Original Article | Open | Published:

Coupling of plasmonic nanopore pairs: facing dipoles attract each other

Light: Science & Applications volume 5, page e16146 (2016) | Download Citation

Abstract

Control of the optical properties of nano-plasmonic structures is essential for next-generation optical circuits and high-throughput biosensing platforms. Realization of such nano-optical devices requires optical couplings of various nanostructured elements and field confinement at the nanoscale. In particular, symmetric coupling modes, also referred to as dark modes, have recently received considerable attention because these modes can confine light energy to small spaces. Although the coupling behavior of plasmonic nanoparticles has been relatively well studied, couplings of inverse structures, that is, holes and pores, remain partially unexplored. Even for the most fundamental coupling system of two dipolar holes, comparison of the symmetric and anti-symmetric coupling modes has not been performed. Here we present, for the first time, a systematic study of the symmetric and anti-symmetric coupling of nanopore pairs using cathodoluminescence by scanning transmission electron microscopy and electromagnetic simulation. The symmetric coupling mode, approximated as a pair of facing dipoles, is observed at a lower energy than that of the anti-symmetric coupling mode, indicating that the facing dipoles attract each other. The anti-symmetric coupling mode splits into the inner- and outer-edge localized modes as the coupling distance decreases. These coupling behaviors cannot be fully explained as inverses of coupled disks. Symmetric and anti-symmetric coupling modes are also observed in a short-range ordered pore array, where one pore supports multiple local resonance modes, depending on the distance to the neighboring pore. Accessibility to the observed symmetric modes by far field is also discussed, which is important for nanophotonic device applications.

Introduction

Nano-optical devices are expected to become the next generation of computing circuits, high-throughput optical biosensors and energy harvesters. Especially, plasmonic nanostructures are promising elements because they can be down-sized below the wavelength. In real devices, each plasmonic element from the input to the output should be optically coupled to perform a certain function. For several years, symmetric coupling modes (also referred to as ‘dark modes’) with symmetric charge distribution, which in principle cannot be excited by plane-wave illumination along the symmetry axis, have been drawing attention because they can support more confined fields and have higher Q-factors than the anti-symmetric (so-called ‘bright’) modes. Possible applications include high-sensitivity sensors, lasing, light emission enhancement and miniaturized plasmonic waveguides1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. To utilize these advantages, coupled nanoparticle systems, including nanodisks and nanorods, have been intensively studied1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. Previous studies have demonstrated that the symmetric mode of plasmonic particle pairs has a higher energy than the anti-symmetric mode and that the coupling energy increases as the inter-particle distance decreases, which can be explained by repulsive dipoles1, 2, 5, 6. In contrast, investigations of the coupling of nanoholes and nanopores have been limited to the anti-symmetric coupling modes in the array configuration, and symmetric modes have not been discussed, although various promising applications using nanopores and nanoholes in sensing and optoelectronics have been proposed1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11. Whereas anti-symmetric modes (‘bright modes’) of arrays, chains and isolated single holes are relatively well studied, pairs have not been studied, although they are the most fundamental and simplest coupling models7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13. The limitation for investigating symmetric modes is related to the measurement method; simple, far-field instrumentation cannot selectively resolve these modes because the symmetry of the excited mode is limited by the symmetry of the plane wave with far-field excitation. In this study, we investigate, for the first time, the symmetric and anti-symmetric coupling of plasmonic nanopore pairs and reveal the unique coupling behavior of hole/pore systems. We employed cathodoluminescence (CL) and electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) using a Cs-corrected scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM), where a focused electron beam of 1 nm in diameter serves as a point source to selectively excite the modes according to the symmetry and beam position14, 15, 16, 17, 18. In CL imaging, the radiative electromagnetic local density of state (EMLDOS) can be mapped, which corresponds to the electric field distribution along the electron path19, 20, 21. The far-field light intensity is detected in CL measurement, indicating that the detected modes are actually accessible by far field on the basis of optical reciprocity, whereas detection by EELS in STEM is not directly related to far-field light interaction. Because so-called ‘dark modes’ can be detected as radiated light at high angles in CL measurement, we use the term ‘symmetric’ rather than 'dark mode' in this study.

Materials and methods

Cathodoluminescence

In our CL-STEM system, the radiated light is collimated by a parabolic mirror placed around the specimen and is detected by a spectrometer (Figure 1a). With a large solid angle of light collection by the parabolic mirror around the specimen (solid angle: 3π), except for the shading by the sample holder, symmetric modes can be detected14, 15, 22. In this study, the polarization is perpendicular to the electron and light optical axes, as shown in Figure 1a. This polarization setting filters out a large portion of the field component along the axis of the optical detection, probably due to the combination of beaming from nanoholes and angle-dependent dipolar radiation13, 23. A JEM-2100F (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) transmission electron microscope with a Schottky field emission electron source was used, and the acceleration voltage of the electron beam was 80 kV. The equipped Cs-corrected system allows a large convergence angle of the electron beam of ~20 mrad and a beam current of 5 nA, with ~1-nm beam diameter.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Illustration of CL-STEM measurement and nanopore charcteristics. (a) Schematic illustration of the CL-STEM setup. The polarization direction is shown by the arrow. (b) Illustration of the nanopore specimen with the diameter of 135 nm. (c) Dispersion relation of the bonding (short-range) SP mode of the AlN(8 nm)/Au(16 nm)/AlN(8 nm) trilayer structure. The light lines are presented as dotted lines. (d) Corresponding propagation length of the SP.

Nanopore fabrication

Nanopore samples were prepared as previously described24. In short, nanopores were fabricated by colloidal lithography and film transfer by wet-etching of the sacrificial layer. To achieve very close separation of nanopore pairs and to obtain high spatial resolution in STEM, we chose ultra-thin, free-standing film structures. For the measurement of single and coupled pairs of nanopores, 135 nm nanopores in an AlN(8 nm)/Au(16 nm)/AlN(8 nm) trilayer membrane were used (Figure 1b). With this sandwich layer structure, it is possible to obtain very thin and stable metal layers, even at high temperatures25, 26. To achieve separated structures with small gaps for pairs, the carbon-mediated method was applied24. For the investigation of short-range ordered (SRO) nanopores, AlN(10 nm)/Au(12 nm)/AlN(6 nm) trilayer films with 120 nm nanopores were fabricated using the direct-etching method, which is suited for dense pore packing24. The AlN layers work both as a buffer layer and to stabilize the gold film. The dimensions were chosen so that the resonance is in the visible–near-infrared wavelength. To tune the resonance in the measurable wavelength range and to investigate the coupling of nanopores through surface plasmons (SPs), the dispersion relation and the propagation length of the bonding (or short-range) mode SP, which is predominantly excited by a fast electron beam, were calculated (Figure 1c and 1d)25, 27, 28. The lossy property of SP dissipates the nanohole resonances and reduces the Q-factor and field confinement. Due to this dissipation, the high mode density of ~2.2 eV does not directly contribute to the CL signal.

Simulation

Simulation was performed to analyze the resonance modes found in the experimental measurement and their behavior. Because the CL and EELS signals correspond to the radiative and full EMLDOS along the electron path (z axis), the calculated field intensity in the z direction with far-field excitation roughly represents the CL signal based on the reciprocity. The electromagnetic field calculation was conducted by the finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method using the CrystalWave software package (Photon Design, Oxford, UK). FDTD can identify the dominant resonance mode by a pulse excitation wave and can avoid undesired SP reflection from the truncation edges by analyzing the field after the pulse has passed but before the reflection reappears (more details can be found in the Supplementary Information). This reflection becomes non-negligible for isolated structures in metallic films, which gives inaccurate results in frequency domain methods. Because the radiated light is detected in the CL measurement, we excited all modes, including the symmetric modes, by plane-wave illumination and detected the perpendicular field close to the sample as the reciprocal of the CL measurement. The anti-symmetric mode is excited by a plane wave with a normal incidence to the film plane with the electric field polarized along the coupling axis. Two detectors were set at the inner and outer edges to detect the inner- and outer-edge modes. The symmetric mode is excited by two plane waves tilted by 30° from normal to the coupling axis directions. Both plane waves are polarized along the coupling axis and illuminated with the same phase to maintain the symmetry, and the perpendicular electric field is detected at the center.

Results and discussion

Coupled nanopore pairs

As an initial investigation of single and coupled pairs of nanopores, 135 nm nanopores in an AlN(8 nm)/Au(16 nm)/AlN(8 nm) trilayer membrane were measured (Figure 1b). Figure 2 presents the STEM bright-field images, panchromatic photon maps (non-filtered) and spectral line profiles of the measured nanopore pairs with different ‘gap’ distances as well as those of a single nanopore. The panchromatic images show that the polarization setup, shown in Figure 1a, mostly extracts the polarization perpendicular to the optical detection axis and electron path (the same polarization is also on the specimen in Figure 1a and the horizontal axis in Figure 2). The details of the polarization dependence of the nanoholes are currently under investigation. The spectral line profiles shown in the lower row in Figure 2 are measured along the center of the pores. The extracted one-dimensional spectra are found in the Supplementary Information. The constant energy band near the wavelength of ~400 nm is attributed to the inter-band transition of gold. The CL spectra of nanopore pairs with different gap distances reveal that the wavelength of the resonance excited at the inner edge of the gap (the inner-edge mode) exhibits a positive correlation with the gap distance, whereas this tendency of the outer-edge mode, excited at the outer edge, is less steep, although showing a similar gap dependence (Figure 3). The inner-edge mode is regarded as an anti-symmetric coupling mode or a so-called bright coupling mode because this mode cannot be excited by the beam placed at the center8, 9, 15. In comparison with the SP wavelength (Figure 1c), the nanopores are located too close to each other, and the pores are considered to be optically coupled through the near field (Supplementary Information). Similar to the inner-edge mode, the outer-edge mode can also be excited by anti-symmetric beam position, which should also be an anti-symmetric mode.

Figure 2
Figure 2

STEM bright-field images (BFIs), photon maps (panchromatic) and horizontal CL spectral line profiles at the nanopore center of single and coupled plasmonic nanopores. The photon map includes photons of all detectable energies (300–1000 nm). The spectral line profile is plotted along the center of the pores (horizontal direction in the image). The detected light is polarized horizontally in the images.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Resonance wavelengths plotted as a function of the ‘gap’ distance. The fitted solid lines are drawn to guide the eye. The resonance of the single pore is indicated by the dashed line.

In addition to these anti-symmetric modes appearing at the edge of the pores, a symmetric coupling mode is excited when the electron beam is incident at the center of the gap6, 29. The symmetric mode can also be weakly excited by illuminating the edges when the gap is small. This symmetric mode always appears at a longer wavelength than the anti-symmetric coupling modes (Figure 3). The resonance wavelength of the symmetric mode shows a slight inverse dependence on the gap distance and is more strongly excited when the gap distance is smaller. The symmetric mode still exists even when the gap distance is negative (thus, when the pores are connected). In contrast, the inner-edge, anti-symmetric mode becomes weaker as the gap distance decreases and completely disappears when the pores are connected.

We also performed EELS measurements, which supported the modes found in the CL measurement (Supplementary Information). The EELS (full EMLDOS) measurement confirms that the modes found in the CL (radiative EMLDOS) measurement are not significantly influenced by the interference in radiation21. To further confirm the inner- and outer-edge modes, we examined a more mode-separated nanopore pair with larger pore sizes, where CL mapping for the mode separation can be more clearly performed than with a system with inner- and outer-edge modes at close energies. We observed the outer-edge mode with low CL intensity distribution at the gap at a longer wavelength, and the inner-edge mode with highly localized field in the gap at a shorter wavelength (Supplementary Information). These complementary measurements confirm the presence and relation of the symmetric mode as well as anti-symmetric inner- and outer-edge modes.

To elucidate and analyze the experimental results, we performed FDTD simulations, as presented in Figures 4 and 5. We first simulated a single pore, as shown in Figure 4. The resonance wavelength of the single pore roughly matches the experimental result. The deviation could be due to the difference of the dielectric constant of the metal and dimensional errors, including the edge shapes and thickness30. The electric field patterns (Ez, Ex) confirm that the SP bonding mode (or short-range SP mode) is dominant. Inside the pore, the electric field is polarized in the x direction, showing a typical x-polarized electric dipole. The magnetic field curls around this electric dipole at the pore position. Far-field patterns and comparison with a simple electric dipole are shown in the Supplementary Information.

Figure 4
Figure 4

Electromagnetic simulation of a single nanopore. Simulated (a) spectrum and (b) cross-sectional field maps of a single plasmonic nanopore. The pore is excited by a plane wave with normal incidence, and the field intensity at the edge was detected. For the field pattern, components of the electric () and magnetic () fields are plotted at the resonance wavelength. The schematic illustration shows the position of the coordination and the extracted cross-sectional area. The film structure is indicated by green lines in the field maps.

Figure 5
Figure 5

Simulation of the coupled plasmonic nanopores. The anti-symmetric modes are excited by a plane wave with normal incidence, and the symmetric mode is excited by two plane waves with ±30° incident angles. The field intensity was detected from the other side of the membrane at the corresponding positions. (a) The spectra of the anti-symmetric and symmetric coupling modes. The intensities for the 50-nm gap spectra are tripled for visibility. (b) The in-plane pattern of the perpendicular electric field (Ez) for a 50-nm gap distance at the wavelengths indicated by arrows in a. The color and style of the arrows correspond to those of the frame of the field pattern.

In Figure 5, the simulation results of coupled pores are shown. The anti-symmetric mode spectra detected at the inner-edge and outer-edge positions (blue and red lines in Figure 5a) show resonance peaks at a wavelength close to that of the single mode at the gap distance of 200 nm. These two anti-symmetric modes start to blueshift, and the difference of the peak wavelengths increases as the gap distance decreases. The inner-edge mode blueshifts more than the outer-edge mode. The symmetric mode starts to appear and becomes stronger as the gap distance decreases, which is opposite to the anti-symmetric modes. The symmetric mode resonance always appears at longer wavelengths than that of the anti-symmetric or single modes. The simulated in-plane field pattern of the symmetric mode is similar to the wave propagation of the breathing mode31. Although the simulation of the spectra qualitatively reproduces the experimental results, the quantitative differences originate from slight differences in dimensions, fabrication errors or differences in the material constants of gold and aluminum nitride32. In addition, the intensity analysis also shows agreement of the experiment and simulation (Supplementary Information). The simulation results show that the symmetric modes can be excited by oblique plane-wave incidence, although we took advantage of the symmetric illumination by two in-phase plane waves to avoid excitation of the anti-symmetric modes. This result also indicates that symmetric modes can be detected by far-field optical measurement with symmetric excitation and detection. However, due to coupling with the propagating waves, the observed symmetric mode does not necessarily have sharper peaks than the anti-symmetric mode (low Q-factors), which also makes the determination of the resonance erroneous.

To better understand the two different anti-symmetric modes, namely, the inner- and outer-edge modes, the perpendicular electric field (Ez) patterns are plotted in Figure 5b. From the reciprocity of the CL signal, Ez corresponds to the CL signal15, 19, 20, 21. The three images with solid line frames show the electric field patterns of the bright inner-edge mode, bright outer-edge mode and symmetric mode at the peak wavelengths indicated by the arrows in Figure 5a. The field intensity of the inner-edge mode is strongly localized at the inner edge, and each pore behaves like a dipole. In contrast, the field of the outer-edge mode is propagating outside the pore and has very low intensity at the gap position. Judging from the field pattern close to the pore, this mode may be considered as coupling of the quadrupoles formed around each pore. We found another weak, outer-edge, anti-symmetric mode from dipoles at a much longer wavelength in the simulated spectrum (dashed blue arrow in Figure 5a and frame in Figure 5b, also in the Supplementary Information).

Because the inner-edge mode is strongly localized at the gap and the outer-edge mode has almost no field at the gap for small gap distances, we assumed that the local structure determines the resonance mode rather than the whole structure of the nanopore pair. To extract only the features of the gap, we modeled a structure without outer edges, consisting of two semi-infinitely long slits (details in the Supplementary Information). The simulated spectra of this ‘only-gap structure’ match the spectral responses of the inner-edge mode, and the field patterns resemble each other. This result indicates that the gap structure only determines the inner-edge mode, with minimal influence of the outer edge. On the basis of the idea of this mode localization, the inner-edge mode can be interpreted as a thin metal strip. Then, the gap distance dependence of the energy of the inner-edge mode can be understood from charge distributions of thin-film plasmons33, 34. As an extreme case of the outer-edge mode, we modeled a single slit with the same width as the outer edge-to-edge distance (Supplementary Information). This structure reproduced similar resonances and field pattern as the outer-edge mode.

For intuitive understanding and simpler analysis, hole or pore structures are often treated as inverse particles because particles are better understood as interacting dipole charges35, 36. For the best simplicity, a thin metal film is considered as an infinitely thin perfect electric conductor (PEC). With this thin-film approximation and by applying Babinet’s principle, the symmetric coupling of pores corresponds to the anti-parallel coupling of disk particles with a side-to-side alignment of dipoles (see upper inset of Figure 6)5, 37, 38. Such anti-parallel configuration has lower energy than the parallel coupling configuration. With this approximation, the relation between the symmetric and anti-symmetric modes can be intuitively understood. However, this exchange of the electric and magnetic fields using Babinet’s principle does not simply convert the system to electric dipole disks, according to the field patterns at the pore, as shown in Figure 4 (the magnetic field is curling around the electric dipole). The coupled disks regarded as inverse structures cannot explain the separate inner- and outer-edge coupling modes, as summarized in Figure 6. We note that the coupling energies found in this study do not fully agree with the previously proposed models for the chain configuration, where not all of the modes were resolved and analyzed due to complexity39. For such coupled plasmonic nanopores in a thin membrane, inversing the pore structures to disks does not completely explain the coupling behavior, although it partially facilitates the interpretation. To fully understand the plasmonic structure with propagating SPs, it is important to consider the local modes. Therefore, nanoscopic optical observation is essential.

Figure 6
Figure 6

Schematic illustration of the single dipole mode, anti-symmetric dipole coupling and symmetric dipole coupling of plasmonic nanopores. Illustration of the thin PEC film approximation with inverse structures is also shown.

Local coupling in SRO arrays

Because the resonance modes can be localized when the pores are close to each other, we investigated a system consisting of multiple pores with various distances, which comprises a SRO nanopore array37. We used an AlN(10 nm)/Au(12 nm)/AlN(6 nm) trilayer with a pore diameter of 120 nm (Figure 7a). The line profiles across adjacent nanopores in Figure 7a exhibit both symmetric and anti-symmetric modes, similar to the nanopore pairs discussed above (Figure 2). One pore shows different resonance wavelengths at the left and right edges when the distances between the left and right neighbors are different. This difference resembles the strong localization of the inner-edge mode, which is insensitive to the outside environment, as discussed previously for pairs. The resonance wavelengths plotted in Figure 7b exhibit the same trend observed for the isolated nanopore pairs shown in Figure 3: the symmetric mode (the gap center excitation) is located at a lower energy than the anti-symmetric mode (the inner-edge excitation), and its resonance wavelength demonstrates a slight inverse dependence on the gap distance, whereas that of the anti-symmetric mode becomes strongly redshifted as the gap distance increases. The shift of the resonance wavelengths with the gap distance is rapid compared with that observed for the isolated pairs (Figure 3), which can be attributed to the shorter SP wavelength in this layer system (Supplementary Information). These two modes correspond to the ω+ and ω− modes with different node positions in a long-range periodic array, which cause the energy gap in the photonic band structure40.

Figure 7
Figure 7

CL-STEM measurement of SRO nanopores. (a) STEM bright-field image (BFI) of the SRO plasmonic nanopores and the CL line profiles from the three locations shown in the BFI. Illustration of the layer structure is shown in the inset. The pore diameter is 120 nm. (b) Resonance wavelength plot of the symmetric and anti-symmetric modes with various local gap distances. Both symmetric (center) and anti-symmetric (inner edge) modes are observed when the gap is small enough. The fitted lines are drawn to guide the eyes.

Conclusions

We have shown the unique coupling behavior of coupled plasmonic nanopores using Cs-corrected CL-STEM. The symmetric coupling mode exhibits a lower-energy resonance than the anti-symmetric mode, and the resonance wavelength of the anti-symmetric mode exhibits a strong positive correlation with the gap distance. The inner-edge, anti-symmetric coupling mode is strongly localized at the gap, which explains the local resonance modes in SRO plasmonic pores. In contrast, the outer-edge mode has almost no field at the gap. Babinet’s principle, assuming inverse structures in thin PEC films, does not fully explain such coupling of plasmonic nanopores, although the qualitative comparison of the symmetric and anti-symmetric modes is still valid. Such understanding of field localization of symmetric and anti-symmetric modes and the relation of the coupling energy provides an important foundation for designing structures to confine light field at the nanoscale1, 2, 3, 4. Furthermore, it is shown that a nanoscopic observation, such as STEM-CL measurement, is essential to analyze field localization and resonance modes. The insights of nanopore couplings obtained here would be useful for sensor applications taking advantage of pore shapes as well as for sub-wavelength photonic devices41, 42. We have also shown that the observed coupling modes are accessible by obliquely incident plane waves, which suggests possibilities to couple the far-field light sources (or detectors) to symmetric modes and to optically measure symmetric modes selectively by far-field instrumentation.

References

  1. 1.

    . Plasmonics: the benefits of darkness. Nat Mater 2009; 8: 699–700.

  2. 2.

    , , , , et al. Active nanoplasmonic metamaterials. Nat Mater 2012; 11: 573–584.

  3. 3.

    , , , , et al. Quantum plasmonics. Nat Phys 2013; 9: 329–340.

  4. 4.

    , . Nonlinear plasmonics. Nat Photon 2012; 6: 737–748.

  5. 5.

    , , , , . Plasmon hybridization in nanoparticle dimers. Nano Lett 2004; 4: 899–903.

  6. 6.

    , , , , et al. Electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS) of surface plasmons in single silver nanoparticles and dimers: influence of beam damage and mapping of dark modes. ACS Nano 2009; 3: 3015–3022.

  7. 7.

    , . Light in tiny holes. Nature 2007; 445: 39–46.

  8. 8.

    , , , , . Optical antennas based on coupled nanoholes in thin metal films. Nat Phys 2007; 3: 884–889.

  9. 9.

    , , , , . Toroidal plasmonic eigenmodes in oligomer nanocavities for the visible. Nano Lett 2012; 12: 5239–5244.

  10. 10.

    , , , . LSPR study of the kinetics of the liquid-solid phase transition in Sn nanoparticles. Nano Lett 2010; 10: 931–936.

  11. 11.

    , , , , et al. Dielectrophoresis-enhanced plasmonic sensing with gold nanohole arrays. Nano Lett 2014; 14: 2006–2012.

  12. 12.

    , , , . Electron energy losses in Ag nanoholes-from localized surface plasmon resonances to rings of fire. Opt Lett 2009; 34: 2150–2152.

  13. 13.

    , . Optical properties of single plasmonic holes probed with local electron beam excitation. ACS Nano 2014; 8: 7350–7358.

  14. 14.

    , , . Photon emission from silver particles induced by a high-energy electron beam. Phys Rev B 2001; 64: 205419.

  15. 15.

    , , . Gap and mie plasmons in individual silver nanospheres near a silver surface. Nano Lett 2011; 11: 91–95.

  16. 16.

    , , , , et al. Unveiling nanometer scale extinction and scattering phenomena through combined electron energy loss spectroscopy and cathodoluminescence measurements. Nano Lett 2015; 15: 1229–1237.

  17. 17.

    , , , , et al. Light well: a tunable free-electron light source on a chip. Phys Rev Lett 2009; 103: 113901.

  18. 18.

    , , , , et al. Cherenkov effect as a probe of photonic nanostructures. Phys Rev Lett 2003; 91: 143902.

  19. 19.

    , . Probing the photonic local density of states with electron energy loss spectroscopy. Phys Rev Lett 2008; 100: 106804.

  20. 20.

    . Optical excitations in electron microscopy. Rev Mod Phys 2010; 82: 209–275.

  21. 21.

    , . Link between cathodoluminescence and electron energy loss spectroscopy and the radiative and full electromagnetic local density of states. ACS Photon 2015; 2: 1619–1627.

  22. 22.

    , , , , et al. Aluminum plasmonic nanoantennas. Nano Lett 2012; 12: 6000–6004.

  23. 23.

    , . Polarization-sensitive cathodoluminescence fourier microscopy. Opt Express 2012; 20: 18679–18691.

  24. 24.

    , . Ultrathin suspended nanopores with surface plasmon resonance fabricated by combined colloidal lithography and film transfer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2014; 6: 6322–6331.

  25. 25.

    , , , , et al. Optical resonances in short-range ordered nanoholes in ultrathin aluminum/aluminum nitride multilayers. J Phys Chem C 2013; 117: 6373–6382.

  26. 26.

    , , , , et al. Controlled polarity of sputter-deposited aluminum nitride on metals observed by aberration corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy. J Appl Phys 2013; 113: 084306.

  27. 27.

    , , . Measurement of surface-plasmon dispersion in oxidized aluminum films. Phys Rev B 1975; 11: 3116–3123.

  28. 28.

    . Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids. New York: Academic Press. 1998.

  29. 29.

    , , , . Signatures of fano interferences in the electron energy loss spectroscopy and cathodoluminescence of symmetry-broken nanorod dimers. ACS Nano 2013; 7: 4511–4519.

  30. 30.

    , , , , et al. Optical properties of a nanosized hole in a thin metallic film. ACS Nano 2008; 2: 25–32.

  31. 31.

    , , , , et al. Dark plasmonic breathing modes in silver nanodisks. Nano Lett 2012; 12: 5780–5783.

  32. 32.

    , , , , . Electrochemical crystallization of plasmonic nanostructures. Nano Lett 2011; 11: 1337–1343.

  33. 33.

    , . On the nature of the bonding and antibonding metallic film and nanoshell plasmons. Chem Phys Lett 2009; 472: 228–231.

  34. 34.

    , . Plasmonics: visit the past to know the future. J Phys Appl Phys 2012; 45: 433001.

  35. 35.

    , , , , . Optical spectroscopy of nanometric holes in thin gold films. Nano Lett 2004; 4: 1003–1007.

  36. 36.

    , , , , et al. Localized surface-plasmon resonances in periodic nondiffracting metallic nanoparticle and nanohole arrays. Phys Rev B 2009; 79: 073412.

  37. 37.

    , , , , . Investigation of plasmon resonances in metal films with nanohole arrays for biosensing applications. Small 2011; 7: 1653–1663.

  38. 38.

    , , , , . Terahertz near-field microscopy of complementary planar metamaterials: Babinet’s principle. Opt Express 2011; 19: 2537–2545.

  39. 39.

    , , , , et al. EFTEM study of surface plasmon resonances in silver nanoholes. Ultramicroscopy 2010; 110: 1094–1100.

  40. 40.

    , . Cathodoluminescent spectroscopic imaging of surface plasmon polaritons in a 1-dimensional plasmonic crystal. Opt Express 2009; 17: 23664–23671.

  41. 41.

    , , , , et al. A plasmonic ‘antenna-in-box’ platform for enhanced single-molecule analysis at micromolar concentrations. Nat Nanotechnol 2013; 8: 512–516.

  42. 42.

    , , , , . Plasmon-induced transparency in metamaterials. Phys Rev Lett 2008; 101: 047401.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank K Imura, K Kajikawa, K Takayanagi, Y Tanishiro and T Okamoto for valuable advice and discussion. The EELS measurement was performed with the support of S Hata at Kyushu University. This work is financially supported by Kazato Research Foundation, Kurata Memorial Hitachi Science and Technology Foundation, JSPS Kakenhi No. 26870184, and JST CREST No. 114209.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Innovative and Engineered Materials, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama 226-8503, Japan

    • Takumi Sannomiya
    •  & Naoki Yamamoto
  2. Center of Advanced Instrumental Analysis, Kyushu University, Kasuga 816-8580, Japan

    • Hikaru Saito
  3. Department of Physics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg 41296, Sweden

    • Juliane Junesch

Authors

  1. Search for Takumi Sannomiya in:

  2. Search for Hikaru Saito in:

  3. Search for Juliane Junesch in:

  4. Search for Naoki Yamamoto in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takumi Sannomiya.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Revised

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2016.146

Note: Supplementary Information for this article can be found on the Light: Science & Applications' website(http://www.nature.com/lsa).

Further reading