The human body hosts an enormous abundance and diversity of microbes, which perform a range of essential and beneficial functions. Our appreciation of the importance of these microbial communities to many aspects of human physiology has grown dramatically in recent years. We know, for example, that animals raised in a germ-free environment exhibit substantially altered immune and metabolic function, while the disruption of commensal microbiota in humans is associated with the development of a growing number of diseases. Evidence is now emerging that, through interactions with the gut–brain axis, the bidirectional communication system between the central nervous system and the gastrointestinal tract, the gut microbiome can also influence neural development, cognition and behaviour, with recent evidence that changes in behaviour alter gut microbiota composition, while modifications of the microbiome can induce depressive-like behaviours. Although an association between enteropathy and certain psychiatric conditions has long been recognized, it now appears that gut microbes represent direct mediators of psychopathology. Here, we examine roles of gut microbiome in shaping brain development and neurological function, and the mechanisms by which it can contribute to mental illness. Further, we discuss how the insight provided by this new and exciting field of research can inform care and provide a basis for the design of novel, microbiota-targeted, therapies.
The disruption of the microbes that are resident in our gastrointestinal tract has long been implicated in the development or exacerbation of mental disorders. There is, for example, a long history of anecdotal reports of psychiatric side-effects of antibiotics, even in those without a premorbid psychiatric history.1 There have also been attempts to influence the composition of the gut microbiota to achieve clinical benefit. For example, in the first decades of the twentieth century, probiotic preparations containing Lactobacillus strains were marketed widely as a means to improve mental health or treat psychiatric disorders.2 These approaches fell from favour in the 1920s because of a lack of mechanistic understanding and their link to the increasingly unfashionable ‘autointoxication’ model. However, the interest in the role of gut microbes in mental health, and our ability to improve psychiatric wellbeing through their manipulation, is resurgent.2, 3
In this review, we consider the potential of dysbiosis to contribute to psychopathology and the evidence linking disruption of gut microbiota with specific psychiatric disorders. We examine the role of the microbiome in neurological development and regulation, and consider its contribution to aging-related morbidity. Finally, we discuss the potential for modification of the gut microbiome to provide clinical benefit in the context of altered brain function.
Regulation of neurological function by the gut microbiome
The potential contribution of bidirectional communication between the gut and central nervous system (CNS) is suggested by high rates of comorbidity between gastrointestinal and psychiatric illnesses.4, 5 For example, mood disorders affect more than half of all patients with irritable bowel syndrome,6 with antidepressants being one of the most common pharmaceutical interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.4 The gut–brain axis consists of a bidirectional communication network that monitors and integrates gut functions and link them to cognitive and emotional centres of the brain. It encompasses the central, autonomic and enteric nervous systems, as well as the neuroendocrine, enteroendocrine and neuroimmune systems.7, 8 It mediates the effects of both genetic and environmental factors on brain development and function, and has been implicated in the aetiology of a number of psychiatric disorders.9, 10, 11, 12
In recent years, we have increasingly understood the contribution made by the gut microbiome not only in the regulation of host physiology, particularly metabolism and immunity,13, 14, 15, 16, 17 but also the CNS and brain function.11, 18, 19 Given mounting evidence that the microbiome has a key role in influencing the development and function of the nervous system through its interaction with the gut–brain axis, it has been suggested that a ‘microbiome–gut–brain axis’ may be a more appropriate model.19, 20, 21, 22
The delicate balance between the human microbiome and the development of psychopathologies is particularly interesting given the ease with which the microbiome can be altered by external factors, such as diet,23 exposure to antimicrobials24, 25 or disrupted sleep patterns.26 For example, a link between antibiotic exposure and altered brain function is well evidenced by the psychiatric side-effects of antibiotics, which range from anxiety and panic to major depression, psychosis and delirium.1 A recent large population study reported that treatment with a single antibiotic course was associated with an increased risk for depression and anxiety, rising with multiple exposures.27 Bercik et al.28 showed that oral administration of non-absorbable antimicrobials transiently altered the composition of the gut microbiota in adult mice and increased exploratory behaviour and hippocampal expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), while intraperitoneal administration had no effect on behaviour. Alteration of brain function may therefore add to the many reasons that inappropriate antibiotic use should be avoided. It should be noted though that unchecked bacterial infection also represents an acute stressor, and has been shown to be associated with memory dysfunction in mice.29
Diet is another important determinant of gut microbiota composition and function that is strongly linked with psychopathological outcomes. For example, consumption of high fat diet (HFD) is associated with altered microbial diversity and reduced synaptic plasticity,30, 31 with increased vulnerability to anxiety-like behaviour in mice,32 while altered microbial diversity upon consumption of a diet high in sucrose results in significantly impaired development of a spatial bias for long-term memory, short-term memory and reversal training.33 In contrast, adolescent rats fed a low-calorie diet show augmented neurogenesis and BDNF levels, and improved cognition in adulthood,34 and a diet that increases microbiota diversity is associated with improved cognitive ability.35 Although human data have shown reduced microbial diversity in individuals is linked with increased adiposity, insulin resistance, dyslipidaemia and more pronounced inflammatory phenotype,36, 37 strong evidence of a direct microbiome effect comes from studies using conventionally housed mice subjected to a microbiome depletion and/or transplantation paradigm using microbiota isolated from donors on either an HFD or control diet. Following re-colonization, mice given the HFD exposed microbiota showed significant and selective disruptions in exploratory, cognitive, and stereotypical behaviour.38 Although it is not possible to exclude the direct effect of host metabolism on brain function, such findings do suggest that diet-induced changes in the intestinal microbiome substantially influence brain function.
Diet and antibiotic exposure are only two factors that potentially influence brain function through shaping the gut microbiome (Figure 1). An array of common variables may be equally important. For example, alcohol consumption,39, 40 smoking habits41 and disruption of diurnal rhythm,26 have all been shown to substantially affect microbiota composition. As such, how wider influences on the microbiome contribute to dysregulation of brain function is an area of growing interest.
The microbiome in specific psychiatric conditions
While the links between the microbiome and specific psychiatric conditions have been reviewed elsewhere,18, 42, 43, 44, 45 a brief examination of the contribution of inter-kingdom interactions to two particularly distressing neuropsychiatric disorders provides a useful illustration.
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is typified by markers known to be influenced by the microbiome. For example, depression-associated changes seen in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) stress response,46 and altered levels of depression-associated monoamines (or their receptors) in corticolimbic regions of the brain, have both been demonstrated in germ-free (GF) mice.28, 47, 48, 49, 50 The increased concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines seen in MDD46 may also result from interactions with gut microbes. Levels of serum antibodies against lipopolysaccharide from gram-negative enterobacteria are higher in patients with MDD than in controls,51 and cause stress-associated with increased gut permeability and bacterial translocation in animal models.22, 52 Evidence also exists that depression alters the gut microbiota, as demonstrated in mice in which chronic depression- and anxiety-like behaviours has been induced by olfactory bulbectomy,53 suggesting a feedback loop between depressive states and dysbiosis. A reflection of the importance of this circular relationship may be the existence of host mechanisms that regulate microbiota composition.54, 55
Similar parallels between dysbiosis and psychopathogenesis exist in schizophrenia (reviewed by Dinan et al.56 and Nemani et al.44). Many of the strongest associations identified between genetic risk and schizophrenia relate to genes involved in immunity,57, 58 paralleling clinical studies that report an upregulated immune and inflammatory status in schizophrenia patients.59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68 Serological markers of bacterial translocation are also substantially elevated in schizophrenia subjects and significantly correlated with systemic inflammatory markers.69 In turn, cytokine levels are correlated with the severity of clinical symptoms,59, 70, 71 and it has been suggested that the resulting neuroinflammation is involved directly in schizophrenia pathogenesis.72, 73, 74
As described later, the microbiota also modulate a range of neurotrophins and proteins involved in brain development and plasticity.48, 49, 75 There is evidence that such alterations are central to the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. For example, BDNF expression is believed to have a role in the molecular mechanism underlying altered cognition,76 and through its influence on brain plasticity, may contribute to the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor dysfunction seen in schizophrenia.77
Treatment interactions with the microbiome in mental illness
In addition to influencing psychopathogenesis directly, the gut microbiome makes an important contribution to drug metabolism, and potentially explains much of the inter-individual variability in treatment efficacy and side-effects.78, 79 For example, the gut microbiota has been implicated in the reductive metabolism of psychotropic medications, including benzodiazepine clonazepam,80 risperidone81 and levodopa.82 In addition, the gut microbiome is also able to influence the gene expression of hepatic enzymes that aid in the metabolism and detoxification of drugs outside of the gut.83, 84
A reciprocal interaction also exists, with drugs used to target psychiatric or neurological disorders having the potential to affect the composition and function of the gut microbiome. For example, the atypical antipsychotic olazapine has been shown to affect microbiota composition in rats, as well as triggering inflammatory effects and weight gain,85, 86 with the co-administration of antibiotics shown to attenuate these physiological effects.87 The impact of atypical antipsychotics on the gut microbiota may therefore explain to some extent the increased levels of cardiac and metabolic disease in patients receiving these medications.88, 89, 90
The clinical implications of these pathways remain poorly understood, but suggest the utility of a precision approach to therapy, as has been advocated in psychiatry91, 92 and other disease contexts.93
The role of the microbiome in brain development
Brain development spans the prenatal period to post adolescence and involves the interplay of genetic and environmental factors.94 Disruption of these interactions can alter normal developmental trajectories and contribute substantially to neuropsychiatric outcomes in later in life.95, 96
Neural development begins early in embryonic life with a number of important stages occurring before birth.94 Areas of the brain undergoing these events exhibit greater fragility97 and the significant impact of insults that occur during gestation is increasingly recognized.98 During this period, maternal immunity and metabolism represents a link between neurodevelopment in the womb and the external environment. Challenges to maternal homoeostasis, such as infection, poor nutrition or prenatal stress (PNS), are associated with neurodevelopmental disorders, including anxiety, autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, depression and schizophrenia.99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109 Disruption of the maternal microbiome, or ‘dysbiosis’, appears to act as a link between external stressors and fetal development, either by altering normal developmental cues, or through the presentation of inappropriate developmental stimuli.
The precise nature of relationships between maternal microbiome interactions, altered neurodevelopment and subsequent psychopathologies, remain poorly defined. To a large extent, this is due to the challenge of determining the relative contribution of parallel and overlapping pathways that link multiple interacting systems. Even in animal models, it is extremely difficult to identify the relative contribution of pathways by which a single factor can lead to an array of behavioural disorders. As an illustration, the consumption of a HFD during pregnancy is associated with subsequent behavioural disorders.110, 111 However, HFD has been shown to influence multiple regulatory pathways in the immune,112, 113 metabolic114 and neuroendocrine110 systems, through both microbiome dependent and independent mechanisms, as well as resulting in the vertical transmission of the associated dysbiosis.25 Further, the impact of an insult such as HFD consumption depends on the developmental stage at which it occurs, with similar adverse events during early or late periods associated with different outcomes.105, 115, 116
One important contributor to aberrant neurodevelopment appears to be the disruption of the immuno-regulatory role of the gut microbiome, resulting in a pro-inflammatory maternal state. Increased levels of circulating cytokines during pregnancy have been shown to negatively affect neural development 110 and could act by altering the fetal immune milieu (reviewed in detail elsewhere94, 117, 118, 119).
Immune-dysregulation could result from factors that ablate the normal microbiota, such as antibiotics, thereby suppressing microbial interactions with toll-like receptors and Treg cells in the gut120, 121, 122 or the production of immuno-regulatory metabolites, such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs).122, 123, 124 Alternatively, factors that trigger dysbiosis, such as high fat consumption, could act by promoting the production of pro-inflammatory bacterial metabolites.125 In addition, the dysbiotic changes in the gut microbiota could influence inflammation and CNS function through changes in activation of vagal and/or spinal nerve pathways.22, 108, 126, 127 The contribution of such a microbiota-immune interaction to stress-associated pathologies is supported by the observation that exposure to repeated stress affects the gut microbiota in a manner that correlates with changes in levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines.128
The maternal HPA axis is likely to represent another important link between prenatal insults and developmental abnormalities. The HPA axis is affected by factors such as PNS129, 130 and infection,131 which are risk factors for a wide range of neurodevelopmental disorders.132, 133, 134, 135, 136 In animal models of early-life postnatal stress, hyper-responsiveness of the HPA axis is coupled with altered visceral pain sensitivity and impaired intestinal barrier function,137, 138 while aberrant dietary protein:carbohydrate ratios during gestation have moderate long-term effects on the function of the HPA and sympatho-adrenomedullary axes in offspring.139 It is useful to note direct responses to in utero stressors such as hypoxia also involve the adrenal system140, 141 and are essential to fetal survival and neurodevelopment.142 Whether the maternal microbiome can influence these pathways remains unknown.
The manner in which a hyperactive maternal HPA stress response influences fetal development is unclear; however, an emerging hypothesis involves maternal cortisol crossing the placenta in a quantity sufficient to affect gene expression in fetal brain cells.143 This model is supported by in vitro analysis of human fetal brain aggregates144 and the observation that the effects of PNS on offspring can be partially mimicked by giving pregnant animals a synthetic glucocorticoid or adrenocorticotropic hormone.130, 145 However, the interaction of the HPA axis with the maternal microbiome is likely to be complex. In addition to affecting fetal neurodevelopment directly, stress-induced alterations to the HPA axis trigger maternal gut dysbiosis.146 These changes in the gut microbiota could further influence HPA axis dysfunction through altered tryptophan metabolism, as well as contributing to other dysbiosis-associated dysregulatory pathways.94 In addition, there is evidence that the gut microbiome influences the function of the placenta via the HPA axis, thereby altering fetal exposure to specific compounds in maternal circulation.147, 148, 149, 150
The maternal gut microbiota could also affect fetal neurodevelopment by influencing levels of circulating 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT). The gut microbiome regulates 5-HT biosynthesis by enterochromaffin (EC) cells in the gut.13 In turn, 5-HT regulates fetal neuronal cell division, differentiation and synaptogenesis151 and its depletion results in altered brain development.152 Furthermore, maternal plasma serotonin is required for proper neuronal morphogenesis during developmental stages that precede the appearance of serotonergic neurons, with embryos depending more on maternal plasma serotonin than their own during in utero development.153 Maternal gut dysbiosis is also likely to influence blood–brain barrier (BBB) formation, a critical component in CNS development, ensuring an optimal microenvironment for neuronal growth and specification.154 This is suggested by analysis of the embryos of GF mice, where the BBB has been shown to be substantially compromised.155
Neurodevelopment continues outside the womb with the neonatal period characterized by substantial neurological development, including morphological changes, cell differentiation and acquisition of function.156, 157 Synaptogenesis begins shortly after birth and reaches maximum levels by around 2 years of age, before a process of synaptic refinement and elimination reduces the number of synapses in the postnatal brain to adult levels by mid-adolescence.158 Remodelling continues well into the third decade of life,159 providing a lengthy window of vulnerability to external perturbations. This critical period of neurodevelopment parallels the establishment and maturation of the microbiome, a process now known to be essential for the establishment of normal immune function,160, 161, 162, 163, 164 the neuroendocrine system165 and metabolic regulation.166, 167 Disruption of the microbiome in early life therefore has the potential to influence neurodevelopment and long-term mental health outcomes, particularly through its interaction with the immune system and the gut–brain axis.
Gnotobiotic animal models have been important in demonstrating the contribution of the developing microbiome to early-life neurodevelopment and the establishment of appropriate stress responses. For example, GF mice have an exaggerated hypothalamic-pituitary response to mild restraint stress, with elevated plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone and corticosterone and reduced BDNF expression levels in the cortex and hippocampus.49 Furthermore, mice that develop in the absence of microbes exhibit increased motor activity and reduced anxiety, associated with differential expression of synaptophysin and PSD-95, proteins that are specifically involved in synaptogenesis pathways.48 Microbial colonization is also required for programming and presentation of normal social behaviours, and is important for the regulation of repetitive behaviours,168 the development of non-spatial memory,29 and the development of pain signalling from the body.169 It is important to note that the absence of appropriate microbial developmental cues in early-life can result in aberrant mental development that is not corrected by later microbial exposure (Neufeld et al.).170
It is clear from these and other GF animal studies that the absence of a commensal microbiota during early-life substantially affects both neurophysiology and the risk of abnormal behaviour development. However, while a useful tool for highlighting mechanistic pathways, the GF animal poorly reflects the types of microbiome disruption that may occur in humans. As such, other investigations have attempted to recreate real-world early-life insults in the controlled context of animal models. For example, while associations between caesarean-section delivery, altered early life microbial colonization171, 172 and the incidence of behavioural disorders and abnormal cognitive development in humans173, 174, 175 have been known for some time, the extent to which a direct causal relationship exists is difficult to discern, given the number of other potentially contributing variables. However, when vaginally delivered mouse pups are compared with those delivered via caesarean section they show an altered gut microbiome and increased anxiety, social deficits and repetitive behaviours reminiscent of autism spectrum disorder-like behaviours in humans.176
Even in animal models though, the line between pre- and post-delivery periods is blurred by factors such as the vertical transmission of microbiota, the influence of the maternal microbiome of milk composition,177 and the continuation of stressors in the external environment. An example of this complexity is the impact of PNS on neurodevelopment. PNS has been shown to alter the composition of the gut178 and maternal vaginal microbiota in mice,98, 179 thereby altering the pool of microbes that can be passed to the neonate (an analogous situation has been described in humans, where PNS has been shown to affect the composition of the human infant gut microbiota over the first 110 days after birth180). As above although PNS also alters prenatal development, and therefore the nature of interactions between the neonate and microbes in early life. Determining the relative contribution and timing of contributory pathways to long-term psychopathological outcomes is therefore challenging.
The lasting impact of antibiotic exposure on the microbiome, whether during pregnancy,181, 182 intrapartum183 or in the neonatal period24, 184 is an example of a further complex factor. There is clear potential for antibiotic dysbiosis to contribute to maternally mediated antenatal neurodevelopment, while antibiotic dysbiosis is also heritable.25 Early-life exposure to antibiotics has been shown to result in long-term immune dysregulation185 and visceral hypersensitivity.186 Further, the developmental impact of antibiotic dysbiosis is not limited to the neonatal period, with adolescent rats exhibiting an altered tryptophan metabolic pathway, reduced anxiety and cognitive defects.187
Diet-induced maternal dysbiosis may also affect early-life neurodevelopment through milk composition. For example, the offspring of mice fed an HFD during lactation show developmental and neurobehavioral changes that suggest possible disruption of physical and sensory-motor maturation, and increased susceptibility to depressive and aggressive-like behaviour.188 These observations suggests further work in in relation to dietary inputs will be important in understanding brain function determinants in humans.
Mechanisms of interaction
Activation of inflammatory pathways appears to be a particularly important link between the microbiome and neonatal neurodevelopment. The gut microbiota can affect the immune system directly via activation of the vagus nerve,22, 126, 189, 190, 191 in turn triggering bidirectional communication with the CNS.192 In addition, indirect effects of the gut microbiota on the innate immune system can result in alterations in the circulating levels of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines that directly affect brain function.
Bacterial metabolites from the gut have a substantial influence on the regulation of the gut–brain axis and local and systemic immunity. SCFAs, produced by the bacterial fermentation of dietary carbohydrates, have immunomodulatory properties121, 123, 124, 193 and can interact with nerve cells by stimulating the sympathetic and autonomic nervous system via G-protein-coupled (GPR) receptor 41 (GPR41)194 and GPR43.195 In addition, they can cross the BBB, modulate brain development and behaviour196, 197, 198 and have been implicated in the development of autism.199 Further, gut microbiota derived SCFAs have been shown to regulate microglia homoeostasis,200 necessary for proper brain development and brain tissue homoeostasis.201, 202, 203 GF mice display global defects in microglia with altered cell proportions and an immature phenotype, leading to impaired innate immune responses in the CNS.200 SCFAs also regulate the release of gut peptides from enteroendocrine cells,204 which in turn affect gut–brain hormonal communication.205, 206 SCFAs have recently been shown to regulate the synthesis of gut-derived 5-HT from EC cells.13 The gut provides ~95% of total body 5-HT,207 most of which exists in plasma. Although this source of 5-HT has intrinsic roles within the gut208, 209 and peripherally in metabolic control,210 EC cell 5-HT can activate afferent nerve endings to signal to the CNS.211 Furthermore, this source of 5-HT has significant links to psychiatric disorders with the most commonly used antidepressant, fluoxetine, blocking the transport of gut 5-HT into plasma, while elevated plasma serotonin is observed in 25–50% of children with autism212, 213, 214, 215 and an inverse correlation between high plasma serotonin and low serotonergic neurotransmission has been demonstrated in young male adults with autism spectrum disorder.216 In addition to SCFAs, gut bacteria are also capable of producing an array of other neuroactive and immunomodulatory compounds, including dopamine,217 γ-aminobutyric acid,218 histamine219 and acetylcholine,220 while the gut microbiome is an important regulator of bile acid pool size and composition,221 and, in turn, BBB integrity and HPA function.222
The gut microbiota could also contribute to the regulation of brain function by influencing tryptophan metabolism (reviewed by O’Mahony and colleagues95). Tryptophan is an essential, diet-derived, amino acid,223 required for serotonin synthesis in the CNS.224 Once absorbed from the gut, tryptophan can cross the BBB and participate in serotonin synthesis.224 However, there are many other pathways through which tryptophan can be metabolized,224 including the largely hepatic kynurenine pathway225 and the major serotonin synthesis pathway in gut EC cells.226, 227, 228
The availability of tryptophan is heavily influenced by the gut microbiota. GF mice have been shown to have increased plasma tryptophan concentrations,47, 48 which can be normalized following post-weaning colonization.47 Resident gut bacteria can utilize tryptophan for growth229 and in some cases, production of indole,230, 231 or serotonin (reviewed by O’Mahony and colleagues95), while the microbiota might also affect tryptophan availability by influencing host enzymes responsible for its degradation.47 By limiting the availability of tryptophan for serotonin production in the CNS (EC-derived serotonin does not cross the BBB), the gut microbiota could influence serotonergic neurotransmission.95 In vulnerable populations, reducing the circulating concentrations of tryptophan has been shown to affect mood, and to reinstate depressive symptoms in patients who have successfully responded to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.232, 233 The gut microbiota could also influence the production of both neuroprotective and neurotoxic components of the kynurenine pathway.224
Other pathways by which the gut microbiota could influence the development and activity of brain tissue include regulation of the release of gut peptides from enteroendocrine cells,204 which in turn affect gut–brain hormonal communication,205, 206 and, as described above, the regulation of microglia homoeostasis.
Two recent, related papers by Wong et al. and Zheng et al. indicate that the microbiota–gut–brain axis functions in a bidirectional manner in the regulation of depressive-like behaviours. Data in the paper by Wong et al.234 demonstrate that changes in behaviour caused by increased stress levels, knockout of caspase 1 leading to decreased inflammasome function, or pharmacological treatments result in changes in the gut microbiome. The paper by Zheng et al. shows three key findings: (i) the absence of gut microbiota in GF mice resulted in decreased immobility time in the forced swimming test relative to conventionally-raised healthy control mice. (ii) From clinical sampling, the gut microbiotic compositions of MDD patients and healthy controls were significantly different from that of MDD patients. (iii) Faecal microbiota transplantation of GF mice with ‘depression microbiota’ derived from MDD patients resulted in depression-like behaviours compared with colonization with ‘healthy microbiota’ derived from healthy control individuals. Moreover, the concerned authors showed that mice harbouring ‘depression microbiota’ primarily exhibited disturbances of microbial genes and host metabolites involved in carbohydrate and amino acid metabolism, indicating that the development of depressive-like behaviours is mediated through the host’s metabolism.235 The combined findings of these two papers suggest that the microbiota–gut–brain axis is fully bidirectional, functioning in a manner through which changes in microbiota affect behaviour, while conversely, changes in behaviour brought about by chronic stress, genetic manipulation, or pharmacological intervention, result in alterations in microbiota composition. Novel approaches to target this bidirectional interface of gut microbiota and depressive-like behaviour may offer novel approaches for the treatment of major depression.
Modification of the gut microbiota to affect therapeutic change
As described above, studies in mice have shown that alteration of the microbial composition of the gut can induce changes in behaviour, raising the possibility of therapeutic manipulation of the microbiome. What approach might be appropriate depends on the specific role of the microbiome in pathogenesis.
In instances where the absence of particular bacterial species is linked to altered brain function, the addition of discrete microbes may be clinically effective. For example, in rats deprived of maternal contact at an early age, treatment with Bifidobacterium infantis results in normalization of the immune response, reversal of behavioural deficits, and restoration of basal noradrenaline concentrations in the brainstem,257 while in a mouse model of gastrointestinal inflammation and infection, exposure to B. longum normalizes anxiety-like behaviour.258, 259 The effects of psychosocial stress are also reversed in mice following probiotic treatments.260, 261 Such effects are not limited to rodent models; in healthy women, a probiotic cocktail alters activity of brain regions that control central processing of emotion and sensation.262 Broadly, such probiotic effects appear to mediate behavioural changes through stimulation of the vagus nerve22, 191, 258 or through modulation of cytokine production.263
Probiotic therapies have limitations, including a poor ability to establish a stable population within the recipient. Further, in many instances, pathogenesis may be contributed to by broad functions conserved across many different species, such as the ability to produce metabolites that are immunomodulatory, or that directly influence brain activity.264, 265 Here, it may be the absence of suitable drivers of beneficial behaviour that is limiting, rather than the absence of microbes capable of exhibiting them. In such instances, the broad-scale alteration of the microbiome using selective dietary microbial growth substrates, or prebiotics, may be more appropriate and result in longer lasting change. For example, consumption of fructooligosaccharides or a non-digestible galactooligosaccharide formulation (BGOS) elevates BDNF levels and NMDAR subunit expression in rats.266 BGOS consumption also reduces anxiety in mice injected with lipopolysaccharide to induce sickness behaviour, an effect that appears to be related to the modulation of cortical interleukin-1β and 5-HT2A receptor expression.267 In humans, daily consumption of BGOS for 3 weeks results in a significantly lower salivary cortisol awakening response compared with placebo and a decreased attentional vigilance to negative versus positive information.268 Pusceddu et al.269 showed that long-term supplementation with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids corrected dysbiosis seen in maternally separated female rats, and was associated with an attenuation of the corticosterone response to acute stress. Interestingly, while the supporting evidence for the efficacy or such approaches is only now emerging, the consumption of wholegrain and high fibre foods, essentially prebiotics, is already recommended to patients.270
Demonstrations of the transmissibility of behavioural traits between animals by faecal microbiota transfer are also intriguing. Faecal microbiota transfer is employed increasingly widely in the treatment of conditions such as recurrent Clostridium difficile infection.271 Its ability to influence behaviour suggests that it might also have a role in the treatment of psychopathology (reviewed by Collins et al.272). It is important to note, however, that these observations also raise important questions about current approaches to donor screening for therapeutic faecal microbiota transfer.
The advances in our understanding of the role of the microbiome in neurodevelopment and mental health, particularly in the past 5 years, have been remarkable. The implications of this new insight are only beginning to become apparent; however, the potential value of microbiome analyses in revealing mechanisms that underpin altered brain development and mental illness is hugely exciting. There is now a need to close the gap between practice, including the increasing use of pro- and prebiotics, and the supporting science. The importance of achieving this is reflected in the substantial investments made to ‘microbiome–gut–brain axis’ research by both the US government and the European Union.273
Achieving a better understanding of the contribution of the microbiome to mental health will require further development of analytical approaches. Studies based on reductive animal models, particularly those involving GF animals, have been important in identifying underlying mechanisms; however, they exclude the complexity of real-world interactions. The rapidly falling costs of ‘omics’ approaches to microbiome analysis now allow them to be applied to large human cohorts within life-course studies, with data generated assessed in the context of detailed genetic, epigenetic, demographic and clinical assessments. Exploiting these opportunities will result in substantial improvement in our understanding of altered brain function and mental illness in the relative near-term.
In addition to changing analytical strategies, the conceptual framework within which these data are assessed must also continue to develop. A ‘three-hit’ model of vulnerability and resilience to mental health issues, based on genetic predisposition, the prenatal environment, and later life experiences, has been proposed.274 However, just as the gut–brain axis might be extended to include the microbiome, such developmental pathways must also take into consideration points of interaction with our resident microbiota. Refining these models based on empirical data now represents a key challenge in understanding the processes behind altered brain function and mental illness.
About this article
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.