Research Note | Published:

Refining timed pregnancies in two strains of genetically engineered mice

Lab Animal volume 38, pages 305310 (2009) | Download Citation

  • A Corrigendum to this article was published on 01 February 2010

Abstract

In order to efficiently generate genetically engineered mouse (GEM) fetuses or neonates of a specified age range, researchers must develop strain-specific strategies, including reliable early pregnancy detection. The authors evaluated pregnancy indices (pregnancy rate, plug rate, pregnant plugged rate, first litter size and body weight) in two GEM breeding colonies: homozygous soluble epoxide hydrolase knockout (sEHKO) mice (n = 164 females) and L7-tau-green fluorescent protein (GFP) transgenic mice (n = 61 females). The goals of the study were to determine the most accurate early pregnancy indicator and to reliably and cost-effectively produce timed pregnant females that were between gestation days 16 and 18. The authors set up each timed mating by placing two naturally synchronized females with a male for 48 h. When males were present, personnel checked each female daily for a vaginal plug. They then weighed the females immediately, 1 week and 2 weeks after removing the males. In both sEHKO and GFP colonies, increases in body weight at 1 and 2 weeks after timed male exposure more reliably and consistently indicated pregnancy than did plug detection. Further evaluations and protocol refinements are planned based on litter size and litter number in these colonies.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    The benefits of a rodent breeding service. Tech Talk 13, 4 (2008).

  2. 2.

    Institute for Laboratory Animal Research. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 1996).

  3. 3.

    et al. Targeted disruption of soluble epoxide hydrolase reveals a role in blood pressure regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 40504–40510 (2000).

  4. 4.

    et al. Soluble epoxide hydrolase gene deletion is protective against experimental cerebral ischemia. Stroke 39, 2073–2078 (2008).

  5. 5.

    , , , & Purkinje cell synapses target physiologically unique brainstem neurons. J. Neurosci. 15, 6392–6398 (2003).

  6. 6.

    , & Developing a mouse colony database from scratch: options and challenges. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 44, 62–63 (2005).

  7. 7.

    , , & Standardization of the Whitten Effect to induce susceptibility to Neisseria gonorrhoeae in female mice. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 40, 13–17 (2001).

  8. 8.

    & in The Mouse in Biomedical Research: Normative Biology, Husbandry, and Models vol. 3 (eds. Fox, J.G. et al.) chap. 3 91–121 (Academic, San Diego, 2007).

  9. 9.

    , & The Laboratory Mouse. (CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2001).

  10. 10.

    & Oestrous synchronization and pregnancy blocking in wild house mice (Mus musculus). J. Reprod. Fertil. 12, 233–236 (1966).

  11. 11.

    & Oestrous induction in unisexually grouped mice by multiple short-term exposures to males. Experientia. 39, 431–432 (1983).

  12. 12.

    & Effect of maternal age on synchronization of ovulation and mating and on tubal transport of ova in mice. J. Gerontol. 29, 493–498 (1974).

  13. 13.

    & Production of timed pregnant mice by utilization of the Whitten effect and a simple cage system. Lab. Anim. Sci. 30, 206–208 (1980).

  14. 14.

    Pheromones and mammalian reproduction. Adv. Reprod. Physiol. 1, 155–177 (1966).

  15. 15.

    Troubleshooting mouse breeding: vaginal plug detection. Tech Talk 12, 1–3 (2007).

  16. 16.

    Mouse Genetics: Concepts and Applications. chap. 4, 62–75. (Oxford University Press, New York, 1995).

  17. 17.

    et al. Ultrasound diagnosis of mouse pregnancy and gestational staging. Comp. Med. 56, 262–271 (2006).

  18. 18.

    Vaginal mucous plug and weight gain in mice. Tech Talk 10, 4 (2005).

  19. 19.

    in Cellular Biology of the Uterus (ed. Wynn, R.M.) chap. 8, 191–290 (Plenum, New York, 1967).

  20. 20.

    On the placental sign as an early indicator of pregnancy in mice. Kaibogaku Zasshi 38, 321–327 (1963).

  21. 21.

    Charles River Laboratories. Pregnant Animal Guarantee Policy. (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, DE, 2008). .

  22. 22.

    Charles River Laboratories. Technical Sheet: Protocol for Setting up Timed Pregnant Rats and Mice (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, DE, 2008) .

  23. 23.

    , , & The Jackson Laboratory Handbook on Genetically Standardized Mice 6th edn. chap. 4, 138–139 (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, 2009).

  24. 24.

    & Sex ratio and litter size in relation to parity and mode of conception in three inbred strains of mice. Lab. Anim. 24, 345–352 (1990).

  25. 25.

    & Difference in reproductivity and offspring growth between litter numbers in four strains of mice. Lab. Anim. 23, 357–360 (1989).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants NS49210, NS20020 and NS044313 from the National Institutes of Health. We thank Dr. Debra L. Hickman for her review and comments on preliminary versions of this manuscript; Nabil Alkayed, MD, PhD and Paco Herson, PhD for their support of this study by providing the sEHKO and GFP mouse colonies, respectively; Sarah Shangraw for assistance with the husbandry manipulations and body weight measurements of the animals used in this study; Jennifer Young, Patty Ayala and Melissa Hernandez for collecting data regarding litter size; John Todd and Ashley Branch for assistance with manuscript figures; and Charles River Laboratories and The Jackson Laboratory for providing information on pregnancy indices in C57BL/6NCrl and C57BL/6J mice, respectively.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Oregon Health and Science University, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Portland, OR.

    • Sarah L. Mader
    • , Nicole L. Libal
    • , Rui Yang
    •  & Stephanie J. Murphy
  2. Charles River, Wilmington, MA.

    • Kathleen Pritchett-Corning

Authors

  1. Search for Sarah L. Mader in:

  2. Search for Nicole L. Libal in:

  3. Search for Kathleen Pritchett-Corning in:

  4. Search for Rui Yang in:

  5. Search for Stephanie J. Murphy in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie J. Murphy.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/laban0909-305

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing