequency-dependent Batesian mimicry. Nature 410, 323 (2001)

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank R. Bshary, S. Dall, T. Getty, A. Lotem, S. Rands and A. Russell for comments and discussion.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rufus A. Johnstone.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnstone, R. The evolution of inaccurate mimics. Nature 418, 524–526 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00845

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature00845

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing