Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research Note
  • Published:

Evaluation of dosages and routes of administration of tramadol analgesia in rats using hot-plate and tail-flick tests

Abstract

Tramadol is an opioid-like analgesic with relatively mild side effects. Because it is inexpensive and is not classified as a controlled substance by the US federal government, the authors wanted to evaluate its applicability as a practical and effective analgesic in male Sprague Dawley rats. They measured the efficacy of four dosages (4, 12.5, 25 or 50 mg tramadol per kg body weight) and three routes of administration (per os (p.o.) in a flavored gelatin cube, subcutaneous (s.c.) or intraperitoneal (i.p.)) using the hot-plate test and the tail-flick test, which were carried out 1 week apart. Rats that were dosed p.o. were given flavored gelatin cubes without tramadol on the 2 d before testing to help them become acclimated to the gelatin, in an effort to increase the likelihood that they would consume the gelatin on the testing day. Results from the hot-plate and tail-flick tests for rats that were given tramadol p.o. were similar before and after administration, regardless of tramadol dosage, suggesting that this route of administration was not effective. The s.c. route of administration was effective at dosages of 25 mg and 50 mg tramadol per kg body weight, although these dosages also resulted in sedation and skin lesions. The i.p. route of administration was also effective at dosages of 12.5 mg, 25 mg and 50 mg tramadol per kg body weight, though sedation was observed at dosages of 25 mg and 50 mg per kg body weight. Intraperitoneal administration of 12.5 mg tramadol per kg body weight had no notable side effects, and the authors plan to further study this dosage and route of administration in a rodent surgical model of pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2: Latency in rats' responses to acute thermal pain.
Figure 3: Epidermal changes consisted of coagulative necrosis of the epidermis and dermis (arrowheads), overlying focal cavitating necrosis and edema, hemorrhage and fibrin (asterisk), bordered by zones of inflammation and granulation tissue.
Figure 4: Cutaneous lesions extended from the epidermis to the deep muscular layers and were characterized by a central area of cavitating necrosis (asterisk) admixed with fibrin, neutrophils and edema, bordered by zones of granulation tissue (arrowheads), skeletal muscle degeneration, necrosis and mineralization with granulomatous inflammation (arrows).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wilson, S.G. & Mogil, J.S. Measuring pain in the (knockout) mouse: big challenges in a small mammal. Behav. Brain Res. 125, 65–73 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kona-Boun, J.J., Silim, A. & Troncy, E. Immunologic aspects of veterinary anesthesia and analgesia. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 226, 355–363 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McGuire, L. et al. Pain and wound healing in surgical patients. Ann. Behav. Med. 31, 165–172 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Interagency Research Animal Committee. U.S. Government Principles for the Utilization and Care of Vertebrate Animals Used in Testing, Research, and Training (Interagency Research Animal Committee, 1985) http://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/references/phspol.htm#USGovPrinciples.

  5. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals 6–68 (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1996).

  6. Raffa, R. et al. Opioid and nonopioid components independently contribute to the mechanism of action of tramadol, an 'atypical' opioid analgesic. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 260, 275–285 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kayser, V., Besson, J.M. & Guilbaud, G. Evidence for a noradrenergic component in the antinociceptive effect of the analgesic agent tramadol in an animal model of clinical pain, the arthritic rat. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 224, 83–88 (1992).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Raffa, R.B. & Friderichs, E. The basic science aspect of tramadol hydrochloride. Pain Rev. 3, 249–271 (1996).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Negro, S., Martin, A., Azuara, M.L., Sánchez, Y. & Barcia, E. Stability of tramadol and haloperidol for continuous subcutaneous infusion at home. J. Pain Symptom Manage. 30, 192–199 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Uyar, M., Onal, A., Urar, M., Dogru, A. & Soykan, N. The antinociceptive effect of tramadol-venlafaxine combination on the paw withdrawal threshold in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Methods Find. Exp. Clin. Pharmacol. 25, 361–365 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grond, S. & Sablotzki, A. Clinical pharmacology of tramadol. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 43, 879–923 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Affaitati, G. et al. Effects of tramadol on behavioural indicators of colic pain in a rat model of ureteral calculosis. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 16, 23–30 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Garlicki, J., Dorazil-Dudzik, M., Wordliczek, J. & Przewlocka, B. Effect of intraarticular tramadol administration in the rat model of knee joint inflammation. Pharmacol. Rep. 58, 672–679 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Xie, H. et al. Involvement of serotonin 2A receptors in the analgesic effect of tramadol in mono-arthritic rats. Brain Res. 1210, 76–83 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hama, A. & Sagen, J. Altered antinociceptive efficacy of tramadol over time in rats with painful peripheral neuropathy. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 559, 32–37 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hampshire, V.A. & Davis, J.A. Postprocedural care of commonly utilized research animal subjects. in Anesthesia and Analgesia in Laboratory Animals 2nd edn. (eds. Fish, R.E., Brown, M.J., Danneman, P.J. & Karas, A.Z.) 231–233 (Academic, San Diego, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Flecknell, P.A., Roughan, J.V. & Stewart, R. Use of oral buprenorphine ('buprenorphine jello') for postoperative analgesia in rats—a clinical trial. Lab. Anim. 33, 169–174 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cooper, D.M., Deong, D. & Gillett, C.S. Analgesic efficacy of acetaminophen and buprenorphine administered in the drinking water of rats. Contemp. Top. Lab Anim. Sci. 36, 58–62 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Martin, L.B.E., Thompson, A.C., Martin, T. & Kristal, M.B. Analgesic efficacy of orally administered buprenorphine in rats. Comp. Med. 51, 43–48 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bihum, C. & Bauck, L. Basic anatomy, physiology, behavior, and husbandry and clinical techniques. in Ferrets, Rabbits, and Rodents, Clinical Medicine and Surgery 2nd edn. (eds. Quesenberry, K. & Carpenter, J.W.) 286–298 (Saunders, St. Louis, 2004).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Harkness, J.E. & Wagner, J.E. Biology and Medicine of Rabbits and Rodents 4th edn. 100 (Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lemberg, K.K. et al. Antinociception by spinal and systemic oxycodone: why does the route make a difference? In vitro and in vivo studies in rats. Anesthesiology 105, 801–812 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fischer, B.D. & Dykstra, L.A. Interactions between an N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist and low-efficacy opioid receptor agonists in assays of schedule-controlled responding and thermal nociception. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 318, 1300–1306 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Cloutier, S. & Newberry, R.C. Tickled pink: Playful handling as social enrichment for laboratory rats. AWI Quarterly 58, 24–25 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Roberts, L. & Dyson, M. An alternative method of rat restraint. TechTalk 13, 1 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Espejo, E.F., Stinus, L., Cador, M. & Mir, D. Effects of morphine and naloxone on behaviour in the hot plate test: an ethopharmacological study in the rat. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 113, 500–510 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Boules, M., Shaw, A., Liang, Y., Barbut, D. & Richelson, E. NT69L, a novel analgesic, shows synergy with morphine. Brain Res. 1294, 22–28 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lomas, L.M., Terner, J.M. & Picker, M.J. Sex differences in NMDA antagonist enhancement of morphine antihyperalgesia in a capsaicin model of persistent pain: comparisons to two models of acute pain. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 89, 127–136 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Thomsen, M. et al. Involvement of Y(5) receptors in neuropeptide Y agonist-induced analgesic-like effect in the rat hot plate test. Brain Res. 1155, 49–55 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Madgulkar, A.R., Bhalekar, M.R. & Padalkar, R.R. Formulation design and optimization of novel taste masked mouth-dissolving tablets of tramadol having adequate mechanical strength. AAPS PharmSciTech 10, 574–581 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Lintz, W., Barth, H., Osterloh, G. & Schmidt-Böthelt, E. Bioavailability of enteral tramadol formulations. 1st communication: capsules. [German]. Arzneimittelforschung 36, 1278–1283 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee, C.R., McTavish, D. & Sorkin, E.M. Tramadol. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in acute and chronic pain states. Drugs 46, 313–340 (1993).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Liao, S., Hill, J.F. & Nayak, R.K. Pharmacokinetics of tramadol following single and multiple oral doses in man (abstract). Pharm. Res. 9 Suppl., 308 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Parasrampuria, R., Vuppugalla, R., Elliott, K. & Mehvar, R. Route-dependent stereoselective pharmacokinetics of tramadol and its active O-demethylated metabolite in rats. Chirality 19, 190–196 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu, H.C., Zhang, X.J., Yang, Y.Y., Wang, N. & Hou, Y.N. Stereoselectivity in renal clearance of trans-tramadol and its active metabolite, trans-O-demethyltramadol. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 23, 83–86 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wu, W.N., McKown, L.A., Codd, E.E. & Raffa, R.B. In vitro metabolism of the analgesic agent, tramadol-N-oxide, in mouse, rat, and human. Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet. 27, 193–197 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lintz, W., Erlaçin, S., Frankus, E. & Uragg, H. Biotransformation of tramadol in man and animal. [German]. Arzneimittelforschung 31, 1932–1943 (1981).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Liu, H., Jin, S. & Wang, Y. Gender-related differences in pharmacokinetics of enantiomers of trans-tramadol and its active metabolite, trans-O-demethyltramadol, in rats. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 24, 1265–1269 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Loram, L.C., Mitchell, D., Skosana, M. & Fick, L.G. Tramadol is more effective than morphine and amitriptyline against ischaemic pain but not thermal pain in rats. Pharmacol. Res. 56, 80–85 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Dhasmana, K.M., Banerjee, A.K., Rating, W. & Erdmann, W. Analgesic effect of tramadol in the rat. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 10, 289–293 (1989).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Cartmell, S.M., Gelgor, L. & Mitchell, D. A revised rotarod procedure for measuring the effect of antinociceptive drugs on motor function in the rat. J. Pharmacol. Methods 26, 149–159 (1991).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hargis, A.M. & Ginn, P.E. The integument: Injection site reactions. in Pathologic Basis of Veterinary Disease 4th edn. (eds. McGavin, M.D. & Zachary, J.F.) 1167–1168 (Mosby Elsevier, St. Louis, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Engelhardt, J.A. Predictivity of animal studies for human injection site reactions with parenteral drug products. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 60, 323–327 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. King, D.L. & Appelbaum, J.R. Effect of trials on “emotionality” behavior of the rat and mouse. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 85, 186–194 (1973).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Grandin, T., Dodman, N. & Shuster, L. Effect of naltrexone on relaxation induced by flank pressure in pigs. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 33, 839–842 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Grandin, T. & Johnson, C. Animal feelings: Feelings from my squeeze machine. in Animals in Translation 58–62 (Scribner, New York, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Bamigbade, T.A. & Langford, R.M. Tramadol hydrochloride: an overview of current use. Hosp. Med. 59, 373–376 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Danielle Waxer, Page Myers, James Clark, Sandy Hackney, Jenetta Jackson and Keisha Chavis for their assistance and support of the research and care of the animals. We thank Dr. Larry Wright for assistance in literature evaluation. We thank Dr. Sheryl Moy, Dr. Greg Travlos and Dr. Gregory Cannon for their extensive reviews of the manuscript. This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health and the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Coralie Zegre Cannon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cannon, C., Kissling, G., Hoenerhoff, M. et al. Evaluation of dosages and routes of administration of tramadol analgesia in rats using hot-plate and tail-flick tests. Lab Anim 39, 342–351 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban1110-342

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban1110-342

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing