Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Myelodysplastic syndrome

Lenalidomide with or without erythropoietin in transfusion-dependent erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-refractory lower-risk MDS without 5q deletion

Abstract

After failure of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), lenalidomide (LEN) yields red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence (TI) in 20–30% of lower-risk non-del5q myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Several observations suggest an additive effect of ESA and LEN in this situation. We performed a randomized phase III study in 131 RBC transfusion-dependent (TD, median transfusion requirement six RBC units per 8 weeks) lower-risk ESA-refractory non-del5q MDS. Patients received LEN alone, 10 mg per day, 21 days per 4 weeks (L arm) or LEN (same schedule) + erythropoietin (EPO) beta, 60,000 U per week (LE arm). In an intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis, erythroid response (HI-E, IWG 2006 criteria) after four treatment cycles (primary end point) was 23.1% (95% CI 13.5–35.2) in the L arm and 39.4% (95% CI 27.6–52.2) in the LE arm (P=0.044), while RBC-TI was reached in 13.8 and 24.2% of the patients in the L and LE arms, respectively (P=0.13). Median response duration was 18.1 and 15.1 months in the L and LE arms, respectively (P=0.47). Side effects were moderate and similar in the two arms. Low baseline serum EPO level and a G polymorphism of CRBN gene predicted HI-E. Combining LEN and EPO significantly improves erythroid response over LEN alone in lower-risk non-del5q MDS patients with anemia resistant to ESA.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ades L, Itzykson R, Fenaux P . Myelodysplastic syndromes. Lancet 2014; 383: 2239–2252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Greenberg P, Cox C, LeBeau MM, Fenaux P, Morel P, Sanz G et al. International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 1997; 89: 2079–2088.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Greenberg PL, Tuechler H, Schanz J, Sanz G, Garcia-Manero G, Sole F et al. Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 2012; 120: 2454–2465.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Ahlgren T, Beguin Y, Carlsson M, Carneskog J, Dahl IM et al. Treatment of anemia in myelodysplastic syndromes with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor plus erythropoietin: results from a randomized phase II study and long-term follow-up of 71 patients. Blood 1998; 92: 68–75.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Casadevall N, Durieux P, Dubois S, Hemery F, Lepage E, Quarre MC et al. Health, economic, and quality-of-life effects of erythropoietin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomized, controlled trial. Blood 2004; 104: 321–327.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Park S, Grabar S, Kelaidi C, Beyne-Rauzy O, Picard F, Bardet V et al. Predictive factors of response and survival in myelodysplastic syndrome treated with erythropoietin and G-CSF: the GFM experience. Blood 2008; 111: 574–582.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jadersten M, Malcovati L, Dybedal I, Della Porta MG, Invernizzi R, Montgomery SM et al. Erythropoietin and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor treatment associated with improved survival in myelodysplastic syndrome. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 3607–3613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Greenberg PL, Sun Z, Miller KB, Bennett JM, Tallman MS, Dewald G et al. Treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome patients with erythropoietin with or without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: results of a prospective randomized phase 3 trial by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (E1996). Blood 2009; 114: 2393–2400.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sekeres MA, Steensma DP . Defining prior therapy in myelodysplastic syndromes and criteria for relapsed and refractory disease: implications for clinical trial design and enrollment. Blood 2009; 114: 2575–2580.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Corral LG, Haslett PA, Muller GW, Chen R, Wong LM, Ocampo CJ et al. Differential cytokine modulation and T cell activation by two distinct classes of thalidomide analogues that are potent inhibitors of TNF-alpha. J Immunol 1999; 163: 380–386.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. List A, Kurtin S, Roe DJ, Buresh A, Mahadevan D, Fuchs D et al. Efficacy of lenalidomide in myelodysplastic syndromes. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 549–557.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. List A, Dewald G, Bennett J, Giagounidis A, Raza A, Feldman E et al. Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 1456–1465.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Raza A, Reeves JA, Feldman EJ, Dewald GW, Bennett JM, Deeg HJ et al. Phase 2 study of lenalidomide in transfusion-dependent, low-risk, and intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndromes with karyotypes other than deletion 5q. Blood 2008; 111: 86–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sibon D, Cannas G, Baracco F, Prebet T, Vey N, Banos A et al. Lenalidomide in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with karyotypes other than deletion 5q and refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Br J Haematol 2012; 156: 619–625.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Komrokji RS, Garcia-Manero G, Ades L, Laadem A, Vo B, Prebet T et alAn open-label, phase 2, dose-finding study of sotatercept (ACE-011) in patients with low or intermediate-1 (Int-1)-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or non-proliferative chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and anemia requiring transfusion. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts, 2014; abstract 3251.

  16. Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, Brunning RD, Borowitz MJ, Porwit A et al. The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood 2009; 114: 937–951.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Malcovati L, Hellstrom-Lindberg E, Bowen D, Ades L, Cermak J, Del Canizo C et al. Diagnosis and treatment of primary myelodysplastic syndromes in adults: recommendations from the European LeukemiaNet. Blood 2013; 122: 2943–2964.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cheson BD, Greenberg PL, Bennett JM, Lowenberg B, Wijermans PW, Nimer SD et al. Clinical application and proposal for modification of the International Working Group (IWG) response criteria in myelodysplasia. Blood 2006; 108: 419–425.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sardnal V, Rouquette A, Kaltenbach S, Bally C, Chesnais V, Leschi C et al. A G polymorphism in the CRBN gene acts as a biomarker of response to treatment with lenalidomide in low/int-1 risk MDS without del(5q). Leukemia 2013; 27: 1610–1613.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gail M, Simon R . Testing for qualitative interactions between treatment effects and patient subsets. Biometrics 1985; 41: 361–372.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Fenaux P, Haase D, Sanz GF, Santini V, Buske C, ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Myelodysplastic syndromes: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2014; 25: iii57–iii69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Narla A, Dutt S, McAuley JR, Al-Shahrour F, Hurst S, McConkey M et al. Dexamethasone and lenalidomide have distinct functional effects on erythropoiesis. Blood 2011; 118: 2296–2304.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fink EC, Krönke J, Hurst SN, Udeshi ND, Svinkina T, Schneider RK et alLenalidomide induces ubiquitination and degradation of CSNK1A1 in MDS with Del(5q). ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts, 2014; 124, abstract 4.

  24. List A, Estes M, Gao G, Janokowska A, Maciejewski J Large CD45 protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) isoforms predominate in myelodysplastic erythroid precursors and attenuate the erythropoietin (EPO): STAT5 signal. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts, 2006; 108, abstract 2650.

  25. McGraw KL, Basiorka AA, Johnson JO, Clark J, Caceres G, Padron E et al. Lenalidomide induces lipid raft assembly to enhance erythropoietin receptor signaling in myelodysplastic syndrome progenitors. PLoS One 2014; 9: e114249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Komrokji RS, Lancet JE, Swern AS, Chen N, Paleveda J, Lush R et al. Combined treatment with lenalidomide and epoetin alfa in lower-risk patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood 2012; 120: 3419–3424.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wei S, Chen X, Rocha K, Epling-Burnette PK, Djeu JY, Liu Q et al. A critical role for phosphatase haplodeficiency in the selective suppression of deletion 5q MDS by lenalidomide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106: 12974–12979.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Giagounidis A, Fenaux P, Mufti GJ, Muus P, Platzbecker U, Sanz G et al. Practical recommendations on the use of lenalidomide in the management of myelodysplastic syndromes. Ann Hematol 2008; 87: 345–352.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Thepot S, Abdelali RB, Chevret S, Renneville A, Rauzy OB, Prebet T et alPrognostic factors of response and survival to azacitidine (AZA) +/− EPO in RBC transfusion dependent (TD) IPSS low and Int-1 (LR) MDS resistant to EPO, with particular emphasis of genetic lesions: a study by the GFM. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts, 2013; abstract 658.

  30. Tobiasson M, Dybedahl I, Holm MS, Karimi M, Brandefors L, Garelius H et al. Limited clinical efficacy of azacitidine in transfusion-dependent, growth factor-resistant, low- and Int-1-risk MDS: results from the nordic NMDSG08A phase II trial. Blood Cancer J 2014; 4: e189.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sloand EM, Wu CO, Greenberg P, Young N, Barrett J . Factors affecting response and survival in patients with myelodysplasia treated with immunosuppressive therapy. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 2505–2511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sloand EM, Olnes MJ, Shenoy A, Weinstein B, Boss C, Loeliger K et al. Alemtuzumab treatment of intermediate-1 myelodysplasia patients is associated with sustained improvement in blood counts and cytogenetic remissions. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 5166–5173.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Raza A, Galili N, Smith SE, Godwin J, Boccia RV, Myint H et al. A phase 2 randomized multicenter study of 2 extended dosing schedules of oral ezatiostat in low to intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Cancer 2012; 118: 2138–2147.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Garcia-Manero G, Khoury HJ, Jabbour E, Lancet J, Winski SL, Cable L et al. A phase I study of oral ARRY-614, a p38 MAPK/Tie2 dual inhibitor, in patients with low or intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Clin Cancer Res 2015; 21: 985–994.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Platzbecker U, Germing U, Giagounidis A, Goetze K, Kiewe P, Mayer K et alACE-536 increases hemoglobin and reduces transfusion burden in patients with low or intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS): preliminary results from a phase 2 study. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts, 2014; abstract 411.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Fatiha Chermat and Rosa Sapena from the Groupe Francophone des Myelodysplasies (GFM) for the management, logistical and administrative assistance. This research was supported by Celgene (Summit, NJ) and Roche (Basel, Switzerland) who provided lenalidomide and epoetin beta, respectively, along with a research grant. PF received honoraria and research funding from Celgene Corporation. FD received honoraria from Celgene and Novartis.

Author contributions

AT performed clinical research, analyzed data and wrote the paper. OK performed biological research and wrote the paper. SChev analyzed data and wrote the paper. AR, JD, AS, CR, OB-R, AB, AG-B, SW, DC, KL, BDR, DB, CG, BS, LS, VS, RP, BG, PCM, BC, CSa, RB, LL, EW, GT, KB, FG, ALT, SChez, KM, SN, CSo, FI, EG and CP performed research and wrote the paper. MF, PF and FD designed research, analyzed data and wrote the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P Fenaux.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Toma, A., Kosmider, O., Chevret, S. et al. Lenalidomide with or without erythropoietin in transfusion-dependent erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-refractory lower-risk MDS without 5q deletion. Leukemia 30, 897–905 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2015.296

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2015.296

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links