Resolvin D1 and aspirin-triggered resolvin D1 regulate histamine-stimulated conjunctival goblet cell secretion

Abstract

Resolution of inflammation is an active process mediated by pro-resolution lipid mediators. As resolvin (Rv) D1 is produced in the cornea, pro-resolution mediators could be effective in regulating inflammatory responses to histamine in allergic conjunctivitis. Two key mediators of resolution are the D-series resolvins RvD1 or aspirin-triggered RvD1 (AT-RvD1). We used cultured conjunctival goblet cells to determine whether histamine actions can be terminated during allergic responses. We found cross-talk between two types of G protein-coupled receptors (GPRs), as RvD1 interacts with its receptor GPR32 to block histamine-stimulated H₁ receptor increases in intracellular [Ca²⁺] ([Ca²⁺]_i) preventing H₁ receptor-mediated responses. In human and rat conjunctival goblet cells, RvD1 and AT-RvD1 each block histamine-stimulated secretion by preventing its increase in [Ca²⁺]_i and activation of extracellular regulated–protein kinase (ERK)1/2. We suggest that D-series resolvins regulate histamine responses in the eye and offer new treatment approaches for allergic conjunctivitis or other histamine-dependent pathologies.

Introduction

Inflammation has a critical role in many widely occurring diseases, and there now is a general consensus that failed endogenous resolution mechanisms can lead to uncontrolled and chronic inflammation.^{1, 2} Uncontrolled inflammation is regarded as a critical component of the pathogenesis of two major diseases of the ocular surface, dry eye and allergic conjunctivitis, as well as dermatitis in the skin.^{3, 4} Active resolution of the acute inflammatory response is orchestrated by a novel family of anti-inflammatory and pro-resolving mediators termed resolvins (Rvs), which are a part of a wider genus of pro-resolving mediators.^{5, 6}

Histamine has a central role in promoting allergic conjunctivitis⁷ and is known to directly stimulate conjunctival goblet cell mucin secretion.⁸ Martin et al.⁹ recently demonstrated that RvD1 regulates histamine release by mast cell degranulation. Herein, we addressed whether RvD1 could regulate the action of histamine on goblet cell secretion and characterized the histamine response by these cells. Recently, we found that Rvs of the D and E series (RvD1 and RvE1) regulate leukotriene-stimulated conjunctival goblet cell mucin secretion as can occur in the setting of allergic conjunctivitis.¹⁰ Here we report that RvD1 interacts with its receptor G protein-coupled receptor 32 (GPR32) to block histamine-stimulated responses of conjunctival goblet cells that include increase in intracellular [Ca²⁺] ([Ca²⁺]_i), activation of extracellular regulated–protein kinase (ERK)1/2, and secretion of high molecular weight glycoproteins, including MUC5AC mucin.

Results

Histamine-stimulated increase in [Ca²⁺]_i in cultured human and rat conjunctival goblet cells was inhibited by Rvs

First, we determined whether histamine alters [Ca²⁺]_i using the intracellular Ca²⁺ probe fura-2 in cultured human conjunctival goblet cells. Histamine increased [Ca²⁺]_i in a concentration-dependent manner, with a maximum increase obtained at 10⁻⁵ M (Figure 1a,b). We used RvD1 and its epimer AT-RvD1, which is produced in the presence of aspirin.^{5, 11} In goblet cells, exposure to either RvD1 or AT-RvD1 (10⁻¹⁰–10⁻⁸ M) blocked histamine-stimulated increases in [Ca²⁺]_i that were reduced by a maximum of 72.3±24.2 and 52.6±23.%, respectively (Figure 1c,d). In rat goblet cells, histamine also increased [Ca²⁺]_i with maximum levels at 10⁻⁶ M, a decreased concentration of histamine compared with that which was maximum for human cells (Figure 1e,f). At concentrations as low as 10⁻¹¹ M, both RvD1 and AT-RvD1 significantly blocked the histamine-stimulated increases in [Ca²⁺]_i (Figure 1g,h). A maximum inhibition of secretion of 82.3±0.3% and 83.9±6.4%. was obtained by RvD1 and AT-RvD1, respectively (Figure 1g,h).

Figure 1

D-series resolvins RvD1 and aspirin-triggered RvD1 (AT-RvD1) reduce histamine (His)-stimulated increase in [Ca²⁺]_i in conjunctival goblet cells. Block of histamine-stimulated increase in [Ca²⁺]_i in human (a–d) and rat (e–h) goblet cells. Increase in [Ca²⁺]_i stimulated by histamine over time is shown in a pseudo color image of [Ca²⁺]_i from fura-2 loaded single goblet cells in a and e. Intracellular Ca²⁺ response over time, in response to increasing concentrations of histamine (10⁻⁹–10⁻⁵ M) from three experiments (human) or a representative experiment (rat) is shown in b and f top panel. Peak [Ca²⁺]_i over basal for each concentration of histamine from three experiments is shown in b and f bottom panels. *P<0.05 (vehicle vs. histamine). Action of RvD1 and AT-RvD1 exposure on histamine (10⁻⁵ M)-stimulated increase in [Ca²⁺]_i in human (c–d) and rat (g–h) goblet cells. Pseudo color image of single goblet cells is shown in c and g; Ca²⁺_i response over time is shown in d and h top panels in response to histamine (10⁻⁵ M) alone or histamine after 30 min exposure with RvD1 (10⁻⁸ M) or AT-RvD1 (10⁻⁸ M) from a representative experiment. Peak Ca²⁺ response (d and h bottom panels) to increasing concentrations of RvD1 (open circles) and AT-RvD1 (closed circles) is shown from three experiments. *P<0.05 (histamine vs. resolvin plus histamine).

PowerPoint slide

Rvs block histamine-stimulated increase in [Ca²⁺]_i when added before but not after histamine

To examine the time-dependency of their effects, RvD1 and AT-RvD1 were each added simultaneously with histamine or 50 s after histamine at the peak of [Ca²⁺]_i response (Figure 2a–d). When histamine and RvD1 or AT-RvD1 were added simultaneously, the peak [Ca²⁺]_i was significantly decreased compared with histamine alone (Figure 2a–d). By contrast, when RvD1 or AT-RvD1 were added at the peak of the histamine response, the [Ca²⁺]_i was not altered when the change in [Ca²⁺]_i (Figure 2a–d) was monitored or when the slope was calculated (data not shown). Both D-series resolvins when added before (Figure 1d,h) or together (Figure 2a–d) with histamine blocked the increase in [Ca²⁺]_i stimulated by histamine. However, these Rvs could not alter the histamine Ca²⁺ response if they were added within a minute after histamine had initiated the release of Ca²⁺_i.

Figure 2

D-series resolvins RvD1 and aspirin-triggered RvD1 (AT-RvD1) reduce histamine (His)-stimulated increase in [Ca²⁺]_i by preventing release of intracellular Ca²⁺ in conjunctival goblet cells. Result of time of addition of (a and b) RvD1 (10⁻⁸ M) or (c and d) AT-RvD1 (10⁻⁸ M) on histamine (10⁻⁵ M)-stimulated increase in [Ca²⁺]_i in rat conjunctival goblet cells. Panels a and c are pseudo color images of [Ca²⁺]_i in single goblet cells in response to histamine alone or with RvD1 or AT-RvD1 added at the same time as histamine or 50 s after addition of histamine. Intracellular Ca²⁺ response over time to histamine alone, RvD1, or AT-RvD1 added simultaneously with histamine or added 50 s after histamine is shown in b and d (top panels, from a representative experiment). Peak [Ca²⁺]_i in response to histamine alone (open bars), RvD1, or AT-RvD1 added simultaneously with histamine (diagonal lines) or added at 60 s after histamine (cross-hatched lines) is shown in b and d lower panels from seven experiments. *P<0.05 (histamine vs. resolvin plus histamine). First arrow indicates addition of RvD1 with histamine. Second arrow indicates addition of RvD1 after histamine. (e) Use of capacitative Ca²⁺ store by RvD1 or AT-RvD1 in rat goblet cells. Left top panel indicates intracellular Ca²⁺ response over time in response to histamine (10⁻⁵ M) alone. Right top panel indicates thapsigargin (Thap; 10⁻⁵ M, first arrow) followed by histamine (10⁻⁵ M second arrow). A 30-min exposure with RvD1 (10⁻¹⁰ M) or AT-RvD1 (10⁻¹¹ M) followed by thapsigargin (10⁻⁶ M, first arrow) and then histamine (10⁻⁵ M, second arrow) is indicated in the middle panels. Bottom panel indicates peak [Ca²⁺]_i in response to histamine (10⁻⁵ M) alone; exposure of vehicle, RvD1, or AT-RvD1 for 30 min followed by thapsigargin (10⁻⁶ M) and then followed by histamine (10⁻⁵ M) from four experiments. #P<0.05 (histamine vs. resolvin plus thapsigargin plus histamine).

PowerPoint slide

Rvs and histamine receptors utilize the same intracellular Ca²⁺ pools

GPRs, including histamine receptors, release Ca²⁺ from intracellular capacitative Ca²⁺ stores located in the endoplasmic reticulum.^{12, 13} Ca²⁺ release, in turn, activates Ca²⁺ influx from extracellular stores. The intracellular Ca²⁺ stores are refilled by Ca²⁺ATPase pumping Ca²⁺ back into the endoplasmic reticulum. As thapsigargin depletes the intracellular Ca²⁺ store by blocking the Ca²⁺ATPase, thapsigargin can be used to evaluate use of this store.¹⁴ To determine whether Rvs decrease [Ca²⁺]_i by preventing the release of this store, we measured the effect of Rvs on thapsigargin-induced [Ca²⁺]_i in the presence of extracellular Ca²⁺. Histamine alone and thapsagargin alone increased [Ca²⁺]_i by 205.7±48.7 and 146.8±70.1 nM, respectively (Figure 2e). When RvD1 or AT-RvD1 was added before thapsigargin, the thapsigargin-induced increase in [Ca²⁺]_i was not altered (Figure 2e). When the thapsigargin response was followed by addition of histamine, the histamine response was significantly decreased compared with histamine alone. When RvD1 or AT-RvD1 were followed by thapsagargin and then histamine, the histamine response was unchanged compared with the histamine response that followed the thapsagargin response. (Figure 2e). In support of this finding, we demonstrated earlier that after removal of extracellular Ca²⁺ a small increase in [Ca²⁺]_i remained after histamine 10⁻⁵ M stimulation.^{15, 16} These results suggest that RvD1 and AT-RvD1 block the histamine-stimulated increase in [Ca²⁺]_i by either directly altering the histamine receptor or by affecting a step before the release of intracellular Ca²⁺.

Histamine-stimulated increase in ERK 1/2 activity in cultured rat conjunctival goblet cells was inhibited by Rvs

We next investigated whether histamine affects ERK 1/2 activity. Rat conjunctival goblet cells were stimulated with histamine and ERK1/2 activity measured by western blotting analysis. Histamine increased ERK1/2 activity in a concentration-dependent manner with a maximum at 10⁻⁶ M (Figure 3a). Histamine also activated ERK1/2 in a time-dependent manner with a maximum stimulation at 5 min (Figure 3b). Hence, at physiological levels histamine activates ERK1/2 along with elevating [Ca²⁺]_i.

Figure 3

D-series resolvins RvD1 and aspirin-triggered RvD1 (AT-RvD1) reduce histamine (His)-stimulated increase in extracellular signal–regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) activity in conjunctival goblet cells. Block of histamine-stimulated activation of ERK1/2 in rat conjunctival goblet cells. (a) Concentration- and (b) time-dependence of histamine-stimulated increase in ERK1/2 activity measured by western blotting using phosphospecific and total activity antibodies in a representative experiment (left panel) and a mean of three experiments (right panel) *P<0.05 (vehicle vs. histamine). Panel a indicates histamine used for 5 min and panel b indicates histamine used at 10⁻⁵ M. (c) Represents action of 30-min exposure of RvD1 (open circles) or AT-RvD1 (closed circles) on 5-min histamine (10⁻⁵ M)-stimulated increase in ERK1/2 activity in a representative experiment using RvD1 (top left panel) and AT-RvD1 (bottom left panel) and a mean of three experiments (right panel). *P<0.05 (histamine vs. resolvin plus histamine).

PowerPoint slide

To determine whether D-series resolvins block histamine stimulation of ERK1/2 activity, we exposed rat goblet cells to Rvs for 30 min before stimulation with histamine at 10⁻⁵ M for 5 min. Both RvD1 and AT-RvD1 significantly inhibited histamine-stimulated ERK1/2 activity, with RvD1 inhibiting by a maximum of 94.0±7.7 and AT-RvD1 by 81.9±20.9% (Figure 3c).

Rvs inhibit histamine-stimulated mucin secretion from cultured rat and human goblet cells

When goblet cell secretion was investigated, RvD1 or AT-RvD1 exposure completely blocked secretion stimulated by histamine (10⁻⁵ M) in human goblet cells and rat goblet cells at two concentrations of histamine (10⁻⁵ and 10⁻⁶ M, Figure 4a–c). RvD1 and AT-RvD1 blocked histamine-stimulated secretion a maximum of 78.1±9.0% and 90.3±18.6%, respectively, in human goblet cells and 76.9±15.1% and 83.0±9.3%, respectively, in rat goblet cells. RvD1 and AT-RvD1 blocked histamine-stimulated increase in [Ca²⁺]_i, ERK1/2 activity, and high molecular weight glycoconjugate, including MUC5AC secretion in both human and rat conjunctival goblet cells.

Figure 4

D-series resolvins RvD1 and aspirin-triggered RvD1 (AT-RvD1) reduce histamine (His)-stimulated increase in high molecular weight glycoconjugate secretion in conjunctival goblet cells. Block of 2-h histamine (10⁻⁵ M)-stimulated high molecular weight glycoconjugate secretion in (a) human and (b, c) rat conjunctival goblet cells by a 30-min previous exposure of RvD1 or AT-RvD1. Panel a indicates mean of four experiments using increasing concentrations of RvD1 (closed circles) and AT-RvD1 (open circles). Mean of four experiments with stimulation by histamine at 10⁻⁶ M (open circles) and 10⁻⁵ M (closed circles) after 30 min exposure to RvD1 (b) and AT-RvD1 (c). *P<0.05 (histamine vs. resolvin plus histamine).

PowerPoint slide

Rvs increase mucin secretion in cultured human and rat conjunctival goblet cells, [Ca²⁺]_i , and ERK1/2 in rat conjunctival goblet cells

RvD1 activates its receptor GPR32,¹¹ which is present in human and rat conjunctival goblet cells,¹⁰ and also can activate the lipoxin A₄ receptor (ALX/FPR2).¹⁷ We tested whether RvD1 and AT-RvD1 themselves alter secretion, [Ca²⁺]_i, and ERK1/2 in conjunctival goblet cells. RvD1 and AT-RvD1 each increased goblet cell secretion in both human (Figure 5a) and rat cells (Figure 5c). A maximum action was recorded at 10⁻⁹ M RvD1 and AT-RvD1 in human cells and at 10⁻⁹ M RvD1 and 10⁻¹⁰ M AT-RvD1 in rat cells. The secretory effect of the D-series resolvins was significantly less than that stimulated by histamine at 10⁻⁵ M, which was 2.2±0.2-fold above basal (not shown). RvD1 and AT-RvD1 caused a maximum stimulation at 1 h in both human and rat cells, which was shorter than histamine, which caused its maximum response at 2 h of stimulation¹⁶ (Figure 5b,d).

Figure 5

D-series resolvins RvD1 and aspirin-triggered RvD1 (AT-RvD1) increase high molecular weight glycoconjugate secretion in conjunctival goblet cells. Increase in high molecular weight glycoconjugate secretion in (a and b) human and (c and d) rat conjunctival goblet cells. Concentration- and time-dependence of RvD1 (open circles) or AT-RvD1 (closed circles) stimulation of high molecular weight glycoconjugate secretion. Panels a and c represent 2-h stimulation with increasing concentrations of RvD1 and AT-RvD1. Panels c and d show 10⁻⁸ M resolvin stimulation for 0–4 h. Mean of three experiments for a–d. *P<0.05 (vehicle plus resolvin).

PowerPoint slide

RvD1 and AT-RvD1 increased the peak [Ca²⁺]_i in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 6a,b), with a maximum increase obtained with 10⁻⁹ M RvD1 and 10⁻⁸ M AT-RvD1. In the same experiments, histamine increased [Ca²⁺]_i to a higher level elevating it by 220.0±49.0 nM. To determine the cellular Ca²⁺ pool used by RvD1 and AT-RvD1, extracellular Ca²⁺ was omitted before stimulation with the Rvs. In the absence of extracellular Ca²⁺, RvD1-stimulated increase in [Ca²⁺]_i was partially decreased, but the increase stimulated by AT-RvD1 was completely blocked (Figure 6c). The role of the intracellular capacitative Ca²⁺ pool was investigated using thapsigargin in the absence and presence of extracellular Ca²⁺. Independent of the presence of extracellular Ca²⁺, when thapsigargin was added first, the increase in [Ca²⁺]_i by the subsequent addition of RvD1 was not altered (Figure 6d). When RvD1 was added first, the thapsigargin-induced Ca²⁺ response was also not altered. Similar results were obtained when AT-RvD1 was used (Figure 6e). Thus, neither RvD1 nor AT-RvD1 appear to use the IP₃-sensitive capacitative Ca²⁺ pool.

Figure 6

D-series resolvins RvD1 and aspirin-triggered RvD1 (AT-RvD1) increase in [Ca²⁺]_i, in conjunctival goblet cells. Increase in [Ca²⁺]_i using fura-2 loaded rat conjunctival goblet cells stimulated by RvD1 and AT-RvD1. (a) Pseudo color images of [Ca²⁺]_i in single goblet cells stimulated by RvD1 (top panels) or AT-RvD1 (bottom panels). (b) Intracellular [Ca²⁺]_i over time in response to RvD1 (10⁻⁹ M), AT-RvD1 (10⁻⁸ M), or histamine (His; 10⁻⁵ M) from a representative experiment (top panel), and peak [Ca²⁺]_i response to increasing concentrations of RvD1 (open circles) and AT-RvD1 (closed circles) from four experiments are shown in bottom panel. *P<0.05 (vehicle vs. resolvin). (c) Peak [Ca²⁺]_i in response to RvD1 (left panel) and AT-RvD1 (right panel) in the presence (closed circles) and absence (open circles) of extracellular Ca²⁺ from three experiments, *P<0.05 (resolvin in presence vs. absence of extracellular Ca²⁺). (d, e) Peak [Ca²⁺]_i in response to thapsigargin (10⁻⁶ M) added either before or after RvD1 (10⁻⁸ M) in the presence (left panel of d) or absence (right panel of d) of extracellular Ca²⁺ or before or after AT-RvD1 (10⁻⁸ M) addition in the absence of extracellular Ca²⁺ (e). (f, g) Mean response of [Ca²⁺]_i over time from three experiments to RvD1 (f) and AT-RvD1 (g) in fura-2 loaded conjunctival goblet cells treated with transfection reagent only (control), a scrambled sequence small interfering RNA (sc siRNA), or lipoxin A₄ receptor (ALX/FPR2) siRNA. (h) Mean of peak [Ca²⁺]_i from three experiments.

PowerPoint slide

As RvD1 and AT-RVD1 can also activate the ALX/FPR2 receptor,¹¹ we determined the role that the ALX receptor has in RvD1- and AT-RvD1-stimulated [Ca²⁺]_i response in rat conjunctival goblet cells. In cells in which the ALX/FPR2 receptor was knocked down with siRNA, the [Ca²⁺]_i over time in response to RvD1 (Figure 6f), AT-RvD1 (Figure 6g), or as a control lipoxin A₄ (data not shown) was abolished. Peak [Ca²⁺]_i response was decreased significantly only with ALX siRNA (Figure 6h). The [Ca²⁺]_i response was unchanged when cells were incubated with either a scrambled siRNA or the transfection reagent alone (Figure 6f–h). In rat goblet cells, RvD1 and AT-RvD1 each activate the ALX/FPR2 receptor.

When ERK1/2 activity was studied, both RvD1 and AT-RvD1 stimulated ERK1/2 activity in a concentration- and time-dependent manner. A maximum increase in ERK1/2 activity was not reached even at 10⁻⁸ M RvD1 or AT-RvD1 (Figure 7a,b). A maximum increase in time was detected at 20 min of Rv stimulation. The Rvs were slower at activating ERK1/2 than histamine whose maximum stimulation was obtained at 5 min (Figure 7c,d). Both RvD1 and AT-RvD1 themselves caused goblet cell secretion, elevation in [Ca²⁺]_i, and increase in ERK1/2 activity.

Figure 7

D-series resolvins RvD1 and aspirin-triggered RvD1 (AT-RvD1) increase extracellular signal–regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) activity in conjunctival goblet cells. Response of ERK1/2 activity to (a and c) RvD1 (upper panels) or AT-RvD1 (bottom panels) in rat conjunctival goblet cells. Concentration (left panels)- and time (right panels)-dependence of ERK1/2 activity in a representative western blotting experiment. Mean of three experiments using (b) RvD1 (closed bars) and AT-RvD1 (open bars) for 5 min and (d) RvD1 (10⁻⁹ M, closed bars) and AT-RvD1 (10⁻¹⁰ M, open bars). *P<0.05 (vehicle vs. resolvin).

PowerPoint slide

H1 histamine and DRV1-GPR32 receptors are present and co-localize in cultured human conjunctival goblet cells

As all four histamine receptors (H₁–H₄) are activated by histamine in conjunctival goblet cells,⁸ we focused on the H₁ receptor to determine whether RvD1 uses its receptor GPR32 to alter the action of histamine. Using fluorescence microscopy, we examined the location of the histamine H₁ receptors and the DRV1-GPR32 receptor in human goblet cells. Both receptors displayed a punctate pattern of localization (Figure 8a,b). They were detected in the same cells and their immunofluorescence location overlapped (Figure 8c).

Figure 8

G protein-coupled receptor 32 (GPR32) and H1 receptor have overlapping localization in conjunctival goblet cells. Immunofluoresence microscopy of the location of the (a) GPR32 receptor (green), (b) the H₁ receptor (red), or (c) a merged image in human conjunctival goblet cells. Original magnification × 400.

PowerPoint slide

DRV1-GPR32, using protein kinase C and GRK 2, blocks the histamine-stimulated increase in [Ca²⁺]_i

To determine whether RvD1 used its receptor GPR32 to block histamine stimulated [Ca²⁺]_i, we transfected Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells with DRV1-GPR32 alone, the H₁ histamine receptor alone, both receptors, or mock transfection. Cells were stimulated with histamine, RvD1, or RvD1 followed by histamine. When both the H₁ and GPR32 receptors were transfected, histamine increased [Ca²⁺]_i, (Figure 9a) and RvD1 blocked histamine stimulation. RvD1 did not alter [Ca²⁺]_i. When only the H₁ receptor was transfected, histamine increased [Ca²⁺]_i and previous exposure to RvD1 did not alter this response (Figure 9b). When only the GPR32 receptor was transfected, no combination of histamine or RvD1 increased the [Ca²⁺]_i (Figure 9c). In mock-transfected cells, neither histamine nor RvD1 increased [Ca²⁺]_i, and the RvD1 treatment did not alter the histamine response (Figure 9d). Together, these results suggest that RvD1 uses its receptor DRV1-GPR32 to block the effect of histamine on [Ca²⁺]_i. As a control, cells were also stimulated with RvE1 or RvE1 followed by histamine in CHO cells transfected with both the H1 receptor and DRV1-GPR32. RvE1 alone had no effect on [Ca²⁺]_i and RvE1 followed by histamine did not have an effect on histamine-stimulated [Ca²⁺]_i (Figure 9e). Results using transfected CHO cells suggested that RvD1 and AT-RvD1 blocked the histamine-stimulated response at a step before the release of [Ca²⁺]_i, and thus a potential mechanism of action for RvD1 is to counter-regulate the histamine receptor. Examination of the phosphorylation sites of the H₁ receptor using Scan Site (http://scansite.mit.edu/motifscan_id.phtml) and the kinases that phosphorylate the H₁ receptor using Phospho.ELM (http://phospho.elm.eu.org/pELMBlastSearch.html) indicates potential PKC and β-adrenergic receptor kinase 1 (βARK1; also known as GRK2) phosphorylation sites. CHO cells transfected with the human H₁ and GPR32 receptors were stimulated with histamine; RvD1 followed by histamine; or the PKC inhibitor calphostin C (Figure 10a) or the βARK1inhibitory peptide (Figure 10b) followed either by histamine or RvD1 and then histamine. RvD1 blocked the histamine-induced Ca²⁺ response. Calphostin C and βARK1 both reversed the inhibitory effect of RvD1 on the histamine Ca²⁺_i response. Neither calphostin C nor βARK1 alone blocked the histamine receptor response.

Figure 9

D-series resolvin RvD1 uses the GPR32 (G protein-coupled receptor 32) receptor to block histamine (His) activation of the H₁ receptor by phosphorylating the H₁ receptor in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells. (a–d) Response of [Ca²⁺]_i to histamine (10⁻⁵ M), RvD1 (10⁻⁸ M) or 30-min RvD1 exposure followed by histamine in fura-2 loaded CHO cells that had been transiently transfected with (a) H₁ and GPR32 receptors, (b) H₁ receptor alone, (c) the GPR32 receptor alone, or (d) mock transfected. Panels a and b indicate intracellular [Ca²⁺]_i over time (upper panels) or peak [Ca²⁺]_i (lower panels) in response to histamine (10⁻⁵ M), RvD1 (10⁻⁸ M), or addition of RvD1 30 min before addition of histamine. Panels c and d show peak [Ca²⁺]_i in response to histamine, RvD1, or addition of RvD1 30 min before addition of histamine. (e) Intracellular [Ca²⁺]_i over time (upper panel) or peak [Ca²⁺]_i (lower panel) in response to histamine (10⁻⁵ M), RvE1 (10⁻⁸ M), or addition of RvE1 30 min before addition of histamine. AT-RvD1, aspirin-triggered RvD1.

PowerPoint slide

Figure 10

D-series resolvin RvD1 uses protein kinase C (PKC) and β-adrenergic receptor kinase 1 (βARK1) to block histamine (His) activation of the H1 receptor in Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells and conjunctival goblet cells. (a, b) Action of PKC inhibitor calphostin C (calC) (10⁻⁷M) (a) or βARK1 inhibitor (10⁻⁷ M) (b) on RvD1 (10⁻⁸ M) block of histamine (10⁻⁵ M) on the [Ca²⁺]_i in fura-2 loaded CHO cells that had been transiently transfected with the H₁ and GPR32 (G protein-coupled receptor 32) receptors. (c, d) Action of PKC inhibitor Ro-317549 (10⁻⁷ M) (c) or βARK1 inhibitor (10⁻⁷ M) (d) on RvD1 (10⁻⁸ M) block of histamine dimaleate (His Dim; 10⁻⁶ M) on the [Ca²⁺]_i in fura-2 loaded rat goblet cells. Intracellular [Ca²⁺]_i over time (upper panels in a and b) or peak [Ca²⁺]_i (lower panels in a and b) in response to histamine (10⁻⁵ M), RvD1 (10⁻⁸ M) added 30 min before addition of histamine; calphostin C, or βARK inhibitor (10⁻⁷ M) added 45 min before histamine; or calphostin C or βARK inhibitor (10⁻⁷ M) added 15 min before addition of RvD1 (10⁻⁸ M), which was added 30 min before histamine. Intracellular [Ca²⁺]_i over time (upper panels in c and d) or peak [Ca²⁺]_i (lower panels in c and d) in response to histamine dimaleate (10⁻⁶ M), RvD1 (10⁻⁸ M) added 30 min before addition of histamine dimaleate; Ro-317549 or βARK inhibitor (10⁻⁷ M) added 45 min before histamine; or Ro-317549 or βARK inhibitor (10⁻⁷ M) added 15 min before addition of RvD1 (10⁻⁸ M), which was added 30 min before histamine dimaleate. In all, 17–20cells were selected for each experimental condition.

PowerPoint slide

In rat goblet cells, both the PKC inhibitor Ro-317549 (Figure 10c) and βARK1 inhibitory peptide (Figure 10d) blocked the RvD1 inhibition of histamine dimaleate, a specific agonist for the H1 histamine receptor.

These data indicate that RvD1 uses PKC and βARK1 to counter-regulate the H₁ receptor.

Rvs inhibit histamine-stimulated increase in [Ca²⁺]_i to the same extent as H1 receptor inhibitor

The inhibitory actions of both RvD1 and AT-RvD1 on the histamine-induced increase in [Ca²⁺]_i in cultured conjunctival goblet cells was compared with that of the H₁ antagonist chlorpheniramine (Figure 11a). Maximally effective concentrations of the three inhibitors each blocked the histamine-stimulated increase in [Ca²⁺]_i to essentially the same extent (Figure 11b).

Figure 11

H₁ histamine (His) antagonist, D-series resolvins RvD1, and aspirin-triggered RvD1 (AT-RvD1) each block histamine-stimulated increase in [Ca²⁺]_i to the same extent in rat goblet cells. (a) Mean intracellular [Ca²⁺]_i over time and (b) percentage of inhibition of peak [Ca²⁺]_i in response to histamine alone (10⁻⁵ M) or following a 30-min exposure with the H₁ antagonist chlorpheniramine (CPA, 10⁻⁴ M), RvD1 (10⁻⁸ M), or AT-RvD1 (10⁻⁸ M) from four experiments *P<0.05 (histamine vs. inhibitor plus histamine).

PowerPoint slide

Discussion

Our results demonstrate that histamine uses its receptors to increase [Ca²⁺]_i, activate ERK1/2, and stimulate secretion. RvD1 blocks the effects of histamine by interacting with its receptor GPR32 to counter-regulate the histamine receptor to prevent the release of intracellular Ca²⁺ and the activation of ERK1/2 thus inhibiting secretion. RvD1 must be added before histamine in order to prevent the release of the intracellular Ca²⁺ store. AT-RvD1 has similar effects in conjunctival goblet cells as RvD1. Previous studies have demonstrated that RvD1 and AT-RvD1 block inflammatory processes in a variety of tissues, but the cellular mechanism of this inhibition has not been demonstrated. Here we show that these Rvs prevent the increase in Ca²⁺ and activation of ERK1/2 used by histamine and its H₁ receptor subtype to induce goblet cell secretion by activating PKC and βARK1 to counter-regulate the histamine receptor. RvD1 is known to interact with its receptor DRV1-GPR32. Here, we show that there is cross-talk between human GPR32 and the H₁ receptor. Use of GPR32 is required for the inhibitory actions of RvD1 on the signaling pathway activated by another GPR, the H₁ receptor activated by histamine. In rat goblet cells, use of the ALX/FPR2 receptor by RvD1 also activates PKC and βARK1 to counter regulate the H1 receptor.

As Ca²⁺ is a major mechanism by which histamine evokes it’s response, the actions of the D-series resolvins RvD1 and AT-RvD1 on blocking the action of histamine could prevent allergic or inflammatory responses in any tissue in which histamine receptors are located. These tissues include the lung, skin, immune cells, smooth muscle, blood vessels, glands, and nerves.

The actions of the D-series resolvins on goblet cell functions are complex as a short-term incubation with the Rvs results in significant activation of ERK 1/2. This activity is short lived, however, as 30 min after addition of the Rvs the ERK 1/2 activity had returned to basal levels. In this study, goblet cells were exposed to D-series resolvins for 30 min before addition of histamine. Thus Rvs counter-regulate the histamine receptors to prevent activation of ERK 1/2.

E-series and D-series resolvins are effective in blocking different types of inflammatory responses in the ocular surface. The E-series resolvin RvE1 can reverse inflammation in the cornea by blocking corneal hemangiogenesis activated in a suture or pellet implanted into the mouse cornea.¹⁸ RvE1 induces corneal epithelial cell migration and attenuates herpes simplex–induced ocular inflammation, as well as corneal epithelial barrier disruption and goblet cell loss in a murine model of dry eye.^{19, 20, 21} RvE1 also stimulates tear production and decreases inflammation in a mouse model of dry eye²² and in humans in phase 1 and 2 clinical trial reduces the signs and symptoms of dry eye syndrome (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00799552). The D-series resolvin RvD1 blocks corneal hemangiogenesis,¹⁸ and previously we demonstrated that RvD1 blocks cholinergic agonist and leukotriene stimulation of conjunctival goblet cell secretion. The present results demonstrate that RvD1 blocks histamine responses and provides a novel function for Rvs in termination of allergic inflammation.

Our findings demonstrate a new use for Rvs as endogenous mediators that could be used to prevent the actions of histamine to treat allergic responses, including allergic conjunctivitis in both the mild and severe forms. In the eye, nose, and lung, steroids are the mainstay of regulating inflammation, but their use carries the major side effect of ocular hypertension and glaucoma.^{23, 24} Rvs are not immunosuppressant, unlike steroids or other anti-inflammatory agents currently used in the eye. RvD1 control of histamine-stimulated responses could represent a novel approach with local anti-inflammatory and pro-resolution mediators to treat allergic conjunctivitis and allergies in other susceptible tissues such as the lung and skin.

Methods

Animals. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (Taconic Farms, Germantown, NY) weighing between 125 and 150 g were anesthetized with CO2 for 1 min, decapitated, and the bulbar and forniceal conjunctival membranes removed from both the eyes. All experiments were approved by the Schepens Eye Research Institute Animal Care and Use Committee.

Human material Human conjunctival tissue was obtained from Heartland Lions Eye Bank (Kansas City, MO). Tissue was placed in Optisol media within 6 h of death.

Cell culture Goblet cells from rat and human conjunctiva were grown in organ culture as described previously.^{25, 26} The tissue plug was removed after nodules of cells were observed. First passage goblet cells were used in all the experiments. Cultured cells were periodically checked by evaluating staining with antibody to cytokeratin 7 (detects goblet cell bodies) and the lectin Ulex europaeus agglutinin (UEA)-1 (detects goblet cell secretory product) to ensure that goblet cells predominated.

Measurement of [Ca²⁺]_i Goblet cells were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with Krebs–Ringer bicarbonate buffer with 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (KRB-HEPES; 119 mM NaCl, 4.8 mM KCl, 1.0 mM CaCl₂, 1.2 mM MgSO₄, 1.2 mM KH₂PO₄, 25 mM NaHCO₃, 10 mM HEPES, and 5.5 mM glucose (pH 7.45) plus 0.5% bovine serum albumin containing 0.5 μM fura-2/AM (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY), 8 μM pluronic acid F127, and 250 μM sulfinpyrazone followed by washing in KRB-HEPES containing sulfinpyrazone. Calcium measurements were made with a ratio imaging system (In Cyt Im2; Intracellular Imaging, Cincinnati, OH) using wavelengths of 340 and 380 nm and an emission wavelength of 505 nm. At least 10 cells were selected in each experimental condition, and experiments were repeated in at least three separate animals. RvD1 or AT-RvD1 (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI) were added 30 min before histamine (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Calphostin C, Ro-317549, βARK1 inhibitor, and H89 (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA) were added 15 min before addition of RvD1. After addition of agonists, data were collected in real time. Data are presented as the actual [Ca²⁺]_i with time or as the change in peak [Ca²⁺]_i. Change in peak [Ca²⁺]_i was calculated by subtracting the average of the basal value (no added agonist) from the peak [Ca²⁺]_i. Although data are not shown, the plateau [Ca²⁺]_i was affected similarly to the peak [Ca²⁺]_i.

Synthetic Rvs at 10 μg μl⁻¹ (dissolved in ethanol as purchased from the manufacturer) were stored at −80 °C, with minimal exposure to light. Immediately before use, the Rvs were diluted in KRB-HEPES buffer to the desired concentrations and added to the cells. The cells were then incubated at 37 °C in the dark. Daily working stock dilutions were discarded following each experiment. Concentrations were confirmed and the Rv structures validated using LC-MS/MS (liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry) and were consistent with reported characteristics.²⁷

Western blotting Cultured goblet cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of histamine, RvD1, or AT-RvD1. Cells were also incubated with histamine 10⁻⁵ M for 0–10 min or RvD1 (10⁻⁹ M) or AT-RvD1 (10⁻⁹ M) for 0–30 min In additional experiments, cells were preincubated with increasing concentrations of RvD1 or AT-RvD1 for 30 min before addition of histamine (10⁻⁵ M). Cells were lysed in radio-immunoprecipitation assay buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 150 mM NaCl, 1% deoxycholic acid, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, and 1 mM EDTA) in the presence of a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich). The homogenate was centrifuged at 2000 g for 30 min at 4 °C. Proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and processed for western blotting. Primary antibodies used were phosphorylated (active) ERK 1/2 or total ERK 2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), diluted at 1:1000. Immunoreactive bands were visualized by the enhanced chemiluminescence method. The films were analyzed with Image J software (Rasband, WS, ImageJ, U.S. National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD; http://imagej.nih.gov; http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/). ERK activation was expressed as fold increase over basal that was set to 1.

Secretion Cultured goblet cells were serum starved for 2 h before use, preincubated with RvD1 or AT-RvD1 for 30 min, and then stimulated with histamine in serum-free RPMI 1640 supplemented with 0.5% bovine serum albumin for 0–4 h. Goblet cell secretion was measured using an enzyme-linked lectin assay with the lectin UEA-I. UEA-1 detects high molecular weight glycoconjugates, including mucins produced by rat goblet cells. The media were collected and analyzed for the amount of lectin-detectable glycoconjugates, which quantifies the amount of goblet cell secretion as described earlier.¹⁰ Glycoconjugate secretion was expressed as fold increase over basal that was set to 1.

Immunofluorescence microscopy First passage cells were grown on glass cover slips and fixed in methanol. Both anti-GPR32 (Gene Tex, Irvine, CA) and anti-H₁ receptor antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were used at 1:100 dilution overnight at 4 °C. Secondary antibodies were conjugated to either Cy2 or Cy 3 (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) and were used at a dilution of 1:150 for 1.5 h at room temperature. Negative control experiments included incubation with the isotype control antibody. The cells were viewed by fluorescence microscopy (Eclipse E80i; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan), and micrographs were taken with a digital camera (Spot; Diagnostic Instruments, Sterling Heights, MI).

Transfection of CHO cells CHO cells (1 × 10⁶ cells) were transfected with mock (pcDNA3), human H1 (NM_000861.2; OriGene, Rockville, MD), or human GPR32 receptors (O75388;¹¹) using FuGENE transfection reagent (Promega, Madison, WI) following the manufacturer’s instruction. At 48 h post transfection, cells were harvested for calcium mobilization experiments.

Knockdown of ALX Receptor Goblet cells were incubated with 100 μM siRNA against a scrambled sequence or ALX receptor for 72 h (ThermoScientific, Waltham, MA) in Accell delivery media according to the manufacturer’s instructions (ThermoScientific). The siRNA was a pool of four molecules whose sequences were: (1) CCAUCAGGUUCGUUAUUGG (2) CCUGCAGACAUUGAGAUAA (3) GUUUAAUACUCGUUACGGA and (4) GUACAAACACUUGUGAAA.

Statistical analysis Results were expressed as the fold increase above basal. Results are presented as mean±s.e.m. Data were analyzed by Student’s t-test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.